You are on page 1of 78

i

SANITIZING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC REFILLING


SOLUTION AND TEMPERATURE SCANNER

A Thesis Presented to
The Faculty of the College of Industrial Technology
Laguna State Polytechnic University
San Pablo City Campus

In Partial Fulfillment for the degree


Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology
Major in Electronic Technology

REGINALD KYLE A. BIGLETE


JEMMINE DECENA
GABRIEL ENRICO T. MANAWIS
JAN RODNIE T. MENDOZA

July 2021
ii

Republic of the Philippines


Laguna State Polytechnic University
Province of Laguna

COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY

APPROVAL SHEET
The thesis entitled “SANITIZING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC REFILLING
SOLUTION AND TEMPERATURE SCANNER” prepared and submitted by GABRIEL
ENRICO T. MANAWIS, JEMMINE DECENA, JAN RODNIE T. MENDOZA, and
REGINALD KYLE A. BIGLETE. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY MAJOR IN
ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY, is hereby recommended for approval and acceptance.

MICHELLE C. GONZALES
Thesis Adviser

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved and Accepted by the Committee on oral Examination with a grade of _______.

FRANCIS NATIVIDAD CECILIA C. BUISER Member Member

DELON A. CHING, Ed.D THESSALONICA M. SINOHIN Member Member

MICHELLE C. GONZALES
Research Coordinator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science
in Industrial Technology Major in Electronics Technology

EUDORA C. TABO
Associate Dean, CIT

DELON A CHING, Ed.D ___________________ Chairperson, Research & Development


Services Date Signed
RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION NO.

iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, praises and thanks to God, the Almighty, for His showers of

blessings throughout the completion of our work. I would like to express our deep and

sincere gratitude to the following:

Mario R. Briones, Ed.D., University President, for his outstanding contributions

to improve the quality of education and the school facilities where this research was

conducted. We thank him for all the support given to us and for sharing his time to be

with us just to give his suggestions to improve this work.

Atty.Rushid Jay S. Sancon, Campus Director of LSPU, San Pablo City for his

continuous guidance and encouragement.

Eudora C. Tabo, Dean of CIT Department of LSPU, San Pablo City. Michelle C.

Gonzales, our thesis adviser, for her consistent support and assistance all throughout the

making of this thesis.

Francis Natividad, our topic specialist, for his help and full support in completing

this study.

CHING DELON A. , Ed. D, Our statistician, who shared his expertise in

analyzing all the given data and other information gathered.

CECILA C. BUISER, Our English critic, for her persistent guidance and

kindness in revising this manuscript.

THESSALONICA M. SINOHIN, our technical editor for checking and revising

this manuscript.

FAMILY, who supported and worked hard for us.


iv
DEDICATION

We dedicated this book to our Almighty God, thank you for the guidance,

strength, power of the mind, protection, and skills and for giving us a healthy life. All of

these, we offer to you.

This study is wholeheartedly dedicated to our beloved parents and teachers, who

have been our source of inspiration and strength when we thought of giving up and who

continuously provided their moral, spiritual, emotional, and financial support.

To our brothers, sisters, relatives, mentor, friends, and classmates who shared their

words of advice and encouragement to finish this study.

R.K.A.B.
J.D.
G.E.T.M.
J.R.T.M.
v

ABSTRACT

TITLE: SANITIZING DEVICE WITH AUTOMATIC REFILLING


SOLUTION AND TEMPERATURE SCANNER

RESEARCHER: Reginald Kyle A. Biglete


Jemmine Decena
Gabriel Enrico T. Manawis
Jan Rodnie T. Mendoza

ADVISER: Michelle C. Gonzales

The goal of this project is to develop a multi-purpose sanitizing device that will
assist in the prevention of COVID 19. It was created during the lockdown in Laguna at

the homes of the students. The use of this device during the pandemic will help the

people who need to work conveniently at home. Thus, this work- at- home job is an

effective measure of preventing the essential workers from being infected by COVID 19

in their workplace.

The study aims to determine the performance of the device in terms of

functionality and accuracy and, the level of acceptability in terms of functionality,

aesthetic, workability, durability, marketability and, safety. The results of the testing

revealed that the device was functional and accurate. The data also showed that there is

one significance but the rest showed no significant difference on the perceived level of

acceptability of the respondents on the Sanitizing Device with automatic refilling solution

and Temperature scanner for community in terms of Functionality (p=0.29), Aesthetic

(p=0.03), Workability (p=49), Durability (p=0.08), Marketability (p=0.10) and Safety

(p=0.57).

Keywords: Sanitizing, Device, Automatic, Temperature, Scanner


vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preliminaries Page No.

TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………………... i

APPROVAL SHEET………………………………………………………………... ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………………………………………………...... iii

DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………. iv

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………. v
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………. vi

LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………... viii

LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………….......... ix

CHAPTER I

Introduction……………………………………………………………...…… 1

Background of the Study……………………………………………………... 1

Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………….... 3

Objectives of the Study……………………………………………………… 4

Significance of the Study …………………………………………………... 5

Scope and Limitation of the Study…………………………...……………... 6

Operational Definition of Terms……………………………...……………. 6

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

12

Research Design …………………………………...………………………… 12

Project Design………………………………….….....…............................... 14

Population and Sampling Technique……...…………………………………. 15


vii

Research Instrument…………………………………………………………. 15

Data Gathering Procedure ……………….…………………………............... 15

Operation and Testing Procedure …………….……………………………… 19

Evaluation Procedure………………………………...……………………… 21

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION


Project Description…………………………………………………………… 24

Project Structure……………………………………………………………… 26

Project Development………………………………....………………………. 27

Production Schedule…………………………………………………………. 27

Project Test Result …….…………………………….………………………. 28

Marketing Strategies………………….……………...………………………. 29

Resource Management………...……………...……………………………… 30

Cost and Return Analysis…………….………...………………………......... 31

Project Evaluation………...…………...………………...……………………

CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings ……………………………………………………...…. 38

Conclusions …………………………………………………………….….… 38

Recommendations ……………………………………………………l……... 39

40
LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………………….…. 41

APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………… 42

A. Survey Questionnaire……………………………………………………... 43

B. Programming (Arduino IDE) .…………………...……………….…......... 44

C. Schematic diagram....…...………………………………………………....
viii

D. Construction of prototype…………...…………………………………….. 46

E. Evaluation Result ……………………………………………..…………… F.

Actual prototype ……………………………………..……………………. G.

Student research conformation form ……………………………………… H.


Certificate of manuscript submission …………………………...………… I.

Request Letter for Topic Presentation Form………………......................

J. Request Letter for Proposal Defense Form………………………………. K.

Request Letter for Final Defense Form……………...................... L. Proposal

Defense Form………………………………………… M. Research Topic

Proposal Evaluation Form………………………. CURRICULUM VITAE

Tables Page
ix

LIST OF TABLES

17
1 Bill of Materials………………………….……………………………………. 18

2 Gantt Chart……………………………………..……………………………… 20

3 Likert Scale………………………………………..…………………………... 20

4 Descriptive Interpretation of Mean…………………….……………………… 38

5 production schedule…………………………………………………………… 38

6 Scoring Range…………………………………………………………………. 39

7 Descriptive Meaning and the Scale……………………………………………. 40

8 Filling of Main Container……………………………………………………… 41

9 Scan the body temperature……………………………………………………... 42

10 Provide the Hand sanitizer……………………………...……………………… 43

11 To Supply the Sanitizing Mat………………………………………………….. 44

12 Functionality (Total time for the process to be completed at its best) ………… 46
13 Accuracy……………………………………………………………………….. 14

Miscellaneous………………………………………………………………….. 27

15 Age…........……………………………………………………………………. 30

16 Gender ………………………………………….…………………….………. 31

17 Functionality...………………………………………………………………… 32

18 Aesthetic……………………………………………………….………………

19 Workability……………………………………………………………….........

20 Durability……………………………………………………………………….

21 Marketability …………………………………………………………………..

22 Safety ………………………………………………………………………….

23 Overall ………………………………………………………………………....

24 T-test of difference …………………………………………………………..

xi

LIST OF FIGURES
Figures Page no. 1 The Conceptual Framework of the Study
…………….……………………….. 17

2 block diagram of the Prototype……………….………………………………...18 3

Isometric drawing of the prototype with dimension ………...…...…...……......20 4

Front view of the Prototype with dimension …………………………………...20 5

Right side view of the Prototype with dimension …...………………………... 27 6

Left side view of the Prototype with dimension ...….………………….…........ 30 7

Front view of the Prototype with dimension……………………………............31 8

Back view of the Prototype with dimension ……………….………………… 32 9


Actual photo of the prototype………………………………………………….

10 Evolutionary Prototyping Model ………………………………………….......


1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

The researchers’ expertise in electronics leads to the conceptualization of a

sanitizing device with automatic refilling solution and temperature scanner. The proposed

project consists of a hand sanitizer, temperature scanner, sanitizing mat, and automatic

refilling. These four devices were widely used around the world for sanitizing purposes.

The COVID-19 situation is particularly stressful because it’s hard to predict how

things will develop, and our circumstances are changing rapidly. This can leave us feeling

powerless like we’re no longer in control of our own lives. As in the case of many aspects

of our lives, there are things we can’t control in this situation. These include the actions

and reactions of other people, how long the situation will last, and what might happen in

the future.

Corona Virus Diseased 2019 or better known as COVID 19 is an incurable

infectious disease which until now there is no assurance where it came from and when

will it end. According to the World Health Organization (2020) COVID-19 affects

different people in different ways. Most infected people will develop mild to moderate

illness and recover without hospitalization.

Since the corona virus broke out and did spread across the world, demand for hand

sanitizers has soared. When one pressures a pump with one's hand, hand sanitizers are

usually applied by squirting the sanitizer liquid. This allows many individuals, which
raises the risk of viral transmission, to come into contact with the pump handle. Some

hand sanitizers are immediately injected into the market. However, since sanitizer

containers

and pump devices are designed to be compatible only with goods made by the same

company. Customers are often forced to repurchase a liquid bottle if the hand sanitizer is

replaced. The design of an automated hand sanitizer system is compatible with different

sanitizer containers suggested in this paper.

Background of the Study

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a dramatic loss of human life worldwide and

presents an unprecedented challenge to public health, food systems, and the world of

work. The economic and social disruption caused by the pandemic is devastating: tens of

millions of people are at risk of falling into extreme poverty, while the number of

undernourished people, currently estimated at nearly 690 million, could increase by up to

132 million by the end of the year.

