Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACS Uni GTHJGJHJ
ACS Uni GTHJGJHJ
Combined footings are used, when design of separate isolated footings are not
feasible. This may be because of low bearing capacity of soil or overlap
R General deflected shape of combined footing
isolated footings due to heavy loads or one/both of column situated very near V
to proper line. R
As far as practicable, it is seen that the resultant of all the external loads from K
columns etc, passes through the CG of the combined footing, such that the
soil is stressed to a uniform pressure. P
Some of the types combined footings: r
i) Rectangular combined footing a
ii) Trapezoidal combined footing
iii) Strap beam on footings
s
iv) Raft foundation a
d
Generally
Solution:
1. Design Constants:
Resultant of the loads must pass through CG of footing, for uniform pressure
As the loading is Symmetrical, hence providing footing symmetrically
Each of the CL offset = (6.8 - 4) 12 = 1.4 m
5. Analysis
From symmetry, SF is zero at the centre C i.e., 3.4m from left end Area of steel, = 415
— 1 - \ 1!-
2
4 6 X96xl ° 6 , 1000 x 440 = 623mm2 < 902
Bending Moment: Provide 12 mm<J) bars @ 1000 x 113 / 902 -> 125 mmc/c
Max hogging BM @ A = - 600 x 1.42 72 = - 588 kNm
Max hogging BM @ B = - 600 x 1.42 II = - 588 kNm 7. Shear force considerations:
Max sagging BM @ C = - 600 x 3.42 /2 + 2040 x 2 = 612 kNm a) One way shear
Critical section at 'd= 440'mm from column face
Point of contra flexure, - 600 x x 2 12 + 2040 x (x-1.4) = 0 Max SF, Vu = 1620 -0.64 x 600 = 1236 kN
x = 1.972 m from the leftmost end TV = Vu/bd = 1236xl03/(2000x440) = 1.4 N/mm2 < TC max
J o e T: j j o u o U L1 L
S •s 1 ~) r "> n r r
Solution:
A
1 ^
f
B
1. Design Constants:
Xu, max = 0.48, Q = .036 x 20x 0.48(1 -.042*0.48) = 2.76
SBC-»l98kPa
2. Area / Dimensions of footing:
Service loads, PA= 1296/1.5 = 864 kN
and PB=1620/1.5 = 1080 kN
Total Service load = 1944 kN Q* 2m '.>'<••.' 1 6 m — -P
1.8m
•
Assume self wt= 194.4kN
Total Load on soil = 2138.4 kN
Max hogging BM @ A = - 486 x 1.02 /2 = - 243 kNm Provide 12 mmifr bars @ 1000 x 113 / 902 -> 125 mmc/c
Max hogging BM @ B = - 486 x 1 A212 = - 476.28 kNm
Max sagging BM @ C = - 486 x 2.6667212 + 1296 x 1.6667 = 432 kNm 7. Shear force considerations:
a) One way shear
Points of contra flexure, - 486 x x212 + 1296 x (x-1.0) = 0 Critical section at 'd= 440'mm from column face
x = 1.3333 m & 4 from the leftmost end Max SF, Vu = 936.9 -0.615x 486 = 638 kN
TV = Vu/bd = 638xl03/( 1800x440) = 0.8 N/mm2 < TC max
6. BM Consideration:
a) Bending in longitudinal direction Percentage of steel, p = 100 Ast/bd = 100x(328l) /(1800x440)= 0.414%
Effective depth required, d ~ ' [Q=kxjx0.36fck] ic = 0.36 +(0.12/0.25)xO. 164 =0.44 N/mm2.
