Gre Eec C 99 CL P 07822 12 029 02

GRE CODE
GRE.EEC.C.99.CL.P.07822.12.029.02
PAGE
Egineering & Construction 1 di/of 2
TITLE: AVAILABLE LANGUAGE: EN
Structural calculation
report for cabin
File: GRE.EEC.C.99.CL.P.07822.12.029.02
02 08/06/20 Structural calculation report for cabin M. Fiori M. Fiori E. Martagni
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED VERIFIED APPROVED
GRE VALIDATION
Sergio Saavedra Nicolas Burdiles
COLLABORATORS VERIFIED BY VALIDATED BY
PROJECT / PLANT
GRE CODE
Sol De Lila GROUP FUNCION TYPE ISSUER COUNTRY TEC PLANT SYSTEM PROGRESSIVE REVISION
GRE EEC C 9 9 C L P 0 7 8 2 2 1 2 0 2 9 0 2
CLASSIFICATION FOR VALIDATION UTILIZATION SCOPE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
This document is property of Enel Green Power S.p.A. It is strictly forbidden to reproduce this document, in whole or in part, and to provide to others any related information
without the previous written consent by Enel Green Power S.p.A.
Antofagasta District
TECHNICAL REPORT
STRUCTURAL CALCULATION FILE
CABIN FOR TECHNOLOGICAL ROOM
OGGETTO: SOL DE LILA SOLAR CAMP
COMMITTENTE: EUROLAM s.r.l. Branch office in Via Marconi, 350

41028 Serramazzoni (MO) - Italy
The Structural Designer
_________________________
2
1. SYNTHETIC ILLUSTRATION OF THE PROJECT PATH ........................................................................... 4
1.1. PLACEMENT OF THE STRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 4
1.2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 5
1.3. TECHNICAL REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................ 6
1.4. PROJECT PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................. 6
1.5. TYPEAND CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURAL MATERIALS ........................................................ 12
1.6. CALCULATION CODE.................................................................................................................... 13
1.7. DESIGN AND MODELING CRITERIA ............................................................................................. 13
1.8. LOAD COMBINATIONS ................................................................................................................ 14
1.9. ANALYSIS METHOD ..................................................................................................................... 15
1.10. LOADS, INTERNAL STRESSES AND MODAL ANALYSIS DEFORMATIONS ..................................... 21
2. PROJECT AND VERIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ..................................................... 49
2.1. UPLIFT CONDITION VERIFICATION .............................................................................................. 55
2.1.1. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL WALL VERIFICATION ..................................................................... 55
2.1.2. LAMINATED BASE PROFILES .................................................................................................... 66
2.1.3. BENDED PROFILES ................................................................................................................... 74
2.1.4. DEFORMATIONS IN LIFTING CONDITION ................................................................................ 79
2.2. WIND CONDITION VERIFICATION ............................................................................................... 80
2.1.1. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL WALL VERIFICATION ..................................................................... 80
2.1.2. LAMINATED BASE PROFILES .................................................................................................... 92
2.1.3. BENDED PROFILES ................................................................................................................. 101
2.2. SEISMIC CONDITION VERIFICATION .......................................................................................... 106
2.2.1. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL WALL VERIFICATION ................................................................... 106
2.2.2. LAMINATED BASE PROFILES .................................................................................................. 117
2.2.3. BENDED PROFILES ................................................................................................................. 125
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTION .......................................................................................................... 130
3
1. SYNTHETIC ILLUSTRATION OF THE PROJECT PATH
1.1. PLACEMENT OF THE STRUCTURE
The object of this report relates to the structural design of a cabin that contains systems serving a photovoltaic
camp called Sol de Lila solar camp.
The project will be located in the Antofagasta District.
4
1.2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE
This project relates to the calculation of a cabin with a single-plane steel structure with a maximum size of
2050x5500 mm in plan and 2600 mm in height. It consists of vertical walls in sandwich panels: external and
internal panel 5 cm thick and steel structural coating with a minimum thickness of 0.5 mm. The walls are
connected to each other by bent steel profiles. The roof is made by bent steel profiles, sandwich panels and
external steel sheet 2 mm thick.
The basement has the perimetric profiles in UPN and centrally IPE profiles. The other intermediate profiles are
U-folded with a thickness of 4 mm.
The metal structure will be laid and fixed on a suitable reinforced concrete foundation not calculated in this
report.
The structure is calculated in three configurations: lifting from four points, earthquake and wind.
An image is provided which better clarifies the structural model used for the calculation.
5
1.3. TECHNICAL REGULATIONS
STRUCTURE
Chilean regulation NCh 170 and following.

ACI 318.
LOADS AND OVERLOADS

1.4. PROJECT PARAMETERS
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES
The Antofagasta Region covers latitudes ranging from 20 ° S to 26 ° S
THE ACTIONS APPLIED TO THE STRUCTURE
OWN WEIGHT
3
Steel 78,50 kN/m
LOAD ANALYSIS
2
Wall panels (dead load) 0,20 kN/m
2
Roof panels and profiles (dead load) 0,45 kN/m
2
Roof live load 1.00 kN/m
2
Internal live load 2.00 kN/m
6
SNOW LOAD
Latitude between 17 and 26
2
snow load for the area where the instruments will be located are equal to 0 kN/m , therefore no snow is
expected.
WIND LOAD
Wind speed distribution is calculated with the formula indicated by the regulation in point 7.10.
2
qz = 0.613 * Kz * Kzt * Kd * V * I
where:
Kz = exposure factor = 1.03

Kzt = topographical factor = 1
Kd = wind direction factor = 1
V = reference speed = 30 m/s
I = importance factor = 1
7
2 2
qz = 0.613 * 1.03 * 1 * 1 * 30 * 1 = 569 N/m
The previously calculated pressure must be multiplied by pressure coefficients that depend on the shape of the
structure. The structural typology can be classified as a partially open building. This structural typology is
explained in chapter 7.12 of the NCh 432 standard.
External pressure coefficients.
8
For the coverage, in the worst condition there is a depression coefficient of 1.3.
Internal pressure coefficients.
It is considered a partially open building, therefore internal coefficient of ± 0.55.
9
EXCEPTIONAL ACTIONS
For this structure they are not considered exceptional actions such as collisions, fires and explosions. The
structural concept, the structural details and the materials used do not allow the structure to suffer damage
disproportionate to the possible causes related to this type of event.
If particular fire resistance characteristics of the structures are required and they cannot guarantee them, it is
necessary to provide them with adequate protection.
SEISMIC ACTION
Chilean regulation NCh 433 and following, NCh 2369 and following.
The seismic action is calculated by dynamic modal analysis, according to the formula:
The parameters that determine the seismic action are the following:
Building category II I = 1.0

Seismic zone 3 A0 = 0.4g
The reduction factor R * is considered equal to 1 (no reduction)
Soil parameters category C
10
Calculation response spectrum:
11
1.5. TYPEAND CHARACTERISTICS OF STRUCTURAL MATERIALS
Steel for metallic carpentry
Nuts and bolts

In the unions with bolts the following calculation resistances are assumed:
12
1.6. CALCULATION CODE
The Numerical Modeling of the structure, the re-elaboration of the results of the Finite Elements analysis, the
design-verification of the structural elements were carried out using the CMP program developed and distributed
by Namirial s.p.a. of Senigallia (AN). The finite element solver used is XFINEST of Ce.A.S. from Milan.
1.7. DESIGN AND MODELING CRITERIA
Geometry modeling
The structure is modeled by means of single-dimensional Beam elements with 2 nodes for the perimeter profiles
and two-dimensional Shell-like elements having 4 nodes for the corrugated sheet.
The XYZ global reference system is a Cartesian right-hand triplet with the vertical Z-axis facing upwards.
The local reference system 123 of the Beam-type elements is a Cartesian right-handed triplet with axis 1 having
the direction of the element, axis 2 definable by the user and axis 3 having the direction which completes the
triplet.
The structure and its behavior under static and dynamic actions has been adequately evaluated, interpreted and
transferred to the model that is characterized by its completely three-dimensional approach.
The analysis of the structure is carried out according to the finite element method with approach in the
displacements, discretizing the structure in connected elements at the nodes, and assuming the components of
nodal displacement (translations and rotations) as unknowns of the problem. The solution to the problem is
obtained by solving a system of linear equations:
[K] {u} = {F} dove [K] = stiffness matrix

{u} = nodal displacement vector
{F} = vector nodal forces
The elements not included in the calculation model have been sized using partial simplified schemes, estimating
the acting loads according to the relative areas of influence and imposing appropriate boundary constraints.
The determination of internal actions is conducted through "typical" formulas available in the literature. The
verification of the safety of the structural elements takes place according to the methods of Science and
Construction Technique, using manual formulas, ie spreadsheets.
The verification of the safety of the structural elements occurs with the methods of Construction Science.
Structural typology
The structural typology is that of structures having laminated metal profiles, press-folded profiles and sandwich
wall panels.
13
Limit states investigated
In general, for the purposes of safety, the criteria contemplated by the semi probabilistic method to the limit
states have been adopted. In particular, the requirements for safety at the ultimate limit state, at the operational
limit state, have been met for possible exceptional actions.
Constraints
All structural elements have a hinge or joint constraint.
Static schemes
The classical static patterns of Construction Science have been used: hinge joint beam, stuck joint beam.
Modeling action
The weight of the Beam and Shell type elements is calculated automatically based on the characteristics of the
materials, the geometry of the elements and the following parameters:
CdC = Number of Elementary Load Condition

mltX = Own weight multiplier in the Global X direction
mltY = Own weight multiplier in the Global Y direction
mltZ = Own weight multiplier in the Global Z direction
Type = Type of Load Condition (D=dead load L= live load Lr = roof live load W=wind load)
Nome CdC mltX mltY mltZ Tipo

Own weight 1 0 0 -1 D
Permanents load 2 0 0 0 D
Switchboards 3 0 0 0 D
Live load 4 0 0 0 L
Live roof load 5 0 0 0 Lr
Vento x1 6 0 0 0 W
Vento x2 7 0 0 0 W
Vento y1 8 0 0 0 W
Vento y2 9 0 0 0 W
1.8. LOAD COMBINATIONS
1) 1,4 D
2) 1,2 D + 1,6 L + 0,5 Lr
3) 1,2 D + 1,6 Lr + L
4) 1,2 D + 1,6 Lr + 0,8 W
5) 1,2 D + 1,6 W + L + 0,5 Lr
6) 1,2 D + 1,4 E + L
7) 0,9 D + 1,6 W
8) 0,9 D + 1,4 E
with:
D = dead load
L = internal live load
Lr = roof live load
14
E = seismic load
W = wind load
1.9. ANALYSIS METHOD
The numerical analysis was carried out using the calculation program. For the seismic analysis, a dynamic linear
analysis was used in compliance with the standards indicated above. The verification procedures adopted follow
the calculation method to the ultimate limit / exercise limits.
The program performs dynamic analysis with the response spectrum method.
The system to be analyzed is seen as an oscillator with n degrees of freedom, whose own modes of vibration
must be identified. The number of frequencies to consider is an entry data that the user must assign. In general,
note that the number of vibration modes can not exceed the number of degrees of freedom of the system.
The procedure implements the dynamic analysis in two distinct phases: the first one deals with calculating the
own vibration frequencies, the second calculates displacements and stresses consequent to the response
spectrum assigned in input.
In the spectral analysis, the program uses the response spectrum assigned in input, in line with the provisions of
the law. Any spectrum in the global direction Z is unitary. The amplitude of the response spectra is determined
by the seismic parameters required by the regulations and assigned by the user.
The procedure initially calculates the modal participation coefficients for each direction of the earthquake and for
each frequency. These coefficients can be seen as the dynamic contribution of each vibration mode in the
assigned directions. It will therefore be possible to note in which direction the single mode of vibration has
predominant effects.
Then, for each vibration mode, the displacements and the stresses relative to each dynamic direction activated
are calculated. For each dynamic direction the global effect is calculated, due to the individual modes of
vibration, by the square root of the sum of the squares of the individual effects. A specific printing phase is
foreseen for these results. The last elaboration concerns the calculation of the total effects, obtained considering
all the dynamic directions applied.
Modal combination method:

- CQC in the calculation of the seismic response, the contributions deriving from the individual modes are
combined taking into account the sign of the individual modal components. The generic Ui component of the
seismic response is given by a quadratic combination of the components Uij (j = 1, N.modi) in which the
coefficients of combination between two distinct modes depend on the damping coefficients of the two modes
and the ratio between the two frequencies . If modal damping is not assigned, the results provided by this
method coincide with those of the RMS method.
The following are all the parameters used for modal analysis:
Calculation method used: LANCZOS
Mass matrices: CONSISTENT complete mass matrix
15
STURM Sequence Enabled
Rigid motion not allowed
Tolerance for eigenvalue calculation 0
Maximum number of iterations for the eigenvalue calculation 24
The modal analysis was carried out considering the model in phase 1.
Dynamic Seismic Conditions

