Professional Documents
Culture Documents
33370779
33370779
by
CHERNG-CHIAO WU
A MASTER'S THESIS
MASTER OF SCIENCE
Manhattan, Kansas
1978
Approved by:
f :> ; . i ;,
Major Professor
L.J)
*
'
'
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
P. Walawender, for his constant advice and guidance during the course
Mr. and Mrs. Song - Pei Wu, and to his friend Ming, their continuous
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Page
Figure 3.2. Trace of the screw wing tips rotated on a flat plane III-4
Figure 3.3. Motion of a solid plug confined between two flat plane. . • •
III-
Figure 3.4. Motion of a solid plug confined between a rectangular channel III-6
and a flat plate ,
Figure 3.5. Velocity of a solid element in the screw channel. ...... III-9
Figure 3.6. Motion of a particle in contact with the rotating screw wing T II-11
tip *
• . . . . . .
Figure 3.9 Disnlacement ina solid element for a unit displacement at the 111-18
barrel surface
Figure 3.10 Side view of the solid element in contact with the screw wing. 111-21
Figure 3.11 Geometry of the solid element for pressure distribution in 111-26
analysis
Figure 3.12 Forces and pressures acting on a small section of the solid -
111-27
element „ .
Figure 3.13 The solid element with a pressure difference acting on it and III- 29
geometric relation betx^een dv and dl.
Figure 4.2 Dimensions and set up for the back pressure test on feeder B. .
IV-6
Figure 6.2 Mass feed rate versus rpm for feeder A VI-6
Figure 6.3
IT
Mass feed rate versus rpm for feeder 3 VI-7
Figure 6.4 Volume feed rate of feeder B versus rpm under different back VI-1I
pressure conditions ,
in
Page
Figure 6.5 Volumetric delivery rate versus back pressure for feeder B. . VI-12
Figure 6.7 Comparison the present work with Darnell and Mol's theory. . VT-15
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 6.1 Comparison of experimental data with prediction for feeder A. VI-4
Table 6.2 Comparison of experimental data with prediction for feeder B. VI-5
CHAPTER L
INTRODUCTION
The screw feeder has been widely used as a feeding device for granular
and other granular materials, as screw feeder for measuring or feeding frag-
materials.
The demarcation between these classes is vague, since the same equipment
very difficult. Attempts have been made to analyze the screw conveying
With the growth of the polymer industry, extruders have been the subject
However, the solids conveying zone has been the subject of much less
attention than the melt zone. Some theories have been proposed to estimate
the delivery rate of the screw conveying device, but at present, the existing
treatment is inadequate.
estimating the delivery rate of a screw feeder for the special case of
tion of the screw feeder and an outline of study are presented. In Chapter
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
the oldest type of screw conveyor. It was invented by Archimedes (287-212 BD)
for pumping water and was probably used in the earliest flour mills. Morin
(1956) reports that the first formula for determining the volumetric output
(Q) of a screw was proposed by Prof. A. M. Samus In the late 19th century.
2
Q = n 74 (D* - D ) pN (2-1)
b s
in which
p = screw pitch
N = screw rpm
H = coefficient of loading
This formula is simply a factor n times the sweep volume of the screw.
(which is an important part of the combine harvester and the main device
for bulk handling on farms and grain terminals) became the subject of
1926b; Konig et al. , 1960; Millier, 1958: O'Callagham, 1961: Fegan, 1959;
Peart, 1958; Rehdugier, 1959a and 1959b: Stevens, 1962: Roberts and Willis,
(1) At low speeds of revolution (usually up to 200 rpm) , the output per
to rpm). (2) At higher rpms, the ouput volume per revolution declines
with rpm and delivery will reach a maximum then decline. (3) The delivery
the screw or force feeding (this indicates that under such condition the
screw is running partial full and that the decline of output per revolution
a helical path. The larger the helix angle formed, the better the volumetric
efficiency (defined as the ratio of the volumetric feed rate to the sweep
volume of the screw) . (6) The helix angle formed by the movement of a
(7) The volumetric delivery rate of a screw varies with the type of
such as moisture content that effect the coefficient of friction with the
Some initial attempts have been made to theoretically analyze the screw
tried to find a general form for the coefficient of loading (rj from his
force, analysis of a single particle in contact with the screw wing tip.
The direction of movement of the particle was found from a force balance.
II- 3
The relation between the direction of particle movement and velocity was
also analyzed. From this information, and the assumption that all particles
wove at the same speed in the axial direction, an equation for the
delivery rate was obtained. Though he didn't include the forces acting
on the particle by the barrel surface and other particles, his analysis
Zaika (1958) worked on the combine harvester auger. Gutyar (1956), Thusing
(1938), and 3a ks and Schmid (1960) developed equations for the output of
their analyses. Vierling and Sinha (1960) also worked on a verticle screw
conveyor and derived an equation for the critical speed (minimum speed
Rcss (1960) analyzed the force from particle stacks and derived equations
for the inclined screw conveyor. His approach has a disadvantage in that
Decker (1941) discussed the variables which control the solid delivery
rate; the dimensions of the screw, the back pressure, and the coefficient
the friction between the plastic and the screw surface, the larger the
friction between the plastic and the barrel surface, the larger the output
but neglected the forces acting between the barrel and the material.
the screw contents and the rotational movement caused by the torque.
the solid movement angle, but he neglected the channel curvature and
didn't include all of the forces acting on the solid plug. Simonds (1952)
ment gives a result that the solid plug either turns with the screw or
does not turn. This is far from the actual helical movement of the plug.
but included the normal force that the pushing flight exerts on the solid
plug. However, they did not consider the forces exerted by the leading
The most thorough analysis was performed by Darnell and Mol (1956)
They treated the particles as a solid plug and assumed that an isotropic
pressure existed within the solid. They made a force balance in the
axial direction and a torque balance about the screw axis to obtain an
expression from which the solid movement angle at the barrel surface, and
the conveying rate can be found. They also took into account the effect
the helix angle over the channel depth was used. This limited their
results with the experiment, but only by neglecting the friction forces
caused by the solid pressure on both wings can the results give any
reasonable agreement with the experiment. Tadmor and Klein (1970) modified
this theory to include the case where the screw and barrel are made of
but considering the work needed to push the solid plug forward and to
rotate the plug. He was able to derive an expression for the solid
movement angle, but since he did not consider the work needed to conquer
the analysis of Darnell and Mol. Schneider (1969) changed the isotropic
pressure assumption. The mean pressure (P) was taken as reference and
(1973) reported his observation that for the most part in an extruder,
shearing within the loose polymer powder may be neglected and that the
loose solids move like a solid plug. Lovegrove and Williams- (1972)
modified equations.
reports of ERDA, Mis try (1976, 1977) stated that the screw feeder was
feed rate with the back pressure was observed. The declination varied
II-6
with types of coal used. A computer simulation based upon Darnell and
Mol's theory of the feed rate and power needed for different operation
Mol's treatment, that the pressure is uniform across the channel for a
CHAPTER 3
one end of the screw from a hopper and delivered at the other end.
