Enrichment Activity

Activity: Analyzing the “Cavite Mutiny of 1872”

Names: Christine Joy Villasis

Angela Allata Taguiam

Arlyn Marcos Gannaban

Carla Rica Gutierrez

Jessa Galletes Dela Peña

Course/Year: ABLES 2A

Score: __________________________

Date: 11/1/22

Directions:Read carefully the article, work as a team and answer the following

questions on the table using the rubric below as a guide in accomplishing the required
task.

Success Indicator Descriptor Allotted Points

Completeness All questions are answered. 20
Quality Answer for each question is 25
derived from the video content.
Each answer is explained well
with elaborations and/or
example.
Miscellaneous The worksheet is erasure-free 15
and cleanly accomplished. No
grammatical lapses are
incurred.
 
SOAPSS Questions Narrative of T. H. Narrative of Narrative of
Pardo de Tavera Jose Montero y Rafael de
Techniqu Vidal Izquierdo
e
Speaker · Who is the author?  Dr. Trinidad H.  Jose Montero y Governor General
Pardo de Tavera Vidal Rafael Izquierdo 
· What is his The Filipino The Spanish Governor General
nationality,ethnicity, social version of the version of the Rafael Izquierdo
status, political belief, and bloody incident of Cavite Muntiny reported to the
other affiliation? Cavite in 1872 was of 1872 was Spanish Minister
written by Dr. written by the of War, dated
· Is he credible or can they Trinidad H. Pardo Spanish Jose manila, January
be trusted? Why? Why not? de Tavera, Filipino Montero y 23, 1872, blaming
scholar , scientist, Vidal, in his the Cavite Muntiny
and historical book entitled on the native
reseacher. Historia de clergy, some local
According to him, Filipinas residents,
this incident was (Madrid, 1895, intellectuals, and
merely a muntiny Vol. III, pp 566- even El Eco
by the native 595. This Filipino, a
Filipino soldiers narrative of Madridbased
and laborers of the Montero y reformist
Cavite arsenal Vidal, normally newspaper.
against the harst a good historian, Significantly, he
policy of despotic was so woefully calls the military
Governor and biased that Dr. Muntiny as
Captain-General T. H Pardo de "insurrection, an
Rafeal de Tavera "uprising", and a
Izquierdo (1871- commented and "revolution". This
1873) which his narrating bias and
abolished their narrating tha exaggeration in
oldtime privileges Cavite episode, narration which
of exemption from he speaks as a either benefit their
paying the annual Spaniard bend own or which just
tribute and from on perverting the belittle bthe native
rendering the polo facts at his Filipino.
(forced labor). The pleasure .
account of Pardo Unsupported by  
de Tavera , positive
prescindig from documentary  
the emotional anti- evidence. That
friar tone that of Montero ,
pervades it. It apart from its
gives evidence of anti Filipino tone
being the most and its
reliable, even supposition of a
 though fairly revolutionary
general. conspiracy,
contains the
  most details and,
to all
  appearance,
most reliable
account of the
actual course of
the revolt itself,
as well as of the
execution of the
three priest.

 
Occasion · Under what  The plan was for  Montero's  The officially
circumstances was the soldiers to adaptation of the Report of
document written? assassinate their Cavite Revolt Governor
officers, the was un Izquierdo on the
· Why did the author create servants, their equivocally Cavite Muntiny
this piece of work? What is masters, and the hostile to the was written for the
the intent? escort of the Filipino Spanish Minister
Captain-General at reformist goals, of war to inform
Malacañang, to and has no Spanish
dispose of the question blame Government about
governor himself. of those what he claimed
executed or was an insurgency.
banished and
encourage set
much of the fault
for the revolt on
the affirmed
resilience of the
as of late
supplanted
Senator
Common Carlos
Maria Dela
Torree.
Audience · Who is reading or  It is for every  In his point of  It is for every
listening the document or Filipino view The Cavite Filipino
material? generation,but it is Mutiny is an aim generation,but it is
particularly useful of natives to get particularly useful
· What is the point of view to historians and rid of the to historians and
of the author? political figures of Spanish political figures of
the period. government in the period.
  •In his point of the Philippines,  •In his point of
view,the incident due to the view He insisted
was a mere munity removal of that the mutiny is
by the native privileges stimulated and
filipino soldiers enjoyed by the prepared by the
and laborers of the laborers of the native clergy,
Cavite Arsenal Cavite arsenal mestizos and
who turned out to such as lawyers as a signal
be dissatisfied with exemption from of objection
the abolition of the tribute and against the
their privileges. It forced labor. injustices of the
is for every government such
Filipino   as not paying
generation,but it is provinces for
particularly useful tobacco crops, pay
to historians and tribute and
political figures of rendering of forced
the period labor.
Purpose · What is the author’s  The purpose of the  The intended  The purpose of his
central claim or argument? author is to give a audience was work was to make
clear information "us" who are not Filipinos afraid to
· What does he hope to about what happen witnesses about them. That our
accomplish? to our country in a what happen to native lands were
past decades and the Philippines' in proper when
· Why does this document what we suffered to keep it from they governing the
exist? from all colonizer. what time it country.
He's motivation started to
· Can it tell you more than was to awake all become a fighter
is on the surface? the residents of the for our land.
Philippines' that And it also,the
were not weak and purpose of Jose
we can start again he did the
through fighting document for
and bring back our biased purpose
country to its he indeed makes
native. a way that
Rafael Izquierdo
is right all the
way.

Subject · What topics do the  The authors not  The author dont  The author don't
document cover? want to talk about want to tell with want to tell about
the result in the the object of what the rights of
· What part of the story can friars afraid that abolishing Filipino they just
we NOT tell from this their leverage in Spanish stated the events
document? the Philippines sovereignty. The that they blame
 · Does this piece
inaccurately reflect
anything about the time
period?
· What does the author
leave out and why does
he/she leave it out (if you
know)?
· What is purposely not
addressed?
So what · Why
is this document important? which shed bloods
· How relevant is the
reading to the
understanding of
sociopolitical, religious and sense of
cultural landscape of the
Philippines?
· What is the contribution significant event
of the reading to Philippine was tragic but it
History?
would be a thing in Madrid Filipinos instead of
the past, took government protecting them
advantage of the without any throughout their
mutiny. attempt to power and wealth
investigate the that they had, and
real facts or It is not clearly
extent of the identified if Indio’s
alleged planned to
revolution inaugurate a
reported by monarchy or a
Izquierdo and republic because
the friars they don't have a
believed the word in their own
scheme was true language to
describe this
different form of
government.
The Cavite Mutiny The mutiny was Spanish
used by the government and
and caused some government to Frailocracia to
lives from our convey the instill fear among
countrymen Filipinos rights the Filipinos so
awakened the in their labor and that they may
to implicate never commit such
nationalism for the nationalism. The daring act again,
Filipinos back document the GOMBURZA
then. this provides an were executed.
understanding This event was
and reminds us tragic but served as
serve as a way for today about the one of the moving
the Filipino heroes sacrifices of our forces that shaped
to fight for what is heroes. Filipino
right, fight for our nationalism. The
freedom and document provides
dignity. The an understanding
document provides and reminds us
an understanding today about the
and reminds us sacrifices of our
today about the heroes.
sacrifices of our
heroes.