The present numerical analysis provides for the examination of the seismic load conditions corresponding to the
following types of actions indicated in the table:
CdC = number of the dynamic load condition
Launch = each roll has a different mass distribution; all the CoCs of the equivalent static seismic type
are analyzed in a single static launch of the solver, while for the dynamic CDs at each launch
corresponds a dynamic launch of the solver.
Name = name of the dynamic CdC
Type = indicates the direction and possibly the type of seismic CdC
SubType: indicates the type of limit state
Response spectrum = defines the response coefficient according to the period
ag / g = this value indicates the peak acceleration of the ground, expressed in g = 9.80665 m / s2
Dy = indicates that it is a dynamic CdC
Molt.X, Molt.Y, Molt.Z: multipliers to apply the response spectrum to the various directions.
CdC Launch Nome Tipo Spettro di Risposta ag/g Molt.X Molt.Y Molt.Z
1 1 Sisma SLV X Dx Sisma SLU X (Dy) CHILE 0.4 1 0 0
SottoTipo: SLV
2 2 Sisma SLV X Sx Sisma SLU X (Dy) CHILE 0.4 1 0 0
SottoTipo: SLV
3 3 Sisma SLV Y Dx Sisma SLU Y (Dy) CHILE 0.4 0 1 0
SottoTipo: SLV
4 4 Sisma SLV Y Sx Sisma SLU Y (Dy) CHILE 0.4 0 1 0
SottoTipo: SLV
Structural calculation models

The calculation model provide two different constraint conditions: in the lifting condition there are four hinge
constraints in the respective points provided for the movement, in the on-site condition hinge constraint in all the
nodes of the perimeter profile that will be resting on the ground.
The images are shown with evidence of the calculation models used and external constraints.
16
Cabin in site condition
Cabin in uplift condition
17
Structural calculation model
Moving Masses
The moved mass is calculated as a percentage of the total mass. The non-moval mass is removed:
Mass direction X = “Base”
Mass direction Y = “Base”
The percentages of masses handled are described below:
Pitch n°1:
n. Rate Phase (sec.) Tot. X % Parz. X % Tot. Y % Parz. Y % Tot. Z % Parz. Z %
1 0.19593 0.000 0.000 21.716 21.716 0.000 0.000
2 0.16726 0.000 0.000 42.678 20.962 0.000 0.000
3 0.15919 0.000 0.000 42.678 0.000 1.160 1.160
4 0.15351 0.000 0.000 42.678 0.000 2.200 1.040
5 0.14272 17.695 17.695 42.678 0.000 2.210 0.010
6 0.13943 17.695 0.000 42.678 0.000 3.100 0.890
7 0.13478 17.695 0.000 42.678 0.000 3.900 0.800
8 0.12157 82.642 64.947 42.729 0.050 3.900 0.000
9 0.11123 82.642 0.000 72.136 29.407 3.900 0.000
10 0.090907 84.804 2.162 72.287 0.151 3.910 0.010
11 0.080172 90.685 5.881 72.337 0.050 3.950 0.040
12 0.07513 90.685 0.000 72.387 0.050 58.460 54.510
18
13 0.07359 90.685 0.000 72.387 0.000 58.460 0.000
14 0.072566 90.886 0.201 84.653 12.266 59.060 0.600
15 0.066328 90.886 0.000 84.653 0.000 59.090 0.030
16 0.065444 90.886 0.000 90.182 5.530 59.400 0.310
17 0.062309 90.886 0.000 90.182 0.000 59.420 0.020
18 0.060051 90.936 0.050 92.595 2.413 59.460 0.040
Pitch n°2:
1 0.19637 0.000 0.000 21.716 21.716 0.000 0.000
2 0.16611 0.000 0.000 42.779 21.063 0.000 0.000
3 0.16433 0.000 0.000 42.779 0.000 1.240 1.240
4 0.15885 0.000 0.000 42.779 0.000 2.350 1.110
5 0.14718 26.391 26.391 42.779 0.000 2.360 0.010
6 0.13439 26.391 0.000 42.779 0.000 3.190 0.830
7 0.12959 26.391 0.000 42.779 0.000 3.930 0.740
8 0.11757 82.541 56.150 43.080 0.302 3.930 0.000
9 0.11147 82.843 0.302 72.236 29.156 3.930 0.000
10 0.094048 85.306 2.463 72.437 0.201 3.930 0.000
11 0.077799 90.987 5.680 72.890 0.452 5.350 1.420
12 0.075179 91.137 0.151 72.890 0.000 58.240 52.890
13 0.07359 91.137 0.000 72.890 0.000 58.240 0.000
14 0.072436 91.439 0.302 84.653 11.763 58.480 0.240
15 0.066328 91.439 0.000 84.653 0.000 59.010 0.530
16 0.065448 91.489 0.050 88.624 3.971 59.300 0.290
17 0.062893 91.489 0.000 89.328 0.704 59.330 0.030
18 0.059769 91.540 0.050 93.098 3.770 59.380 0.050
Pitch n°3:
1 0.19548 0.000 0.000 22.772 22.772 0.000 0.000
2 0.15943 0.000 0.000 44.689 21.917 0.000 0.000
3 0.15804 0.000 0.000 44.689 0.000 1.250 1.250
4 0.15804 0.000 0.000 44.689 0.000 2.250 1.000
5 0.1411 2.564 2.564 44.689 0.000 2.260 0.010
6 0.13286 2.564 0.000 44.689 0.000 3.050 0.790
7 0.12599 82.944 80.380 44.739 0.050 3.050 0.000
8 0.12386 82.944 0.000 44.739 0.000 3.740 0.690
9 0.11397 82.944 0.000 73.493 28.754 3.740 0.000
10 0.087279 83.195 0.251 73.795 0.302 3.750 0.010
11 0.082945 90.182 6.987 73.795 0.000 3.880 0.130
12 0.075122 90.182 0.000 73.795 0.000 57.940 54.060
13 0.07359 90.182 0.000 73.795 0.000 57.940 0.000
14 0.071062 90.182 0.000 85.809 12.014 58.160 0.220
15 0.066245 90.182 0.000 85.809 0.000 58.770 0.610
16 0.063529 90.283 0.101 89.830 4.022 59.000 0.230
17 0.060324 90.383 0.101 92.193 2.363 59.000 0.000
18 0.057703 96.215 5.831 92.294 0.101 59.000 0.000
Pitch n°4:
1 0.20164 0.000 0.000 21.716 21.716 0.000 0.000
2 0.16967 0.000 0.000 21.716 0.000 1.300 1.300
3 0.16827 0.000 0.000 42.125 20.409 1.300 0.000
19
4 0.15817 0.000 0.000 42.125 0.000 2.430 1.130
5 0.13919 2.513 2.513 42.125 0.000 2.440 0.010
6 0.13574 2.513 0.000 42.125 0.000 3.240 0.800
7 0.13574 2.513 0.000 42.125 0.000 4.090 0.850
8 0.12442 81.787 79.274 42.125 0.000 4.090 0.000
9 0.11025 81.888 0.101 70.980 28.854 4.090 0.000
10 0.09083 82.692 0.804 70.980 0.000 4.100 0.010
11 0.085496 90.233 7.540 71.332 0.352 4.100 0.000
12 0.075277 90.233 0.000 71.633 0.302 57.330 53.230
13 0.073834 90.233 0.000 85.457 13.824 59.360 2.030
14 0.07359 90.233 0.000 85.457 0.000 59.360 0.000
15 0.066403 90.233 0.000 85.507 0.050 59.370 0.010
16 0.066042 90.233 0.000 89.629 4.122 59.780 0.410
17 0.06313 90.484 0.251 91.741 2.111 59.790 0.010
18 0.059911 93.048 2.564 91.891 0.151 59.800 0.010
Spectral Periods used in the Checks

Periods found T1x, T1y (for earthquake in dir.x, y): 0.12599, 0.11123
20
1.10. LOADS, INTERNAL STRESSES AND MODAL ANALYSIS DEFORMATIONS
Applied loads, stress diagrams and modal analysis deformations most significant are shown below.
Applied loads
Dead Load
21
Electrical components
Live load
22
Roof live load
Wind x1
23
Wind x2
Wind y1
24
Wind y2
Stress diagrams in static analisys
Maximum axial stress (kN)
25
Minimum axial stress (kN)
Minimum bending moment in x direction for pillars and bending moment out plane for beams (kNm)
26
Maximum bending moment in x direction for pillars and bending moment out plane for beams (kNm)
27
Minimum bending moment in y-direction for pillars and bending moment in vertical plane for beams (kNm)
28
Maximum bending moment in y-direction for pillars and bending moment in vertical plane for beams (kNm)
Minimum shear stress in x direction for pillars and shear stress out plane for beams (kN)
29
Maximum shear stress in x direction for pillars and shear stress out plane for beams (kN)
30
Minimum shear stress in y-direction for pillars and shear stress in vertical plane for beams (kN)
31
Maximum shear stress in y-direction for pillars and shear stress in vertical plane for beams (kN)
32
Stress diagrams in uplift analisys
33
34
35
36
37
38
Stress diagrams in seismic analisys
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Modal analysis deformation
Modal analysis deformation in x direction
46
Modal analysis deformation in y direction
47
Constraint reactions
For each Static Elementary Load Condition, Seismic Condition, the resultant of the constraint reactions with the
calculated moments with respect to the origin are reported:
Uplift condition
CdC Rx (kN) Ry (kN) Rz (kN) Mx (kNm) My (kNm) Mz (kNm)
1S 0. 0 11.021154 0 0 0
2S 0. 0 29.522500 0 0 0
3S 0. 0 41.901999 0 0 0
On site condition
1S -4.41e-09 -9.61e-09 11.021154 11.545917 -29.03515 -2.00e-08
2S -3.34e-09 -4.57e-09 29.522500 30.888625 -76.75850 -7.43e-09
3S -1.03e-07 8.382e-09 41.902000 44.980750 -108.0767 1.305e-07
4S -2.20e-08 9.555e-10 23.100001 24.255001 -60.06000 2.462e-08
5S 3.077e-09 4.072e-09 11.550001 12.127501 -30.03000 7.893e-09
6S -3.543800 -9.21e-08 -10.58200 -11.11313 22.906259 3.7292317
7S -3.536000 6.020e-09 -4.290000 -4.505325 6.5572001 3.6873330
8S 0.9074000 -7.847600 -10.58200 -0.911255 28.692820 -20.46387
9S 0.0078000 -9.193200 -4.290000 7.4458349 11.164141 -23.89890
Wind base shear is highlighted.
Seismic condition
1S -4.41e-09 -9.61e-09 11.021154 11.545917 -29.03515 -2.00e-08
2S 2.994e-08 -7.38e-10 41.072501 43.016126 -106.7885 -3.09e-08
3S -1.03e-07 8.382e-09 41.902000 44.980750 -108.0767 1.305e-07
4S -2.20e-08 9.555e-10 23.100001 24.255001 -60.06000 2.462e-08
1D -12.92597 -1.198740 0.1883621 0.3160778 -34.13449 10.348702
2D -12.44109 -1.200102 -0.158585 -0.489529 -32.59087 9.2773693
3D -0.081214 -10.04018 -0.231766 25.007306 4.5605154 -28.25784
4D 0.1400207 -10.50783 0.3993352 26.226958 -1.373785 -25.01875
Seismic base shear is highlighted.
48
2. PROJECT AND VERIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
The main characteristics of the calculation model elements are shown.