A single wing screw has been chosen for the purpose of simplicity. The
inner diameter of the barrel is D, , and the diameter of the screw root
D
is D . The radial clearance between the crest of the screw wing and the
inner barrel surface is 5 . The axial distance of one full turn of the
screw is termed the pitch, p, and the axial direction between wings is
the channel width, H. The thickness of the screw wing in the axial
surface at any point and a plane normal to the screw axis (or the plane
of motion) is called the helix angle x(r). At the wing tip the helix
to D .
3
The helix angle will vary with radial position from the screw axis
to the pitch and radius. This relation has been given by Tadmor &
Klein (1970) and will be reviewed here. Assume that the wing tip of
III-2
r
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzaagzzg zzzzzazzzzzzz
-Barrel
•Screw
Root
Wing
zzzzzzzazzzzzzzzzz pzzzmmnzzzzzzzzzmazmm
H
a screw is painted with ink and the screw is placed on a piece of paper
and rotated one full turn. The paths traced on the paper are shown in
Fig. 3.2.
It can be seen that the helix angle at the wing tip, cl. can be
b
expressed as
tana =
b ^To (3.1)
Now if the radius of the wing is reduced to r, then the trace of one
full turn in the axial direction will still be p, but that, in the
This is the general expression for the helix angle. Similarly, the
tana =
s 7rs (3-3)
easiest to begin with a simple model. Consider a rigid solid element con-
fined between two infinite parallel plates. The lower plate is stationary,
and the upper one moves at a constant velocity V as shown in Fig. 3.3.
The coefficient of friction and the contact area between the element and
the moving upper plate are, respectively, f and A , while those between
the plug and lower plate are f and A . If the pressure exerted by the
solid element on the plates is equal, then the friction force that the
Path trace
TrDt,
27rr
« l c.~
m
i
<£± r
Db
flat plane.
Figure 3.2. Trace of the screw wing tips rotated on a
III-5
>
tn )i ) )) /{j
Fb =f A p
b b — tp->
u
-
'
s s s
1 muni) unt/it nuinn n "«?
Figure 3.3. Motion of a solid plug confined between two flat planes,
III-6
a
oo
e
\ U
o
d
u
2
a)
5
c
o •
u a)
a
oo «t
3 t-l
rH a.
a.
4J
•a n)
H rH
o
a co
-1
1*4 CO
°^
C 0)
S3
0)
I
III-7
are three possible results: 1) If. F < FL , the plug will accelerate
s b
Now consider the constraint of the screw wing to the solid plug
i
The point on the upper plate contact with point A at time t is at another
The relative motion of the solid plug with respect to the plate can be
expressed by the line, CB . The angle between the lines AC and CB is defined
important quantity for the evaluation of the feed rate of a screw. From
Fig. 3.4 it can be seen that for a constant upper plate velocity of V,
the faster the solid plug moves in the down channel direction the larger
the angle 3.
III-8
friction is a minimum.
predict the perfor-
It should, therefore, be possible to quantitatively
*vh
where IL and R are the radius at the inner barrel surface and that at
the screw root respectively, p is the pitch of the screw, and E is the
wing thickness. The last term represents the fraction of the cross
in Fig. 3.6. When the screw wing tip moves a small distance from A to A',
angle of this movement with respect to the plane normal to the screw axis
is the solid movement angle at barrel surface, <K- The lengths of lines
From Fig. 3.6 it can be shown that the following relationship holds for the
angle <j» .
fa
B^C
tan <f>,
= AA' - AB* sin ^/tan «^ (3-5)
m b b__ (3 _ 6)
AA' tan i>. + tan a
where B'C/AA' represents the ratio between the axial velocity of the
Then V is obtained as
pa
tan 4 tan a
V - Vt -^- 3_ 8 )
(
pa b tan o>, +tan n
D D
Substituting the above equation into Eqn. (3.4) and equating V, to the
b
perimeter times speed of revolution (V = rrND. ) gives an expression for
b o
V
tan tan _
Q - »»^b 7
tan — A,
rz;
A,+tan
D
ex,
a,
D
4
n
[7 (»? -
d
*>
_
2
s
>*=*1
p
-
(3-9)
\-> ?>
If the frictional force between t.he solid element and the screw is
so large that the particles in fact adhere to (he screw, the plug will
In all real cases, the angle will be in range < 4, < 90 - a, . A higher
b b
delivery rate can be achieved if the friction coefficient between the
barrel and solid plug is very large compared to that between the screw
This would be the case when the plug moves like a nut held in a wrench.
If the angle 5 can be determined, then the delivery rate' can be cal-
b
culated from Eqn. (3-9). A force and torque balance is used to obtain an
The basic assumptions that have been introduced in the derivation are:
(3) The geometry of the screw does not change with axial position.
(4) The clearance between the wing tip and the barrel is
negligible.
from the screw root to the barrel surface, as shown in Fig. 3.7 a and b.
a helical path toward the exit of the screw and form an angle $. between
b
the direction of movement at the surface in contact with the barrel and
its kinetic energy and potential energy the toatl work done by all forces
acting on the element when it travels from one position to another position
must be zero:
• (3-10)
ill^i
Each force can be divided into the axial and tangential components.
W. = F. i. + F. : _ (3-11)
K
l ia ia iT iT '
111-15
Defining
ia 'ia*ia (3-12)
C X
IT iT iT (3-13)
(3~ 14)
= 1. W. + I if.
i=l ia i=l iT
W = F +
Jl i *a ill ia JlViT (3-15)
W *
1=1 la - a Jl ha = °
(3-17)
consequently
1=1
W
lr
=
ill
W
i
-
A W
ia
= °
(3-18)
F = ? HR d * f
l b b b (3-19)
coordinate.
