You are on page 1of 1

Collin Jasper C.

Pachingel
BSN 2C

ACTIVITY 17

1. "Members of the LGBTQ+ such as gays and lesbians are genetic rather than environmental
influence."

This argument relates to the nature versus nurture debate regarding the origins of sexual orientation.
While there is evidence to suggest that genetics play a role in sexual orientation, it is important to note that it is
a complex interplay of both genetic and environmental factors.

A comprehensive review published in the journal Psychological Science in 2008 analyzed the findings
of numerous studies on sexual orientation. The review concluded that there is substantial evidence for a genetic
influence on sexual orientation, particularly in men. However, it also emphasized that environmental factors,
such as prenatal hormone exposure and social influences, likely interact with genetic factors to determine sexual
orientation. The review noted that the exact mechanisms and contributions of these factors are still being
researched.

Source:

Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual
orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3),
524-536.

2. "Gene Therapy and Stem Cell Therapy hinder the natural balance of life and death."

This argument is subjective and does not have a definitive answer within the scientific community. The
impact of gene therapy and stem cell therapy on the natural balance of life and death depends on various ethical,
philosophical, and cultural perspectives.

Gene therapy and stem cell therapy have the potential to treat genetic disorders, regenerate damaged
tissues, and improve overall health outcomes. These therapies aim to alleviate suffering, improve quality of life,
and potentially extend life expectancy.

While there are ethical considerations and concerns about unintended consequences associated with
these therapies, such as potential risks and implications for personal identity, it is crucial to evaluate their
benefits in addressing specific medical conditions. The ethical and societal discussions surrounding these
therapies involve weighing the potential benefits against the risks and considering individual autonomy and
societal values.

Source:

Hyun, I., Lindvall, O., & Ahrlund-Richter, L. (2008). The ethics of stem cell research and therapy. Stem Cell
Reviews and Reports, 4(1), 52-58.

It's important to note that scientific debates are ongoing, and new evidence and research may emerge
over time, potentially influencing the consensus within the scientific community.

You might also like