Static characteristics of sections
The static characteristics of sections used in the model are shown in the following table with the following
meaning of symbols
Sez = Section Name

A = Section Area
I22* = Moment of Inertia to the local barycentric axis 2 * parallel to the local axis 2 of the section
I33* = Moment of Inertia to the local barycentric axis 3 * parallel to the local axis 3 of the section
I23* = Centrifugal inertia to the local barycentric axes 2 * and 3 * parallel to the local axis 2 and 3 of
the section respectively
I44 = Main Moment of Inertia (Minimum) to the barycentric axis 4
I55 = Main Moment of Inertia (Maximum) to the barycentric axis 5
 = Angle formed by the main axes of inertia with respect to the local axes 2 and 3 of the section.
i22 * = Inertia radius with respect to the local barycentric axis 2 *
i33 * = Inertia radius with respect to the local barycentric axis 3 *
i44 = Inertia Radius with respect to the barycentric local axis 4
i55 = Inertia Radius with respect to the barycentric local axis 5
JT = Torsional Stiffness Factor
AT2 = Resistance shear area in the direction of the local axis 2 of the section (if 0 is not considered
the shear deformability)
AT3 = Resistance shear area in the direction of the local axis 3 of the section (if 0 is not considered
the shear deformability)
qp = Own weight (force per unit of length) of the section
A I22* I33* I23* I44 I55  i22*

(cm²) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (°) (cm)
i33* i44 i55 JT AT2 AT3 qp
(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm^4) (cm²) (cm²) (kN/m)
Nome Section: IPE [IPE 140]
16.4260519 541.2208470 44.91853155 0.00000000 44.91853155 541.2208470 90.00000000 5.740115918
1.653659840 1.653659840 5.740115918 2.450000048 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.1289445
Nome Section: Montante centrale
10.3250000 45.73008113 1006.594604 0.00000000 45.73008113 1006.594604 0.00000000 2.104534045
9.873753229 2.104534045 9.873753229 0.273558836 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0810513
Nome Section: Montante1
12.0250000 419.0775881 824.6011108 -280.344648 275.8545902 967.8241086 -27.0616652 5.903433499
8.280935753 4.789581471 8.971306112 0.425865450 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0943962
12.0250000 419.0775881 824.6011108 280.3446481 275.8545902 967.8241086 27.06166519 5.903433499
8.280935753 4.789581471 8.971306112 0.425865450 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0943963
12.0250000 419.0775881 824.6011108 -280.344648 275.8545902 967.8241086 -27.0616652 5.903433499
8.280935753 4.789581471 8.971306112 0.425865450 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0943962
12.0250000 419.0775881 824.6011108 280.3446481 275.8545902 967.8241086 27.06166519 5.903433499
8.280935753 4.789581471 8.971306112 0.425865450 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0943963
Nome Section: pannello parete ext1 [Rectangular 5x105 cm s=0.05 cm]
10.9900000 10996.15166 65.30165833 0.00000000 65.30165833 10996.15166 90.00000000 31.63162580
2.437604590 2.437604590 31.63162580 245.5712898 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0862715
10.1900000 8757.022992 60.40099167 0.00000000 60.40099167 8757.022992 90.00000000 29.31508468
2.434641062 2.434641062 29.31508468 226.0121781 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0799915
11.7900000 13586.96033 70.20232500 0.00000000 70.20232500 13586.96033 90.00000000 33.94722283
2.440163043 2.440163043 33.94722283 265.1362218 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0925515
Nome Section: pannello parete int [Rectangular 91.7x5 cm s=0.05 cm]
9.66000000 57.15430000 7454.759550 0.00000000 57.15430000 7454.759550 0.00000000 2.432405024
49
A I22* I33* I23* I44 I55  i22*
(cm²) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (cm^4) (°) (cm)
i33* i44 i55 JT AT2 AT3 qp
(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm^4) (cm²) (cm²) (kN/m)
27.77974512 2.432405024 27.77974512 213.0581786 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0758310
Nome Section: pannello parete int v1 [Rectangular 5x97 cm s=0.05 cm]
10.1900000 8757.022992 60.40099167 0.00000000 60.40099167 8757.022992 90.00000000 29.31508468
2.434641062 2.434641062 29.31508468 226.0121781 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0799915
Nome Section: pannello parete int v2 [Rectangular 5x105 cm s=0.05 cm]
10.9900000 10996.15166 65.30165833 0.00000000 65.30165833 10996.15166 90.00000000 31.63162580
2.437604590 2.437604590 31.63162580 245.5712898 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0862715
Nome Section: Pavimento
8.08000000 29.72008977 107.1949333 0.00000000 29.72008977 107.1949333 0.00000000 1.917870937
3.642348098 1.917870937 3.642348098 0.788559744 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0634280
Nome Section: Profilo 180 [UPN 180]
27.9697542 1354.099293 113.4712542 0.00000000 113.4712542 1354.099293 90.00000000 6.957944022
2.014181498 2.014181498 6.957944022 9.550000191 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.2195626
Nome Section: Profilo parete int
3.92000000 9.815515646 67.15226667 0.00000000 9.815515646 67.15226667 0.00000000 1.582389988
4.138922598 1.582389988 4.138922598 0.077709758 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0307720
Nome Section: Sopra parete ext
2.12000000 7.218898742 35.77706667 0.00000000 7.218898742 35.77706667 0.00000000 1.845302392
4.108037834 1.845302392 4.108037834 0.011900248 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0166420
Nome Section: Sopra parete int
1.62000000 5.735127778 7.765400000 0.00000000 5.735127778 7.765400000 0.00000000 1.881542541
2.189396444 1.881542541 2.189396444 0.012922590 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0127170
Nome Section: Trave porta
8.48000000 43.61661384 93.38026667 0.00000000 43.61661384 93.38026667 0.00000000 2.267921650
3.318406832 2.267921650 3.318406832 0.956121302 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.0665680
BEAM DESCRIPTION
BEAM type elements configuration

In order to allow a clearer interpretation of the output results of the analysis, and therefore a greater possibility of control of
the same, the modeling has been developed so as to assign to all the members local reference systems (according to which
they are from read the results in terms of stresses) arranged according to logical guidelines. In particular, care was taken to
ensure that by default:
- all the rods having the global orientation prevalent according to the global axis X or Y [TRAVI on X or on Y] are
characterized by local axis 1 directed according to the geometric axis of the Beam and local axis 3 in the direction of the
global axis Z ( vertical bending plane = plane 1-3)
- all the rods having the global orientation prevalent according to the global axis Z [PILLARS] are characterized by a local
axis 1 directed along the global axis Z positive and the local axis 3 in the direction of the global positive y
axis.L’orientamento di default di cui sopra è associato automaticamente per valori di n1, n2 e Ang di cui sotto pari a 0.
To change the default setting, specify a non-zero value for n1 and n2 and / or Ang.
In particular, based on the values of n1 and n2, the local axis 2, (with Ang = 0) is defined as follows:
n1= “Axis +X” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis X
n1 = “Axis +Y” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis Y
n1 = “Axis +Z” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis Z
n1 = “Axis -X” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis -X
n1 = “Axis -Y” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis -Y
n1 = “Axis -Z” e n2 = 0: the axis has the direction of the global axis -Z
n1 = “Str7 Y” e n2 = 0: the axes are defined using the Straus7 default convention considering the Y axis of
Straus coinciding with the Z axis of CMP: if the axis 1 (of the Beam in CMP) has a direction coinciding
with the global axis X (of CMP) ) the direction of 3 is always the positive one of the Z axis. In all other
cases the direction of the axis 3 ha is obtained from the vector product between the global axis X and the
vector defined by the start and end Beam nodes.
n1 = “Str7 X” e n2 = 0: the axes are defined using the Straus7 default convention considering the X axis of
50
with the global Y axis (of CMP) ) the direction of 3 is always the positive one of the X axis. In all the
other cases the direction of the axis 3 ha is obtained from the vector product between the global axis Y
and the vector defined by the start and end Beam nodes.
n1 = “Str7 Z” e n2 = 0: the axes are defined using the Straus7 default convention considering the Z axis of
with the global axis Z (of CMP) ) the direction of 3 is always the positive one of the Y axis. In all other
cases the direction of the axis 3 ha is obtained from the vector product between the global axis Z and the
vector defined by the beginning and ending Beam nodes.
n1 = 0 e n2 <> 0: in this case the value assigned to n2 is the number of a model node. The local axis 3 is obtained
from the vector product between the axis of the rod and the axis NI-n2 (NI = first node of definition
Beam)
n1 <> 0 e n2 <> 0: the axis has the direction of the junction n1 and n2
If Ang <> 0 then n1 and n2 define the reference axis with respect to which axis 2 forms an angle Ang.
The geometry and other characteristics of the Beam elements constituting the model are shown in the following table with
the following meaning of the symbols:
Beam = Number of the Beam Element

N1 = Initial Node Number of the Beam Element
N2 = Final Node Number of the Beam Element
Sec. = Section name associated with the Element
n1 = first local reference axis identification node
n2 = second node for locating the reference local axis
Ang. = local axis angle 2 with respect to the reference local axis, positive if anti-clockwise (rotation around the
local axis 1 on the plane defined by the reference axis and the local axis 3)
Stages of inexistence = lists the phases in which the Beam is declared as non-existent
Beam N1 N2 Axis direction 2 ( n1 n2 ) Ang (°)
1 1 110 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: Profilo 180 [UPN 180]
2 2 12 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: Profilo 180 [UPN 180]
5 5 11 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
6 7 9 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
8 7 79 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
14 17 93 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
18 11 68 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
19 9 6 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
22 16 7 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
26 21 114 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
38 17 33 Asse +X 0 90 Sez.: Profilo parete int
39 16 34 Asse +X 0 -90 Sez.: Profilo parete int
40 8 35 Asse +X 0 -90 Sez.: Profilo parete int
41 7 36 Asse +X 0 90 Sez.: Profilo parete int
42 6 37 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: Montante centrale
43 5 38 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: Montante centrale
44 4 39 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: Montante4
48 42 43 Asse +Y 0 0 Sez.: Trave porta
51
56 41 48 Asse -X 0 0 Sez.: Sopra parete ext
62 12 48 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: pannello parete ext1 [Rectangular 10x105 cm s=0.05 cm]
72 38 67 Asse -X 0 0 Sez.: Sopra parete int
75 33 55 Asse +Y 0 0 Sez.: Sopra parete int
83 61 60 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: pannello parete int [Rectangular 91.7x5 cm s=0.05 cm]
89 68 67 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: pannello parete int v1 [Rectangular 5x97 cm s=0.05 cm]
90 9 69 Asse +X 0 0 Sez.: pannello parete int v2 [Rectangular 5x105 cm s=0.05 cm]
93 63 62 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
94 66 111 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
96 68 122 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
97 64 103 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
98 25 96 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
101 62 61 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
102 61 73 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
103 71 90 Asse -X 0 0 Sez.: Pavimento
111 82 80 Asse +Y 0 0 Sez.: Pavimento
52
139 79 63 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
142 93 66 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
143 114 64 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
149 111 25 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
150 122 16 Asse -X 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
151 103 16 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
152 96 21 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
153 73 8 Asse +Y 0 180 Sez.: IPE [IPE 140]
Internal release of beam type elements

Beam = Number of the Beam Element
N = Disengagement code Effort Normal
T2 = Disengagement code shear Axis 2
T3 = Disengagement code shear Axis 3
MT = Disengagement code Rotation around Axis 1
M13 = Disengagement code Rotation around Axis 2
M12 = Disengagement code Rotation around Axis 3
Phase = Phase of belonging
Beam Initial Node Final Node Phase

38 M13 M12 M13 M12
39 M13 M12 M13 M12
40 M13 M12 M13 M12
41 M13 M12 M13 M12
48 M13
49 M13
50 M13
53
51 M13
52 M13
53 M13
54 M13
55 M13
56 M13
58 M13
60 M13
62 M12 M12
63 M12 M12
66 M12 M12
67 M13
69 M12 M12
72 M13
75 M13
78 M13
79 M13
82 M13
83 M13 M13
84 M13 M13
85 M13 M13
86 M13 M13
87 M13 M13
88 M13 M13
89 M12 M12
90 M12 M12
100 M13
54
2.1. UPLIFT CONDITION VERIFICATION
Here is the structural verification in uplift condition.
2.1.1. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL WALL VERIFICATION
The external walls are made of sandwich panels with a thickness of 5 cm and a structural coating in steel with a
thickness of 0.5 mm. The table shows the maximum stresses acting on these walls.
Steel checks at ultimate limit state

Parameters meaning:
Ver: assumes the following meaning:
1 envelope that determines the maximum negative normal stress
2 envelope that determines the maximum positive normal stress
3 envelope that determines the shear 1-2 maximum negative
4 envelope that determines the shear 1-2 maximum positive
55
7 envelope that determines the maximum negative torque
8 envelope that determines the maximum positive torque
9 envelope that determines the bending moment 1-2 maximum negative
10 envelope that determines the bending moment 1-2 maximum positive
17 envelope that determines S1 maximum negative
18 envelope that determines S1 maximum positive
The symbols S1, S2, S3, S4 indicate the "combined sigma" and refer to the calculation of the fictitious stress
evaluated in hypothesis of linearity of the behavior of the material and indefinite resistance, whose maximization
identifies the most probable worst verification to buckling, evaluated with the formula (positive sigma indicates
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
(W are the resistance modules) on the four corners of the ideal rectangle with resistance modules equal to those
of the base section of the rod.
Dist: indicates the distance from the starting point of the tested section
Verification solicitations:
N = normal stress acting in the direction of the local axis 1
V12, V13 = cuts in direction 2 and 3
M12, M13 = bending moments acting in floors 12 and 13
MT = torque
The following verification method is adopted:

Compact sections: Classs 1-2, plastic verification
Slightly slender sections: Class 3, elastic check
Slender sections: Class 4, unverified; they can be forced to be considered as class 3 sections, with consequent
elastic verification.
The slender sections are subject to local buckling phenomena, therefore local analyzes must be performed on the
single elements making up the section, these checks are not carried out automatically by CMP.
56
RESISTANCE CHECKS:
ArmNMT = indicates the armature section involved in the verification of deflected pressure, shear and
torsion resistance
CoeffRes = exploitation coefficient of equal strength, for Classs 1 and 2, at most between CoeffMN,
CoeffV and CoeffT, while for Classs 3 and 4 is calculated as an elastic tension ratio.
CoeffMN = exploitation coefficient of biaxial bending moment and compression resistance
CoeffV = exploitation coefficient of shear strength (par.6.2.6 EC3); the shear strength tests are
differentiated between the case of sections of class 1 and 2, for which coeffV is calculated as the
sum of the ratio between the cutting agent and resistant in direction 2 and 3, and the sections of
class 3 and 4, for which coeffV is calculated as a stress ratio.
CoeffT = exploitation coefficient of torsion resistance
Class = classification of the section
An asterisk next to a record identifies the unsatisfied checks (CoeffMN>1, CoeffV>1, CoeffT>1)
INSTABILITY CHECKS:
For the instability checks the basic section is always used.
CoeffN = coefficient of exploitation of compression instability

CoeffNM12, CoeffNM13 = coefficient of exploitation of flexional instability plan 12 and 13
LRif = reference length for instability checks on which the shape of the moment diagram is evaluated for
both the 12 and 12 13 planes.
An asterisk next to a record identifies the unsatisfied checks (CoeffN> 1, CoeffNM12> 1, CoeffNM13> 1)
Resistance checks “PressoFless.Steel ULS”

Verification type: checks at the ultimate limit state Nch.
Origin of the stress reference system: in the center of gravity of the homogenized base section;
Verification Envelope Set used: "Chile1"
Selection Group on which the verification acts: ~ STEEL
Resistance of materials for Class 1-2-3-4 sections for SLU checks (t = section thickness)
fy (t<40mm) fy (t>40mm)
Material ID Material name M0
(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05
The CoeffV, for the sections of class 1 and 2 and different from tubular and double T is also evaluated with the
elastic tangential tension ratio.
NOTE: the class 4 sections are forced to be considered as class 3 sections.
Beam n.62 - Section “pannello parete ext1 [Rectangular 5x105 cm s=0.05 cm]”
Coord. Effort application point N (local plane 2-3): 0 m; 0 m
Summary of armor on the rod:
Basic Section up to the end of the rod
Section Type: thin wall profile
57
Ver Dist N V12 V13 M12 M13 MT ArmNMT
(m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
CoeffRes CoeffMN CoeffV CoeffT Class
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 1.55 0.00 -3.96 -0.01 0
0.0808 0.0808 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 1.55 0.00 -3.96 -0.01 0
0.0808 0.0808 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 1.55 0.00 -3.96 -0.01 0
0.0808 0.0808 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 1.55 0.00 -3.96 -0.01 0
0.0808 0.0808 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 1.34 0.00 -3.42 -0.01 0
0.0811 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 1.34 0.00 -3.42 -0.01 0
0.0811 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 1.34 0.00 -3.42 -0.01 0
0.0811 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 1.34 0.00 -3.42 -0.01 0
0.0811 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 -1.25 0.00 3.22 -0.00 0
0.0576 0.0576 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 -1.25 0.00 3.22 -0.00 0
0.0576 0.0576 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 -1.25 0.00 3.22 -0.00 0
0.0576 0.0576 0.0000 0.0000 4
58
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 -1.25 0.00 3.22 -0.00 0
0.0576 0.0576 0.0000 0.0000 4
Beam n.83 - Section “pannello parete int [Rectangular 91.7x5 cm s=0.05 cm]”

Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.75 -0.07 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.01 0
0.0075 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.75 -0.07 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.01 0
0.0075 0.0075 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
2 0.00 -0.68 4.22 0.00 -10.70 0.00 -0.01 0
0.2794 0.2794 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
2 0.00 -0.68 4.22 0.00 -10.70 0.00 -0.01 0
0.2794 0.2794 0.0000 0.0000 4
Beam n.89 - Section “pannello parete int v1 [Rectangular 5x97 cm s=0.05 cm]”

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 4.69 0.00 -11.94 0.01 0
0.2795 0.2795 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 4.69 0.00 -11.94 0.01 0
0.2795 0.2795 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 4.69 0.00 -11.94 0.01 0
0.2795 0.2795 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.39 0.00 4.69 0.00 -11.94 0.01 0
59
0.2795 0.2795 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.41 0.00 -4.87 0.00 12.43 0.02 0
0.2510 0.2510 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.41 0.00 -4.87 0.00 12.43 0.02 0
0.2510 0.2510 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.41 0.00 -4.87 0.00 12.43 0.02 0
0.2510 0.2510 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.41 0.00 -4.87 0.00 12.43 0.02 0
0.2510 0.2510 0.0000 0.0000 4
Instability check “PressoFless.Steel ULS"

Selection Group on which the verification acts: ~ STEELResistance of materials due to instability of
SLU members (with t section thickness)
(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05
Parameters for stability verification:
Heel instability curve on plan 12: Section in steel Curve a

Heel instability curve on plan 13: Steel section Curve a
Reference length of the LRif rod: 260 cm
Coefficient for distortion stability (only Steel World-EN15512 checks) db: 1
NOTE: in the parts of the text dedicated to the indication of the presence or absence of
disengagement for the heeling, if a restraint has been identified automatically by CMP appears
also the writing “(A)”:
60
Description Plan 1-2 Plan 1-3 Twist
Constraint coefficients 1 1 1
Effective rod lengths 260 cm 260 cm 260 cm
Free lengths of inflection 260 cm 260 cm 260 cm
Retention for buckling
starting Beam present present present (A)
(node 12)
ending Beam present present present (A)
(node 48)
Slendiness of heelinging plan 12: 106.662

Ver Dist N M12 M13 CoeffN CoeffNM12 CoeffNM13 Class
(m) (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -3.96 0.0026 0.0610 0.0830 4
Max CoeffNM13:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -3.96 0.0026 0.0610 0.0830 4
Max CoeffNM12:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -3.96 0.0026 0.0610 0.0830 4


(node 52)
(node 51)

61
Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.35 0.00 -3.42 0.0026 0.0605 0.0825 4
Max CoeffNM13:
1 1.30 -0.35 0.00 -3.42 0.0026 0.0605 0.0825 4
Max CoeffNM12:
1 1.30 -0.35 0.00 -3.42 0.0026 0.0605 0.0825 4


(node 54)
(node 53)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 3.22 0.0025 0.0441 0.0601 4
Max CoeffNM13:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 3.22 0.0025 0.0441 0.0601 4
Max CoeffNM12:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 3.22 0.0025 0.0441 0.0601 4
62


(node 63)
(node 58)

Max CoeffNM13:
2 1.30 -0.68 -10.70 0.00 0.0054 0.2055 0.2808 4
Max CoeffNM12:
2 1.30 -0.68 -10.70 0.00 0.0054 0.2055 0.2808 4

63

(node 25)
(node 56)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.84 1.74 0.00 0.0067 0.0367 0.0516 4


(node 68)
(node 67)

64
Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 -11.94 0.0029 0.2072 0.2815 4
Max CoeffNM13:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 -11.94 0.0029 0.2072 0.2815 4
Max CoeffNM12:
1 1.30 -0.39 0.00 -11.94 0.0029 0.2072 0.2815 4


(node 9)
(node 69)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.41 0.00 12.43 0.0028 0.1885 0.2557 4
Max CoeffNM13:
1 1.30 -0.41 0.00 12.43 0.0028 0.1885 0.2557 4
Max CoeffNM12:
1 1.30 -0.41 0.00 12.43 0.0028 0.1885 0.2557 4
65
2.1.2. LAMINATED BASE PROFILES
66
Parameters meaning:
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
67
RESISTANCE CHECKS:
torsion resistance
INSTABILITY CHECKS:


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05
68
Beam n.4 - Section “Profile 180 [UPN 180]”

Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -1.60 -0.02 -7.86 0.01 4.21 0.10 0
0.1177 0.1075 0.1177 0.0924 1
Beam n.5 - Section “IPE [IPE 140]”

Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.36 -0.09 -18.51 0.03 0.17 -0.01 0
0.1896 0.0125 0.1896 0.0200 1

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.44 -0.07 17.07 0.01 -8.86 -0.00 0
0.4488 0.4488 0.1740 0.0086 1
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -0.44 -0.07 17.07 0.01 -8.86 -0.00 0
0.4488 0.4488 0.1740 0.0086 1

69
Max CoeffT:
2 0.00 4.08 2.90 -0.77 -0.12 -4.99 0.10 0
0.2640 0.2640 0.0332 0.2198 1
Beam n.138 - Section “Profilo 180 [UPN 180]”

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.99 -1.50 -0.03 -12.88 -0.02 -11.12 0.01 0
0.2798 0.2798 0.0906 0.0106 1
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.99 -1.50 -0.03 -12.88 -0.02 -11.12 0.01 0
0.2798 0.2798 0.0906 0.0106 1
Beam n.146 - Section “Profilo 180 [UPN 180]”

Max CoeffV:
2 0.00 0.01 0.01 13.61 -0.00 -6.94 -0.08 0
0.1722 0.1722 0.1368 0.0677 1

(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05
70
Section Type: laminated
Heel instability curve on plan 12: Section in steel Curve b


Effective rod lengths 105 cm 52.5 cm 105 cm
Free lengths of inflection 105 cm 52.5 cm 105 cm
starting Beam absent (A) presente (A) absent
(nodo 9)
ending Beam present (A) present (A) present
(nodo 6)

Max CoeffNM13:
1 0.26 -0.44 0.03 -8.86 0.0015 0.2682 0.4538 1
Max CoeffNM12:
1 0.26 -0.44 0.03 -8.86 0.0015 0.2682 0.4538 1
Heel instability curve on plan 12: Section in steel Curve c

Heel instability curve on plan 13: Steel section Curve c
Reference length of the LRif rod: 137.5 cm
71

starting Beam present (A) present (A) present (A)
(nodo 31)
ending Beam present (A) absent (A) present (A)
(nodo 71)

Max CoeffN:
1 0.54 -1.61 0.01 10.87 0.0032 0.1426 0.3357 1
Max CoeffNM12:
1 0.54 -1.61 0.01 10.87 0.0032 0.1426 0.3357 1


starting Beam present (A) absent (A) present (A)
(nodo 79)
ending Beam absent (A) present (A) absent (A)
(nodo 63)
72
Max CoeffN:
1 0.11 -3.23 0.01 -6.48 0.0114 0.2317 0.3494 1


(nodo 77)
ending Beam present (A) present (A) present (A)
(nodo 31)

Max CoeffNM13:
1 0.56 -0.11 0.03 10.87 0.0002 0.1359 0.3389 1
73
2.1.3. BENDED PROFILES
Generic checks at ultimate limit state

Parameters meaning:
74
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
ArmNM = indicates the portion of reinforcement involved in the deviated bending check, followed by the
position of the bars on the positive and negative; checks are carried out with positions that are
lower or equal to positive positions and greater or equal to negative.
ArmT = indicates the armature section affected by the check, followed by the number of the bracketing
section
ArmNMT = indicates the portion of reinforcement involved in the deflected press-deflection check,
followed by the position of the bars in the positive, negative and bracket length
d2, d3 = heights useful for shear checks in direction 2 and 3
bw2, bw3 = widths useful for shear checks in direction 2 and 3
nst2, nst3 = number of arms useful for the shear checks V12 and V13 acting in direction 2 and 3
respectively.
corr. = current longitudinal reinforcement
Pos = position of the longitudinal reinforcement bars
CoeffMN: indicates the coefficient of flexure and normal effort; given the stress triplet N, M12, M13, the
following ratio is defined as the exploitation coefficient (with the subscript "r" the last resistance
values are indicated):
N M M
CoeffMN   12  13
Nr Mr12 Mr13
75
CoeffV12, CoeffV13: indicate the shear exploitation ratios in direction 2 and 3. CoeffV12 is given by the
ratio between the computational shear V12 acting in direction 2 and the shear strength Vr12 in
direction 2. The same is true for CoeffV13. Vr12 and Vr13 are calculated according to par.6.2 of
EN 1992-1-1: 2005. For parameters not indicated in this paragraph, see the parameters of the
shear checks in the characteristics of the materials.
Type: this column may contain information on the type of verification
An asterisk next to a record identifies the unsatisfactory checks (CoeffMN> 1, CoeffV12> 1 and CoeffV13> 1).
Resistance check “~PressoFless.Mat.Gen. SLU”

Verification Envelope Set used: Chile1
Selection Group on which the verification acts: ~ MAT.GEN.
Tensile strength and compression calculation for ULS:

fd a Traction fd a Compression
Material ID Material name
(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.1 S 235 general 223.81 223.81
Beam n.41 - Section “Profilo parete int”

Section Type: bended profile
Ver Dist N M12 M13 V12 V13 ArmNMT
(m) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kN) (kN)
CoeffMN CoeffV12 CoeffV13 Type
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.0025 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.42 - Section “Montante centrale”
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -4.26 -0.18 -0.27 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1014 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.44 - Section “Montante4”
76
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -2.26 4.19 0.35 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.4411 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -2.24 -4.07 0.40 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.4236 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -2.25 -4.03 -0.42 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.4180 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -2.22 3.53 -0.37 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3669 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.49 - Section “Trave porta”
Max CoeffMN:
1 1.37 0.86 0.01 0.42 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1988 0.0000 0.0000
77
Beam n.64 - Section “Sopra parete ext”
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -1.45 0.02 -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1259 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.78 - Section “Sopra parete int”
Max CoeffMN:
2 0.00 3.08 -0.03 0.12 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.4818 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.107 - Section “Pavimento”
Max CoeffMN:
2 0.42 0.00 -0.02 1.14 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.7151 0.0000 0.0000
78
2.1.4. DEFORMATIONS IN LIFTING CONDITION
The maximum deformation in the lifting condition is equal to 3 mm. The technician considers this deformation
acceptable for the structure.
79
2.2. WIND CONDITION VERIFICATION
Here is the structural verification in uplift condition.