F = F sin
la l *b . (3" 2 °)
F = f cos *
1T x b
The work done by this force is equal to the force times distance it
W = ~F Sin2
la 1 % (3-22)
and
2
W = - F] cos * (3_ 23)
1T _
b
here the minus sign appears as the result of the opposite direction of
F = F CaR d * f
2 s s 8 (3-24)
where P is the average pressure exerted by the element on the screw root.
g
movement of the contact surface. Since the solid element can only move
in the direction of the channel relative to the screw. The force acting
111-19
J+COS(p
-Lcoscf)
Rb Tb
ccosc/)
on the solid element by the screw root is in the direction of the channel
at the screw root, whcih has an angle, a , with the plane normal to the
s
screw axis.
F, = F. sin a (3-25)
la. I s
F = F cos a (3-26)
2T 2 g
where a is the wing angle to the direction normal to the axis of screw
s
at the screw root. The movement of this surface axially is sin <*>
, and
tangentially is C cos -?, as shown in Fig. 3-9. Consequently, the work will
be:
and
W - F cos * (3-28)
2T 2T b .
At the pushing wing and the leading wing, there are pressures, P* and
Now consider the surface of the leading wing in contact with the
(as shown in Fig. 3-10) . The force acting on the subelement is:
dF = P dA
3 w
The area of this strip dA is equal to length of the strip times dr.
The length of the strip as shown in Fig. 3-9 is approximately c dy/cos ot.
rd*
dF_ = P
3 w cos a
dr w
(3-30) '
111-21
This force is normal to the wing surface, and it can be divided into the
r
dF„ = -P « dr cos a (3-31)
\.-*--»*-t
3a w cos a
= -P
V* dr
'
dF,_ - -P
3T
^—
w cos a
dr sin a
(3-32)
= -P 8. d'J)dr tan a
This small strip will move axially a distance sin ± and tangentially r/R,
cos ^> when the solid element moves a unit distance ax the barrel surface.
dW - dF sin * |-
3T 3T fa
(3-34)
= -P rd^tan cer~ dr
KD
w. = / dW.
(3-35)
2
- -4 P R? (1 - C ) dH> sin 4
* w d b
w
3T
=/ \ dw
3T
R
s
(3-36)
"?
12 (1-C)
-
",.8.
w b
2
tan x
b
d'« cos 4,
b
111-22
Rs cty
Figure 3.10. Side view of the solid element in contact with the
screw wing.
111-23
Using a parallel treatment, one can obtain the work done by the normal
2 (3-37)
W = (1 " q2) d * Sin
4a 2
P*
\ *b
2 (3-38)
W = P* R (1 " ° 2) d * tan a COS
4T I b b ^b
There are also friction forces accompanying the normal forces. They have the
dF c = f dF- (3-39)
5 w 3
dF = f dF COS a (3-43)
5T w 3
Wc
5a
= -P
W
R.
D
(1 C) tan a.
D
dM W
, sin <(.,
D
(3-45)
2
W = P R (1 " ° 2) d*f COS (3-47)
5T I w b w *b
Equations (3-23), (3-28), (3-36), (3-38), (3-47), and (3-48) can b e substituted
pT H Ps d> f
b
sin
2
*
b
+FCHR b di)- f
g
sin a
g
sin ^
2 2 2
+ |p R^ (1 - C ) d^ sin + (P + P*) R (1 - C) tan a, dii; f
<J»
b w b b w
2 2
= P* P^ (1 - C d* sin (3-49)
\ ) <fr
b
P
b
H f
b
sin *
b
—
+P s CHf s sina s+I
12 UP
w
R
b
- C
2
)
(3-50)
2
+ (P* + P R (1 - C) f tan a = \ P* P^ (1 - C )
w) b w b
Defining:
= Hf (3-51)
4 b
A =? A (3-51')
l b" i
t
A
"1i = R, (1 - C
2
)
(3-53)
2
,= (3-54)
A R (1 " C) tan f
2 b "b w
M)
A = A + P (A + A (3-55)
2 ^ 2 w 2 2
A
*
3
=
n
1
(1 -
2
C) - A
"
2
(3-56)
Introducing Eqns. (3-51, 55, 56) into Eqn. (3-49) and rearranging gives
(A sin $ + A )
2
P* = i
(3-57)
A
3
Substituting Eqns. (3-23), (3-28), (3-36), (3-38), (3-47), (3-48) into Eqn.
—
P H R
t
b d
d\b f.
b
cos r4.
2
bs— - P C
2
H tL d*
b
f
s
cos a
s
cos T
A,.
b
2
+ -| P
w (1 - C ) R^ tan a
b
d cos A
b
- 3 (P* + P„) (3-58)
3 2
R^ (1 - C ) dip f cos f -
b J
P* (1 - C ) R^ tan «
b
d4 cos A -
—H
P,
bb f, cos ql
bs— - P H C
2
f
s
cos a
s
+ T P
2 w
1
R,
b
(1 - C
2
) tan a,
b
Defining:
f
2
B = f c H cos a (3-60)
l s s
B = P~ B (3-61)
l s i
1
1 2
B = (1 - •c ) tan R (362)
2 2 'b b
1
B = P B (3-63)
2 w 2
B = (1 + ° 3) f
w
°~ 6ii)
3 3 *b
B = P B3 (3-65)
3 w
B^ = B3 + B^ (3-67)
Substituting Eqns. (3-60) through (3-67) into Eqn. (3-59) and rearranging gives:
P* = (A cos A - B + B - B ) / B (3-68)
x b 1 2 3 4
(A
±
cos A " B + B - B )
b x 2 3
/ B^ = (A
1
x
sin A
fa
+ ^ !
