SITE PLANNING & SELECTION v1.0

G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.
0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
09 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
SITE PLANNING
AND SELECTION
Gerick Morta Domingo, MSc.CM
Architect / Environmental Planner / Real Estate
Appraiser
AR 511S4
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
14
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE
SEPTEMBER |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
INTENDED LEARNING
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
OUTCOMES (I.L.O.)
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION To examine the ideas and concepts behind
FACTORS the study of site planning.
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
To evaluate the parameters in site selection
RATINGS process.
CONCLUSION To identify the different factors that affect site
analysis.
AR 511S4
To select and support concepts appropriate
SEPTEMBER 14 to a given site situation.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
SITE PLANNING
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
The art of arranging structures on
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION the land and shaping the spaces
FACTORS between.
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION The art and science of arranging
RATINGS the uses of portions of land.
CONCLUSION
The critical thinking process of
research, analysis and synthesis that
AR 511S4
makes a major contribution to the
SEPTEMBER 14 formation of design decisions.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
METHODS OF
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING ESTABLISHING A SITE
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT
SITE SELECTION SITE SELECTION

SUITABILITY
RATINGS
PROCESS
CONCLUSION
PROCESS
AR 511S4
SEPTEMBER 14 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
METHODS OF
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING ESTABLISHING A SITE
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
1. SITE SELECTION PROCESS: Select a site

FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION that suits best the given use of the
RATINGS project;
CONCLUSION
2. DEVELOPMENT SUITABILITY PROCESS:
Select the best use and development
AR 511S4
suited for a given site.
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
SITE ANALYSIS
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
NATURAL
 SITE ANALYSIS FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
https://www.netclipart.com
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
SITE ANALYSIS
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CULTURAL
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
https://www.123rf.com
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
MAIN POINTS
SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE PLANNING
AESTHETIC
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
http://gofreedownload.net
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL FACTORS
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CLIMATE GEOLOGY
 SITE ANALYSIS Solar orientation for buildings, Earth – its composition;
 SITE SELECTION best facing slope, wind flows the processes that
FACTORS for breezes shaped its surface;
and its history (rocks)
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA WILDLIFE
Habitats (openland, GEOMORPHOLOGY
 SITE SELECTION woodland, wetland) Physiography, landforms,
RATINGS soils, drainage,
VEGETATION topography and slopes,
CONCLUSION Climatic control (solar radiation,
and soil erosion
wind), environmental
engineering (air purification, HYDROLOGY
AR 511S4
noise, glare, erosion), Surface and
architectural uses (space ground water
14
definition, view control, mood) (watershed)
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
CULTURAL FACTORS
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
 SITE ANALYSIS HISTORIC FACTORS EXISTING LAND USE
 SITE SELECTION Historic buildings, Ownership of adjacent
FACTORS landmarks, and property, off-site nuisances
archeology
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA TRAFFIC AND
UTILITIES TRANSIT
 SITE SELECTION sanitary, storm-water, Vehicular and pedestrian
RATINGS water supply, power circulation on or adjacent
supply, and to site
CONCLUSION communications.
DENSITY AND
SOCIO-
ZONING
ECONOMIC
AR 511S4
Legal and regulatory
FACTORS
14
controls
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
AESTHETIC FACTORS
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS NATURAL FEATURES
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
VISUAL RESOURCES SPATIAL PATTERNS
RATINGS
Views and vistas Spaces and sequences
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
FACTORS
09
MAIN POINTS
SITE PLANNING
1. Natural, Environmental,

 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
Physical Factors
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
2. Legal, Institutional,
 SITE SELECTION Administrative, and Aesthetic
RATINGS
Factor
CONCLUSION
3. Socio-Economic and
Cultural Factor
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL,


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1. Land Area/Lot Size (20%)
 SITE SELECTION 2. Accessibility (Modes of Transportation)
RATINGS (10%)
CONCLUSION 3. Soil Characteristic & Condition (10%)
AR 511S4
http://clipart-library.com
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL,


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
4. Accessibility of Utility and Service
 SITE SELECTION Needs (Electricity, Water,
RATINGS Communication Service, Waste
CONCLUSION Management) (10%)
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL,


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
5. Vulnerabilities to Natural Hazards
 SITE SELECTION (Flooding, Site Erosion, Seismologic
RATINGS Activity) (10%)
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL,


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
6. Site Drainage (5%)
 SITE SELECTION 7. Topography (10%)
RATINGS 8. Climate (10%)
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL,