TV > TC - unsafe - provide shear reinforcement
476 XlO 6 Design SF, Vus = V - TC bd = 936.9 x 103- 0.44(1800x440) =588x 103 kN
d= '2.76X 1800
= 310 provide 440 mm, D = 440 + 60 = 500mm
Min tension reinforcement = 0.00205*1000*440 = 902 mm2 /m width Spacing of 10mm <j), 8 legged vertical stirrups, sv = 0.87iy Asv d/Vus
= 0.87 x415 x (8 x78.5) x440/ 588xl0 3 -» 160 mm c/c
Area of steel required at mid-span for the sagging moment Maximum spacing
fck 4.6 Mu 10 4.6 X 432 x 106 (i) 0.75 d = 0.75(440) = 330
Ast+ - 1- 1- bd = 1- 1- bd (ii) 300
2fy fck b d2 415 20 x 1800 x 440Z
(iii) Min. shear reinforcement 0.87fy Asv /0.4b
Ast" =2948mm2 > (1.8 x902) = 0.87x415x(8x78.5) / 0.4 /1800 = 283 V
Provide 20 mm<t> bars @ 1800 x 314 / 2948 -> 175 mmc/c Provide 10 mm<j> 8 legged Vertical stirrups @ 160 mm c/c
Nominal shear reinforcement of 10 mm<t> 8 legged @ 275 c/c can be provided
Ast required at cantilever portion for the hogging moment on Right side ,;/ in the x2 portion from free end and in the middle 2x xl portion
I -^
i
20X1800X 4402
n
1_ 1 _ 4.6X476.28X10' hsoo x 440 = 3281mm 2 >
Ast required at cantilever portion for the hogging moment on left side *
46X243X10* lgoo x 44Q = 159y m m 2 <
415 20X1800X4402
7. Development length
Ld = «f(0.87fy)/4tbd = $ 0.87x415/(4xl.6xl.2) = 47+
For 20 mm-> 940 mm
") ~) 3 ") 3 h nr 3 n c C
kPa Use M20 and Fe 415. The length of footing is restricted to 6m with equal
CL offset to each column
Solution:
1. Design Constants:
Xu, max = 0.48, Q = ,036 x 20x 0.48(1 -.042*0.48) = 2.76
2. Area/Dimensions of footing:
Service loads are = 1296/1.5 = 864 kN
and 1620/1.5 = 1080 kN
Total Service load = 1944 kN
Assume self wt = 194.4 kN
Total Load on Ground = 2138.4 kN
Area of footing required = 2138.4/198 = 10.8 m2
Let the length of footing, L = 6 m and other lateral dimensions be 'a' and 'b'
Area = L(a+b)/2 = 6(a+b)/2 = 10.8 ;/. (a + b)= 3.6m - - - (1)
CG of loads from CL of column A = W2 x C / (Wl + W2) 583.2 T<N/m •
= 1620 x 3.6 /(1296+1620) = 2m.
3. Position of columns on footing:
Resultant of loads must pass through CG of footing, for uniform pressure
CL offsets on each column in longitudinal direction = (6-3.6)/2 = 1.2m
wkt; Centroid of Trapezium from A =(L/3) x (a + 2 b)/(a + b)
=(6/3) [(a + 2 b) /(a+b)] = (1.2 + 2)
.-. 2(a+2b)/(3.6) =3.2
a + 2b = 5.76m - - -(2)
from(l)&(2); a= 1.44m & b = 2.16m
Provided, area of footing = (1.44+2.16) /2 * 6 = 10.8 m2
bx= 1.44 + x(2.16-1.44)/6=1.44 + 0.12 x
Ast required at cantilever portion for the hogging moment on left side
19|Page RVRK Prasad, KDK College of Engineering, Nagpur.
b) Two way shear
Critical section at *d/2 =220' from column surface
Total length of critical section, bO =2(790+740) = 3060 mm
Max SF, Vu = 1620 -(0.79x0.74)270 = 1462 kN
7. Development length
Ld = <t>(0.87fy)/4Tbd = <t» 0.87x415/(4xl.6xl.2) = 47<|>
For 20 mm-» 940 mm
J u ~c c J J u O J
s L
2. Area/Dimensions of footing:
1.8
Service loads are = 1296/1.5 = 864 kN
and 1620/1.5 = 1080 kN
Total Service load = 1944kN
Assume self wt = 194.4 kN
Total Load on Ground =2138.4 kN Pu=1296 Pu=jL62
l.lmih^
Area of footing required = 2138.4/198=10.8 m2 3.6m
1 1 Sm*^ 1
Taking width = 1.8m D B
Total length of both footings; a + b = 10.8/1.8 = 6 m - - (1) wvvwv \A/V|\A7\
CG of loads from CL of column B = Wl x C / (Wl + W2)
= 1296x3.6/(I296+1620) = 1.6m.