1
A3 (3-69)
Now define
i
B
4
K = -t (3-70)
3
3
111-26
- B + B3] (3-71)
cos * = K sin * b + [KA 2 + Bj
b 2
/
^
(3-61) through (3-67) into
Substituting Eqns. (3-51) through (3-56) and
angle in terms of screw geometry,
Eqn. (3-71) yields an expression for the <f>
b
each surface
coefficients of friction, and the pressure on
f f R. f
U Ts —s
1 1
. D w r -L
^U
_i_/i r2J
C 1
cos <j>
= K sin * + C sin a
g
+ -f J- l
2
b b
"
— b
^ f p T
+ I_w _« _k (1
P
1 3
f f , _ c )
+ Ji tan a. (1 - C) J) + /-i C
2
sin a 3 f
fe
pb H
f b b *b
b
distribution.
has been neglected, it
Consider a screw channel which the variation of a
weight average of the helix angle. Consider a solid element which is confined
and shrinks to dZ at the screw root. The relation between dZ fc and dZ g is:
111-27
Pushing wing
Leading wing
p
m : 4
F
P+ d P
L
/<« — t
AY-
dh
Hcosa
P=P'
P = PW
dZ = CdZ, (3-73)
s b
It is assumed that the pressure in the solid element can only vary over the
length of the element and is independent of the radial position. The dotted
lines in Fig. 3-11 show the equal pressure lines. For a subelement as shown
in Fig. 3-12 at position h with length dh, the pressure acting at each face
the surfaces in contact with barrel and the screw root. The magnitude of the
where dA is the trapezoidal cross sectional area of the solid element, and
" =
| (R
b
"
V (dZ
b
+ dZ
8
)
,2v 2
(1 - (T)
J ) R^d""b
*b
Now dF and dF can be expressed in terms of the local pressure acting on the
i J
and
substituting Eqns. (3-75), (3-76) and (3-77) into Eqn. (3-74) gives;
2
dp[| (1 - C )^] = - (P f sin(4 + a)
b b b
(3-78)
+ P (f sin(a - a)dh)
s s s
Previously
'
it was assumed that P, = P . In addition if we assume a linear
b s
111-30
P, = P = k P (3- 79)
b s p
if (1 - c2)
h'S (f
b
^ b
+ ->
2
Cf sin (a - a)]/[-~ (1 - C ) R^] (3- -81)
g s
2
+ Cf sin (a - a)]/[^(l - C ) B.] (3-82)
s s 2 b
J cos a
dh
° b
P = P = _ (3- -83)
b s H cos a
Eqns. (3-82) and (3-83) supply the information to calculate P , P and P . The
w
ratio * of P to P can be obtained by dividing Eqn. (3-82) by Eqn. (3- -84), and
w b
the P* term will cancel out. This ratio can be used to solve for from
*b
Eqn. (3-72).
If a pressure difference exists over the length of the barrel , 1 :hen I there
will be one more force that needs to be considered in the analysis Consider
111-31
barrel
l
zzznzzzzzzzzzzzzz Ul 7ZZZZ2ZZZZ2 niiin\
barrel
P inlet
'<b
P-dP
lujjlu i u t± n n i n 1 iiilimjjjulllljj n 1 1 iizrz
1 1
again the solid element used in section 3.4 (see Fig. 3.13). With reference
to Fig. 3-13, let the mean pressure difference in the wedge shape solid element
be dP, since pressure is normal to the surface, the force it forms acting
tangent to the axial direction on a small strip on the side wall of the solid
dF = dP H rdr (3-85)
The movement of this strip will be r/lL cos i}> tangentially when the surface
contact will barrel moves a unit distance. Then the work done by this force
will be:
= dF cos
**n ? p^ *b
- dpH
2
— cos <f>,
dr (3-86)
\ b
W =
A dpH r
2
C° S dr
7T R R^ *b
g
2
= - dp H P^ (1 - C ) cos <|> (3-87)
b
Addition of this term to the RHS of Eqn. (3-18), followed. by the rearrangement
and combination with Eqn. (3-57) gives a modified expression for the angle of
solid movement
where
or
d* = t !r-¥-
tan a
— b ^
<3
- 91)
B
5
= | H (1 - C
2
) tan a
b
R
b
& (3-92)
Making use of Eqns. (3-51) through (3-56) and (3-60) through (3-67) permits
b b
_ i
+ B. '
=| - b' -2 + b' r^} /A. + ^ ^— (3-93)
1
ph 2
K 3 P
b
x A d£p
i b
where
2
B. • '* B (1 - C ) tan a P^ (3-94)
b
or
= cos
F ^df *b "
K sin
*b
" M (3-96)
where
P
M = {K[A^ + (A " + A "') p2]
2 3
b
P
+ Bj + (-B + BJ) =-} /Aj (3-97)
2
P
b
111-34
B'
-4 In P = I [cos - K sin 4> - M] + C (3-98)
A-
<J>,
D D A
or
lnP = ~
A.'
Mcos 4>
b
- K sin <f>
b
- M] + C
2
(3-99)
<3
- 10 °)
C = In P
2 x
f P~
ccs i>. = K sin <b, + Kfcr~ =: C sin a +
b b f S
b P
b
r b b
b
+ /^C
f
2
cosa s + /b =*b -fH i
f P 3
(1 - C
3
) - \2 -}r^
H p
tan a
b
(1 - C
2
)
b Pb b
(1 - C
2
)
jri:
b
tan
—
cu t
m-
P^
*1
111-35
the last term of Eqn. (3-103) drops out and it reduces to Eqn. (3-72).
exit,
IV-
CHAPTER 4
4 1 . APPARATUS
Two screw feeders with different screw dimensions were used in the
3 in., a screw wing thickness of 3/8 in., a barrel with inner diameter of
3 i/4 in., a length of 9 in. and a 3 cubic foot hopper. A secondary 10 in.
diameter ribbon type screw, of Intromitter, rotated in the hooper wii:h the
reducer. The metering screw speed could be adjusted in the range of 0-100
rpm by adjusting the voltage applied to the motor. The speed ratio of the
intromitter and metering screw is 1:20. Both the metering screw and dis-
charge barrel were made of 304 stainless steel. The set up for screw feeder
Screw feeder B (Vibra Screw serial 175) had a screw diameter of 15/16 in.,
a pitch of 1 3/16 in., a screw wing thickness of 9/16 in., and no screw root.
A 6 in. long, 1 in. inner diameter transparent barrel made of plexiglass was
used. This permitted visual observation of the particle motion through the
3 5/16 in. had connected to the existing hopper which was a rectangular box
with a 12 in. width and a 15 in. length. This allowed measurement of the
volume of material discharged from the feeder by observing the level in the
The screw speed could be adjusted within the range 0-200rpm. To test the
effect of pressure upon feed rate, the screw feeder B discharged into a
columm that could be pressurized. The pressure column had a 6 inch- inner
diameter and was made of plexiglass. A gas distributor was placed in the
the air line to give a steady pressure. Two valves were used to control
the pressure of the column. The first valve (right behind the pressure
regulator) controlled the amount of inlet air. The second valve (on the
top of the column) controlled the amount outlet air. 'By adjusting the two
valves, the pressure in the column could be adjusted. A U-tube water mono-
tube with a clamp was fitted in the lower part of the column, by fluidizing
the particles and opening the clamp, the particles simply flowed out from the
column through the tube. The experimental arrangement is shown in Fig. 4.2.