Parameters meaning:
80
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque

81
RESISTANCE CHECKS:
torsion resistance
INSTABILITY CHECKS:


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05
82
Max CoeffMN:
2 0.00 -0.21 -0.68 -0.54 0.00 1.37 -0.01 0
0.1055 0.1055 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.04 0.03 0
0.0049 0.0049 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.35 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.04 0.03 0
0.0049 0.0049 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
2 0.00 -0.21 -0.68 -0.54 0.00 1.37 -0.01 0
0.1055 0.1055 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
7 0.00 -0.27 0.64 -0.51 0.00 1.30 -0.03 0
0.1048 0.1048 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.32 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.01 -0.02 0
0.0031 0.0031 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.32 0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.01 -0.02 0
0.0031 0.0031 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
7 0.00 -0.27 0.64 -0.51 0.00 1.30 -0.03 0
0.1048 0.1048 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
3 0.00 -0.31 -0.78 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0
0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 0.01 0.00 -0.03 0.03 0
0.0043 0.0043 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 0.01 0.00 -0.03 0.03 0
0.0043 0.0043 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
3 0.00 -0.31 -0.78 0.00 0.00 -0.01 0.01 0
83
0.1176 0.1176 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffMN:
3 0.00 -0.93 -5.08 0.00 12.88 0.00 -0.01 0
0.3367 0.3367 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -1.81 -4.16 0.00 10.48 0.00 -0.01 0
0.2787 0.2787 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -1.81 -4.16 0.00 10.48 0.00 -0.01 0
0.2787 0.2787 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
3 0.00 -0.93 -5.08 0.00 12.88 0.00 -0.01 0
0.3367 0.3367 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffMN:
6 0.00 -0.34 0.00 4.25 0.00 -10.82 -0.01 0
0.2532 0.2532 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.36 0.00 3.46 0.00 -8.81 -0.01 0
0.2066 0.2066 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.36 0.00 3.46 0.00 -8.81 -0.01 0
0.2066 0.2066 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
6 0.00 -0.34 0.00 4.25 0.00 -10.82 -0.01 0
0.2532 0.2532 0.0000 0.0000 4
84
Max CoeffMN:
5 0.00 -0.35 0.00 -5.41 0.00 13.80 -0.01 0
0.2781 0.2781 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.38 0.00 -3.45 0.00 8.81 -0.01 0
0.1781 0.1781 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.38 0.00 -3.45 0.00 8.81 -0.01 0
0.1781 0.1781 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
5 0.00 -0.35 0.00 -5.41 0.00 13.80 -0.01 0
0.2781 0.2781 0.0000 0.0000 4

(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05


85
(node 12)
(node 48)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.35 0.00 0.04 0.0024 0.0019 0.0032 4


(node 10)
(node 47)

Max CoeffNM13:
21 1.30 -0.29 -0.44 1.40 0.0020 0.0640 0.0960 4
Max CoeffNM12:
21 1.30 -0.29 -0.44 1.40 0.0020 0.0640 0.0960 4
86


(node 52)
(node 51)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.32 0.00 0.01 0.0024 0.0015 0.0027 4
Max CoeffNM13:
19 1.30 -0.27 0.42 1.30 0.0020 0.0665 0.0997 4
Max CoeffNM12:
19 1.30 -0.27 0.42 1.30 0.0020 0.0665 0.0997 4

87

(node 54)
(node 53)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -0.03 0.0024 0.0017 0.0029 4
Max CoeffNM13:
19 1.30 -0.31 0.47 1.58 0.0020 0.0640 0.0958 4
Max CoeffNM12:
19 1.30 -0.31 0.47 1.58 0.0020 0.0640 0.0958 4


(node 61)
88
(node 60)

Max CoeffNM13:
9 1.30 -1.79 12.59 0.00 0.0142 0.2453 0.3399 4
Max CoeffNM12:
10 1.30 -0.93 12.88 0.00 0.0074 0.2476 0.3391 4


(node 25)
(node 56)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -2.09 -2.73 0.00 0.0166 0.0608 0.0872 4
89


(node 68)
(node 67)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.36 0.00 -8.81 0.0027 0.1532 0.2083 4
Max CoeffNM13:
11 1.30 -0.34 0.00 -10.82 0.0025 0.1877 0.2549 4
Max CoeffNM12:
11 1.30 -0.34 0.00 -10.82 0.0025 0.1877 0.2549 4

90
(node 9)
(node 69)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.38 0.00 8.81 0.0027 0.1339 0.1817 4
Max CoeffNM13:
11 1.30 -0.35 0.00 13.80 0.0024 0.2088 0.2830 4
Max CoeffNM12:
11 1.30 -0.35 0.00 13.80 0.0024 0.2088 0.2830 4
91
92
Parameters meaning:
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
93
RESISTANCE CHECKS:
torsion resistance
INSTABILITY CHECKS:


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05
94

Max CoeffMN:
6 0.53 0.00 0.00 4.16 0.00 1.26 -0.02 0
0.0377 0.0312 0.0377 0.0151 1

Max CoeffT:
8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 -0.06 0.11 0
0.0985 0.0014 0.0985 0.0971 1
Max CoeffV:
8 0.38 0.00 0.00 -0.70 0.00 -0.10 0.11 0
0.0992 0.0026 0.0992 0.0971 1
Max CoeffRes:
8 0.38 0.00 0.00 -0.70 0.00 -0.10 0.11 0
0.0992 0.0026 0.0992 0.0971 1

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -3.48 0.01 16.98 -0.00 -8.84 -0.00 0
0.4521 0.4521 0.1724 0.0055 1
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -3.48 0.01 16.98 -0.00 -8.84 -0.00 0
0.4521 0.4521 0.1724 0.0055 1
95
Max CoeffT:
2 0.00 1.96 0.63 -1.30 -0.03 -4.37 0.08 0
0.2252 0.2252 0.0194 0.1670 1

Max CoeffV:
6 0.29 -3.65 0.01 20.61 0.00 0.04 0.00 0
0.2087 0.0119 0.2087 0.0000 1

(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05


96

(nodo 1)
(nodo 110)

Max CoeffN:
1 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.0000 0.0041 0.0063 1



Effective rod lengths 52.5 cm 52.5 cm 52.5 cm
Free lengths of inflection 52.5 cm 52.5 cm 52.5 cm
(nodo 1)
(nodo 110)
97
Max CoeffNM13:
11 0.26 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.0000 0.0129 0.0283 1



(nodo 9)
(nodo 6)

Max CoeffNM13:
1 0.26 -3.48 0.00 -8.84 0.0119 0.2741 0.4585 1

98


starting Beam present (A) present (A) present
(nodo 17)
(nodo 54)

Max CoeffNM12:
11 0.28 0.00 0.00 -1.02 0.0000 0.0149 0.0238 1



99
(nodo 61)
ending Beam absent (A) present (A) absent (A)
(nodo 73)

Max CoeffN:
1 0.08 -4.00 -0.00 -7.28 0.0138 0.2557 0.3898 1
Max CoeffNM12:
11 0.08 -3.98 0.00 -8.12 0.0138 0.2845 0.4332 1
100

Parameters meaning:
101
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
section
respectively.
N M M
CoeffMN   12  13
Nr Mr12 Mr13
102


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.1 S 235 general 223.81 223.81

Max CoeffMN:
18 1.40 -0.13 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.7878 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
6 0.00 -2.22 0.40 -1.30 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.5275 0.0000 0.0000
103
Max CoeffMN:
2 0.00 -0.29 0.33 0.57 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.0914 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
2 0.00 -0.35 0.47 0.57 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1062 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
21 0.00 -1.77 0.08 0.76 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1366 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
19 0.00 -1.74 0.01 0.76 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.1380 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
18 1.37 -0.22 -0.03 1.22 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.5828 0.0000 0.0000
104
Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -1.54 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3097 0.0000 0.0000
Beam n.81 - Section “Sopra parete int”
Max CoeffMN:
5 0.91 -4.55 0.01 -0.26 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.8946 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
18 0.60 -0.01 -0.00 1.28 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.7948 0.0000 0.0000
105
2.2. SEISMIC CONDITION VERIFICATION
Here is the structural verification in seismic condition.

Parameters meaning:
106
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque

RESISTANCE CHECKS:
107
torsion resistance
INSTABILITY CHECKS:


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05
108
Max CoeffMN:
5 0.00 -0.31 0.00 -1.90 0.00 4.86 0.17 0
0.1019 0.1019 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.32 0.00 0.27 0.00 -0.69 0.28 0
0.0424 0.0424 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.32 0.00 0.27 0.00 -0.69 0.28 0
0.0424 0.0424 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
5 0.00 -0.31 0.00 -1.90 0.00 4.86 0.17 0
0.1019 0.1019 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
17 0.00 -0.29 0.00 1.81 0.00 -4.62 -0.07 0
0.1094 0.1094 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.30 0.00 0.76 0.00 -1.93 -0.25 0
0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.30 0.00 0.76 0.00 -1.93 -0.25 0
0.0606 0.0606 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
17 0.00 -0.29 0.00 1.81 0.00 -4.62 -0.07 0
0.1094 0.1094 0.0000 0.0000 4

Max CoeffMN:
6 0.00 -0.33 0.00 2.19 0.00 -5.63 0.18 0
0.1027 0.1027 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.33 0.00 0.93 0.00 -2.38 0.35 0
0.0629 0.0629 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.33 0.00 0.93 0.00 -2.38 0.35 0
0.0629 0.0629 0.0000 0.0000 4
109
Max CoeffRes:
6 0.00 -0.33 0.00 2.19 0.00 -5.63 0.18 0
0.1027 0.1027 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffMN:
3 0.00 -1.48 -6.58 0.00 16.67 0.00 -0.16 0
0.4382 0.4382 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -1.51 -2.38 0.00 5.99 0.00 0.23 0
0.1659 0.1659 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -1.51 -2.38 0.00 5.99 0.00 0.23 0
0.1659 0.1659 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
3 0.00 -1.48 -6.58 0.00 16.67 0.00 -0.16 0
0.4382 0.4382 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffMN:
6 0.00 -0.37 0.00 7.75 0.00 -19.73 -0.00 0
0.4604 0.4604 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 7.59 0.00 -19.32 0.14 0
0.4518 0.4518 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 7.59 0.00 -19.32 0.14 0
0.4518 0.4518 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
6 0.00 -0.37 0.00 7.75 0.00 -19.73 -0.00 0
0.4604 0.4604 0.0000 0.0000 4
110
Max CoeffMN:
5 0.00 -0.37 0.00 -8.01 0.00 20.45 -0.19 0
0.4129 0.4129 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffT:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 -7.80 0.00 19.90 -0.01 0
0.4006 0.4006 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffV:
1 0.00 -0.37 0.00 -7.80 0.00 19.90 -0.01 0
0.4006 0.4006 0.0000 0.0000 4
Max CoeffRes:
5 0.00 -0.37 0.00 -8.01 0.00 20.45 -0.19 0
0.4129 0.4129 0.0000 0.0000 4

(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.2 S 250 pannelli 250 250 1.05


111
(node 12)
(node 48)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.32 0.00 -0.69 0.0022 0.0115 0.0161 4
Max CoeffNM13:
12 1.30 -0.31 0.00 4.86 0.0022 0.0746 0.1011 4
Max CoeffNM12:
12 1.30 -0.31 0.00 4.86 0.0022 0.0746 0.1011 4


(node 52)
(node 51)

112
Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.30 0.00 -1.93 0.0022 0.0345 0.0472 4
Max CoeffNM13:
12 1.30 -0.29 0.00 4.64 0.0022 0.0813 0.1104 4
Max CoeffNM12:
12 1.30 -0.29 0.00 4.64 0.0022 0.0813 0.1104 4


(node 54)
(node 53)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.33 0.00 -2.38 0.0022 0.0329 0.0448 4
Max CoeffNM13:
11 1.30 -0.33 0.00 -5.63 0.0021 0.0761 0.1029 4
Max CoeffNM12:
11 1.30 -0.33 0.00 -5.63 0.0021 0.0761 0.1029 4
113