3. Position of columns on footing:
Resultant must pass through CG of both the footings, for uniform pressure
Taking moments from CL of column B
Al x xl =(A1 + A2) x x -» a x x l = (a + b) x x
[1.8 x a] x [3.6+1.1 -a/2] = [1.8x6]x [1.6]
-> a x [4 7 -0.5 a] =6x 1.6-> 0.5 a2 - 4.7 a +9.6-0 - -(2)
from (2); a = 3 m or 6.4m
Provide a = 3m ; /. b = 3 m
Provided, total (both) area of footing = (3+3) 1.8 =10.8m2
546
SFjust left of A = 1.1 x 486 = 534.6 kN Provide 20 mm<J) bars-»No of bars = 24057314 = 8 (try in two layers)
Just right of A = 534.6-1296 = - 761.4 kN
Right end of footing A = 3 x 486 -1296 = +162 b). Check for shear:
SF just right of B = - 1.5x486= - 729 kN
Just left of B = - 729 + 1620 = 891 kN Critical section at 'd= 740'mm from column face
Left end of footing B = - 3 x 486 + 1620 = +162 Max SF, Vu = 891 -0.915x 486 = 446 kN
SF is zero at F ~> 486x - 1296 = 0-> x =2.6667 m from left end TV = Vu/bd = 446xl037(450x740)= 1.34N7mm2<tc max
Bending Moment:
Max hogging BM@ A = -486 x 1.1'72 = - 294 kNm Percentage of steel, p = 100 Ast/bd = 100x(2405) 7(450x740)= 0.72%
Max hogging BM @ B - - 486 x 1.5: /2 = - 546 kNm TC = 0.48 +(0.08/0.25)x0.22 =0.55 N/mm2.
Max sagging BM @ F = - 486 x 2.66672 72 + 1296 x 1.5667 = 302 kNm TV > TC - unsafe - provide shear reinforcement
Points of contra flexure, -486 x x2 72 + 1296 x (x-1.1) = 0-> 1.55m Design SF. Vus - V - TC bd = 446 x IO3- 0.55(450x740) =263x ] O3 kN
7. Development length
Ld = <t>(0.87fy)/4Tbd = <t> 0.87x4157(4x1.6x1.2) = 47$
For 20 mm-» 940 mm
U O^
0 O O C
none:
23 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , KDK College of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r .
D) Raft foundation (a) Raft supported on soil,
(b) Raft supported on piles, and
Foundation engineering has been practiced as an art, without help of science, (c) Buoyancy raft.
since time immemorial up to 1920 .This is the time when study of soil
mechanics was started and it was in 1919 when Karl Terzaghi, popularly On the basis of structural system adopted for the structure of the raft, these
known as 'father of soil mechanics', made successful attempt to explain the can be classified as:
phenomenon of settlement on a scientific basis. (a) Plain slab rafts which are flat concrete slabs having a uniform thickness
throughout. This can be with pedestals or without pedestals.
Amount of uncertainty and degree of variation in the properties of soil and (b) Beam and slab raft which can be designed with down stand beam or
number of parameters on which performance of a foundation depends, make upstand beam systems.
exact solution impractical, if not impossible. (c) Cellular raft or framed raft with foundation slab, walls, columns and one
of the floor slabs acting together to give a very rigid structure
In case of soil having low bearing pressure, use of raft foundation gives three- Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Raft
fold advantage: Foundation l.S : 2950 (Part-I) 1973 proposes the following methods of,
analysis:
(a) Ultimate bearing capacity increases with increasing width of the
foundation bringing deeper soil layers in the effective zone. (a) Assumption of linearly varying contact pressure
(b) Settlement decreases with increased depth. (b) Perfectly rigid structures
(c) Raft foundation equalizes the differential settlement and bridges over the (c) Perfectly flexible structures
cavities. Every structure has a limiting differential settlement which it can (d) Structures stiffened along one axis
undergo without damage. The amount of differential settlement between (e) Structures stiffened along both the axis
various parts of a structure supported on a mat foundation is much lower than (f) General methods:
that if the same structure was supported on individual footings and had (i) Based on modulus of subgrade reaction, and
undergone the same amount of maximum settlement. With these (ii) Based on modulus of compressibility (half space theory).
considerations, maximum total settlement which can be allowed for a
particular structure on mat foundation is more than what is permitted when Basically two approaches have been suggested for analysing the behaviour of
the structure is resting on individual footings. This, therefore, allows a higher raft foundation:
bearing capacity for such situations A. Rigid foundation approach
B. Flexible foundation approach
Some designers work on the rule that if more than 50% of the area of the Modulus of Sub-Grade Reaction
structure is occupied by individual footings, it is necessary to provide an One of the important terms required in analysing foundation on the basis of
overall raft. flexible footings is value of modulus of sub-grade reaction also called
coefficient of sub-grade reaction for the particular soil in the foundation of the
The total settlement under the raft foundation can be considered to be made buildings. Mathematically, this can be expressed as intensity of soil pressure
up of three components, i.e., S = Sd + Sc + Ss required to create a unit deflection
Where, Sd is the immediate or distortion settlement. Sc the consolidation
settlement and Ss is the secondary compression settlement.
Winter 16 •
0 (11) [ 13M ] : Design a combined footing for two columns 3.6 m C/C
a part carrying load of 850 kN and 1100 kN at service. The size of
25 | P a g e RVRK Prasad, KDK College of Engineering, Nagpur.