The material used in the experiments was sand. The particle size
barrel to remove any dirt, oil or grease. Then the feeders were run with
sand for 1-1 1/2 hours so that the screw and barrel surface attained an
equilibrium state. Checking the feed rate at constant rpm can indicate
sand discharged from the feeder in a given time interval was recorded. The
number of turns that the screw revolved during the same time period were
3
IV-
Table 4.1. Particle size dis tribution of the sand usee in experiments.
Summation -
100%
IV-4
9 77.56 — »
10 86.18 — —
IV-5
3-^-I.D BARREL
-IO"D
INTROMITTER
3 SCREW
+ /\
->f — .3 "
g SCREW ROOT
:-^-V-
~ \-a
;- 77
< •
Wl ^T.
-A \/ ^T
A
-g WING THICKNESS
BUCKET
->
©
SCALE
IV--
GRADUATED
COLUMN 34"
3 ID.
15
VftLVE
X MONOMETER
/
VARIABLE 6"I.D.
SPEED
DRIVE PRESSURE
COLUMN
4 vJ
vVvWVVWvWy^
-n l"r.D. BARREL
DISTRIBUTOR
SCREW
1.2
15"
" PITCH A PRESSURE
DIAMETER
REGULATOR
0" SCREW ROOT DRAIN PIPE
ik-C^) A,R
t
VALVE
pressure test on
pensions and Mt up for the bacU
Figur e 4.2.
feeder B.
IV-
also recorded to determine rpm. The bulk density of sand was measured by
comparing the weight of sand to the weight of water that occupied the same
rate. A similar procedure was used to determine the feed rate of feeder B
feeder B, the hopper of feeder B was first filled up with sand. Then the
the desired rpm, the feeder was started. The sand level in the hopper
was allowed to drop for a few inches before the recording started. This
would allow the packing of sand in the hopper and the rpm to reach a steady
feed rates. The actual rpm was also measured by measuring the revolutions
of the screw in a given time interval. To assertain that the volume changed
in the hopper can represent the actual feed rate, a calibration was conducted
of the weight discharged and the volume changed in the hopper is presented
CHAPTER 5
the solid movement angle, £ , using Eqn. (3-9). In Eqn. (3-103) f is related
o b
to the geometric variables of the screw and barrel; the friction factors
f , f and f , ; the pressure difference across the barrel; the ratio between
S W D
pressure at the leading wing P , that at the screw root, P , and that at
where M' is the collection of terms on the right hand side of Eqn. (3-103)
2 2
sin $ = 1 - cos $ (5-2)
2 2 *"
sin ? =
(1 ± K - M'
a
- KM') ,.
(
„
3 -3)
b 2
1 - K
For a given screw and material to be handled along with the known
pressure differences between the inlet and outlet, the angle ifc. ot Eqn. (4-3)
P P
1)
\ - '<^r. z - (5-4)
o b
s b b ' v b
p
\ " f (rr) (5-5)
P
b
V-2
2
+ cf
s
sin (a
s
- l))/[\ (1 - C ) Rj} (3-81)
P _f f n sin .(,,
+ •) + Cf . sin («. ~ «)J
w = H cos
-
p- 3
b 2(1 - (?)
The mean helix angle a can be obtained by making use of the general equation,
Eqn. (3-2):
a = tan (— (5-7)
where the average diameter of the screw channel will be evaluated from the
weighted mean:
S r
2
A
dr
% \
D = 2R = 2 ^ . A il_Z_C_l R . 1 (1 - C )
b J b
. • rar
(i - c-) (1 - (T)
Rs
For a screw of known geometry (and a given material), Eqn. (5-6). is a function
of p only:
o
i^
= *(
V (5-9)
simultaneously Eqn. (5-9) and Eqn. (5-5). For this purpose a numerical method
P
was used. By assuming a value of j*-, a value, of was found from Eqn.
> (5-3)
b
)
V-3
This value of *> was substituted into Eqn. (5-6) to find a new value of
?
w
V
This iteration was repeated until the difference between the assumed
P P P
D [
(•=—) assumed] = (»—) assumed - (=— ) generated (5-10)
P
'b % b
tan J, tan 1
neglected. The screws for both feeders were assumed to have the same
screw feeder B was taken as 0.001 inch instead of 0. This was done to
-1 P
2
s
tan (—
tD
—
s
were equal. Since P.,/?, = 1 for this case, there was no need to evaluate
V-4
read
ER Q Del L,R ,Po,fb it .f w k
p E
f
s V
f I f .
N =0
%/Pb =0
N = N+l
Z(N)=S/Pb
D(N)Z(N-1)-D(N-1)Z(N)
§L.=
R. D(ND-D(N-I)
Calc.db (Egn. 4-3)
b
Z(N-i)=Z(N-2)
Yes Yes Calc. F^/Ph (Egn.4-6)
D(N-l)=D(N-2
D(N)=Z(N)-P„/Pb
No
Yes
No No No
Yes
V-5
P and P . For the cases where the back pressure exists, the pressure at
the outlet of the barrel was taken as Y^ plus the back pressure, i.e.,
P = ? + AP
2 1
The back pressure AP was taken as the pressure difference measured from the
monometer.
on the geometry of the container as well as the stack height and the density
of the solids. (Ross, 1960). For a shallow bed (bed height is small
But with an increase in the bed height, the increase in the pressure decreases
height, and adding more solids to the container has no effect on the pressure
at the bottom. This phenomena can explain the constant feed rate of solids
at different hopper levels before the height drops below a certain level.
For screw feeder B, this level occured about 0.5 in. from the bottom
of the cylindrical hopper. This means that the sand in the cylindrical
hopper had little effect on P • P. was taken as the sand bed height at
the inlet of the barrel (3.5 in) times the bulk denisty of the sand.
under light loading were caused to slide over a bed of sand. The ratios
of the forces needed to maintain the movements to the weights of the plates
were taken. The coefficient of friction on stainless steel was found 0.3
CHAPTER 6
became apparent that the output from the feeder was not uniform all the
time, but varied periodically as the screw turns. It was not possible to
measure the variation in the flow rate during each revolution of the screw
with this apparatus, and consequently only a mean value taken over a period
all the available space between wings was occupied by sand at the inlet
section of the barrel. But at the discharge end of the barrel, some
void space appeared on the upper surface of the barrel. The void space
end of the barrel, the upper part of the sand in the screw was not forced
out of the barrel by the screw but appeared to flow out of the barrel by
gravity. The void space in the end section decreased and the variation
in output also decreased with an increase in the back pressure. The above
observations suggest that the periodic output was caused in part by the
effect of gravity.
