NEWS CONTROLS DRIVES ENCODERS MECHANICAL LINEAR MOTORS

SYSTEMS NETWORKS RESOURCES

YOU ARE HERE: HOME / FAQS + BASICS / VIBRATION DAMPING: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PASSIVE AND ACTIVE
METHODS?

Vibration damping: What’s the

difference between passive and active
methods?
MAY 22, 2019 BY DANIELLE COLLINS — LEAVE A COMMENT

Unlike typical static or dynamic loads, forces due to vibrations are difficult to predict, model,
and account for when designing motion control systems. Some manufacturers recommend
adding a safety factor to account for vibrations when sizing and selecting components —
especially those that involve rolling or sliding motion, such as linear guides and screws.

Of course, the ideal solution would be to avoid or remove vibrations altogether, eliminating the
risk of damage to the equipment or interference with the process being performed. But
avoiding vibrations is difficult since they can be caused not only by the machine or the nature of
the process itself but also by structural resonances (vibrations of the building or supporting
structure close to its natural frequency). For vibrations in machinery that cannot be avoided or
eliminated, there are two methods to reduce their effects — vibration damping and vibration
isolation.
 Even in an environment as benign as a lab, a variety of sources cause
vibrations that can affect the equipment or process.
Image credit: Thorlabs Inc.

Damping vs. isolation: Although the terms “vibration damping” and “vibration isolation” are
often used interchangeably, they refer to different methods of vibration mitigation. Vibration
damping is the process of absorbing or changing vibration energy to reduce the amount of
energy transmitted to the equipment or machinery, while vibration isolation prevents energy
from entering machinery.

Regardless of whether you’re discussing damping or isolation, the systems used to achieve the
end result can be classified as either passive or active. Passive and active methods of vibration
damping (or vibration isolation) differ in the way they respond to and manage vibrations. An
easy way to distinguish between the two is that passive systems use simple mechanical
devices, fluids, or elastomeric materials, whereas active vibration damping relies on a closed-
loop system with feedback.

Passive vibration damping systems often employ a mechanical device or a fluid to reduce
vibration, but passive damping can also be achieved with viscoelastic materials. In either case,
the kinetic energy of the vibration is converted to heat. Because many types of damping
systems have inherent resonances, they are primarily effective at frequencies higher than 4 Hz.
Passive vibration dampers also tend to have trouble compensating for vibrations that occur in
more than one direction — in other words, they are most effective for vibrations that occur only
in the X, Y, or Z direction, and less so for vibrations that occur in multiple directions
simultaneously.
 Shown here is an example of a passive vibration damping
system, consisting of a simple harmonic oscillator (a rigid mass
and a spring) with an added damper. The damper removes
mechanical energy from the system in the form of heat.
Image credit: Newport Corp.

Active vibration damping systems use added power in the form of electronically controlled
sensors and actuators in a closed-loop system to counter vibrations and end oscillations.
Unlike passive systems, active vibration damping systems can be tuned to remove
resonances, allowing them to work at lower frequencies caused by structural resonances.
They can also provide damping for vibrations and interference caused by the equipment itself,
such as noise from cabling or acoustic noise.

Active vibration damping systems use electronically controlled sensors

and actuators in a closed-loop system.

Active systems can also provide proactive (rather than merely reactive) damping response by
using feed-forward control. Where standard closed-loop configurations provide equal but
inverse forces to cancel vibrations that enter the system, the addition of feed-forward allows
the system to proactively generate and send canceling signals based on the expected
vibrations. Feed-forward systems are especially useful for extremely low frequencies.

The choice between a passive or active vibration damping system should take into
consideration how sensitive the machine or process is to vibrations — for example, vibrations
are more detrimental to test and measurement equipment than to industrial production
machinery — and the types of vibration that could occur.

You may also like:

What’s the FAQ: What are What are gas FAQ: Where Shock and
difference mechanical, springs? A and why are vibration
between a fluid-power, technical miniature mitigation by
dashpot and a and primer hydraulic design not by
snubber? elastomeric shock mistake
material absorbers
dampers? useful?

FILED UNDER: FAQS + BASICS, FEATURED, MECHANICAL PT, SHOCK + VIBRATION MITIGATION

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Search this website

POWER TRANSMISSION REFERENCE

GUIDE