The Impact of pandemic to 3rd year Science student of SJCC: Challenges and Opportunities

for Quality Education

What's the essence of your proposed study?

- The substance of the study is look at the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on the nature of training
for third-year science understudies at SJCC, recognizing both the difficulties looked by the understudies
and the valuable open doors that arose because of the pandemic.

The study could mean to comprehend the particular difficulties looked by third-year science
understudies at SJCC during the pandemic, like the shift to web based learning, interruptions to
scholastic and individual lives, and absence of admittance to assets and emotionally supportive
networks. The study could also investigate the opportunities provided by the pandemic, such as the
growth of students' new skills and competencies, the increased utilization of technology in education,
and novel teaching and learning strategies.

Surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions are all possible research methods for this study.
Qualitative or quantitative methods could be used to analyze the collected data to discover themes,
trends, and patterns in the responses. The study's findings could help educators and policymakers better
understand the pandemic's challenges and opportunities and develop strategies to address them,
influencing educational policies and practices at SJCC and elsewhere.

Who will be your respondents? Do you think they will cooperate?

- The SJCC third-year science students would be the intended respondents. These students can
provide valuable insights into the difficulties and opportunities they have faced because they
have experienced the effects of the pandemic on their education.

We conducted the survey and approached respondents in terms of cooperation. It is crucial to

ensure that respondents are aware of the study's objective and how their participation will
contribute to it. The respondents' confidentiality and privacy should also be respected, and
their participation should be entirely voluntary.

We employ a variety of strategies to maximize cooperation, including using concise language,

offering incentives for participation, maintaining anonymity, and establishing rapport with
respondents. We also think about the ethical implications of their research and make sure they
get the right permissions and informed consent from the right people and people who took
part in it.

If approved, how many months would you take to finish this study?
-The proposed study, titled "The Impact of the Pandemic to Third-Year SJCC Science Students: The
completion of "Challenges and Opportunities for Quality Education" is likely to take between seven and
twelve months. The researcher will identify research questions, objectives, and the methodology to be
used during the initial stage of planning and proposal development, which can take anywhere from one
to two months. The researcher will recruit participants and collect data through surveys, interviews,
focus group discussions, and document analysis during the second stage of participant recruitment and
data collection, which could take anywhere from two to three months. The researcher will then identify
patterns and themes related to the research questions during data analysis, which will take two to three
months. The researcher will interpret the results, draw conclusions, and prepare a report summarizing
the study's objectives, methods, findings, and implications over the course of one to two months.
Finally, the researcher will share the study's findings with relevant stakeholders via conference
presentations, journal articles, or presentations to the school community, which may take another 1-2
months.