The sand in the inlet section of the screw was observed to move in a
helical path toward the exit. This observation supports the rigid plug
of sand at the barrel surface (especially betwen the wing tip and barrel)
of movement and moved in and out of the clearance of the wing tip. The
VI-2
plexiglass barrel
screw void space
sand discharge
VI-
abrasion of the sand, made the direct measurement of the solid movement
angle difficult. The solid movement in the exit section of the barrel
deviated further from the rigid plug flow pattern as a result of the creation
of void space. Since the feed rate was mainly determined by the part of
the screw that is running full, this phenomena should not have appreciable
A critical hopper level was observed for each feeder, above which
the feed rate at a constant rpm remained constant despite the change in
the hopper level. Below this level, the feed rate at 'a constant rpm dropoed
with the level. Since the steady feed rate was of direct concern in this
work, all the experiments were carried out with solid levels in the hopper
above the critical level. Only a small variation in the feed rate (less
Figures 6.2 and 6.3 show, respectively, the mass feed rates as
functions of rpm for feeder A and 3. The feed rate was observed to increase
volumetric delivery per revolution was almost constant at any rpm showing
only a slight decline with increasing rpm. However, the feed rate at
a constant rpm decreased when a back pressure was present. The larger the
back pressure, the smaller the feed rate. The volumetric feed rate versus
data in this section. Tables 6.1 and 6.2 list the exerimentally determined
value of the volume deliver;/ rate per revolution obtained with feeders
screw 3
rpm total wt. (lb) wt/rev (lb) volume/rev (in )
turns
VI-6
•
60
A Experimental Data
Theory
50
1 40 -
c:
1 30 "™
/D\
</>
o
' J^"^
20 •—
10
f 9
/ 1 1 1 « » 1
10 20 30 40 50 60
rpm
o
»
- o 1
I
2
i
o PQ
•
U
i
CD
XI
<a
M-l
M
O
o U-l
o a
c
m
3
CO
M
«
' >
\l - 2 p
Q. «
v.
T3
•
i i
co
- O
•
co
\ 1
en
•
Figure
40
• -
goo
20
o1
• 1 1
o o •
o o S o o
,
o CO <D + <m
•
(uiui/uj6) ajoy paaj ssoj/y
• -
VI-8
of the predicted results from the present work and from previous theory
isshownat the end of each table. It can be seen that the present, theory
Darnell and Mol's theory is too low for feeder A, but is too high for
results.
Figure 6.4 (in section 6.1) presents the volumetric feed rate as
a function rpm for feeder B with the back pressure as. the parameter. The
solid lines represent the computed results based on, and the averaged
zero back pressure and triangle for a back pressure of 20 inches of water.
Figure 6.5 shows the volume delivery rate as a function of the back
pressure for feeder 3 operated at 54 rpm. The solid line represents the
computed results based and the circles represent the experimental results.
The agreement is quite good. Similar agreement was observed for the other
values of rpm.
Darnell and Mol (1956) have developed a model that is based on the
solid plug concept. With the assumptions that the pressure in the solid
plug is uniform, and the same coefficient of friction on the screw and
barrel they used a force and torque balance to derive an equation for the
solid movement angle (?) for a screw with a shallow channel. Tadmor and
friction on the screw and the barrel. The resultant equation is:
Vl-9
c
6
•H
4J
CJ
•H
H >
<H 14-1
VM
O
M
II
l/->
«M
O
sr
O
m
w fn « •
C
<U II
•H
(J CO
•H «-l
•H
IH
CU
o
u
i
•v ro 4^S
c e c O
o
lO
CN
in
CO O •H
S.X
CN
"^>. CM i-H .H
e M * • "
60
s-^
c
u s ^\ O O CTN
CO CU C o r^ CN
Q u
o
U~l
r^
o CO
.H CO
•H
>-• CN
•
CN
•
<N
•
co < cr>
«* vO C O.
• • • O
c •H
TJ •H en
CU C ^-N
CO >> cu r* u-i C O
3 (J e
w
•H r^.
en
O
o
O
o
•H
to CO CO • • •
u c Q i-i .H .H
Hi CU
u
0)
a
e O ^-v
tfl Crt c
•H
iH O
\D
O
vO
o\
v_^ o> o\ Oi
a. • • •
e
<D O
4J •H •
CO iH 3
>» C
o cu h
> 0)
M U o w
rH c u CJ
>, cu CO TO
0) c iH
NO
fl
rH
O >, O
to r-\ JZ «tf
CU
M o
r-{
c
-H =
4-1
CU
H HC
-H CO c >> = co
.O : cu O r-t cu cu
CO iH H ja o 4J ^
H cu 4J a •H
4-1 to y
N>, H
<
3
_3
«H
to
•H
h
CU
4-1
>H CN m
i
X
VI-10
CD
T3
Model
-3-<riHvomcorHcn«N
CM CM CM i-H rH CM
5*. Present
JO
fl)
3 o
i-l M
U
o
C
o •a
c
r-l
CO
CO00OO\«d-00rH00i-l
ir>ooocMmcocM«a-i~--
iH rH
0)
M c
P. u
CO
5 P
co 01
4J > •3
i-l at
3
a> ^.
a) CO (J
1.46 1.24 1.05 2.94 2.50 2.11 2.80 2.51 2.25
B' c
•H OJ
*^ (0
0)
01
C u Pi
CO
Si
! -a
0) 0) o
i
4-1
£
ai •a
•a C
a* co
•U .90 .20 .00 .30 .85
2.23 1.21 2.25 1.50
CJ rH
•H rH
£ 13 0)
c
-o u u
B PL, CO
«
•
Q
rH rH
HOJ
01
-a
c o
H
1-1
ni
n uc rate
Experimental
4-1 OJ
O W 1.91 1.64 1.34 3.12 2.63 2.42 2.83 2.88 2.88
0) in-Vrev
c S-i
o
0)
a feed
•H 0)
>J .c
fl U
rx .-t
1 -a co
o c •H
u aj M
0) i-HCMCOrHCMCOrHCMCO
•
<t
•
2
vo
H<u
XI
H
eg
Screw UUUQQQUUW
VI-11
4 Or
Parameter
30
o
20
a>
o
•f-
o>
E
10
Figure 6.4. Volume feed rate of feeder B versus rpm under different
back pressure conditions.
