Cultural context: In ancient Greece, where the play is set, a man's primary

responsibility was to secure the future of his family by producing legitimate

heirs. Jason may have felt that marrying a princess would provide more
stability and security for his children, which is an important ethical
consideration. This argument highlights the cultural norms and expectations of
ancient Greece, where Jason's actions would have been seen as necessary for
the survival and well-being of his family. Moreover, his decision to marry the
princess may have been motivated by his desire to protect his children from
the political and economic instability that existed in his society.
Fulfilment of obligations: Jason may have felt that he had a moral obligation to
marry the princess in order to secure a political alliance and protect his
community. From an ethical standpoint, this argument suggests that Jason's
actions were motivated by a sense of duty to the greater good. By marrying
the princess, he may have been seeking to secure a powerful alliance that
would benefit his community and protect them from external threats.
Furthermore, he may have seen this as a way of fulfilling his responsibilities as
a leader and protector of his people.
Personal freedom: Jason had the right to choose his own spouse and pursue
his own happiness, as long as it did not harm others. Some could argue that he
acted within his ethical rights by pursuing a new relationship. This argument
emphasizes the importance of personal freedom and the right of individuals to
make choices that will bring them happiness and fulfillment. Jason may have
believed that his relationship with Medea was no longer fulfilling, and that he
had the right to pursue a new relationship that would bring him greater
happiness. From an ethical standpoint, his actions could be seen as a legitimate
expression of his personal freedom and the pursuit of his own well-being.
Self-defence: Jason may have felt that he had to protect himself from Medea's
wrath. In the play, Medea is depicted as a powerful sorceress with a volatile
temper, and Jason may have believed that he was in danger of being harmed
by her. From an ethical perspective, this argument suggests that Jason's
actions were motivated by a desire to defend himself and protect his own
safety. He may have seen his decision to marry the princess as a way of
removing himself from a potentially dangerous situation and ensuring his own
survival.
Moral improvement: Jason may have felt that he had a moral obligation to
improve himself and his standing in society. In the play, he is depicted as a
hero who has undergone a significant change, and he may have believed that
his marriage to the princess was a step towards becoming a better person.
From an ethical perspective, this argument suggests that Jason's actions were
motivated by a desire to improve himself and his moral character. He may
have seen his decision to marry the princess as a way of demonstrating his
newfound maturity and sense of responsibility.
Love: Jason may have genuinely fallen in love with the princess and believed
that his relationship with her was a positive and fulfilling one. From an ethical
perspective, this argument suggests that Jason's actions were motivated by a
deep and sincere love for the princess. He may have seen his decision to marry
her as an expression of his love and a commitment to building a life together.
This argument emphasizes the importance of love and personal relationships
in ethical decision-making and suggests that Jason's actions were motivated by
a desire to build a life with someone he deeply cared for.

Defence
Revenge is justifiable: One argument in defense of Medea's actions is that
revenge is justifiable in the face of betrayal and abandonment. In the play,
Medea has been betrayed by Jason and cast aside, and she may have felt that
her actions were a legitimate form of revenge against someone who has
wronged her.
Rebuttal: While revenge may be a natural human reaction to hurt and betrayal,
it is not necessarily justifiable from an ethical perspective. Revenge often
involves hurting others and can lead to a cycle of violence that can cause
further harm. It is important to seek non-violent solutions to conflicts and to
avoid actions that may cause harm to others.
Protecting her children: Another argument in defense of Medea is that she was
motivated by a desire to protect her children from the consequences of Jason's
actions. In the play, Medea is depicted as a devoted mother who is willing to
do anything to protect her children.
Rebuttal: While protecting one's children is a noble goal, it does not necessarily
justify harmful or violent actions. It is important to consider the potential
consequences of one's actions and to seek non-violent solutions that do not
cause harm to others. Additionally, the act of killing one's own children is
considered morally reprehensible in many cultures and is not a justifiable
means of protection.
Mental distress: Another argument in defense of Medea is that she was driven
to her actions by mental distress, possibly caused by the trauma of Jason's
betrayal and abandonment. In the play, Medea is depicted as a woman who is
overcome by emotions and unable to control her actions.
Rebuttal: While mental distress can certainly have a profound impact on one's
actions, it does not excuse harmful or violent behavior. It is important to seek
help and support when struggling with mental health issues, rather than
turning to harmful or violent actions. Additionally, it is the responsibility of
individuals to control their actions and to seek help when needed, rather than
allowing their emotions to dictate their behavior.