Millions of enterprises face an existential threat. Nearly half of the world’s 3.3

billion global workforces are at risk of losing their livelihood. Informal economy workers

are particularly vulnerable because the majority lacks social protection and access to

quality health care and have lost access to productive assets. Without the means to earn an

income during the lockdown, many are unable to feed themselves and their families. For

most, no income means no food, or, at best, less food and less nutritious food.

The pandemic has been affecting the entire food system and has laid bare its fragility.

Border closures, trade restrictions, and confinement measures have been preventing
farmers from accessing markets. This also include buying inputs and selling their

produce. Agricultural workers are affected from harvesting crops, thus disrupting

domestic and international food supply chains and reducing access to healthy, safe, and

diverse diets. The pandemic has decimated jobs and placed millions of livelihoods at risk.

As breadwinners lose jobs, fall ill, and die, the food security and nutrition of millions of

women and men are under threat, with those in low-income countries, particularly the

most marginalized populations, which include small-scale farmers and indigenous

peoples, being hardest hit (World Health Organization, 2020).

The most potent sanitizing solution in the world won’t be effective if people aren’t

using your sanitizing mat system properly. The two most important factors in killing

viruses and bacteria are solution coverage and dwell time. For a sanitizing solution to be

effective, it needs to come into contact with the surfaces that need to be sanitized – so in

this case, shoe soles! Building operators must keep sanitizing mats appropriately charged

with enough sanitizing solutions for users to fully cover their shoe bottoms with the

solution as they enter the building (Source Floor and Specialties Inc, 2020).

An automatic hand sanitizer dispenser manufactured by knowledge-based Exon

Company is a highly applicable device manufactured to confront Coronavirus and to

increase society’s health level. The product has been designed based on observation of

health protocols and social distancing principles, upon which users can use it for touchless

hand sanitization. The device can be used in hospitals, medical clinics, shops,

organizations and administrations, educational institutions, hotels and restaurants, banks,

industrial factories, mosques, etc. Among other advantages of using automatic hand

sanitizer dispensers is controlling the amount of sanitizer used and saving it. When hands
are placed in the proximity of a precise electronic sensor installed in the sanitizer

dispenser, the pump would be triggered to dispense a specific amount of sanitizer. This

will lead to the reduction

of usage made of sanitizer and saving the amount; while, users wouldn’t be required to

touch the device (Exon, 2020).

A temperature sensor is a device, typically, a thermocouple or RTD that provides

for temperature measurement through an electrical signal. A thermocouple (T/C) is made

from two dissimilar metals that generate an electrical voltage in direct proportion to

changes in temperature. An RTD (Resistance Temperature Detector) is a variable resistor

that will change its electrical resistance in direct proportion to changes in temperature in a

precise, repeatable, and nearly linear manner (Trerice, 2001).

Conceptual Framework

The study aimed to develop a Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution

and Temperature Scanner.

Input Process Output


Arduino IDE Aesthetics
Knowledge Requirements Java AutoCAD Durability
Programming Economy
Project designing Safety
Design
Electronic circuit designing SANITIZING DEVICE WITH
Develop
AUTOMATIC REFILLING
Hardware
Test SOLUTION AND
Arduino UNO
Tools Evaluate TEMPERATURE SCANNER
Electronics component

Software
EVALUATION Functionality
Figure1. Research Paradigm
5

It shows the paradigm of the procedure’s materials performed in the Sanitizing

Device with an Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner. The conceptual

model serves as the guide in the development of the project. The input phase, which is

subdivided into knowledge requirements, hardware requirements, and software

requirements, shows the basis and tools needed to complete the project; knowledge

requirements contain the studies and concepts about the java programming language,

project designing, and electronic circuit designing. The evaluation tool is used to measure

and assess the prototype's performance. By describing the research topic and by knowing

the objectives of the study, the researchers find the right process, procedure, and raw

materials needed for the development of the product.

Objectives of the Study

The general objective of the study is to develop a Sanitizing Device with an

Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner.

Specifically, the study aimed to:

1. Design a Sanitizing Device with an Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature

Scanner with the following characteristics:

a. power supply as a converting power AC to DC;


b. build-in alcohol container with the level sensor and sound alarm;

c. installed with automatic hand sanitizer;

d. sanitizing mat with moisture sensor; and

e. temperature scanner with notification alarm;

2. Test and evaluate the performance of the prototype and terms of function and accuracy.
6

3. Determine the perceived level of acceptability of the prototype in terms of

functionality, aesthetic, workability, durability, marketability, and safety.

4. Determine if there is a significant difference in the perceived level of acceptability of

the respondent in terms of functionality, aesthetic, workability, durability, marketability,

and safety.

Significance of the Study

The study may be useful in the process of refilling sanitizing stations effectively

with automatic sanitizer dispensers.

The study aims to develop a sanitizing device that can help in avoiding and

lessening the contamination of COVID-19.This is a multifunctional device that is relevant

and timely. The study aims to benefit not just a certain number of people who can afford

the device but also families from the middle class or below who may conceptualize it

simply and more cheaply. The following people could benefit from the prototype:

Business owners. When the researchers have conducted the research, the

individual who might own this device may be able to earn money from it, and it could be

offered to the industry because of its availability, usefulness, and quality.


Community. The prototype’s purpose is to protect and control the spread of virus

Researchers. This study may improve researchers in understanding the process of

creating a protection device. It can also be used as a guide and foundation for future

research, recognizing any developments.

Scope and Limitation of the Study

The study aims to assist in the prevention of the spread of the virus in the

community mainly in shopping malls, schools, and companies. The study of the subject is

focused on the effects of the device on essential workers, not with the people who will be

interacting with them .The product will be tested and evaluated at Laguna State

Polytechnic University's San Pablo Campus and in a business market. It would be placed

near the gate at the entrance. The researchers would choose thirty-nine (39) respondents

to evaluate it, which will include ten (10) technical experts and twenty-nine (29) end-users.

The technical experts are teachers in the Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo

City Campus, while the end-users are students in San Pablo City, Laguna.

Operational Definition of Term

For a better understanding of this study, the following terms are operationally

defined.

Arduino UNO. An open-source microcontroller board. It is the main brain of our

devices. Here the wires are connected.

Float switch. It detects the liquid solution on the container

Java. It is a cross-platform language that can be used to create high-performance


applications. It gives programmers a high level of control over system resources and

memory.

Launching relay. It detects the level of liquid solution and to automatically refill

the container.

Mini-pump. It provides the liquid solution.


8

Moisture sensor (SMS). It is connected to a sanitizing mat to sense if the mat is

dry.

Monitor. This means to see the result of body temperature.

Prototype. It refers to the development of a sanitizing device.

Relay. This means to loop the sensor and mini-pump.

Sanitizing mat. It refers to sanitizing the shoes.

Sound alarm. This means to give signal and alarm.

Temperature. It is the amount of heat that is present in a person's body.

Temperature scanner. This is a device that uses a variety of sensors and software to

quickly measure a person's body temperature, using infrared technology Ultrasonic

sensor. This is used to detect a user's hand applied with a liquid solution.

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

The study consists of the review of related literature and studies, both local and

foreign, and significant discourse on the relevance of the included materials to the present

study. This section provides a general picture of the research study.


Sanitizing Floor Mat

The present invention consists of an antibacterial door mat system for cleaning,

disinfecting, and detection of bacteria and other organisms on footwear to control the

spread of biological infections and contamination. The present invention is further

composed of an antibacterial door mat that cleans footwear, detects the presence of

bacteria, and a bio-detection clearance door entry system that controls the entry into

sterile areas (Omidi, 2012).

The Importance of Sanitizing Shoes during COVID-19

We know that washing your hands and keeping a social distance from people is

incredibly important to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus right now. Essential

businesses that are allowed to operate are sanitizing high-touch areas several times a day

such as door handles, countertops, and so on. What people may not realize is that there is

another common virus carrier and that is the person’s shoes (Notrax, 2020).

10

Non-Contact Thermometers for Detecting Fever

Body temperature can be measured in several ways. Traditionally, body

temperature has been measured using contact thermometers that are placed on the

forehead or in the mouth, ear, armpit, or rectum. For children, in particular, rectal

temperature measurement is often considered to be the gold standard. Non-contact

thermometers allow a person’s temperature to be taken with minimal (tympanic) or no

(Non-contact infrared thermometer [NCIT], thermal scanner) contact with the person.

This means the temperature can be measured without the discomfort of having to sit still
with a thermometer in the mouth or armpit long enough to obtain a correct temperature

reading. The lack of contact also means the disinfection process between patients for the

thermometers is minimal or unnecessary, allowing the easier and faster use when

screening large numbers of people in settings like airports or border crossings (Canadian

Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2014).

Hand sanitizer

Hand antiseptic, hand rub, agent applied to the hands to remove common

pathogens (disease-causing organisms). Hand sanitizers typically come in foam, gel, or

liquid form. Their use is recommended when soap and water are not available for hand

washing or when repeated hand washing compromises the natural skin barrier (e.g.,

causing scaling or fissures to develop in the skin). Although the effectiveness of hand

sanitizer is variable, it is employed as a simple means of infection control in a wide

variety of settings, from day

care centers and schools to hospitals and health care clinics and from supermarkets to

cruise ships (Rogers, 2006).

11

Handwashing: Clean hands save lives

Handwashing is one of the most important ways to prevent the spread of disease.

The five steps that need to be completed every time handwashing occurs are: wet, lather,

scrub, rinse, dry. Using these tips will help disappear the germs and reduce the spread of

disease (Alexis, 2020).


Hand washing and hand hygiene

Washing hands properly is one of the most important things you can do to help

prevent and control the spread of many illnesses. Good hand hygiene will reduce the risk

of things like flu, food poisoning, and healthcare-associated infections being passed from

person to person (Nidirect, 2020).

Design of automatic hand sanitizer system compatible with various containers

Demand for hand sanitizers has surged since the coronavirus broke out and spread around

the world. Hand sanitizers are usually applied by squirting the sanitizer liquid when one

presses a pump with one’s hand. This causes many people to come into contact with the

pump handle, which increases the risk of viral transmission. Some hand sanitizers on the

market are automatically pumped. However, because sanitizer containers and pump

devices are designed to be compatible only between products produced by the same

manufacturer, consumers must also repurchase the container for the liquid if they replace

the hand sanitizer. Therefore, this paper suggests the design of an automatic hand sanitizer

system compatible with various sanitizer containers (Juhui et. al., 2020).

