Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office No. VIII
DIVISION OF NORTHERN SAMAR
CATARMAN

CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION DIVISION (CID)

TABLE OF SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE

School: Siljagon National High School District: Mapanas School Year: 2022-2023
Subject: English Grading Period: 3rd Quarter Grade & Section: 8a/8b

Learning Competencies % Time COGNITIVE DIMENSIONS TOTAL

Composition Devoted Remembering Understandin Applying Analyzing Evaluating
g
1. Examine biases (for or against) made by the author
EN8RC-IIIg-3.1.12 15.625% 5 2 2 2 2 1 9
2. Recognize propaganda techniques used in a given text
3. Analyze intention of words or expressions used in propaganda 15.625%
techniques EN8V-IIIg-26 5 2 2 2 2 1 9
4. Determine various social, moral, and economic issues discussed
in the text listened to EN8LC-IIIh-7.4 15.625% 5 1 1 2 2 2 8

5. Appreciate literature as a mirror to a shared heritage of people

with diverse backgrounds 18.75% 6 1 1 2 2 2 8

6. Use appropriate cohesive devices in various types of speech

15.625% 5 0 0 4 4 0 8
7. Use parallel structures EN8G-Ia-7 18.75% 6 0 0 4 4 0 8
TOTAL 100% 32 6 6 16 16 6 50

Prepared by: Checked by: Noted:

JEPHER MARK N. PECSON, T-I CARMELIA S. LAODENIO, MT-I RODULFO F. TENEDERO

English Teacher Academic Department Head School Head
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office No. VIII
DIVISION OF NORTHERN SAMAR
CATARMAN

CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION DIVISION (CID)

TABLE OF SPECIFICATION TEMPLATE

School: Siljagon National High School District: Mapanas School Year: 2022-2023
Subject: English Grading Period: 3rd Quarter Grade & Section: 10a/10b

Learning Competencies % Time COGNITIVE DIMENSIONS TOTAL

Composition Devoted Remembering Understandin Applying Analyzing Evaluating
g
1. Compose an argumentative essay EN10WC-IIh-13 20 4 2 2 2 2 2 10

2. Use a variety of informative, persuasive, and argumentative 40 8 4 4 4 4 4 20

writing techniques EN10WC-IIIb-14.1.2

3. Compose an independent critique of a chosen selection 20 4 2 2 2 2 2 10

4. Critique a literary selection based on the following approaches: - 20 4 2 2 2 2 2 10

structuralist/formalist

TOTAL 100% 20 10 10 10 10 10 50

Prepared by: Checked by: Noted:

JEPHER MARK N. PECSON, T-I CARMELIA S. LAODENIO, MT-I RODULFO F. TENEDERO

English Teacher Academic Department Head School Head