ro
>
o
O
AP (inch H20)
(P - R f
cos .b - k sin
b
+ 2 —w —)
j-
r
(6-D
b b
where
- sin a + f cos a
k = 5
*>
(6-2)
D, cos 5 - f sin a
b s
Equation (6-1) is similar to Eqn. (3-103), but it does not contain terms
w = H cos a (6-5)
w = H cos a (6-6)
s s
and Z is the helical distance from inlet of the barrel following the wing
b
tip to outlet of barrel and can be expressed as:
Z. = L/sin a ( 6_7)
b
The second term on the right hand side of Eqn. (6-1) is a result of the
friction on the two wings. The third term results from the friction on the
screw root and the fourth term is from the back pressure. An additional
force on the wing is needed to balance the other force and is given by
p^fe =
dZ
b
(f
bV —in -
*
+ 2(R
1
b~ R )f
s
»g
s
Slna
s
+W s f s
-—
sln
'
"-'
V
cos a - f sin a
s
(6-8)
+ Hwsin adP
VI-1A
p*
\
\
\
\
i_
\\
CO
to
CD
\
O
CO
direction.
Figure 6.6. Pressure distribution in the cross channel
o
2>
0)
"O
Figure 6.7. Comparison the present work with Darnell and Mol's
theory.
VI-16
distribution in a solid plug contained between the two wings is assumed to be:
P = P* = ? + P for h = (6-9)
w A
P -
WD
P, = P, for < h —< H (6-10)
channeL direction for a solid element. The dotted line represents the solid
Figure 6.7 presents a comparison of Eqn. (3-103) and Eqn. (6-1), and,
interns of a plot of i> versus C, calculations were made for the following
Lino B represents the case where the nonuniform distribution was considered.
From the figure, it can be seen that without considering the pressure
dotted line agrees with Eqn. (3-103)when the channel is shallow (C close
Darnell and Mol (1956) also published some experimental data on the
volumetric feed rates in screw feeders. Three different screw sizes and
parameters are shown in Table 6.3. When theoretical volumetric feed rate
VI-17
data.
tan tan a, -
Q „
w „,,,
i>,
!b b a_
L (D
2
_ D
9
2
)
B^L*v }
(3-9)
b tan d>_ + tan a, 4 s s p
b b
output, the
In order to discuss and compare the efficiency of a screw's
volumetric efficiency is defined as the ratio of the actual feed rate to the
sweep volume of the screw. The sweep volume of a screw can be expressed as:
v
s
- . P if a* - *
2
S
> ^i <«»
Substituting for p (the pitch) from Eqn. (3-1) outside the brackets in Eqn.
tan
n
1
= fi
V
=
tan 4L
J
<J>.
+ tan a,
(6-12)
s b b
solid movement angle and the helix angle at the barrel surface. The helix
angle at the barrel surface can be expressed in terms of the ratio of the
seen that for a fixed helix angle, the larger the solid movement angle, the
VI-18
•
P
Parameter -jr-
ub
1.0-
„
0.9-
o
§ 0.6-
'o
**-
UJ 0.5-
o
2>
c
0.4 -
1 / // :
> 0.3-
0.2-
O.lJf
1 1
4fc 1 1 1 1 1 • 1
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
<£ (degree )
•
VI-19
f (p/D,
cos *. = K sin <b. + k{ 2 -
p
C — : ~ , +
.
=
b b
Vb (,C
2
+ (p/DK )
b
2
f 2(1 - |~)
°b
f f n
^[if(i-c
p
2
2 f
) +
/i
£ *D
(i-c)]} + /^c
f
2
b b b b b Pb
ttC _w ^w 1 1 n p
3. 1
" 4
C, c
2
+ JL.^ f
b P, 2(1 - E/D b ) 3
D
b
(1 - E/D )
Si
P *
(
v
S
Dr)
; (1
v
. c
2
)
'
+ 0^ 2 2(p/D
b
)
b h
i £-)
* D
b
(§-) In
D
b p
l
^ (6 13)
be expressed as
p
i = G(*-, C, \-> f , f ,
«i) (6-14)
b D f-,
D D s b P
b b b 2
The effects of the variables in the right hand side of Eqn. (6-14) will be
numerically based on the nresent model, for the case of, f = f, , and no
s b
back pressure, P.. P.. The effects of screw geometry are considered first.
Figure 6-9 shows the effect of the dimensionless screw root diameter or C
VI-20
decreases and
can be seen that as the screw root diameter increases, <(>
p/D = 1 and C = 0.5. The figure shows that the larger the wing thickness,
p/D 1.2.
with the coefficient of friction and lies in the range of 0.7 <
b
<
This agrees with the fact that most screws used in industry have a pitch
From Eqn. 6-11, it can be seen that the length of the barrel has no
of screw conveyors, since the length of the barrel has never been listed
in -Fig. 6-12. The simulation was based upon a p/D = 1, E = 0, and C = 0.5.
The figure presents a plot of cf> versus f /f value, the larger the ^.
fa
At fixed f. It , the smaller the f , the larger the <j> . This behavior is
b s s b
apparently well-known as it has been suggested that the screw be coated with
Next, the effects of back pressure are examined numerically for the
case of p/D L =1, C = 0.5, E = .5. Figure 6-13 presents a plot of ku versus
b
VI-21
parameter f
50
E=0
40
1%
X*
30 -
CD
20
10
^"^\
1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ -,\ 1
.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 ID
_ R
C s -^ s
RD
— Dimensionlcss Screw root Dia.
a>
-6? 20
•
JL — Dimensionless wing thickness
to o Q."
it II H
O LU Q.~
u o
£ O
u
w
c
o
(A
c
<y
1-t
E
b
0)
S-l
3
60
. Fn
q
(89J69P) cj>
>
VI-24
Parameter f8
3.0
%'%
b<
VI-25
(In P„/P, )/ (L/D, ) . The smaller the coefficient of friction, the more rapidly
2 1 b
<f>,
decreases, or the greater the influence of back pressure. It can also be
b
p
2
(In ^) /L/D
1
Figure 6-14 plots <j>, against P„/P.. for the conditions of Fig. 6.13
b 2 1
with barrel length as the parameter when f = .3. The figure shows that
Figure 6-15 and 6-16 respectively. Figure 6-15 plots <|> against ? I?
with C as the parameter for the case of p/D, = 1, L/D, =5, f = 0.3,
b b
At a fixed P„/P n ratio, the smaller the E, the larger the <j>, .