12

Automated Sanitization Device–Hand Sanitization, Thermal Screening, and IoT

based Web-database

In this time of great distress brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, hand

sanitization is of utmost priority to prevent the transmission of germs. We have come forth
with an innovative “automated sanitization device” which makes the process of hand

sanitization and temperature screening rapid, automatic, and easier. The proposed

automated sanitization device contributes significantly to prevent the spread of the virus

and also raises awareness to increase hygiene in public places. The concept of embedded

systems with various sensors attached to a PCB has been used in designing the device.

This paper addresses the methodological details of the proposed automated sanitization

device while focusing on its technical as well as financial expects. The proposed device is

anticipated to be used at various public places like workplaces, residences, railway

stations, etc. working of this model, addressing both the technical as well as the financial

aspect (Prathamesh et al., 2020).

Design of an Intelligent Multifunction Corona Virus Prevention and Monitoring

System Model with Biometric Identification System

The integration of a temperature monitoring scheme as an early warning system

will boost the prevention rate since high temperature is a recognized symptom of the

corona virus in humans. Individual temperature identification in most entrance and exit

points of public places has created isolation and management challenges. This design

incorporates a

13

biometric recognition system to guarantee individual identification using iris pattern

scanning and comparison with an already existing database through internet

communication. Individual details are remotely retrieved without disagreement. The

combination of several known corona virus preventive actions was applied to develop a

new anticipatory model for multiple operations within a single intelligent system. The
model was demonstrated with proteus simulation software integrating the GSM module.

The results proved the functionality of the model. Further research will consider

translating the simulation into a prototype (Kufre, 2020).

Design of automatic hand sanitizer with ultrasonic sensor

An automatic hand sanitizer allows the discharge of the sanitizing liquid without

pressing any nozzle. The design of the automatic hand sanitizer is focused on the

mechanism of pressing the nozzle of the hand sanitizer that involves conversion from a

rotation movement into a translation movement. VDI 2221 method is used to design the

automatic hand sanitizer, which uses Arduino Nano as the microcontroller, servo motor as

the motor, ultrasonic sensor for detecting the movement from the environment, and rack

and pinion system as the mechanism for pressing the nozzle from the hand sanitizer

(Jonathan, L., et al., 2020).

Antimicrobial Properties of Commercial Hand Sanitizers

Hand sanitizers have been developed as a convenient means to decontaminate an

individual’s hands of bacterial pathogens in situations in which soap and water are not

available. Yet to our knowledge, no study has compared the antibacterial efficacy of a

large

14

collection of hand sanitizers. Using zone of growth inhibition and kill curve assays, we

assessed the performance of 46 commercially available hand sanitizers that were obtained

from national chain big-box stores, gasoline stations, pharmacies, and boutiques for

antibacterial activity toward prototypical Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and


Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) bacterial pathogens. Results revealed substantial

variability in the efficacy of many sanitizers evaluated (Johnson, et. al. 2021).

Sanitizing device and Associated Method Using Electrochemically Produced

Sanitizing Agents

This device includes a component for sanitizing a surface, liquid, gas, and/or

associated surrounding environment. The sanitizing component may be an

electrochemical cell having an anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte component, that

works in cooperation with a power source and a precursor material. The electrochemical

cell, power source, and precursor material may be supported by a housing. Upon

application of a potential across the electrodes of the electrochemical cell, a sanitizer is

formed from the precursor material. The housing contains an outlet for releasing the

sanitizer (Ashok et. al. 2007).

Sanitizing Floor Mat

A sanitizing floor mat is for the user's shoes when the user steps thereon to prevent

the spread of germs and bacteria on the user's shoes. The sanitizing floor mat includes a

body that is substantially planar so that it can be placed flush on the floor, wherein the mat

is preferably placed in the threshold of a doorway. The body is composed of absorbent

material and is impregnated with a disinfecting solution. The disinfecting solution is

15

preferably an antiseptic one. A base layer is disposed on an underside of the body,

wherein the base layer is composed of a high-friction material to prevent the sanitizing

floor mat from slipping on the floor (Collins, 2016).


Shoe cleaning mat assembly

A floor mat assembly for cleansing and sanitizing one’s shoes to prevent tracking

dirt from one area to another. The assembly is provided with a first area that moistens the

soles of the wearer’s shoes by utilizing the wearer’s weight to dispense a controlled

amount of cleaning solution to loosen the dirt. An adjacent second area removes the

cleaning solution along with the suspended dirt and dries the shoes (Kureca and Monroe,

1972).

Shoe Sanitization Machine

The main objective of the system is to disinfect the shoes by throwing a liquid

sanitizer. The system looks like a shoe mat. The sanitizer sprayer is placed under the mat.

The system sprays liquid fluid when it senses the shoes. An IR sensor array is used for

sensing the presence of shoes or people. The micro-controller is responsible for

coordinating the whole system such as, ON/OFF the liquid flows, senses the shoes, etc.

Additionally, the proposed unit provides the required amount of spillage and gets prepared

for the next action rapidly within 15 seconds of duration (Shailesh et. al. 2021).

Anti-microbial Floor Mat

A floor mat system is placed directly near an entryway to permit the disinfecting

and cleaning of shoe soles and all other surfaces contacting directly with the fibers of the

16

mat. The floor mat system consists of a frame structure either mechanical or rubberized in

construction. The top portion being of a carpet-type fiber construction, with a hollow
center portion and rubberized non-skid backing against the floor and sides. The hollow

center portion of the system may be enclosed and a microbicidal component introduced

to the carpet fiber portion in a capillary action. Alternatively, the microbicidal component

may be contained in a separate enclosed package which is introduced to the carpet fiber

portion through spray heads located on the enclosed package in a pressure action

activated by weight on the top carpet layer. The floor mat system may also be integrated

into other floors or carpets. The floor mat system may also include a moisture absorbing

component, a cushioning component, customized graphics, anti-fungal composition, or a

fragrance. Anti-slip features may be associated with the mat to prevent slipping.

Additionally, a sensor may be included in the floor mat to assist a user in identifying

when the floor mat system may require a refill of the microbicidal component (Michael,

2005).

Body Temperature Norms

Normal body temperature varies by person, age, activity, and time of day. The

average normal body temperature is generally accepted as 98.6°F (37°C). Some studies

have shown that the "normal" body temperature can have a wide range, from 97°F

(36.1°C) to 99°F (37.2°C). A temperature over 100.4°F (38°C) most often means you

have a fever caused by an infection or illness. Body temperature normally changes

throughout the day. (MedlinePlus, 2021).

17

Increasing Safety with Biometric Temperature Screening

DERMALOG's detection system measures body temperature by scanning people's

faces using the latest sensor technology. The DERMALOG camera can simultaneously
check up to 5 people. If an increased temperature is detected, the system sets off an alarm

or even denies access, for example, as part of an automated access control system. As an

option, the temperature check includes automated face mask detection. If a person passes

the camera without a mask, the system displays a message informing that a mask is

mandatory (DERMALOG Identification Systems GmbH, 2021).

Hand Sanitizer in a Pandemic: Wrong Formulations in the Wrong Hands

Households are increasingly stockpiling and producing hand sanitizer amid the

coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which can pose an increased risk for

unintentional toxicity among children. Despite guidelines for hand sanitizer production

published by the World Health Organization, many turns to streaming media for

instruction. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate hand sanitizer formulations

and safety precautions discussed in popular do-it-yourself (DIY) YouTube videos and to

assess the frequency of calls to poison control centers for pediatric hand sanitizer

exposure before and after the arrival of COVID-19 in the United States (Amir & William,

2020).

Automatic Hand Sanitizer System Compatible with Various Container The demand

for hand sanitizers has surged as the corona virus broke out and spread around the world.

Alcohol gel hand sanitizers are usually applied by squirting the sanitizer liquid when one

presses a pump with one’s hand. This causes many people to come into

18

contact with the pump handle, which increases the risk of viral transmission. Pressing the

pump handle is bothersome and many passes by without disinfecting their hands.
Moreover, each person presses the pump handle differently, making it difficult to predict

the amount of use and to manage refills and replacements. For this reason, the actual use

of hand sanitizers is reduced, which does not help prevent the spread of the virus. Some

hand sanitizers on the market are automatically pumped. However, because sanitizer

containers and pump devices are designed to be compatible only between products

produced by the same manufacturer, consumers must also repurchase the container for the

liquid if they replace the hand sanitizer. It is not economical and it harms the environment

by increasing waste emissions. In addition, some users may think that it is a hassle to buy

a hand sanitizer-containing device compatible again, so they pour other hand sanitizers

into previously used containers and reuse them. However, sanitizers that come directly

into contact with the human body are classified as medicines or non-medical products,

and they are safest to use in original containers (Health Inform Res., 2020).

Body Temperature

Normal body temperature varies by person, age, activity, and time of day. The

average normal body temperature is generally accepted as 98.6 F (37 C). Some studies

have shown that the “normal” body temperature was 98.6 F (37.2 C) (MedlinePlus, 2018).

Fever: First Aids

Fever is a rise in body temperature. It's usually a sign of infection. The fever itself

is generally harmless and probably helpful. Fevers usually don't need treatment.

19

The average body temperature is 98.6 F (37 C). But normal body temperature can range

between 97 F (36.1 C) and 99 F (37.2 C) or more. Your body temperature can vary
depending on how active you are or the time of day (Mayo Clinic, 2021).

Automated Sanitizer & Temperature Anomaly Detector

Hand sanitizers are usually applied by pressing the sanitizer dispenser cap with

hands, causing many people to come into contact with the dispenser cap surface, which

increases the probability of getting infected. As per the recommendation and advice are

given by WHO and the medical fraternity, vigorous sanitization is needed for protection

from this virus. The presented module provides the solution for this issue by introducing

an innovative automatic hand sanitizer-cum- temperature sensing system, which can

perform sanitization and detect temperature simultaneously whenever desired, without

any contact with the machine, thus eradicating the possibility of getting infected from the

manual usage of sanitizer dispenser. The paper discusses briefly the different sensors

being used in the module, namely PIR Sensor, MLX90614(temperature sensor), and

HCSR04(ultrasonic distance sensor) (International Journal of Innovative Science and

Research Technology, 2021).

Automated Hand Sanitizer Dispenser Integrated with Contactless Temperature Gun

and Pulse Oximeter

COVID-19 is the greatest threat we are facing now. Using masks, gloves,

sanitizing our hands, getting checked for Temperature, Pulse rate and Oxygen level have

become our new normal. However, in public places, people are still at risk when they use

conventional

20

sanitizer dispensers and allot a person with a temperature gun, who himself is at the risk
of getting affected by COVID. Our Sensor based Automated System will be a better

solution for the current scenario and it is risk-free. It combines checks for temperature,

oxygen level, and the buzzer go off indicating that the person has some conditions. In this

approach, we have integrated three systems namely Sanitizer Dispensing System (SDS),

Temperature Monitoring System (TMS), and Pulse rate and Oxygen level Monitoring

System (POMS) that are built into a single Hybrid System. The Sanitizer Dispensing

System (SDS) consists of Infrared Obstacle Avoidance Sensor, Ultrasonic Sensor, Relay

Module connected to Arduino UNO, Water pump, Sanitizer tank, and Indicator LEDs.