(node 61)
(node 60)

Max CoeffNM13:
9 1.30 -1.48 16.67 0.00 0.0118 0.3215 0.4423 4
Max CoeffNM12:
9 1.30 -1.48 16.67 0.00 0.0118 0.3215 0.4423 4

114

(node 25)
(node 56)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -1.73 -0.83 0.00 0.0138 0.0234 0.0352 4


(node 68)
(node 67)

115
Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -19.32 0.0028 0.3341 0.4533 4
Max CoeffNM13:
11 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -19.73 0.0028 0.3412 0.4629 4
Max CoeffNM12:
11 1.30 -0.37 0.00 -19.73 0.0028 0.3412 0.4629 4


(node 9)
(node 69)

Max CoeffN:
1 1.30 -0.37 0.00 19.90 0.0026 0.3008 0.4073 4
Max CoeffNM13:
12 1.30 -0.37 0.00 20.45 0.0026 0.3091 0.4185 4
Max CoeffNM12:
12 1.30 -0.37 0.00 20.45 0.0026 0.3091 0.4185 4
116
117
Parameters meaning:
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
118
RESISTANCE CHECKS:
torsion resistance
INSTABILITY CHECKS:


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05
119

Max CoeffT:
8 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 -3.41 0.10 0
0.1335 0.0846 0.1335 0.0907 1
Max CoeffV:
5 0.38 0.00 0.00 -11.21 0.00 -0.67 0.10 0
0.1377 0.0166 0.1377 0.0902 1
Max CoeffRes:
5 0.38 0.00 0.00 -11.21 0.00 -0.67 0.10 0
0.1377 0.0166 0.1377 0.0902 1

Max CoeffV:
5 0.00 -5.63 0.03 -25.39 -0.01 0.29 -0.01 0
0.2598 0.0301 0.2598 0.0240 1

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -5.65 0.26 23.87 -0.09 -12.28 -0.00 0
0.6277 0.6277 0.2443 0.0060 1
Max CoeffRes:
1 0.00 -5.65 0.26 23.87 -0.09 -12.28 -0.00 0
0.6277 0.6277 0.2443 0.0060 1
120
Max CoeffT:
8 0.00 1.73 1.24 -11.31 -0.08 -3.64 0.07 0
0.1895 0.1895 0.1330 0.1614 1

Max CoeffMN:
6 0.29 0.00 0.00 13.91 0.00 3.68 -0.05 0
0.1240 0.0913 0.1240 0.0475 1

(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.28 S 235 235 215 1.05


121

starting Beam present (A) present (A) present
(nodo 1)
(nodo 110)

Max CoeffN:
1 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.0000 0.0036 0.0055 1
Max CoeffNM13:
11 0.57 0.00 0.00 -2.91 0.0000 0.0420 0.0909 1



(nodo 9)
122
(nodo 6)

Max CoeffNM13:
1 0.26 -5.65 0.10 -12.28 0.0193 0.3935 0.6600 1
Max CoeffNM12:
1 0.26 -5.65 0.10 -12.28 0.0193 0.3935 0.6600 1



starting Beam absent (A) present (A) absent (A)
(nodo 61)
(nodo 73)

Max CoeffN:
1 0.08 -7.26 0.15 -10.01 0.0251 0.3573 0.5549 1
123
Beam n..147 - Section “Profile 180 [UPN 180]”


starting Beam present (A) present (A) Present (A)
(nodo 1)
(nodo 110)

Max CoeffNM12:
12 0.15 0.00 0.00 3.68 0.0000 0.0496 0.0690 1
124

Parameters meaning:
125
traction)
N M12 M13
id   
A W12 W13
MT = torque
section
respectively.
N M M
CoeffMN   12  13
Nr Mr12 Mr13
126


(N/mm²) (N/mm²)
n.1 S 235 general 223.81 223.81

Max CoeffMN:
1 0.00 -0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.0095 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
20 0.00 -5.51 -4.41 -0.29 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3906 0.0000 0.0000
127
Max CoeffMN:
17 0.00 -2.82 3.47 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3972 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
23 0.00 -2.70 -3.65 -0.17 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.4267 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
21 0.00 -2.72 -3.23 0.04 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3693 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
19 0.00 -2.59 2.84 0.18 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.3367 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
9 1.37 0.20 -0.86 1.01 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.6393 0.0000 0.0000
128
Max CoeffMN:
3 0.53 0.11 -0.98 0.01 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.6331 0.0000 0.0000
Max CoeffMN:
3 0.60 0.14 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.00 0 (0,0,0)
0.7244 0.0000 0.0000
129
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTION
The cabin will be laid on a suitable reinforced concrete foundation. There are four anchor plates shown in the
attached drawing. The single connection is made by 10 mm thick L-shaped plate, two 10 mm diameter threaded
bars towards the cabin and one 16 mm diameter threaded bar towards the foundation.
130
Total constraint reaction
1S -4.41e-09 -9.61e-09 11.021154 11.545917 -29.03515 -2.00e-08
2S 2.994e-08 -7.38e-10 41.072501 43.016126 -106.7885 -3.09e-08
3S -1.03e-07 8.382e-09 41.902000 44.980750 -108.0767 1.305e-07
4S -2.20e-08 9.555e-10 23.100001 24.255001 -60.06000 2.462e-08
1D -12.92597 -1.198740 0.1883621 0.3160778 -34.13449 10.348702
2D -12.44109 -1.200102 -0.158585 -0.489529 -32.59087 9.2773693
3D -0.081214 -10.04018 -0.231766 25.007306 4.5605154 -28.25784
4D 0.1400207 -10.50783 0.3993352 26.226958 -1.373785 -25.01875
Seismic base shear is highlighted.

A vertical earthquake equal to 2/3 of the horizontal earthquake is added. V = 8.7 kN.
The verification of the basic anchorage to the foundation is performed by attributing all the seismic shear action
to a single anchorage. There are four anchors, therefore a multiplication coefficient is applied to the verification
equal to 4, higher than required by the regulations.
131
Check foundation side
In this paragraph, only the resistance check of the threaded bar an the resi stance of steel plate. The concrete
calculations is a referencial one and must be checked during the foundation design.
The connection is made by means of suitably prepared 16 mm diameter anchor bolts.
The screenshot of the calculation software shows Italian text. The result of the calculation is translated.
Shear strength of a single M16 bolt is 60.29 kN. Bearing resistance of plate is 33.28 kN.
These values are higher than the calculation values for the cabin.
Check cabin side

The connection on the steel side is checked, that is, the check of the plate that connects the cabin to the
foundation.
The single connection is made by means of an 10 mm thick L-shaped plate, two 10 mm diameter threaded bars
towards the cabin and one 16 mm diameter threaded bar towards the foundation.
132
The checks performed are: shear verification of single bolt M10 class 8.8. Bearing resistance of plate.
The screenshot of the calculation software shows Italian text. The result of the calculation is translated.
Shear strength of a single M10 bolt is 22.27 kN. Bearing resistance of plate is 68.57 kN.
133
TECHNICAL REPORT
TRANSFORMER LOAD AND

CONNECTION

_________________________
2
1.2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 5
1.6. LOAD COMBINATIONS ................................................................................................................ 13
1.7. ANALYSIS METHOD ..................................................................................................................... 13
2. CALCOLO DELLE SOLLECITAZIONI AL PIEDE .................................................................................... 14
2.1. TRASFORMATORE ....................................................................................................................... 14
2.1.1. STATIC LOAD ........................................................................................................................... 16
2.1.2. WIND LOAD ............................................................................................................................. 17
2.1.3. SEISMIC ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 21
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTIONS........................................................................................................... 24
3
The object of this report relates to the structural design of a cabin that contains systems serving a photovoltaic
camp called Sol de Lila solar camp.
The project will be located in the Antofagasta District.
4
1.2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STRUCTURE
This project relates to the calculation of the stresses at the base and the ground connections of some
instruments that will be housed on suitably prepared foundations which are not the subject of this report.
In particular, the instruments are:
 Transformer with total weight 11350 kg.
STRUCTURE

ACI 318.
LOADS AND OVERLOADS

OWN WEIGHT:
3
Concreet 25,00 kN/m
3
Steel 78,50 kN/m
5
LOAD ANALYSIS
Transformer
Own weight 11350 kg = 113.5 kN
Variable see next calculation
According to the regulation Nch 1537, paragraph 2, no additional overloads of use are to be considered since
the type of product does not fall within the scope of application of the regulation.
6
SNOW LOAD
2
expected.
WIND LOAD
2
qz = 0.613 * Kz * Kzt * Kd * V * I
where:

7
2 2
qz = 0.613 * 1.03 * 1 * 1 * 30 * 1 = 569 N/m
structure. The structural typology can be classified as a partially open building. This structural typology is
8
For the coverage, in the worst condition there is a depression coefficient of 1.3.
EXCEPTIONAL ACTIONS
SEISMIC ACTION

Base shear stress:
Q0 = C*I*P
9
10
Soil type C
R= 2
Cmax = 0.9*1.05*0.4 = 0.38
Total transformer weight:

P = 113.5 kN.
The transformer is a rigid equipment, so the shear force should be:

Q0 = 0.4*W = 0.4*113.5 = 45.4 kN
Vertical stress at the transformer base considering 2/3 A0/g:

V0 = 2/3 * 45.4 = 30.27 kN.
Due to the Chilean Seismic code, all equipment must have shear key or seismic stop, unless only 1/3 of the
anchor bolt resist the total shear force. This means that the shear force must be considered amplified by 3 in
order to avoid shear keys or seismic stop.
Bolt checks and steel side checks of the single connection are performed. Checks on the concrete side must be
performed by the foundation designer.
11
Nuts and bolts

12
1.6. LOAD COMBINATIONS
1) 1,4 D
2) 1,2 D + 0,5 S
3) 1,2 D + 1,6 S
4) 1,2 D + 1,6 W + 0,5 S
5) 1,2 D + 1,4 E + 0,2 S
6) 0,9 D + 1,6 W
7) 0,9 D + 1,4 E
with:
D = dead load
L = internal live load
Lr = roof live load
E = seismic load
W = wind load
The calculation of the stresses acting at the instruments base and the relative anchors is using the simple
formulas of construction science. In particular, the geometric dimensions of the elements, the support and fixing
points, the mass and the position of the center of gravity of the masses will be considered.
The own weight will unload on the ground uniformly on all the support points, the wind will be applied uniformly
on all the surfaces with the previously calculated exposure coefficients. The earthquake will be applied as a
concentrated force in the center of gravity of the masses.
13
2. CALCOLO DELLE SOLLECITAZIONI AL PIEDE
2.1. TRASFORMATORE
14
15
The height of the main body affected by the wind is 1900 mm.
It is considered a coincidence between the geometric center of gravity used for the calculation of the wind
resultant and the center of gravity of the masses used for the calculation of the resultant of the seismic actions.
2.1.1. STATIC LOAD
The load condition in which only the static load is present is:
1) 1,4 D = 1.4 * 113.5 kN = 158.9 kN
This load is divided on 4 support points, therefore each single point is stressed with 39.7 kN.
A table is reported with the reactions to the foot of each individual support point schematized below.
16
2.1.2. WIND LOAD
The wind direction that produces the worst stress condition is that which affects the 2960 mm long wall. In favor
of safety, the same wind value is considered for both main directions.
2
Agent pressure: qz = 495 N / m
Pressure coefficients
Windward wall: 0.8
Leeward wall: -0.5
Sidewalls: 0.7 (this pressure is generally canceled because it acts simultaneously on the two sidewalls with
opposite directions)
Coverage -1.3 (lifting). We also consider a zero coefficient that maximizes vertical loads.
The forces acting on the surfaces are of constant value, therefore the resultant is applied to the geometric center
of gravity of the surface itself. The global coefficient deriving from the sum of the windward and leeward walls is
calculated. Cp_tot = 1.3
Fw wall = 495 * 1.3 * 2.96 * 1.90 = 3.62 kN

Fw coverage = 495 * 1.3 * 2.96 * 1.60 = 3.05 kN (lifting force)
The acting loads are unloaded on the ground on four points positioned in a 1000 x 1000 mm square.
Load combinations with wind are:

4) 1,2 D + 1,6 W
6) 0,9 D + 1,6 W
17
COMBINATION 4
1.2 D = 1.2 * 113.5 kN = 136.2 kN
1.6 Wh = 1.6 * 3.62 kN = 5.80 kN (horizontal force)
1.6 Wv = 1.6 * 3.05 kN = 4.90 kN (vertical uplift force)
Two conditions are considered: condition with no uplift wind and condition with uplift wind.
Condition with no uplift wind
The vertical force of the permanent load only is divided over 4 feet => every single foot unloads a stress equal to
34.05 kN downwards.
The horizontal wind creates a pair of vertical forces at the points of support given by the relationship:
5.80 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 6.96 kN
The pair of forces is released on two feet, therefore two points will have a downward force of 3.48 kN and two
points will have an upward force of 3.48 kN.
The horizontal wind creates a shear force at the support points which is divided into four points with a value of
1.45 kN.
The result of this condition is given by 2 supports with:

Fv = 30.57 kN (down)
Fh = 1.45 kN
2 support with:
Fv = 37.53 kN (down)
Fh = 1.45 kN
18
Condition with uplift wind
32.8 kN downward.
5.80 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 6.96 kN
1.45 kN.

