Evaluation of the Instrument (answer this and send it to me BEFORE

5PM TOMORROW.)

ITEMS RESPONSE

I. Content and Format Ye N No

s o t
Sur
e

1. Is the language of the statement /question/task ✔

clear, direct, and specific?

2. Does the statement/question/task contain only ✔

one complete thought or concept?

3. Is the language appropriate for your ✔

respondents’ characteristics (e.g., age,
education, and language preference)?

4. Can the statement be interpreted in more than ✔

one way?

5. Is the instrument’s intended purpose clear ✔

(e.g., measuring outcomes versus assessing
needs) AND does this match your purpose?*

Additional Comments for Content and Format ✔

II. Relevance with Areas/ Domains of Affective

Traits

1. Is the statement/question/task applicable to ✔

the traits being assessed?

2. Is the statement/question/task related to the ✔

effectiveness of the course of study?

3. Is the statement/question/task congruent with ✔

the intended area of measurement?

4. Can the tool as a whole generate data that ✔

are relevant to the program/course intervention
and desired learning outcome?

5. Does the instrument measure the same outcome ✔

type (attitude, knowledge, behavior,
condition) as the one you want to measure?
Additional Comments for Relevance

III. Feasibility

1. Is the instrument well-suited to the ✔

circumstances (when, where, etc.) under which
you/your assistant or respondents will complete
it?

2. If you need to collect data once to measure ✔

change and monitor progress, can the instrument
collect this type of data?

3. Is the instrument’s length and level of ✔

complexity appropriate for your respondents?

4. Is the instrument’s length reasonable for ✔

the respondents to complete it?

5. Is it clear how you will deal with the data to ✔

report results?

Additional comments about Feasibility

IV. Data Quality

1. Do questions/statements/task that address the ✔

affective outcome cover all the relevant
dimensions of your outcome?

2. Does the instrument capture the background ✔

information you need, such as age, gender,
status, etc?

3. Does the instrument reflect the thinking and ✔

the element of the affective construct that
is assessed?

4. Do any questions/ tasks require personal or ✔

sensitive information that it would be
inappropriate to ask for?

5. Do any questions ask for personal or sensitive ✔

information that it would be unnecessary or
inappropriate to ask for?

Additional Comments on Data Quality

The output shall be scored using the criteria below with the corresponding point
distribution.
 • Content and Format 15
• Relevance with Areas/ Domains of Affective Traits 30
• Feasibility 15

• Data Quality 30

• Promptness of Submission 10

Part II. Peer Rating

MEMBERS: Rate your leader and give a short explanation

10/10. I would give a perfect score for our leader because she knows how
to manage our group very well and she has a very long patience in this
task while explaining to us about our task and she’s very strict when it
comes to deadlines.

LEADER: Rate your members and give short explanation