The Temperature Monitoring System (TMS) consists of MLX90614 Temperature Sensor,

a Buzzer connected to Arduino UNO, and an LCD. Pulse rate and Oxygen level

Monitoring System (POMS) consists of a MAX30100 pulse oximeter sensor connected to

NODEMCU and the LCD. This integrated system does not require physical assistance,

which prevents the spread of the disease to a great extent (TURCOMAT, 2021)

Smart Sanitizer Disperser with Level Monitoring

A smart sanitizer is an automatic sanitizer dispensing machine with no physical contact. It

is an alcohol-based hand sanitizer that can be used in schools, hospitals, workplaces,

offices, and much more. This alcohol is a solvent and not only a solvent it is also a very

good disinfectant which is very much required in this current pandemic, as alcohol is

volatile so it will vaporize instantly after application to hands. It is also proven and well

known that above 70% of alcohol can kill Coronavirus in hands. In this we are using an

IR sensor to sense the hand placed near the bottle, esp32 as microcontroller which senses

the

21
distance and the result is the pump running to pump out the hand sanitizer (Turkish

Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT, 2021).

Smart Hand Sanitizer Offers Extra Protection Against Coronavirus The SAVORTEX

hand sanitizer harnesses sensors to provide users with the exact amount of sanitizer

required. It provides owners with real-time anonymized usage data, yielding insights into

cleaning patterns and whether building occupants are maintaining a sufficient level of

hygiene (Chandler, 2020).

Benefits of Using a Hand Sanitizer Dispenser

Hand sanitizers can reduce the risk of spreading gastrointestinal and respiratory

infections between co-workers. These dispensers allow for minimal contact with other

surfaces and have a stronger bacteria-killing agent than the average hand soap (Honey

bucket, 2018).

Importance of Automatic Hand Sanitizer to Improve Health and Hygiene of

Individuals During Pandemic

There is a high risk of COVID virus transmission through manual use of sanitizers

in public places. The contagion is primarily attributed to droplets of saliva generated by

coughing, sneezing, or nasal discharge. For instance, when an infected person touches the

manual sanitizer, there is a high probability of viruses being transmitted to other healthy

individuals. Hence personal hygiene and protection are paramount. This can be achieved

22
through the automating hand sanitizer (touch-free), where there is no need for manual

operation (Deepak et al., 2021).

The Importance of Hand Sanitizer Placement in the Workplace

Using hand sanitizer reduces microbial counts and kills many harmful germs that

could infect workers with the flu and other viruses. To keep the workplace a healthy and

thriving environment, employers must consider the health of their employees. Providing

hand sanitizer for employees, at desks, and in communal areas, is just as essential as

providing the right equipment and tools to do their job (Faivre, 2018).

Make an Automatic Hand Sanitizer Dispenser Using Arduino

The COVID-19 pandemic has radically affected life for almost everyone around

the globe, and makers are no exception. With everyone being more careful of their

interactions with humans and objects, personal hygiene has taken serious precedence over

all other factors in public space. A lot of public places have hand sanitizers for visitors,

but they need to be manually pressed (Maker.io Staff, 2020).

COVID 19: myths and facts

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from being asymptomatic to clinical

conditions characterized by respiratory failure. Management of the disease is mostly

supportive in the form of oxygen supplementation, noninvasive ventilation, and in severe

cases, mechanical ventilation. There is no specific antiviral treatment available nor is

there any vaccine available. The most important step to curb this disease is the prevention
of the

23

spread by social distancing and strict hand hygiene. This review article describes various

myths and facts about COVID-19 and various preventive measures which should be

followed to limit the spread of this disease (Gurmeet, S., 2020).

Evaluation System

An Evaluation Instrument for Prototype Production has been formulated and

validated by the Laguna State Polytechnic University (LSPU) with six (6) key criteria:

safety, functionality, aesthetics, workability, durability, and economy. These conditions are

defined as follows:

Functionality. This refers to the capacity under the stated condition to accomplish

the necessary results and device functions.

Aesthetics. It refers to the prototype's physical features. It requires the

appropriateness of the design's use of color, shapes, structure, and style. Workability. It

refers to the availability of resources, equipment, machines, and technological

knowledge.

Durability. It refers to the lifetime of materials, workmanship, and design for

consistency.

Marketability. It refers to the minimum amount of materials used, the time and

effort exerted to create the prototype, and other things needed.

Safety. It refers to the correct operation of the prototype in the absence of any

anomalies which could bring inconvenience.

24
CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter aims to explain the methods and procedures to be used in the analysis

and interpretation of results, consisting of the research design, project design, population

and sample of the study, research instruments, research process, and statistical treatment.

Research Design

The researchers developed a Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution

and Temperature scanner. The Project has three main uses; first, the hand sanitizer to

sanitize our hands and it will automatically, because of motion sensors. Second, the

temperature to determine or to check our body temperature before entering any

establishment. Lastly, connect the tube for the sanitizing solution and it is connected to the

sanitizing mat with a moisture sensor to sense if the mat is dry.

Developmental research, as opposed to simple instructional development, has

been defined as the systematic study of designing, developing, and evaluating

instructional programs, processes, and products that must meet criteria of internal

consistency and effectiveness. Developmental research is particularly important in the

field of instructional technology. The most common types of developmental research

involve situations in which the product-development process is analyzed and described,

and the final product is evaluated. The second type of developmental research focuses

more on the impact of the product on the learner or the organization. The third type of

study is oriented toward a

25
general analysis of design development or evaluation processes as a whole or as

components (Richey, 1994).

Project Design

The design of the Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and

Temperature Scanner was shown in the figures below. Demonstrate the detailed size of the

unit. The system is a circular and calculating unit. It has been designed as a portable

device.

Figure 2. Block Diagram

The block diagram of the proposed Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling

Solution and Temperature Scanner is shown in figure 2. It displays input and output

modules connected to the Arduino UNO microcontroller. The power supply is responsible
for supplying the device using electricity. The Arduino Uno is the main operator of

various components such as; ultrasonic sensor, moisture sensor, LCD monitor, scanner,

sound alarm and relay. The temperature scanner is connected to the Arduino Uno and its

function

26

is to read a person’s body temperature. If it exceeds the normal body temperature, a

warning will appear on the LCD monitor and it will alarm. The ultrasonic sensor is

connected to the Arduino Uno, it censors the hand to provide sanitizer. The DC

mini-pump "B" would carry the sanitizer to disinfect the hand. The moisture sensor

detects liquid solution and pumps “C’ giving if dry the sensor and solenoid valve to force

stop refill on the sanitizing mat and hand sanitizer. When the moisture sensor detects that

the sanitizing mat is dry, it would automatically refill it. occur to apply a controlled

amount of solution to the sanitizing mat. By launching the relay, it acts as a level sensor,

if the float switch is lowered the DC mini-pump "A" will work and it will refill the main

container.
Figure 3. Isometric view of the Prototype
27

The Isometric diagram of the proposed Sanitizing Device with Automatic

Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner is shown in figure 3 shone the distinctions of

the part of the prototype, first is the chassis which is the main frame of the prototype,

inside of the chassis is the Arduino UNO, power supply 9 volts and 12 volts, buzzer

alarm, LCD monitor, ultrasonic sensor, hand sanitizer dispenser, thermal scanner, and the

main container of the sanitary solution. Second is the temperature scanner that will be

sensing the user’s temperature, if your temperature is high the buzzer inside the device

will make an alarm that the user’s temperature is high then it will be displayed on the
LCD monitor. The third is the hand sanitizer it will automatically spray the sanitizing

solution into the user’s hand by the use of an ultrasonic sensor if it senses the hand it will

spray the sanitizing solution. Forth is the Arduino outlet it is the outlet to access and

reprogram the Arduino UNO inside the device. Fifth is the sanitizing mat that will

sanitize the user’s feet if the mat is dry out the humidity sensor inside it will trigger the

Arduino to dispense another solution to the sanitizing mat by the use of hose and wire

that attach to the main assembly and the mat. Sixth is the second container which is

attached to the main container. It supplies the main container if it ran out of sanitizing

solution and finally the stand that supports the whole assembly.

28 Figure 4. Front
view of the Prototype with dimension
Figure 5. Right view of the Prototype with dimension
29

Figure 6. Left side view of the Prototype with


dimension

Figure 7. Front view of the Prototype with dimension


30

Figure 8. Rear/Back view of the Prototype with dimension


Population and Sampling Technique

The researchers will use simple random sampling for data gathering. According to

Valerie J. Easton and John H. McColl's from Yale University Simple random sampling is

the process of selecting a subset of subjects (sample) from a wider community for

research (population). An individual is selected at random, and everyone in the

population has an equal probability of being included in the survey. A sample of a certain

size has the same probability of being chosen. The researchers will wait for the

statistician's advice for a better sampling technique.

31

Research Instrument

The study utilized a researcher-made questionnaire of eighteen (18) short

questions divided into six (6) parts. The first part is about the device's functionality, on its

expected output towards the users that will be testing it. The second is the user's

judgment of the prototype's appearance. The third part is the maintainability of the device

focusing on the tools and experts available that are required, in case the device

malfunctions. The fourth part is about the durability of the device during operation, and

for how long and consistently it can perform its functions repeatedly throughout the day.

The fifth is about the device’s marketability, the affordability of the materials, and the

duration of assembling the prototype. The sixth and last part is about the safety of the

device towards the users. Since there would be around twenty-nine (29)

Students/end-user and ten (10) technical experts total of thirty-nine (39) respondents in

San Pablo City, Laguna that would be present to work during the day, the researchers
printed out thirty- nine (39) questionnaires for them to answer after using the sanitizing

device.

Data Gathering

The researchers used a self-made questionnaire of respondents with the given

Likert scale: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA), 3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA),

2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A), 1.80-2,60-Fairly acceptable (FA), 1.00-1.80- Not acceptable

(NA). The questionnaires were given to the respondents after they view the prototype.

The researchers collected the answered questionnaires from the essential student and

experts to interpret the outcome of the data gathered.

