Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright © 2020
La Union Schools Division
Region I
All rights reserved. No part of this module may be reproduced in any form
without written permission from the copyright owners.
Management Team:
1
Module
Writing A Critique or A Review
7
Jumpstart
A critique is a genre of academic writing that briefly summarizes and critically
evaluates a work or concept. Critiques can be used to convey a balanced view on a
variety of works such as creative works (novels, exhibits, films, images, poetry),
research (monographs, journal articles, systematic review, theories), media (news
reports, feature articles), and events or programs.
Remember that a critique should be accessible to the audience or readers.
Therefore, it is very helpful for them to be provided with background information. In
this manner, the writer should have a vast knowledge on a particular work or at
least have researched on it.
2
information you gathered. Use may cut reviews on printed sources like newspapers
and paste it on a separate sheet.
Strengths Weaknesses
Remember this!
Critiques are an important rhetorical pattern in academic writing as they
present a balanced view of things. Critiques, however, are based not only on
personal perspective but should be grounded on actual observations. Here are some
tips in developing your critique.
1. Critique should provide readers or audience an overview of a work or a
concept. Therefore, it is your job to provide sufficient information such as the
central ideas of a book, concept, event /program, or movie to be critiqued.
2. Relating your critique to greater realities will also help as you ground your
critique on the wider scheme of things. For example, what subject/theme
does the movie, concept, book, or event address? Are there questions that
people constantly ask that this particular subject/theme you are reviewing
can answer?
Discover
In this section of the lesson, you will be provided with instructions on how to
do reviews. What makes a review or critique very interesting is how logical the ideas
are when presented to the readers. In general, a critique or review should be
organized in the following manner:
1. Introduction
2. Body
3. Conclusion
Take this one!
Do a product review. The product may be a gadget, a piece of clothing or
garment, or a popular item used among the young generation. Or you may choose
one topic listed in Activity 1 at the Jumpstart page. Fill out the table by answering
the questions in the second column.
3
Parts of a
Guide Questions Answers
Review
______________________________________________________________________________
If you have finally picked one, then, you are ready to proceed to the next
lessons. Keep in mind that you have to have a rich background of your topic. You
can do that by researching printed and online sources. Keep important notes. You
will need them in the next lessons. Remember to keep your references for your
4
citations later on. Also, for your online sources, make sure that you copy and save
the links because you will be needing them when you compile and create the
reference list.
Deepen
In this lesson, you will be guided to write your own introduction, body and
conclusion. Study the sample activities and answer the questions for you to be able
to get familiar with the parts of a review or a critique.
Questions:
5
1. Why was the review conducted in the first place?
________________________________________________________________________
b. _________________________________________________________________
c. _________________________________________________________________
d. _________________________________________________________________
Activity 1: Show-Me More
Directions: Based on the prompts and information you gathered from sources
about the topic you picked. Fill out the table below and draft the introduction of
your review. Remember to go back to the tips in writing an introduction listed in the
previous page. If the spaces in the table are not enough, you may use separate sheet
for your answers.
Recent developments in
the world and in the
country or even in the
community where you
belong.
6
Writing the Body of a Review
After providing an overview in the introduction part, it is important to provide
informed insights on the central features. This is the part that connects the
introduction and the body of your review. The body of a review comprises 70% of the
entire review. This is because details and insights will be elaborated and explained
in this part. The informed insights should focus on highlights of the work or
product. For example, weakness or strengths should be based on what is observable
and comparable to other items of the same class.
Some expressions below will help you in presenting strengths and weaknesses.
Illustrating Strengths
Given its features, X may be the best among the competition because…
X does not only provide (enumerate common features found in other counterparts)
but also (enumerate unique features)
Illustrating Weaknesses
However, X may not be a wise choice if you intend to … (Cite specific activities of
features needed by a specific user or audience.)
In certain cases, X lacks some interesting points such as … (Cite specific features
or qualities.)
X may not appeal to certain users or audience as it … (Cite specific features or
qualities.)
Consider the following sample statements.
Sample 1:
The smartphone has an eight megapixel camera supported
by both Bluetooth technology and wireless applications. These features
are standard among modern phones, so that the higher price is not justified.
Sample 2:
The movie is worth seeing because it features not only talented actors but
also tells an excellent story filled with unexpected twists.
7
Explore
Identifying the strengths or weaknesses of a particular work or product is
actually part of the process called critical evaluation. Critical evaluation should give
a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work,
evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose of the work or
product. For example, you would assess the plot structure, characterization and
setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition, brush
strokes, color, and light; a critique of a research project would look at the subject
selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions.
