You are on page 1of 58

CE 97 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING

BEARING
CAPACITY
DR. MA. CATHERINE Q. ARCA
WOMEN's Month
"Empowered Women Empower Women"

Name a person you consider an empowered woman.


State the reason why.
Topic
Introduction
Outline Foundation Types
Definition of Terms
Shallow Foundations
Bearing Capacity Problems
Bearing Capacity Failures
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Model
Bearing Capacity Theory
Ultimate Bearing Capacity
Allowable Bearing Capacity

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Inroduction
The lowest part of a structure generally is referred to as the
foundation.
Its function is to transfer the load of the structure to the soil
on which it is resting. A properly designed foundation
transfers the load throughout the soil without overstressing
the soil. Overstressing the soil can result in either excessive
settlement or shear failure of the soil, both of which cause
damage to the structure. Thus, geotechnical and structural
engineers who design foundations must evaluate the
bearing capacity of soils.
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Foundation Types
1.Shallow Foundation
2.Deep Foundation

Two main modes of failure/damage that


occur to a foundation:

1. Settlement – elastic, consolidation

2. Bearing Capacity- deforming the


soil through development of a
shear plane beneath a foundation

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Definition of Terms
1. Foundation - a structure that transmits loads to 6. Ultimate net bearing capacity/ Safe bearing
the underlying soil. pressure - is the maximum pressure that the soil
2. Footing - a foundation consisting of a small can support in excess of its current overburden
slab for transmitting the structural load to the stress.
underlying soil ( Spread, Combined, Strip, Mat or 7. Safe bearing Capacity (qs) = is the intensitiy of
Raft) applied pressure or stress that the soil will safely
3. Shallow Foundation - is one in which the ratio support without risk of a shear failure
of the embedment depth to the width of qs =qult.net/FS
foundation, Df/B <= 2.5 8. Allowable bearing capacity (qall) - is allowable
4. Embedment depth (Df) = is the depth below the intensity of the applied pressure or stress taking
ground surface where the base of the foundation into account both bearing capacity and settlement.
rests. 9. FS - is the ratio of the ultimate net bearing
5. Ultimate Bearing Capacity - the maximum capacity to the allowable bearing capacity. In GE FS
pressure/stress that the soil can support. = 1.5 to 5.

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Shallow Foundations

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Sloped Footing Or Trapezoidal
Footing: These types of footing
having a sloping top or side faces are
known as sloped footings. They are
useful in the construction
of formwork.

Sloped/Trapezoidal Footing

Stepped Footings: The main purpose of


using stepped footing is to keep the
metal columns away from direct contact
with soil to save them from corrosive
effects.

Stepped Footing
Raft Foundation: This foundation covers the
entire area under the structure. This
foundation has only RCC slab covering the
whole area or slab and beam together.

Raft Foundation

Combined Footings: When two or more


columns are supported by a footing it is
called combined footing. This type of
footing may be rectangular or trapezoidal in
plan.

Combined Footing
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Strap Footing: In this type of footing, the
outer and inner column is connected by a
strap beam, does not transfer any load to
the soil.

Strap Footing

Strip footing: Strip footing is a component


of shallow foundation which distributes
the weight of a load-bearing wall across
the area of the ground.

Strip Footing
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Shallow Foundation Bearing Capacity

The problems in soil mechanics can be


divided into two principal groups- stability
problems and elasticity problems.
-Karl Terzaghi, 1943

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Bearing Capacity Problem

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Transcona Grain Elevator Canada (Oct. 18, 1913)

The construction of the silo started in


1911 and was completed in the autumn
of 1913. silo is 77 ft by 195 ft in plan and
has a capacity of 1,000,000 bushels.
Foundation was a reinforced concrete
raft 2ft thick and founded at a depth of
12ft below the ground surface.
The weight of the silo was 20,000 tons,
which was 42.5 percent of the total
weight, when it was filled. Filling the silo
with grain started in September 1913,

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Transcona Grain Elevator Canada (Oct. 18, 1913)

And in October when the silo contained


875,000 bushels, and the pressure on the
ground was 94 percent of the design
pressure, a vertical settlement of 1 ft was
noticed.
The structure began to tilt to the west and
within twenty four hours was at an angle
of 26.9° from the vertical, the west side
being 24ft below and the east side 5ft
above the original level.