32

Planning Stage

The design, criteria, and specifications based on the goal of the study were the

subject of the planning stage of this research study. The procurement of materials and

preparation of tools and equipments are also included. The internal and external

components of the project would also be designed in this process. It defined the various

materials that would be used in the prototype. The initial design, which focuses on the

basic cores and modules of the project, would be generated in the first iteration. The

second would then develop the prototype's aesthetics. When changes are required, further

revisions would begin.

Testing stage

Each feature of a prototype should be tested against its specification at this stage to

ensure that the intended action is carried out. The prototype would be subjected to a series

of tests to validate its compliance with defined criteria and to define its capabilities and
limitations and assess its acceptability in terms of functionality, aesthetics, workability,

durability, marketability, and also the safety of the project.

Operation and Testing procedure

The quality and functionality of the prototype were inspected during the operation

and testing of the project development. To validate the prototype, the following steps

were executed:

Operating Procedure of the prototype:

1. Check all the termination and wirings of the instrument including power supply
33

2. Double-check the components, container, and chassis

3. Switch ON the power source

4. Check the components (Arduino UNO, sensor, buzzer, relay, solenoid valve, LCD

monitor, scanner, and pump motor)

If it works for test runs

1. The prototype is prepared to be used

Testing Procedure of the prototype

The following five (5) stations are part of the project and would be

tested: 1. Turn on the power source.

2. Place your hand or forehead on the thermal scanner if it is enabled, and the temperature

will be displayed on the monitor.

3. The small water pump would automatically release a solution and disinfect the hand

when the palm is placed on the ultrasonic sensor.


4. When the moisture sensor is dry, the small water pump will start pumping and the

solution will be transferred to the sanitizing mat.

5. The small water pump is automatically refilled when the solution reaches the

container's low capacity.

34

Supplies and Materials:

Table 1. Bill of Materials

Particulars Quantity cost Total amount (Php)


Arduino UNO 1 500.00 500.00 Liquid solution 1 800.00 800.00 Temperature
scanner 1 1500.00 1000.00 Sound alarm/Buzzer 1 40.00 40.00 Power supply
(12 and 9 volts) 2 150.00 300.00 Cladding 1 800.00 800.00
Transparent tube 1 100.00 100.00 Motor pump 3 50.00 150.00
Ultrasonic sensor 1 200.00 200.00 Relay 4 300.00 300.00
Sanitizing mat 1 200.00 200.00 Wires 1 200.00 200.00
Stainless tray mat 1 500.00 500.00 Angel bar iron 1 300.00 300.00 Bolt
and nut screw 25 2.00 50.00 PCB 1 100.00 100.00
Float switch 1 100.00 100.00 LCD screen display 1 300.00 300.00 Lead
1 100.00 100.00
Moisture sensor 2 100.00 200.00 Switch 1 50.00 50.00
Solenoid valve 2 250.00 500.00 Tubular metal 1 500.00 500.00
Optional
Other expenses
Travel expenses 2 250.00 500.00 Communication(load) 2 100.00
200.00
Representation
Total 7,410.00
35

Table 1 shows that the researchers have indicated the list of names of the

components, number of quantities, unit cost, and the total amount to determine the overall

cost.
Table 2. Gantt chart
Activity Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Ma
y

Logistics

Design and plan

assembly of Mechanical Parts

Electronic Wiring Installation

Testing and Development

Processing function

Data analysis

Gantt chart in Table 2 shows the expected process of developing the prototype to

complete the product on time. In November, the prototype's logistics was completed. In

December, the suggested prototype's design and plan were completed. From January to

April, the researchers assembled mechanical parts online. In the required time, the

prototype was assembled and the concept was developed.

After the prototype has been completed, the researchers will conduct the

preliminary testing to ensure that no unexpected failures occur. They will also conduct the

final prototype testing, as well as expert validation and recommendation collecting

through expert questionnaires. In May, the evaluation will be completed, and all of the

data will be collected. For the entire process, all of the data acquired will be documented.

36
Evaluation Procedure

The study used a questionnaire to evaluate its functionality to ensure the

usefulness of the prototype. Functionality, including easy to use, convenience of the

device multiple function, and placement of the device, is the first part. The second is

aesthetics, appearance of the device, manageability of the size, and color used on the

device. The third is Workability including availability of materials, availability of tools

and equipment, and availability of technical expert for maintenance. Durability, quality of

materials, quality of functionality, duration of use, is the fourth component. The fifth

element is marketability, which includes the marketability in terms of in terms of

materials used, in terms of time used to assemble the prototype, and in terms of

performance of the prototype on live testing. Safety, absence of harmful substance and

materials, absence of sharp edges present on the device, and availability of emergency

switch when an error occurs, is the sixth component. The researchers should print out 40

questionnaires for them to answer after their use of the sanitizing device.

Table 3. Likert Scale


Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating
Very Acceptable
5 4
Acceptable
3
Fairly Acceptable Not
2
Acceptable
1
Highly Acceptable

The researchers created a self-made questionnaire that used the Likert scale to

evaluate all of the respondents (Table 3). Three subgroups will be assigned to the

37
questionnaire. The first group consists of electronics-specialist professors and the student

group consists of end-users.

Table 4. Descriptive Interpretation of Mean


Range Mean of Values Descriptive Equivalent
Very Acceptable
4.21 - 5.00 3.41 -
Acceptable
4.20 2.61 - 3.40 1.81
Fairly Acceptable
- 2.60 1.00 - 1.80
Not Acceptable
Highly Acceptable
38

CHAPTER IV

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The project description, structure, development, production schedule, project test

result, marketing strategies, resource management, cost analysis, and project evaluation

are all covered in this chapter. This chapter comprises the presentation, analysis, and

interpretation of the findings resulting from this study. The analysis and interpretation of

data were carried out in three phases. The first part was based on the results of the survey

questionnaire that deals with the profile of the respondents. The second part was based on

the results of the level of acceptability of the project design. The third part was based on

the results of the significant difference between the two groups of respondents.

Project Description

The prototype has three functions in one device: it can detect a person's body

temperature, sanitize their hands and shoes, and then automatically refill when the

container inside is empty. The Arduino UNO controls all of the necessary connections and
the purpose of the launching relay is to supply and manage the liquid solution inside the

container.

The 12volts power supply would power 3 separate motors pumps performing

different functions that are: refilling the main container, the other is for dispensing hand

sanitizing solution and the last is for dispensing solution on the sanitizing mat when the

moisture sensor detects the mat is dry. The 9volts power supply would power the Arduino

UNO that is connected to the sensors, so that an error would not occur during the

prototype’s functions. The sensors that are connected and would be operated by the

39

Arduino UNO are the ultrasonic sensor that will detect the objects in front of it, and a

moisture sensor for reading the liquid solution on the sanitizing mat. The solenoid valve is

connected to the pump and forced to stop refilling on the sanitizing mat. LCD display is

to show the temperature of the person as shown by the scanner , if the person's

temperature is high, the sound alarm would let out consecutive beeping noises and the

relay is in charge of reacting from the sensors reading, sending those readings to the

Arduino. So the Arduino would be operating the individual pump motors. The launching

relay is a manually operated level sensor that uses a high and low relay connected to two

float switches and powered by 12 volts. If the float switch is lowered, the liquid solution

would automatically refill; however, if the liquid solution rises, the low switch would no

longer be affected, the second float switch would activate, and the refill would stop

functioning.

Project Structure

This would be the base idea and designs that would be carried over to the
prototype. Each base idea and design shall be present on the finished project structure

Procedures in the fabrication of the prototype:

Figure 9. Actual photo of the prototype


40

1. Prepare all the materials needed

1.1. Arduino UNO

1.2. Liquid solution

1.3. Temperature scanner

1.4. Sound alarm/Buzzer

1.5. Power supplies (12 and 9 volts)

1.6. Cladding

1.7. Transparent tube

1.8. Motor pumps

1.9. Ultrasonic sensor

1.10. Relay

1.11. Sanitizing mat

1.12. Wires

1.13. Stainless tray mat

1.14. Angel bar iron


1.15. Bolt and nut screw

1.16. PCB

1.17. Float switch

1.18. Relay

1.19. LCD screen display

1.20. Lead

1.21. Moisture sensor

1.22. Switch
41

1.23. Tubular

1.24. Solenoid valve

2. Basic tools and power tools

2.1 Tools and equipment

2.2 Screwdriver (flat & Phillips)

2.3 Pliers (pincers, long nose, side cutter)

2.4 Soldering iron

2.5. Boring tools

2.6 Tester

2.7 Power tools (welding, grinder, drill)

Project Development

During the prototype fabrication, the following would be followed step by step.

This is based on the principles and methods of evolutionary prototyping. The prototype

goes through the five (5) stages of the model as shown on the diagram. (1) planning, (2)
fabrication, (3) testing, (4) development, and (5) evaluation are shown in Figure below.

Figure 9. Evolutionary Prototyping Model


42

Production Schedule

The production schedule reflects the time frame in the actual construction of the

development of the Sanitizing device with an automatic refilling and temperature scanner.

Table 5. Production Schedule

Table 5. Production Schedule

Activities Time
Planning 4 weeks
Purchase of materials 20 weeks
Development 20 weeks
Trials 2 weeks
Testing of the project/Product 1 weeks
Expert validation/Checking 1 weeks

Project Test Result

The following tests are done to investigate the functionality and the accuracy of

the prototype. The functionality has five (5) parameters namely: (P1) Time (minutes) it

takes to fill the main container at the set point; (P2) time (seconds) it takes to scan the

body temperature; (P3) time (millisecond) it takes to provide hand sanitizer; (P4) Time
(second) it takes to supply the sanitizing mat; (P5) time (minutes) Total time for the

process to be completed at its best.

Table 6. Scoring Range


Scores P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Minutes Seconds Milliseconds Seconds Minutes

1 1.00-1.20 0.80-0.90 0.35-0.50 1.00-1.20 2.80-2.90

1.21-1.40 0.91-1.00 0.51-0.66 1.21-1.40 2.91-3.00


42

1.41-1.60 1.01-1.10 0.67-0.82 1.41-1.60 3.01-3.10


33

4 1.61-1.180 1.11-1.20 0.83-0.88 1.61-1.180 3.11-3.20

5 1.81-2.00 1.21-1.30 0.89-1.04 1.81-2.00 3.21-3.30

Table 6 shows the scores that the researchers will assign based on the actual values

generated by each of the parameters during the functionality testing.