Fv = 29.32 kN (downward)
Fh = 1.45 kN
2 supports with:
Fh = 1.45 kN
19
COMBINATION 4
0.9 D = 0.9 * 113.5 kN = 102.2 kN
1.6 Wh = 1.6 * 3.62 kN = 5.80 kN (horizontal force)
1.6 Wv = 1.6 * 3.05 kN = 4.90 kN (vertical uplift force)
Two conditions are considered: condition with no uplift wind and condition with uplift wind.
Condition with no uplift wind
25.6 kN downward.
5.80 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 6.96 kN
1.45 kN.

Fh = 1.45 kN
2 supports with:
Fh = 1.45 kN
Condition with uplift wind
24.3 kN downward.
5.80 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 6.96 kN
20
1.45 kN.

Fh = 1.45 kN
2 supports with:
Fh = 1.45 kN
2.1.3. SEISMIC ACTION

The seismic action is calculated in the two main directions. Actions in the two main directions must not be
combined with each other. The vertical earthquake is added to the horizontal earthquake.
The transformer is a rigid equipment, so the shear force should be:

Q0 = 0.4*W = 0.4*113.5 = 45.4 kN
Vertical stress at the transformer base:

2/3 A0/g
V0 = 2/3 * 45.4 = 30.27 kN.
The combination loads in which the earthquake appears are the following:
5) 1,2 D + 1,4 E
7) 0,9 D + 1,4 E
COMBINATION 5
1.2 D = 1.2 * 113.5 kN = 136.2 kN
1.4 E = 1.4 * 45.4 kN = 63.56 kN horizontal earthquake
1.4 E = 1.4 * 30.27 kN = 42.38 kN vertical earthquake
34.1 kN downward.
The vertical earthquake force is divided over 4 feet => every single foot unloads a stress equal to 10.6 kN
upwards to the ground (worst condition).
The horizontal seismic action creates a pair of vertical forces at the points of support given by the relationship:
63.56 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 76.3 kN
21
The pair of forces is released on two feet, therefore two points will have 38.1 kN downward force and two points
will have 38.1 kN upward force.
The horizontal seismic action creates a cutting force at the support points that is divided over four points with a
value of 15.9 kN.
So seismic shear force is = 47.7 kN
COMBINATION 7
0.9 D = 0.9 * 113.5 kN = 102.2 kN
1.4 E = 1.4 * 45.4 kN = 63.56 kN horizontal earthquake
1.4 E = 1.4 * 30.27 kN = 42.38 kN vertical earthquake
25.6 kN downward.
The vertical earthquake force is divided over 4 feet => every single foot unloads a stress equal to 10.6 kN
upwards to the ground (worst condition).
The horizontal seismic action creates a pair of vertical forces at the points of support given by the relationship:
63.56 * 1.20 / 1.00 = 76.3 kN
The pair of forces is released on two feet, therefore two points will have 38.1 kN downward force and two points
will have 38.1 kN upward force.
The horizontal seismic action creates a cutting force at the support points that is divided over four points with a
value of 15.9 kN.
So seismic shear force is = 47.7 kN
Seisimc base action.
22
Positive downwards, negative upwards.
23
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTIONS
The transformer will be laid on a suitable reinforced concrete foundation. The design of the foundation and the
concrete side connection must be carried out by the designer of the reinforced concrete works.
The base element will have a larger hole of 34.3 mm in diameter to allow easier positioning of the element in
correspondence with the anchor bolts. The oversized hole must be filled with resin in order to have a perfect
solidarity between the anchor bolt and the transformer.
The worst tensile and shear stresses are considered agents at the same time.
N = -23.1 kN
T = 47.67 kN
24
The traction and shear verification of the 16 mm diameter anchor bolt is satisfied.
25
TECHNICAL REPORT
TRAFO BOX LOAD AND

CONNECTION

_________________________
2
1.2. DESCRIZIONE GENERALE DELLA STRUTTURA................................................................................ 5
1.6. CALCULATION CODE.................................................................................................................... 14
1.7. DESIGN AND MODELING CRITERIA ............................................................................................. 14
1.8. COMBINAZIONI DI CARICO.......................................................................................................... 15
1.9. ANALYSIS METHOD ..................................................................................................................... 16
2. BASIC STRESS CALCULATION ........................................................................................................... 18
2.1. WIND ........................................................................................................................................... 18
2.2. EARTHQUAKE .............................................................................................................................. 20
2.3. WIND ........................................................................................................................................... 20
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTIONS........................................................................................................... 22
3
The object of this report is related to the structural design of the ground connection of a roof that covers a
transformer serving a photovoltaic system called Sol de Lila solar camp.
The Project will be located in the Antofagasta Region.
4
1.2. DESCRIZIONE GENERALE DELLA STRUTTURA
The present project relates to the calculation of the basic connections of a metal roofing structure for a
transformer which is independent of the metal cabin having an above ground floor. The metal structure will be
laid and fixed on a suitable reinforced concrete foundation not calculated in this report.
The structure is made with folded profiles that constitute pillars and beams. The roof is made with corrugated
sheet. The pillars have a hinge constraint at the base and a joint at the top.
The structure is calculated against the earthquake and the wind.
STRUCTURE

ACI 318.
LOADS AND OVERLOADS

OWN WEIGHT
5
3
Steel 78,50 kN/m
LOAD ANALYSIS
2
Roof panels (dead load) 0,10 kN/m
2
Roof live load 1.00 kN/m
SNOW LOAD
2
expected.
WIND LOAD
2
qz = 0.613 * Kz * Kzt * Kd * V * I
where:

6
2 2
qz = 0.613 * 1.03 * 1 * 1 * 30 * 1 = 569 N/m
structure. The structural typology can be classified as a completely open building. This structural typology is
The presence of the transformer produces an obstruction greater than 50%
7
Table to be used for wind incident perpendicular to the long side of the canopy.
8
Table to be used for wind incident perpendicular to the short side of the canopy.
The canopy has a wall fence that will have a specific drilling mesh. In favor of safety, a wind is considered acting
on the walls as if it were a full wall.
9
EXCEPTIONAL ACTIONS
SEISMIC ACTION
The seismic action is calculated by dynamic modal analysis, according to the formula:
10
Building category II I = 1.0
The reduction factor R * is considered equal to 1 (no reduction)
Soil parameters category C
Calculation response spectrum:
11
12
Nuts and bolts

13
1.6. CALCULATION CODE
The Numerical Modeling of the structure, the re-elaboration of the results of the Finite Elements analysis, the
design-verification of the structural elements were carried out using the CMP program developed and distributed
by Namirial s.p.a. of Senigallia (AN). The finite element solver used is XFINEST of Ce.A.S. from Milan.
1.7. DESIGN AND MODELING CRITERIA
Geometry modeling
The structure is modeled by means of single-dimensional Beam elements with 2 nodes for the perimeter profiles
and two-dimensional Shell-like elements having 4 nodes for the corrugated sheet.
The XYZ global reference system is a Cartesian right-hand triplet with the vertical Z-axis facing upwards.
The local reference system 123 of the Beam-type elements is a Cartesian right-handed triplet with axis 1 having
the direction of the element, axis 2 definable by the user and axis 3 having the direction which completes the
triplet.
The structure and its behavior under static and dynamic actions has been adequately evaluated, interpreted and
transferred to the model that is characterized by its completely three-dimensional approach.
The analysis of the structure is carried out according to the finite element method with approach in the
displacements, discretizing the structure in connected elements at the nodes, and assuming the components of
nodal displacement (translations and rotations) as unknowns of the problem. The solution to the problem is
obtained by solving a system of linear equations:
[K] {u} = {F} dove [K] = stiffness matrix

{u} = nodal displacement vector
{F} = vector nodal forces
The elements not included in the calculation model have been sized using partial simplified schemes, estimating
the acting loads according to the relative areas of influence and imposing appropriate boundary constraints.
The determination of internal actions is conducted through "typical" formulas available in the literature. The
verification of the safety of the structural elements takes place according to the methods of Science and
Construction Technique, using manual formulas, ie spreadsheets.
The verification of the safety of the structural elements occurs with the methods of Construction Science.
Structural typology
The structural typology is that of structures having laminated metal profiles, press-folded profiles and sandwich
wall panels.
14
Limit states investigated
In general, for the purposes of safety, the criteria contemplated by the semi probabilistic method to the limit
states have been adopted. In particular, the requirements for safety at the ultimate limit state, at the operational
limit state, have been met for possible exceptional actions.
Constraints
All structural elements have a hinge or joint constraint.
Static schemes
The classical static patterns of Construction Science have been used: hinge joint beam, stuck joint beam.
Modeling action
The weight of the Beam and Shell type elements is calculated automatically based on the characteristics of the
materials, the geometry of the elements and the following parameters:
CdC = Number of Elementary Load Condition

mltX = Own weight multiplier in the Global X direction
mltY = Own weight multiplier in the Global Y direction
mltZ = Own weight multiplier in the Global Z direction
Type = Type of Load Condition (D=dead load L= live load Lr = roof live load W=wind load)
Nome CdC mltX mltY mltZ Tipo

Own weight 1 0 0 -1 D
Permanents load 2 0 0 0 D
Live roof load 3 0 0 0 Lr
Wind x1 4 0 0 0 W
Wind x2 5 0 0 0 W
Wind y1 6 0 0 0 W
Wind y2 7 0 0 0 W
1.8. COMBINAZIONI DI CARICO
NORMATIVA: Normativa NCh 3171 e successive.
1) 1,4 D
2) 1,2 D + 1,6 Lr
3) 1,2 D + 1,6 Lr + 0,8 W
4) 1,2 D + 1,6 W + 0,5 Lr
5) 1,2 D + 1,4 E
6) 0,9 D + 1,6 W
7) 0,9 D + 1,4 E
con:
D = carico permanente
E = carico sismico
W = carico Wind
Lr = carico d’uso della copertura
15
The numerical analysis was carried out using the calculation program. For the seismic analysis, a dynamic linear
analysis was used in compliance with the standards indicated above. The verification procedures adopted follow
the calculation method to the ultimate limit / exercise limits.
The program performs dynamic analysis with the response spectrum method.
The system to be analyzed is seen as an oscillator with n degrees of freedom, whose own modes of vibration
must be identified. The number of frequencies to consider is an entry data that the user must assign. In general,
note that the number of vibration modes can not exceed the number of degrees of freedom of the system.
The procedure implements the dynamic analysis in two distinct phases: the first one deals with calculating the
own vibration frequencies, the second calculates displacements and stresses consequent to the response
spectrum assigned in input.
In the spectral analysis, the program uses the response spectrum assigned in input, in line with the provisions of
the law. Any spectrum in the global direction Z is unitary. The amplitude of the response spectra is determined
by the seismic parameters required by the regulations and assigned by the user.
The procedure initially calculates the modal participation coefficients for each direction of the earthquake and for
each frequency. These coefficients can be seen as the dynamic contribution of each vibration mode in the
assigned directions. It will therefore be possible to note in which direction the single mode of vibration has
predominant effects.
Then, for each vibration mode, the displacements and the stresses relative to each dynamic direction activated
are calculated. For each dynamic direction the global effect is calculated, due to the individual modes of
vibration, by the square root of the sum of the squares of the individual effects. A specific printing phase is
foreseen for these results. The last elaboration concerns the calculation of the total effects, obtained considering
all the dynamic directions applied.
Modal combination method:

- CQC in the calculation of the seismic response, the contributions deriving from the individual modes are
combined taking into account the sign of the individual modal components. The generic Ui component of the
seismic response is given by a quadratic combination of the components Uij (j = 1, N.modi) in which the
coefficients of combination between two distinct modes depend on the damping coefficients of the two modes
and the ratio between the two frequencies . If modal damping is not assigned, the results provided by this
method coincide with those of the RMS method.
The following are all the parameters used for modal analysis:
Calculation method used: LANCZOS
Mass matrices: CONSISTENT complete mass matrix
STURM Sequence Enabled
Rigid motion not allowed
Tolerance for eigenvalue calculation 0
16
Maximum number of iterations for the eigenvalue calculation 24
The modal analysis was carried out considering the model in phase 1.
Dynamic Seismic Conditions