A critical evaluation does not simply highlight negative impressions. It should
deconstruct the work and identify both strengths and weaknesses. It should
examine the work and evaluate its success, in light of its purpose.
Here are examples of critical questions that could help your assessment.
1. Who is the creator? Is the work presented objectively or subjectively?
2. What are the aims of the work? Were the aims achieved?
3. What techniques, styles, media were used in the work? Are they effective
in portraying the purpose?
4. What assumptions underlie the work? Do they affect its validity?
5. What type of evidence or persuasion are used? Has evidence been
interpreted fairly?
6. How is the work structure? Does it favor a particular interpretation or
point of view? Is it effective?
7. Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas or theories? Does the
work engage (or fail to engage) with key concepts or other works in its
discipline?
This evaluation is written in formal academic style and logically presented.
Group your ideas into paragraphs. Start with broad impressions first and then move
into details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the
strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses. In longer critiques, you may wish
to discuss the positive and negative of each key critical questions in individual
paragraphs.
To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a
quote, example, or research-based facts. You can also cite evidences from related
sources. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.
Activity 1: Support Me
Directions: Given the following ideas, write a sentence that uses a citation to
strengthen specific claims.
1. Claim/Comment: The movie is good for younger audiences.
Cited Information: Torres (1990) emphasized positive values as an indicator of
favorable viewership for younger audiences.
Revised sentence:
___________________________________________________________________________
8
___________________________________________________________________________
2. Claim/Comment: the car can sustain higher speed for several hours. Cited
information: As seen in several lab tests, the car is not only efficient in fuel
consumption but it is quite fast compared to its competitors (Santos, 2009).
Revised sentence:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
9
also in specific locales. Therefore, this can help in making sense of one’s data
through adequate examples.
The book is intended as suitable introduction for graduate students and
researchers interested in exploring the complexities of news discourse, as it
provides input, a list of readings and additional activities for research. It also
integrates several theoretical and methodological perspectives, giving readers
a free hand on deciding which approach to employ in analyzing their own
data. Overall, this book, which is part of the Continuum series of books
covering areas of discourse, is a valuable contribution for the enrichment of
scholarship concerning news discourse.
Guide Questions:
1. Is the recommendation of the book positive or negative? Cite specific
information to support your answer.
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
2. What consideration did the author mention for the readers to consider in
reading the book?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Activity 2: It’s Your Turn
Directions: Prepare a draft for the conclusion of your review. Fill out the table below
to help you in writing your draft. Use another sheet for your answers.
10
Gauge
Finally, it is time to complete your review. Here is a checklist that you may
consider in finalizing your review or critique.
Have I:
1. Mentioned the name of the work, the date of its creation and the name of the
creator?
2. Accurately summarized the work being critiqued?
3. Mainly focused on the critical evaluation of the work?
4. Systematically outlined an evaluation of each element of the work to achieve
the overall purpose?
5. Used evidence, from the work itself as well as other sources, to back and
illustrate my assessment of elements of the work?
6. Formed an overall evaluation of the work, based on critical reading?
7. Used a well-structured introduction, body, and conclusion?
8. Used correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation; clear presentation and
appropriate referencing style?
In the process of editing and reviewing your critique, it is best to ask feedback
from friends and teacher about your work. You can have them answer the
statements below. Or you may send your manuscript and have them comment on it.
1. I think the review is _____________________ because _________________________.
However, it may be good to improve the following points: ________________
__________________________________________________________________________.
11
References
Printed Materials:
Saqueton, Grace M. & Uychoco, Marikit Tara A. (2016). Chapter 1: The Reaction
Paper, English for Academic and Professional Purposes (pp 57-68). First
Edition. Quezon City, Philippines: Rex Bookstore Inc.
Website:
Lacuata, Rose Carmelle, (2015). Review: ‘Heneral Luna’ shows human side of hero.
Retrieved on July 23, 2020 from https://news.abs-
cbn.com/lifestyle/09/06/15/review-heneral-luna-shows-human-side-hero
Tsui, Clarence. (2015). ‘Heneral Luna’: Film Review. Retrieve on July 23, 2020 from
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/heneral-luna-film-review 831202
Valdez, Paolo Niño M. (2014). “Review of News Discourse by Monica Bednarek &
Helen Caple”. Discourse Studies. 16(2) 317-318. Retrieved on July 23, 2020
from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445613518868d
Writing a Critique. (n.d.) QUT Cite/Write. Retrieved July 22, 2020 from
https://www.citewrite.qut.ed.au/write/critique.jsp#
Zinampan, Tristan, (2015). Movie Review: Heneral Luna. Retrieved July 23, 2020
from http://www.filmpolicereviews.com/reviews/heneral-luna
12