43

Table 7. Descriptive Meaning and the Scale


Highly Functional (HF) 1.00-1.80
Functional (F) 1.81-2.60
Moderately Functional (MF) 2.61-3.40
Fairly Functional (FF) 3.41-4.20
Not functional (NF) 4.21-5.00

Table 8. Functionality (Filling of Main Container)

Trial No. Parameter 1 (P1)


Score
Actual Value
(Minutes)
1 1.30 2

2 1.35 2

3 1.44 3

4 1.38 2

5 1.40 2
Mean 2.2
SD 0.4
Interpretation Functional (F)

As shown in table 8, the prototype has a mean score of 2.2 from the average of the

5-point trials. This mean score has a descriptive meaning of “Functional” which means

the prototype has achieved an acceptable performance, though looking at the standard

Deviation of 0.4, the measured time seems to be quite unstable which may be caused by

the pump’s functionality in the second container.

44

Table 9. Functionality (Scan the body temperature)


Trial No. Parameter 2 (P2)
Actual Value Score
(Seconds)

1
.86 1
2
.85 1
3
.93 2
4
.91 2
5
1.01 3
Mean 1.8
SD 0.75
Interpretation Functional (HF)

As shown in table 9, the prototype has a mean score of 1.8 from the average of the

5-point trials. This mean score has a descriptive meaning of “High Functional” which

means the prototype has achieved an acceptable performance, though looking at the

standard Deviation of 0.75, the measured time seems to be quite unstable which may be

caused by the distance sensitivity in the temperature scanner.

Table 10. Functionality (Provide the Hand sanitizer)


Trial No. Parameter 3 (P3)
Value (Milliseconds) Score
1
.51
2
2 3
.63 2 .60 2
.35
4 5
49 1 .39 1 Mean 1.6
SD 1.16 0.49
Interpretation Functional (F)
45

As shown in table 10, the prototype has a mean score of 1.6 from the average of

the 5-point trials. This mean score has a descriptive meaning of “Functional” which

means the prototype has achieved an acceptable performance, though looking at the

standard Deviation of 0.49, the measured time seems to be quite unstable which may be

caused by the pump’s functionality in the hand sanitizer.

Table 11. Functionality (To Supply the Sanitizing Mat)


Trial No. Parameter 4 (P4)
Value (Seconds) Score
1
1.58 3
2
1.36 2
3
1.25 2
4
1.46 3
5
1.45 3
Mean 2.6
SD 1.16 0.49
Interpretation Functional (F)

As shown in table 11, the prototype has a mean score of 2.6 from the average of

the 5-point trials. This mean score has a descriptive meaning of “Functional” which

means the prototype has achieved an acceptable performance, though looking at the

standard Deviation of 0.49, the measured time seems to be quite unstable which may be

caused by the pump’s functionality that supplying the sanitizing mat. The programmed

AND logic gate for dispensing the sanitizing solution to the mat with the motor pump is

dependent on the two moisture sensors that are on the sanitizing mat, the motor pump

will only dispense sanitizing mat if both sides of the mat is detect by the moisture sensors

as dry to the Arduino UNO. If one side of the mat is still wet the motor pump will not

dispense liquid solution.

46

Table 12. Functionality (Total time for the process to be completed at its best)
Trial No. Parameter 5 (P5)
Value (Minutes) Score
1
2.82 1
2
3.04 3
3
2.87 1
4
2.90 1
5
2.95 2

Mean 1.6
SD 1.16 0.8
Interpretation Functional (F)

Table 12 shows the prototype has a mean score of 1.6 from the all of the trials.

This score has a descriptive meaning of a “Functional” which means the prototype has

achieved the performance as far as the sanitizing solution is dispense, looking at the

standard deviation of 0.8, these values exhibits a good and stable performance.

Table 13. Accuracy (Control of components)


Trials 1 2 3 4 5 % Accuracy
Interpretation
Parameters

1. Time (minutes) it takes to fill the main √ √ √ √ √ 100% Accurate √ √ √ √ √ 100%


container at the set point.
2. Time (seconds) it takes to scan the body Accurate
temperature. 3. Time (millisecond) it takes to
provide hand sanitizer.
X √ √ √ √ 80% Accurate √ √ √ √ √ 100%
4. Time (second) it takes to supply the
sanitizing mat.
Accurate
5. Time (minutes) Total time for the process to
be completed at its best.
√ √ √ √ √ 100% Accurate

Legend: Accurate– Has a total of at least eight to ten (8-10) check symbols in all trials.
Not Accurate– Has a total of only zero to seven (0-7) check symbols in all
trials.
47

Table 13 sh the device almost performed perfectly throughout the accuracy tests,

except for the fourth parameter trial that is “the time it takes to supply the sanitizing mat”
it failed the first test because one the moisture sensors indicated a side of the mat is still

wet so the motor pump did not dispense the liquid solution on it.

Cost and Return Analysis

In order to gauge the efficiency and effectiveness of the budget policies through

the cost and return analysis.

Table 14. Miscellaneous


Expenses (Miscellaneous) Amount (Php)
Utilities 400
Shipping Fees 250
TOTAL 650

The total cost of material was Php 7,410 which was detailed on table 1 under

Supplies and Materials on Chapter 3.

Unit Price = Php 9,700.00

Yield = 1

Unit Cost (Php7,410.00) + Miscellaneous (Php650.00) = Total Cost

(Php8,060.00)

To compute the data, the formula below is used.

Unit Price x Yield Product = Profit

Profit – Total Cost = Revenue/Return

9,700 X 1 = 9,700

9,700 – 8,060 = 1,640


48

Revenue = Php1,640.00
Project Evaluation

After the video demonstration of all the parameters to the respondents, the

prototype has undergone evaluation by a pre-selected number of respondents composed of

fifteen (24) end-users and fifteen (6) technical experts who are exposed in the industrial

firms to measure the prototype’s overall acceptability in terms of functionality, aesthetics,

workability, durability, economy, safety, and sale ability. (See Appendix A for the sample

evaluation instrument)

Part 1. Socio-demographic Profile of the Respondents

The respondents of this study included 10 technical experts in the field of

electronics technology, electrical technology, electrical engineering, architectural drafting,

and science research, while 29 end users are students.

Table 15. Distribution of the Respondents as to Age

Age Technical Expert End-user Composite Frequency Percent Frequency Percent


Frequency Percent 20-30 3 30% 29 100% 32 82%

31-40 3 30% - - 3 8% 41-50 1 10% - - 1 2% 51-60 3 30% - - 3 8% Total 10 100% 29

100% 39 100%

49

Table 15 shows that 3 or 30% of technical experts were 20-30 years old, 3 or 10%

were 31-40 years old, 1 or 10% , 41-50 and 3 or 30% were 51-60 years old. On the other

hand, 29 or 100% of the end users belong to 20-30 years old age group. This revealed that

most of the respondents were 20-30 years old with a composite mean of 32 (82%).
Table 16. Distribution of the Respondents as to Gender

Gender Technical Expert End-user Composite Frequency Percent Frequency


Percent Frequency Percent Female 2 20% 13 44.83% 15 38.46% Male 8 80% 16
55.17% 24 61.54% Total 10 100% 30 100% 30 100%

Table 16 shows that 2 or 20% of the technical experts were female while, 8 or

80% were males. On the other hand, 13 or 44.83% of the end-users were females while

16 or 55.17 % were males. The data shows that majority of the respondents were males

having an average mean of 24 or 61.54%.

Part 2. Perception of the Two Groups of Respondents in terms of Functionality,


Aesthetic, Workability, Durability, Marketability, and Safety of the Sanitizing Device
with an Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for Community.

Table 17. Perception of the Respondents as to Functionality

Indicators Experts End-user Composite Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD


VI
1. Easy to use 4.70 0.48 HA 4.83 0.38 HA 4.77 0.07 HA
2. Convenience of the device multiple 4.60 0.52 HA 4.83 0.38 HA 4.72 0.10 HA
functions
3. Placement of the device
4.70 0.48 HA 4.73 0.45 HA 4.72 0.02 HA

Overall
4.67 0.02 HA 4.80 0.04 HA 4.73 0.04 HA
Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
50

1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 17 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability


of the sanitizing device with an automatic refilling solution and temperature for

community in terms of Functionality. The data revealed that the two groups of

acceptable” that the prototype is easy to use (x


respondents “High =4.77,
̅ SD=0.07),

multiple functions (x=4.72, SD=0.02), Placement of the


Convenience of the device ̅

device (x However, the experts rated the functionality (x


=4.72,
̅ SD=0.10). =4.67,
̅

rating of the end-user (x


SD=0.02) which was lower than the =4.80,
̅ SD=0.04). The

findings further highlighted that the two groups of respondents “High acceptable” that

its Functionality (x
the project design was “Acceptable” as to ̅=4.73, SD=0.04).

Table 18. Perception of the Respondents as to Aesthetic

Experts End-user Composite


Indicators
Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD VI
4.50 0.71 HA 4.63 0.56 HA 4.57 0.11 HA
1. Appearance of the device
2. Manageability of the size 4.30 0.48 HA 4.63 0.49 HA 4.47 0.01 HA
3. Color used on the device
4.10 0.57 VA 4.70 0.53 HA 4.40 0.02 HA

Overall 4.30 0.11 HA 4.66 0.03 HA 4.48 0.05 HA Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable
(HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 18 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability

of the Sanitizing Device with an Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner

51
for community in terms of Aesthetic. The data revealed that the two groups of

rated as“ High acceptable” which means that the Appearance of the device
respondents

is (x SD=0.02), Manageability of the size (x=4.57, SD=0.11), Color used on the


=4.40,
̅ ̅

device (x SD=0.01). However, the end-user rated the Aesthetic (x


=4.47,
̅ =4.66,
̅ SD=0.03)

than the rating of the experts (x


which was higher =4.30,
̅ SD=0.11). The findings further

highlighted that the two groups of respondents rated as “High Acceptable”which means

design was “Acceptable” as to its Aesthetic (x


that the project =4.48,
̅ SD=0.05).

Table 19. Perception of the Respondents as to Workability


Experts End-user Composite
Indicators
Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD VI
4.80 0.42 HA 4.70 0.47 HA 4.75 0.03 HA
1. availability of materials
2.availability of tools and equipment
3. availability of technical experts for 4.70 0.48 HA 4.77 0.43 HA 4.73 0.04 HA
maintenance
4.90 0.32 VA 4.67 0.48 HA 4.78 0.12 HA

Overall 4.80 0.08 HA 4.71 0.03 HA 4.76 0.05 HA Likert scale: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable
(HA), 3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA), 2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A), 1.80-2,60- Fairly acceptable (FA), 1.00-1.80- Not
acceptable (NA)

Table 19 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability of the

Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for

community in terms of Safety. The data revealed that the two groups of respondents rated

as “High Acceptable” which means that there is availability of materials (x


=4.78,
̅
SD=0.12), availability of tools and equipment (x
=4.75,
̅ SD=0.03), availability of technical

experts for maintenance (x


=4.73,
̅ SD=0.04). However, the overall rating of the experts as

to Workability (x=4.80, SD=0.08) was higher than the perception of the end-user (x
̅ =4.71,
̅

52

SD=0.03). The findings further highlighted that the two groups of respondents rated as

“High Acceptable” which implies that the project design was “Acceptable” as to its

Workability (x
̅=4.76, SD=0.05).