The present numerical analysis provides for the examination of the seismic load conditions corresponding to the
following types of actions indicated in the table:
CdC = number of the dynamic load condition
Launch = each roll has a different mass distribution; all the CoCs of the equivalent static seismic type
are analyzed in a single static launch of the solver, while for the dynamic CDs at each launch
corresponds a dynamic launch of the solver.
Name = name of the dynamic CdC
Type = indicates the direction and possibly the type of seismic CdC
SubType: indicates the type of limit state
Response spectrum = defines the response coefficient according to the period
ag / g = this value indicates the peak acceleration of the ground, expressed in g = 9.80665 m / s2
Dy = indicates that it is a dynamic CdC
Molt.X, Molt.Y, Molt.Z: multipliers to apply the response spectrum to the various directions.
CdC Launch Nome Tipo Spettro di Risposta ag/g Molt.X Molt.Y Molt.Z
1 1 Sisma SLV X Dx Sisma SLU X (Dy) CHILE 0.4 1 0 0
SottoTipo: SLV
2 2 Sisma SLV X Sx Sisma SLU X (Dy) CHILE 0.4 1 0 0
SottoTipo: SLV
3 3 Sisma SLV Y Dx Sisma SLU Y (Dy) CHILE 0.4 0 1 0
SottoTipo: SLV
4 4 Sisma SLV Y Sx Sisma SLU Y (Dy) CHILE 0.4 0 1 0
SottoTipo: SLV
17
2. BASIC STRESS CALCULATION
The pillars are modeled with a hinge at the base and interlocking at the top.
2.1. WIND
BINDING REACTIONS
For each Static Elementary Load Condition, Seismic Condition, Load Combination for Non-Linear
Analysis, the constraint reactions in the constrained nodes are reported
Node = Node number

CdC = Load Condition (S = Static, D = Dynamic, N = Non Linear)
Rx = Force in the X direction
Ry = Force in the Y direction
18
Rz = Force in the Z direction
Mx = Moment around the X axis
My = Moment around the Y axis
Mz = Moment around the Z axis
Node 1
1S 0.002090 0.050617 0.480493 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.004898 0.097555 0.565453 0. 0. 0.
3S 0.032332 0.650365 2.465924 0. 0. 0.
4S 0.506055 0.268835 1.016960 0. 0. 0.
5S 0.495074 0.157407 0.508501 0. 0. 0.
6S -0.35993 -1.60681 -3.70680 0. 0. 0.
7S -0.34731 -1.33393 -2.68552 0. 0. 0.
Node 2
1S 0.002090 -0.05062 0.480493 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.004898 -0.09755 0.565453 0. 0. 0.
3S 0.032332 -0.65037 2.465924 0. 0. 0.
4S 0.506055 -0.26883 1.016960 0. 0. 0.
5S 0.495074 -0.15741 0.508501 0. 0. 0.
6S -0.58569 -0.40612 -3.06226 0. 0. 0.
7S -0.57308 -0.67900 -2.04097 0. 0. 0.
Node 3
1S -5.0e-05 -0.00022 0.256692 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00016 -0.00045 0.547265 0. 0. 0.
3S 5.47e-09 4.97e-05 1.052702 0. 0. 0.
4S 0.828579 1.035809 -0.66867 0. 0. 0.
5S 0.850876 1.035803 -0.67010 0. 0. 0.
6S -0.54804 -1.18992 -0.58749 0. 0. 0.
7S -0.54804 -1.18990 -0.17486 0. 0. 0.
Node 4
1S -5.0e-05 0.000215 0.256692 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00016 0.000454 0.547265 0. 0. 0.
3S 5.47e-09 -5.0e-05 1.052702 0. 0. 0.
4S 0.828579 -1.03581 -0.66867 0. 0. 0.
5S 0.850876 -1.03580 -0.67010 0. 0. 0.
6S -0.92716 -0.58795 -0.59547 0. 0. 0.
7S -0.92716 -0.58797 -0.18283 0. 0. 0.
Node 5
1S -0.00215 0.009484 0.368555 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00509 0.014847 0.640943 0. 0. 0.
3S -0.03233 0.098223 0.960378 0. 0. 0.
4S 1.395434 0.444250 -2.39005 0. 0. 0.
5S 1.384118 0.461038 -2.13817 0. 0. 0.
6S -1.06978 -1.28683 -1.10932 0. 0. 0.
7S -1.08240 -1.24561 -0.71971 0. 0. 0.
Node 6
1S 0.000219 -1.4e-18 0.409829 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.000709 1.33e-17 1.051645 0. 0. 0.
3S -2.0e-07 3.33e-17 3.011094 0. 0. 0.
4S 1.819864 -4.0e-15 -1.66387 0. 0. 0.
5S 1.819863 -5.7e-15 -1.14784 0. 0. 0.
6S -1.59588 -1.13875 -2.13056 0. 0. 0.
7S -1.59588 -1.13875 -0.86721 0. 0. 0.
Node 7
1S -0.00215 -0.00948 0.368555 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00509 -0.01485 0.640943 0. 0. 0.
3S -0.03233 -0.09822 0.960378 0. 0. 0.
4S 1.395434 -0.44425 -2.39005 0. 0. 0.
5S 1.384118 -0.46104 -2.13817 0. 0. 0.
6S -1.29752 -0.86763 2.877700 0. 0. 0.
7S -1.31014 -0.90885 3.267307 0. 0. 0.
19
They will be combined according to the load combinations previously reported obtaining the
following maximum stresses.
2.2. EARTHQUAKE
2.3. WIND
BINDING REACTIONS
For each Static Elementary Load Condition, Seismic Condition, Load Combination for Non-Linear
Analysis, the constraint reactions in the constrained nodes are reported
Node = Node number

CdC = Load Condition (S = Static, D = Dynamic, N = Non Linear)
Rx = Force in the X direction
Ry = Force in the Y direction
Rz = Force in the Z direction
Mx = Moment around the X axis
My = Moment around the Y axis
Mz = Moment around the Z axis
20
Node 1
1S 0.002090 0.050617 0.480493 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.004898 0.097555 0.565453 0. 0. 0.
3S 0.032332 0.650365 2.465924 0. 0. 0.
1D -3.10139 0.155347 -11.3542 0. 0. 0.
2D -1.79087 -0.16783 -6.67319 0. 0. 0.
3D 0.461648 -2.19910 -1.50105 0. 0. 0.
4D 0.818032 -2.39973 -1.05809 0. 0. 0.
Node 2
1S 0.002090 -0.05062 0.480493 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.004898 -0.09755 0.565453 0. 0. 0.
3S 0.032332 -0.65037 2.465924 0. 0. 0.
1D -1.78885 0.165891 -6.65862 0. 0. 0.
2D -3.09889 -0.15701 -11.3383 0. 0. 0.
3D -0.46165 -2.19910 1.501049 0. 0. 0.
4D -0.81803 -2.39973 1.058091 0. 0. 0.
Node 3
1S -5.0e-05 -0.00022 0.256692 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00016 -0.00045 0.547265 0. 0. 0.
3S 5.47e-09 4.97e-05 1.052702 0. 0. 0.
1D -5.18740 -3.2e-05 -0.00623 0. 0. 0.
2D -2.99409 2.88e-05 0.005463 0. 0. 0.
3D 0.763246 -0.00035 -0.05201 0. 0. 0.
4D 1.359601 -0.00034 -0.04639 0. 0. 0.
Node 4
1S -5.0e-05 0.000215 0.256692 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00016 0.000454 0.547265 0. 0. 0.
3S 5.47e-09 -5.0e-05 1.052702 0. 0. 0.
1D -2.99072 -3.0e-05 0.005552 0. 0. 0.
2D -5.18319 3.08e-05 -0.00609 0. 0. 0.
3D -0.76325 -0.00035 0.052010 0. 0. 0.
4D -1.35960 -0.00034 0.046389 0. 0. 0.
Node 5
1S -0.00215 0.009484 0.368555 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00509 0.014847 0.640943 0. 0. 0.
3S -0.03233 0.098223 0.960378 0. 0. 0.
1D -3.10247 -0.45790 10.46675 0. 0. 0.
2D -1.78977 0.443485 7.450816 0. 0. 0.
3D 0.451322 -2.72414 -8.13866 0. 0. 0.
4D 0.808226 -2.21970 -8.21011 0. 0. 0.
Node 6
1S 0.000219 3.20e-18 0.409829 0. 0. 0.
2S 0.000709 -3.3e-18 1.051645 0. 0. 0.
3S -2.0e-07 6.33e-17 3.011094 0. 0. 0.
1D -0.00038 -0.79583 -0.03186 0. 0. 0.
2D -0.00038 0.785715 -0.03146 0. 0. 0.
3D 1.72e-15 -4.81440 -2.2e-13 0. 0. 0.
4D -2.8e-16 -3.93453 -9.1e-13 0. 0. 0.
Node 7
1S -0.00215 -0.00948 0.368555 0. 0. 0.
2S -0.00509 -0.01485 0.640943 0. 0. 0.
3S -0.03233 -0.09822 0.960378 0. 0. 0.
1D -1.78775 -0.44924 7.451181 0. 0. 0.
2D -3.09993 0.452132 10.46887 0. 0. 0.
3D -0.45132 -2.72414 8.138659 0. 0. 0.
4D -0.80823 -2.21970 8.210113 0. 0. 0.
21
They will be combined according to the load combinations previously reported obtaining the
following maximum stresses.
The worst shear and traction stresses are in the Wind condition.
3. CHECK BASIC CONNECTIONS
The basic connection checks are performed with the maximum stresses acting in all directions.
Nmax = 5 kN (traction)
Tx max = 2.91 kN
Ty max = 2.44 kN
The two shear components are composed in a single value equal to 5.35 kN
Each pillar is connected to the base by means of a steel plate with a minimum thickness of 4 mm and
2 threaded bars with a diameter of 8 mm.
22
The resistance test of the threaded rod is carried out and the base plate is checked again. The
verification of the anchor on the concrete side is not performed and will be borne by the designer of
the foundation works.
In this paragraph, only the resistance check of the threaded bar an the resi stance of steel plate. The
concrete calculations is a referencial one and must be checked during the foundation design.
The screenshot of the calculation software shows Italian text. The result of the calculation is
translated.
Shear strength of a single M8 bolt is 14.82 kN. Bearing resistance of plate is 12.8 kN. Traction resi
stance of single M8 bolt is 22.23 kN.
23

Gre Eec C 99 CL P 07822 12 029 02

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gre Eec C 99 CL P 07822 12 029 02

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GRE CODE

TITLE: AVAILABLE LANGUAGE: EN

report for cabin

02 08/06/20 Structural calculation report for cabin M. Fiori M. Fiori E. Martagni

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED VERIFIED APPROVED

CABIN FOR TECHNOLOGICAL ROOM

OGGETTO: SOL DE LILA SOLAR CAMP

COMMITTENTE: EUROLAM s.r.l. Branch office in Via Marconi, 350

The Structural Designer

Chilean regulation NCh 170 and following.

LOADS AND OVERLOADS

Chilean regulation NCh 431 and following.

1.4. PROJECT PARAMETERS

The Antofagasta Region covers latitudes ranging from 20 ° S to 26 ° S

THE ACTIONS APPLIED TO THE STRUCTURE

Chilean regulation NCh 431 and following.

Latitude between 17 and 26

Chilean regulation NCh 432 and following.

Kz = exposure factor = 1.03

External pressure coefficients.

Internal pressure coefficients.

It is considered a partially open building, therefore internal coefficient of ± 0.55.

Building category II I = 1.0

Steel for metallic carpentry

Nuts and bolts

1.7. DESIGN AND MODELING CRITERIA

[K] {u} = {F} dove [K] = stiffness matrix

CdC = Number of Elementary Load Condition

Nome CdC mltX mltY mltZ Tipo

1.8. LOAD COMBINATIONS

Chilean regulation NCh 3171 and following.

1.9. ANALYSIS METHOD

Modal combination method:

Dynamic Seismic Conditions

Structural calculation models

Cabin in uplift condition

The percentages of masses handled are described below:

Spectral Periods used in the Checks

Maximum axial stress (kN)

Maximum axial stress (kN)

Minimum axial stress (kN)

Maximum axial stress (kN)

Minimum axial stress (kN)

Modal analysis deformation in x direction

Wind base shear is highlighted.

Seismic base shear is highlighted.

The main characteristics of the calculation model elements are shown.

Sez = Section Name

A I22* I33* I23* I44 I55  i22*

BEAM type elements configuration

Beam = Number of the Beam Element

Internal release of beam type elements

Beam Initial Node Final Node Phase

Here is the structural verification in uplift condition.

2.1.1. EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL WALL VERIFICATION

Steel checks at ultimate limit state

The following verification method is adopted:

For the instability checks the basic section is always used.

CoeffN = coefficient of exploitation of compression instability

Resistance checks “PressoFless.Steel ULS”

Ver Dist N V12 V13 M12 M13 MT ArmNMT

Ver Dist N V12 V13 M12 M13 MT ArmNMT

Ver Dist N V12 V13 M12 M13 MT ArmNMT