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Transcona Grain Elevator Canada (Oct. 18, 1913)

Figure shows the view of the silo after it was straightened in 1916 Current name:Parrish & Heimbecker Grain Elevator

The excellent quality of the reinforced concrete structure is shown by the fact
that later it was underpinned and jacked up on new piers founded on rock. The
level of the new foundation is 34 ft below the ground surface.
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Underpinning Eglinton Crossway, Canada
General Concepts

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Bearing Capacity Failures

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Principal Modes of Failure

Rule of thumb: φ’ > 36

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Principal Modes of Failure

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Principal Modes of Failure

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Bearing Capacity
Failures

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Strength Criteria
Foundation must be safe against overall
shear failure in the soil that supports

B. Serviceability or Settlement Criteria


Foundation settlement should be within
tolerable limits

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Steps for the Selection of the Type of
Foundation
Im choosing the type of foundation, the design engineer must
perform successive steps.

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Analysis
In 1921, Prandtl published the results of his study on the penetration of hard bodies (such
as metal punches) into a softer material. Terzaghi (1943) extended the plastic failure theory
of Prandtl to evaluate the bearing capacity of soils for shallow strip footings.

The failure mechanism assumed by Terzaghi

1. Zone I of Elastic equilibrium- zone directly beneath the footing.


2. Zones II of Radial shear state (Prantl zone)- shear plane is developed.
3. Zones III of Rankine passive state- the radial zone is pushing the Rankine zone
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Three parts of Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation that contribute to the Passive force on the elastic zone

a. Friction along the wedge b. Cohesion along the wedge c. Weight of the Surcharge, q

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Three parts of Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation that contribute to the Passive force on the elastic zone

a. Friction along the wedge b. Cohesion along the wedge c. Weight of the Surcharge, q

Friction is a function of effective stress and effective stress increases with depth
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Three parts of Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation that contribute to the Passive force on the elastic zone

a. Friction along the wedge b. Cohesion along the wedge c. Weight of the Surcharge, q

As the soil being pushed down there will be cohesion along the side of the elastic zone.
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Three parts of Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation that contribute to the Passive force on the elastic zone

c. Weight of the Surcharge, q

The elastic wedge will try to push up the soil out of the way, the surcharge will try to resist the rotation
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation

KARL VON TERZAGHI


1883-1963I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Factors

Karl von Terzaghi

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
KARL VON TERZAGHI
1883-1963I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
FACTOR OF SAFETY
A. Strength Criteria
Foundation must be safe against overall
shear failure in the soil that supports

B. Serviceability or Settlement Criteria


Foundation settlement should be within
tolerable limits

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
FACTOR OF SAFETY
Depends on:

Types of Soil
Level of Uncertainty in soil strength
Importance of structure and consequences
of failure
Likehood of design load occurence

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity

KARL VON TERZAGHI


1883-1963I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Allowable Bearing Capacity

KARL VON TERZAGHI


1883-1963I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Gross vs. Net Allowable Pressure

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Meyerhof' Bearing Capacity Model
The general bearing capacity equation is an improvement of the previously
derived bearing capacity equation for a strip foundation. It takes into
consideration the effects of the size (finite length, shape) of the foundation,
depth of embedment of foundation, and load inclination. Meyerhof (1963)
derived the general ultimate bearing capacity equaion:

GEORGE GEOFFREY MEYERHOF


1916-2003

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
General Bearing Capacity

GEORGE GEOFFREY MEYERHOF


1916-2003

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
General Shear Failure

GEORGE GEOFFREY MEYERHOF


1916-2003

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
General Shear Failure

GEORGE GEOFFREY MEYERHOF


1916-2003

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Bearing Capacity of Clay Soil

ALEC WESTLEY SKEMPTON:


1914–2001

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Groundwater Table Effect
In developing the bearing-capacity equations given in the preceding section, we
assumed that the groundwater table is located at a depth much greater than the
width, B, of the footing. However, if the groundwater table is close to the
footing, some changes are require.

Three different conditions can arise regarding the location of the groundwater
table with respect to the bottom of the foundatio.

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Groundwater Table Effect

Case I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Groundwater Table Effect

Case II

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Groundwater Table Effect

Case III

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Example

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Example

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Case I

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Case II

CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
CE 97 | FOUNDATION ENGINEERING

You might also like