Table 20. Perception of the Respondents as to Durability

Indicators Experts End-user Composite Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD


VI
1. Quality of materials 4.40 0.52 HA 4.67 0.55 HA 4.53 0.02 HA
2. Quality of functionality
4.40 0.52 HA 4.63 0.56 HA 4.52 0.03 HA

3. Duration of use 4.30 0.48 HA 4.67 0.55 HA 4.48 0.04 HA Overall 4.37 0.02 HA
4.66 0.01 HA 4.51 0.01 HA
Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 20 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability of the

Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for

community in terms of Durability. The data revealed that the two groups of respondents

rated as “High Acceptable”which means that there is Quality of materials (x


=4.52,
̅
SD=0.03), Quality of functionality (x=4.53, SD=0.02), duration of use (x
̅ =4.48,
̅

However, the overall rating of the end-user as to Durability (x


SD=0.04). =4.66,
̅ SD=0.01)

than the perception of the expert (x


was higher =4.37,
̅ SD=0.02). The findings further

highlighted that the two groups of respondents mentioned “High Acceptable” and that

was “Acceptable” as to its Durability (x


the project design =4.51,
̅ SD=0.01).

53

Table 21. Perception of the Respondents as to Marketability

Indicators Experts End-user Composite Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD


VI
1. In terms of materials used 2. In terms of 4.50 0.53 HA 4.60 0.50 HA 4.55 0.02 HA
time use to
assemble the prototype
3. In terms of performances of the
prototype on live testing 4.50 0.53 HA 4.67 0.48 HA 4.58 0.03 HA
4.30 0.95 VA 4.73 0.45 HA 4.52 0.35 HA

Overall 4.43 0.24 HA 4.67 0.02 HA 4.55 0.19 HA


Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 21 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability

of the Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for

community in terms of Marketability. The data revealed that the two groups of

rated as “High Acceptable” which means that materials used is (x


respondents =4.52,
̅
used to assemble the prototype is (x
SD=0.35), time =4.55,
̅ SD=0.02), terms of

prototype on live testing is (x


performances of the =4.58,
̅ SD=0.03). However, the overall

as to Marketability (x
rating of the experts =4.43,
̅ SD=0.24) was lower than the perception

(x
of the end-user =4.67,
̅ SD=0.02). The findings further highlighted that the two groups of

respondents rated as “High acceptable” and that the project design was “Acceptable”

and so its

marketability is (x
=4.55,
̅ SD=0.19).
54

Table 22. Perception of the Respondents as to Safety

Indicators Experts End-user Composite Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD


VI
1. Absence of 4.60 0.52 HA 4.70 0.53 HA 4.65 0.01 HA
harmful
substances and materials
2. Absence of sharp edges
present on the device 4.40 0.52 HA 4.53 0.57 HA 4.47 0.04 HA
3. Availability of emergency switch when
an error occurs
4.60 0.52 HA 4.67 0.61 HA 4.63 0.06 HA

Overall 4.53 0 HA 4.67 0.04 HA 4.58 0.03 HA


Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 22 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability

of the Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for

community in terms of Safety. The data revealed that the two groups of respondents rated
as “High acceptable” which means that there is the absence of harmful substances and

materials which is (x=4.63, SD=0.06), absence of sharp edges on the device (x


̅ =4.65,
̅

SD=0.01), 3. Availability of emergency switch when an error occurs (x


=4.47,
̅ SD=0.04).

However, the overall rating of the experts as to Safety (x


=4.53,
̅ SD=0) was lower than the

perception of the end-user (x


=4.67,
̅ SD=0.04). The findings further highlighted that the

two groups of respondents answered “High acceptable” which means that the project

design was “Acceptable” as to its Safety (x


=4.58,
̅ SD=0.03).

55

Table 23. Perception of the Respondents as to Overall

Indicators Experts End-user Composite Mean SD VI Mean SD VI Mean SD


VI
1. Functionality 4.67 0.02 HA 4.80 0.04 HA 4.73 0.04 HA 2. Aesthetic 4.30 0.11 HA
4.66 0.03 HA 4.48 0.05 HA 3. Workability 4.80 0.08 HA 4.71 0.03 HA 4.76 0.05 HA
4. Durability 4.37 0.02 HA 4.66 0.01 HA 4.51 0.01 HA 5. Marketability 4.43 0.24 HA
4.67 0.02 HA 4.55 0.19 HA 6. Safety 4.53 0 HA 4.67 0.04 HA 4.58 0.03 HA Overall
4.53 0.09 HA 4.70 0.01 HA 4.60 0.06 HA
Legend: 4.21-5.00- High Acceptable (HA)
3.41-4.20 Very Acceptable (VA)
2.61-3.40- Acceptable (A)
1.80-2.60-Fairly acceptable (FA)
1.00-1.80- Not acceptable (NA)

Table 23 shows the summary of the respondent’s perceptions on the acceptability

of the Sanitizing Device with Automatic Refilling Solution and Temperature Scanner for

community in terms of Safety. The data revealed that the two groups of respondents gave

a rating “Highly acceptable” for the Functionality (x=4.73, SD=0.04), aesthetic (x


̅ ̅=4.48,
SD=0.05), Workability (x=4.76, SD=0.05) Durability (x
̅ 4.51,
̅ SD=0.01), Marketability

(x=4.55, SD=0.19), safety (x


̅ ̅=4.58, SD=0.03). However, the overall rating of the experts

as to Overall (x=4.53, SD=0.09) was lower than the perception of the end-user (x
̅ =4.60,
̅

SD=0.06). The findings further highlighted that the the prototype was “Highly

acceptable” on all the criterion as described in the research instrument having the average

mean of4.60 (SD=0.06).

Table 24. T-test Equality of Means


t-test for Equality of Means
95% Cl of the Diff.
GROUP Group Mean Mean
Interpretatio
SD
t Sig. n
Uppe Experts 4.67 0.38 Diff.
r 0.288 Low er
End

Users 4.80 Not


0.32 - -
Function - 0.11 7 Significant
1.07 9 0.38 4
ality 0.133 56
Experts 4.30 -
Aesthetic 0.43 - 0.030 - -
End- Significant
s 0.43 0.67 5
0.356
Users 4.66 2.25 3 0.03 6
Experts 4.80 0.320.69 Not
Workabil 0.34
-
End
Significant Users 4.71 0.36
ity 0.17 0 8
6 0.491 0.089
Experts 4.37 -
Not
Durabilit 0.46 - 0.079 - 0.03
End
Significant Users 4.66 0.43
y 1.80 0.42 - 0.61 3
3 - 0.05
0.289 0.103 -
Marketa Experts 4.43
6
Not
End
Significant Users 4.67 0.37
bility Experts 4.53 -
1.67 0.48 - 0.25
0.572 - 0
0
0.233 0.51 6 Not
Safety
End
Significant Users 4.63 0.48
0.56 9 0.45 6
0.100 6

The perceived level of acceptability from the groups on the sanitizing device with

automatic refilling solution and temperature scanner in term of functionality, workability,

durability and safety, have no significant difference of acceptability between the two

groups of respondents. The technical expert and end-users have found the aesthetics of the

sanitizing device with automatic refilling solution and temperature scanner is significant,

for both groups have misunderstood that the device is mainly designed to accomplish it`s

functions on preventing the spread of the virus, that there was not much time or resources

to improve on the device appearances. As a result of the performance presentation, both

groups of respondents were highly satisfied with the device functionality, aesthetic,

workability, durability, marketability, and safety of the sanitizing device with automatic

refilling solution and temperature scanner. This confirms that the sanitizing device with

automatic refilling solution and temperature scanner was accepted by the technical expert

and end-user.

57

CHAPTER V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS


This Chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusion and recommendations

of the study

Summary of Findings

The study utilized developmental-descriptive type of research using quantitative

approach. The researchers assessed the product design through the two group of

respondents using the survey questionnaire. The project design was assessed in terms of

the layout, concept, appropriateness and value by thirty (39) randomly selected

respondents divided into two groups. The first group was from selected students from the

Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo City Campus and the second group were

selected Technical Expert in San Pablo City, Laguna.

The significant findings of the study are as follows:

1. Majority of the end-user respondents were, 20-30 years old (f=20, %=100), male

(f=16, %=53.33), students (f=30, %=100). Moreover, majority of the experts were

either, 20-30, 31-40 or 51-60 years old (f=3, %=30), male (f =3, %=30),

2. In terms of the level of acceptability, the design of the sanitizing device with

automatic refilling solution and temperature scanner was found out to be “Highly

Acceptable” as perceived by the respondents in terms of Functionality (x


=4.73,
̅

SD=0.04), Aesthetics (x=4.48, SD=0.5), Workability (x


̅ =4.76,
̅ SD=0.05),

58

Durability (x=4.51, SD=0.01), Marketability ((x


̅ =4.55,
̅ SD=0.19), and Safety
(x
=4.58,
̅ SD=0.03),

3. The test of difference revealed that is no significant difference between the

perceived level of acceptability of the two groups of respondents on the sanitizing

devices in terms Functionality (p=0.76), Aesthetics (p=0.03), Workability

(p=0.49), Durability (p=0.29), Marketability (p=0.23), Safety(p=0.57).

Conclusions

Based on the findings of the study, the sanitizing device with automatic refilling

solution and temperature scanner that was developed by the researchers was functional

and accurate. The results of the evaluation imply that the device has passed its

functionality, aesthetic, workability, durability, marketability, and safety for the

community.

Recommendations

The following are highly recommended for future researchers:

1. The use of alternative power source such as the integration of solar power panel

maybe used to lessen electricity bill.

2. A more accurate level sensor may be used to increase the performance and

accuracy of the project design.

