trial report

subject

Wet magnetization based mineral dressing

subjectResources Process Laboratory I course code 2106332

make by

groupB2

Jiraporn documents 6130904021

property complete 6130909221

Natthanan MM6130912021

People Srichonlapraisan 6130916621

offer
 Mr. Teerayut Puengsa-ad

The experiment was conducted on 13 November 2020.

Faculty of Engineering Department of Mining Engineering

Chulalongkorn University, academic year 2020

introduction

This report is prepared as part of the course.Resources

Process Laboratory I, subject code 2106332, which is intended
to accompany mineral sizing experiments with hydrocyclone
equipment as well as collect data about mineral sizing
experiments with hydrocyclone equipment that has been
studied.

The organizer hopes that this report will be useful to those

who have studied. And thank you to those who contributed to
the completion of this report. If this report has any errors The
organizer apologizes at this time.

Organizing team
 Wet magnetization based mineral dressing

(Wet Magnetic Separator)

The aforementioned dry magnetic separation separates

larger minerals.200 mesh or 75 micron. Wet separation is
therefore more suitable. From an economic point of view, wet
separation is better in that it Minerals that have undergone
other processes before ore sorting are usually in a wet
condition. Therefore, it is possible to separate the ore in the
wet state economically as it does not need to be dried prior to
separation. In this experiment, a cylindrical high-concentration
wet mineral separator was used. The feed ore will enter
through a round cylinder. through a matrix that is woven into a
net It has a higher capacity than other mineral separators.

objective

1. To study the operation of electromagnetic mineral

separation.

2. To study the performance of electromagnetic mineral

separation.

1
tools and equipment

1. Wet Intensity Magnetic Separator

2. Mineral samples

2.1 Ilmenite

2.2 Silica Sand

experimental method

1. Prepare the ore with the mixture calledIlmenite and Silica

Sand is 20 : 80 amount 3 kg.
2. to separate the ore into3 parts, 1 kg each, including
collecting samples for microscopy
3. Adjust the pressure of the water flowing into the wet
magnetic separator. and bring a beaker to get water for a
time10 seconds to measure the flow rate.
4. Clean the unit by removing the internal sieve plate to
clean and remove mineral deposits.

2
5. Place the bucket under the machine to receive. ore that
will come out of the machine
6. Turn on the water and run the magnetometer to 4.Aand
feed the ore slowly for approx.7minute
7. When the ore is completely fed, adjust the intensity of the
magnetic field to the remaining0 and turn off the water
8. Remove the sieve and wash to place the ore in the tray.
and put the ore in the barrel into another tray Wait for the
minerals to settle and drain the water before placing both
trays in the oven for 15 minutes.24 hours at 115 °C
9. repeat in verse5 to item 8 again by changing the intensity
of the magnetic field to7Aand11Arespectively
10. When the ore is completely dry, take the ore out of
the oven. to weigh and collect samples for use under a
microscope
11. Data obtained from microscopy were used for
calculations.

3
experimental results

Concentrate 4A concentrate weight=89.3 g

89.3× 100
gross weight= 1000 grams %Yield = 1000
=8.93 %

Average of total analytical

results= 61.5%

4
 Tail 4A tailings weight= 902.5 g
902.5 ×100
%Yield = =90.25 %
1000
Average of total analytical
results= 70.0%

Concentrate 7A concentrate weight= 112.4 g

112.4 ×100
gross weight= 1000 grams %Yield = 1000
=11.24 %

Average of total analytical

5
 results= 82.2%

Tail 7A concentrate weight= 882.4 g

882.4 ×100
%Yield = =88.24 %
1000
Average of total analytical
results= 22.8%

6
 Concentrate 11A concentrate weight= 163.4 g
163.4 ×100
gross weight= 1000 grams %Yield = 1000
=16.34 %

Average of total analytical

results= 79.0 %

Tail 11A concentrate weight= 830.4 g

830.4 ×100
%Yield = =83.04 %
1000

7
 Average of total analytical
results= 13.7%

Percent Recovery

4
= 55.8%
A
7
= 9.39%
A
11
= 13.12%
A

Summary of experimental results

From the experimental results table, it can be seen that mineral samples at concentrations7 amperes and 11 amperes
will have a similar effect. Thus, it can be concluded that the separation of ilmenite from silica sand should have a current of 7
amperes or more. To get good wet separation efficiency