NAME OF EDITOR : Maya Lestari PEER EDITOR’S COMMENTS AND

NAME OF AUTHOR:Gite Saputri SUGGESTIONS

GENERAL
1. What do you like best about this
paragraph?
 I like how you……….
 As a reader, it was enjoyable
when you…..
 I was impressed with …..
ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT
2. Topic sentence: is there a clear topic
sentence? Does it have a controlling
idea?
3. Supporting sentences: is the main idea
clear? Does the writer need to add
more details to explain it?
4. Concluding sentence: is there a
concluding sentence? does it begin
with an appropriate end-of-paragraph
signal?
SENTENCE STRUCTURE
5. Are there any unclear sentences? Can 5.In the paragraphs the author has written that
you suggest a way to improve them?
1. I like the title that the author chose
about the influence of regional
languages on campus with students,
but here the author has not neatly
arranged the flow of the text he wrote
so that the reader does not know the
direction and purpose of the author
writing this, and in the first paragraph
the author immediately explains the
meaning based on the law law but did
not include the law of what year and
what number.
2.In every paragraph made by the author
there is a topic sentence. The topic
sentence made by the author is also quite
clear, so that readers can more easily find
the topic sentence made by the author.
And every sentence in the text can be
understood.
3. Quite clear, but here maybe the author
can add more ideas that are made so that
the flow and subject matter conveyed is
more detailed and concrete about the
influence of the use of discussion on
campus among students
4. the concluding sentence in the last
paragraph already exists and it is clear
about the impact of using language on
campus, but here the author can also add a
more design conclusion about the use of
language on campus, both suggestions for
its impact and criticism
the impact of using foreign languages on
campus is very clear in each paragraph, so
that they can be read and understood very
well

GRAMMAR AND MECHANICS

6. Are there any errors in grammar and 6. In my opinion there were no fatal errors
 mechanics (spelling, punctuation, and made by the author, both in terms of
capitalization)? paragraphs and in terms of spelling,
punctuation, and the use of capital letters,
maybe there were only slight improvements
in some parts. Correct commas and
capitalization that are wrong and fix the
appropriate sentence structure
REFERENCING
7. Are there any errors in the format of 7. The writing of the author's references is
reference? quite good, all the elements needed have been
fulfilled such as name, year of publisher, book
title, maybe the writing can be improved a
little
PEER FEEDBACK ACTIVITY