3. Provision of an intruder alarm and sensor is also suggested.

4. Installation of caster wheels may be done to make the device to be easily

transported

59
5. Other types of LCD monitor may be used to improve the design and aesthetics of

the prototype

60

LITERATURE CITED

World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), (2020). Retrieve form


https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and
answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR1m5m
rOrZ_NfG0x_q_-rFxqSv1lVl3u2TOY_kvjGHOT3UtiZpb6igX7mo

World Health Organization, Coronavirus, (2020). https://www.who.int/health


topics/coronavirus?fbclid=IwAR11y3j-C
gl4W0TPtRkSEc3mCBO4yTDpIbFBU2tCS5IJ7dZxVdTnrsGR1

Healthcare informatics research, Design of Automatic Hand Sanitizer System Compatible


with Various Containers, (2020).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438695/?fbclid=IwAR1
i1F39EcPlXD5hbwLOZuPCokVI9m6yoUzdTKTFWiGgOP8DoX5aKEF_FwY

Trerice, (2001). “Temperature sensor”, Retrieve form


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http%3A%2F%2Fww
w.cpinc.com%2FTrerice%2FTemperature%2F63%2520-
%252064%2520temperature.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiW79vq7onuAhXBIqYKHbqIA
FgQFjABegQIAhAF&usg=AOvVaw3LMyBUnFrnfZIX9vo3Ubrq&cshid=16100
24094097&fbclid=IwAR3mpoUlMn_iquUyJiy7zv7LMtH5kFF0b8HlJQTmVsuC
1kkJrCsxqpaiAk

Exon Medical Equipment, (2020). “Automatic Hand Sanitizer Dispenser”, Retrieve form
https://exonmedical.com/index.php/en/covid-19/automatic-hand-sanitizer
dispenser?fbclid=IwAR20uiF6jSOvFKmBWJ-TU4fStkFXnrtzJvKp
DfiIGRzEcECedcZ49aX-K0

Source floor & Specialties Inc., (2020). “How Effective Are Sanitizing Entrance Mats In
Fighting Germs and Bacteria” https://www.sourcefloor.com/how-effective-are
sanitizing-entrance-mats-in-fighting-germs-and-bacteria/

Omidi, J., (2015). “Sanitizing floor mat”, Retrieve from


https://patents.google.com/patent/US8973197B2/en

Notrax, B., (2020). “The Importance of Sanitizing Shoes during COVID-19”, Retrieve
from https://www.notrax.eu/blog/the-importance-of-sanitizing-shoes-during-covid
19/
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, (2014). “Non-Contact
Thermometers for Detecting Fever: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness”, Retrieve
from. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25520984/

Rogers, K., (2006). “Hand sanitizer”, Retrieve from


https://www.britannica.com/topic/hand-sanitizer
61

Ashok, S.B. et al., (2007). “Sanitizing Device and Associated Method Using
Electrochemically Produced Sanitizing Agents”, Retrieve form
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20070141434A1/en

Collins. J., (2016). “Sanitizing floor mat”, Retrieve from.


https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160015844A1/en

Kacera, A. J., Pulley jr, M., (1972). “Shoe cleaning mat assembly”, Retrieve form.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3696459A/en

Michael, T. D., (2005). “Anti-microbial floor mat” Retrieve form


https://patents.google.com/patent/US6886210B2/en

DERMALOG Identification Systems GmbH, (2021). “Increasing Safety with Biometric


Temperature Screening”. Retrieve form.
https://www.dermalog.com/products/hardware/body
temperaturecamera/?gclid=Cj0KCQiAx9mABhD0ARIsAEfpavTQUR_pXvU0Ry
uwBcNY5fMeO57FH4YOYwCO1X1U_UXbR6ePwRRWC4aAuVSEALw_wcB

MedlinePlus, (2018). “body temperature”. Retrieve form


https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001982.htm2021?fbclid=IwAR3oUmoM922
- jCS4sYfkFqfEUhhG_YC8u6VtrO6TnX-Y7ItXeiGfNMb1TJI
mayo clinic, (2021). “Fever: first aid”, Retrieve form
https://www.mayoclinic.org/first-aid/first-aid-fever/basics/art-20056685
Rawat, A. S., et al., (2021). “Automated Sanitizer & Temperature Anomaly Detector
“Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department”. International Journal of
Innovative Science and Research Technology.
https://www.ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT21MAY252.pdf

Sivaprasad, R., (2021). “Automated Hand Sanitizer Dispenser Integrated with


Contactless Temperature Gun and Pulse Oximeter”. TURCOMAT.
https://www.turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/6374

“The Importance of Sanitizing Shoes during COVID-19”, (April 27, 2020). Notrax
https://www.notrax.eu/blog/the-importance-of-sanitizing-shoes-during-covid-19/
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, (November 20, 2014). “Non
Contact Thermometers for Detecting Fever: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness?”.
Retrieve form. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25520984/
Rogers k., (2006). “Hand sanitizer”. Retrieve form
https://www.britannica.com/topic/hand-sanitizer
Hadaway, A., (February 11, 2020). “Handwashing: Clean Hands Save Lives”. Retrieve
form
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15398285.2019.1710981?journalCo
de=wchi20&fbclid=IwAR1wFtA1Tm-JNPgt6VK0f3-
vkSVhFp2BD51QQQFF7J7Q18tTUGOA8-MdSwI&
62

“Hand washing and hand hygiene” (2020). Nidirect


https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/hand-washing-and-hand-hygiene
Lee J. et al, (July 31, 2020). “Design of Automatic Hand Sanitizer System Compatible
with Various Containers”. The Korean Society of Medical Informatics.
https://synapse.koreamed.org/articles/1144872?viewtype=pubreader
Samal, P., et al., (December 3, 2020). “Automated Sanitization Device – Hand
Sanitization, Thermal Screening and IoT-based Web-database”. Chitkara
university. http://3.214.134.51/jotitt/index.php/jotitt/article/view/148
Esenowo, K., (2020). “Design of an Intelligent Multifunction Corona Virus Prevention
and Monitoring System Model with Biometric Identification System”.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=2014&q=Desi
gn+of+an+Intelligent+Multifunction+Corona+Virus+Prevention+and+Monitoring
+System+Model+with+Biometric+Identification+System&btnG=
Lesmana, J., et al., (August 4, 2020). “Design of automatic hand sanitizer with ultrasonic
sensor”. IOP Publishing Ltd. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-
899X/1007/1/012164/meta

Johnson, M., et al., (2021). “Antimicrobial Properties of Commercial Hand


Sanitizers”. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33658274/

Ashok, J., et al., (August 14, 2008). “SANITIZING DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED
METHOD USING ELECTROCHEMICALLY PRODUCED SANITIZING
AGENTS”.
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2008097567
Kureca, A. J., Monroe, Pulley jr, M., (2020). “Shoe cleaning mat assembly”. Notrax
justrite safety group. https://www.notrax.com/blog/disinfecting-shoes-workplace
floor-mats/
Shailesh, S., et al., (2021). “Shoe Sanitization Machine”. International Journal of Research
in Engineering, Science and Management
https://www.journals.resaim.com/ijresm/article/download/886/855/1442
Tadikonda, C., (2021). “Smart Sanitizer Disperser with Level Monitoring”. Turkish
Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT).
https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/7509

Chandler, S., (July 29, 2020). “Smart Hand Sanitizer Offers Extra Protection Against
Coronavirus”. forbes.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/simonchandler/2020/07/29/
world-first-smart-hand-sanitizer-promises-extra-coronavirus-protection/amp/
“Benefits of Using a Hand Sanitizer Dispenser” (May 18, 2018). Honey bucket.
https://www.honeybucket.com/blog/benefits-of-a-hand-sanitizer-dispenser/
63

Deepak, V., (2020). “importance of automatic hand sanitizers to improve health and
hygiene of individuals during pandemic”
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Importance+of+Aut
omatic+Hand+Sanitizer+to+Improve+Health+and+Hygiene+of+Individuals+Duri
ng+Pandemic&btnG=
Faivre, I., (March 13, 2018). “The Importance of Hand Sanitizer Placement in the
Workplace” https://www.google.com/amp/s/info.debgroup.com/blog/the
importance-of-hand-sanitizer-placement-in-the-workplace%3fhs_amp=true
Maker.io Staff, (November 25, 2020). “Make an Automatic Hand Sanitizer Dispenser
Using Arduino” https://www.digikey.ph/en/maker/blogs/2020/make-an-automatic
hand-sanitizer-dispenser-using-arduino
Singh, G., (April 2020). “COVID 19: Myths and Facts”
https://www.re/searchgate.net/publication/340479742_COVID_19_Myths_and_Fa
cts
Elsayir, H. A., (2014). Comparison of precision of systematic sampling with some other
probability samplings. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics,
3(4), 111-116.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285598831_Comparison_of_Precision_o
f_Systematic_Sampling_with_Some_other_Probability_Samplings
64

APPENDICES
Appendices A
Survey questionnaire
EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

Name: (optional) _________________________________


Instruction: Please evaluate the prototype by using the given scale and placing a
checkmark (/) under the corresponding numerical rating.

5 Highly Acceptable
4 Very Acceptable
3 Acceptable
2 Fairly Acceptable
1 Not Acceptable
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1

A. Functionality

1. Easy to use

2. Convenience of the device multiple functions

3. Placement of the device

B. Aesthetics

1. Appearance of the device

2. Manageability of the size

3. Color used on the device

C. Workability

1. Availability of materials

2. Availability of tools and equipment

3. Availability of technical experts for maintenance

D. Durability

1. Quality of materials

2. Quality of functionality

3. Duration of use

E. Marketability

1. In terms of the materials used

2. In terms of time used to assemble the prototype

3. In terms of performance of the prototype on live testing

F. Safety

1. Absence of harmful substances and materials

2. Absence of sharp edges present on the device


3. Availability of emergency switch when an error occurs

Comments/Suggestions:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________
Appendix B
65

Programming (Arduino IDE)


66
67

Appendix C
Schematic diagram
68

Appendix D
Construction of prototype

Assembly of chassis
and container
Setting of programs

Wiring
installation

Designing of prototype

Finish
prototype
69

Appendix E
Evaluation Result
Indicators 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

A. Functionality

1. Easy to use 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

2. Convenience of 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
the device multiple
functions

3. Placement of 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
the device

B. Aesthetics

1. Appearance of 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5
the device

2. Manageability 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
of the size

3. Color used on 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4
the device

C. Workability

1. Availability of 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
materials

2. Availability of 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
tools and
equipment

3. Availability of 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4
technical experts
for maintenance

D. Durability

1. Quality of materials 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

2. Quality of 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
functionality

3. Duration of use 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 5

E. Marketability

1. In terms of the 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5
materials used

2. In terms of time 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5
used to assemble
the prototype

3. In terms of 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5
performance of
the prototype on
live
testing

F. Safety

You might also like