2 1 b
operation with or without back pressure, a small screw root diameter and
a small wing thickness are necessary and desirable to achieve a high feed
rate. For an operation with a back pressure, the longer the barrel, the
smaller the influence of back pressure and the higher the limit of back
pressure. But, since the strength of the screw will decrease as the
screw root diameter and wing thickness decrease, some trade-offs will have
to be made. Further, the longer the barrel, the more power it will consume;
again, trade-offs will have' to be made. The optimum design for the geometry
VI-26
parameter f p
=
\ "d"
'
'
c s 5
\v -
40
\.l E*0
(degree)
e^
04
20
oi
"n^ —_-5
1-
^ • 9
10
i \
1
i t
* t 1
< 3 2 4 6 8 10
(in
ft)
\ -
•
VI-27
c
0)
u
0)
u
i
9
3
-e-
CM
U-l
o
o
U-l
U-l
W
0)
3
63
(99j6ap) <£
VI-28
o
o -
4-1
c
0)
u
m mi o 0)
M-l
CM m P 00 U-l
•H
10
ii o
in
)-i
0>
ro Q /
" -J
q: lu M- < I
-©-
c
o
o
C\J
iH
CM
P4
M-l
Q=- O
V.
o qCJ feet
M-l
CO
o lO
"55
3
E CO
S
CM
—r~
O 8
(99J63P) c/>
VI-29
o M
-g 4J
8
*/ m 6
4-1
If) / •H
T3
CVJ /
d I
/
1
e-
c
o
rH
Ph
fM
PM
in
qT
2 o
Effect
1
/
1
SO
•
u
3
60
•H
o
1
(89J69P) q
<£ i
*
VII-1
CHAPTER 7
mechanism arise from the complexity of describing both the particle movement
and the curvature of the screw. In this work, equations have been formu-
horizontal position. It was assumed that all the particles conveyed in the
this assumption, to develop a model for estimating the solid movement angle.
The feed rate of the screw feeder can then be readily obtained from this
friction. A force balance on a solid plug enables one to express the solid
of friction, pressure rise and the ratio of the solid pressure on the leading
wing to the average pressure on the barrel surface. A simplified model which
neglects the curvature of the wing was used to obtain the pressure distribution
movement angle.
values of the feed rates for two screw feeders conveying sand for selected
speeds from zero to 200 rpm. The deviation between the experimental and
predicted values of the volumetric feed rate was less than three percent.
VII-2
The model used in this study considered two important variables that
previous workers had neglected. These variables are the pressure distri-
bution in the solid plug and the change of screw angle with the diameter
the model is significant. For example, the average deviation between the
experimental data and the theoretical values based on the model of Darnell
and Mol 61%; in contrast, the average deviation between the experimental
data and the theoretical values based on the present model was 14%.
by trial and error and from data of similar feeders. In addition, the effect
the model developed in this thesis, it is hoped that a feeder can be quickly
and accurately designed and optimized with a minimum of trial and error.
The controversial assumptions made in the screw feeder model were that
the solids always moved in plug flow and that the solid pressure against the
screw wing is uniform irrespective of the radius. Although the plug flow
assumption is quite realistic for most cases, it will not accurately describe
the solid movement under some conditions. These conditions are as follows.
If the screw is not full of solids, or the clearance between the screw and
barrel is large, or the internal friction among particles is smaller than that
between the barrel and screw, the plug flow assumption is not applicable.
The uniform pressure assumption has not been examined, either experimentally
a model that can account for flows other than plug flow and variable pressure
the present model. Therefore, the results of this work are applicable only
and centrifugal forces in the analysis will expand the versatility of the
present model to inclined screw feeders and conveyors, and permit considerations
LITERATURE CITED
Germany (1941).
Screw Extruder - The Role of Gravity Force," J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 15,
No. 3, 114 (1973a).
Morin, I. V., "Auger Output," Nat. Inst. Agri. Eng. Trans. 77, Silsoe (1956).
yn-5
° ,Cal h an
Aof N o : I;
R
4 so Ztllr
ance of Vertlcal Screw CORveyors
'
M
A ^ c -
E» g -
'^^(llj;):
1
" UnpUbli8hed re P° rt
« — D Sen, Farbenfabliken Bayer, Gennany
Peart
Bulie t ^I No: 631 ^958):
r a U r
* ^ Unl ° ader '" «*«** °f "*~*
Regan W M
and Henderson, S. M. "Performance Characteristics of ,
Roberts
Lp L
G. E
aP r P r
A. W.
"Performance Characteristics of Farm
e
mb e ri-3 (1959?:
and Willis, A. H.
.
rth
,
"^ «**> ^ ^
Type Auger Elevator
"
R° SS
\l'r J'r
Screw
The
^^
ACting ° n Partic ^s Stacks and Capacity
Conveyors," Master Thesis, Purdue
University (I960)!
of Enclosed
finclo8ed
"
E0£!ineer1 ^ Principle, of Plasticating
1 -'
^iV-'cr^^^V
sion, Chapter Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York4,
(1970).
Extru-
Zi
"\VYork'(i?05
e
)
MeChanlCal Handling f
° «^^>" Van Nostrand,
by
CHERNG-CHIAO WU
MASTER OF SCIENCE
Manhattan, Kansas
1977
ABSTRACT
Screw feeders and screw conveyors have been widely used in industry
approaches to describe the performance of screw feeders and enclosed screw conveyors
feeders.
barrel, and the particles fill up all the available space in the screw
channel. It was assumed that all the particles conveyed in the screw move
like a rigid plug at constant velocity. Then the delivery rate of the
device could be related to the r.p.m. of the screw, geometry of the screw,
and the direction of the solid plug movement. With the aid of a force
and work balances on a small section of the solid plug and an analysis of
the solid pressure distribution in the plug, the angle of solid movement
particles on the screw and barrel surfaces, and the pressure exerted on
the inlet and outlet of the screw feeder. With the angle of solid movement
Two screw feeders with screw diameters of 15/16" and 3 1/4" respectively,
were used in the experiments. . Comparisons were made between the experimentally
determined and predicted values of the delivery rate for both feeders
measured values.