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
9. Orientation (5%)
 SITE SELECTION 10. Existing Vegetation (5%)
RATINGS 11. Future Expansion Plan (5%)
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ADMINISTRATIVE, AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
AESTHETIC FACTOR
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1. Proper Land Use & Zoning (20%)
 SITE SELECTION 2. Ease of Ownership (25%)
RATINGS 3. Land Cost (35%)
CONCLUSION 4. Compatibility with Adjacent Land Use
(20%)
AR 511S4
https://www.kissclipart.com
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CULTURAL FACTOR
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1. Site Potential (20%)
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
2. Accessibility to major roads (30%)
CRITERIA 3. Must be within urban area (20%)
 SITE SELECTION 4. Accessibility to important existing
RATINGS
facilities (15%)
CONCLUSION 5. Pedestrian Access and Circulation
(15%)
AR 511S4
https://eng521milton.wordpress.com
https://clip.cookdiary.net
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL,
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ENVIRONMENTAL AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
PHYSICAL FACTORS
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR LAND
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
AREA CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Lot size is inadequate to meet the
FACTORS
suggested minimum lot size requirement
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA set in the national building code
 SITE SELECTION 2 – Lot size is adequate to meet the
RATINGS
suggested minimum lot size requirement
CONCLUSION set in the national building code
3 – Lot size exceeds 50% of
the suggested minimum lot size
AR 511S4
https://clipartart.com
requirement set in the national
SEPTEMBER 14 building code and
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
AREA CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION provides area for another expansion or
FACTORS
provision of another adjacent amenities
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA and activities
 SITE SELECTION 4 – Lot size exceeds 75% of the suggested
RATINGS
minimum lot size requirement set in the
CONCLUSION national building
code and provides area
for another expansion or
AR 511S4
provision of another adjacent
SEPTEMBER 14 amenities and activities
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
AREA CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 5 – Lot size exceeds more than 100% of
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
the suggested minimum lot size
CRITERIA requirement set in the national building
 SITE SELECTION code and provides area for another
RATINGS
expansion or provision of another
CONCLUSION adjacent amenities and
activities
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY NETWORK


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – Accessed by taxis
 SITE SELECTION and private vehicles
RATINGS 2 – Accessed by PUVs, taxis
CONCLUSION and private vehicles
3 – Accessed by jeepney,
PUVs, taxis, and private
AR 511S4
vehicles
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY NETWORK


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
4 – Accessed by public bus, jeepney,
 SITE SELECTION PUVs, taxis, and private vehicles
RATINGS 5 – Near an airport terminal and
CONCLUSION accessible through public,
buses, jeepneys, PUVs, and
private vehicles
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR SOIL
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CHARACTERISTIC AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CONDITION CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – Soil is unstable all over and soil is
 SITE SELECTION mostly consists of made ground or fill
RATINGS 2 – Soil is unstable for most parts of site
CONCLUSION and is mostly consists of peat
and organic soil
3 – Some remote area of the
AR 511S4
site have unstable soils and is
SEPTEMBER 14 mostly consists of
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR SOIL
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CHARACTERISTIC AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CONDITION CRITERIA):
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION cohesive soils (hard, firm and soft clays)
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
4 – Most areas of the site have stable soils
RATINGS and is mostly consists of non cohesive soils
CONCLUSION
(hard clays, gravel and sand)
5 – Soils are stable and mostly
consists of rocks (igneous,
AR 511S4
gneissic, limestone, sandstone,
SEPTEMBER 14 schist, slate, mustone)

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY TO UTILITY


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
AND SERVICES

FACTORS
SITE SELECTION CRITERIA):
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS 1 – No existing utilities and services and
has known difficulties of access on site
CONCLUSION 2 – No existing utilities and
services but is far from the site
3 – No existing utilities and services
AR 511S4
14
but is accessible near the site
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY TO UTILITY


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
AND SERVICES

FACTORS
SITE SELECTION CRITERIA):
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS 4 – Existing utilities and services are
available adjacent to or near
CONCLUSION
the site
5 – Existing utilities and
AR 511S4
https://clipartart.com services are available within
SEPTEMBER 14 the site

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
VULNERABILITIES TO
SITE PLANNING
NATURAL HAZARD

 SITE ANALYSIS
CRITERIA):
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
1 – Site in proximity to hazards
RATINGS 2 – Site is in proximity to three or more hazards
3 – Site is in proximity to
CONCLUSION two hazards
4 – Site is in proximity to
one hazard
AR 511S4
5 – Site free of any potential
SEPTEMBER 14 damage/injury from natural hazards
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR SITE
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
DRAINAGE CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Site is mostly low and the neighboring
FACTORS
areas drain into it
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA 2 – Drainage accumulates in some
 SITE SELECTION portion of the site
RATINGS
3 – Drainage accumulates in the
CONCLUSION neighborhood near the site
4 – Site has definite drainage
with water coming from
AR 511S4
adjacent properties but can
SEPTEMBER 14 merely be contained
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
DRAINAGE CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 5 – Site has definite drainage with no
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
unnecessary water coming from
CRITERIA adjacent properties
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
TOPOGRAPHY CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Site contains major topographic
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
irregularity and cannot hold
CRITERIA possible uses
 SITE SELECTION 2 – Site is not even, and can only hold
RATINGS
certain possible use
CONCLUSION 3 – Site is not even, but
can still hold all possible uses
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
TOPOGRAPHY CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 4 – Site is chiefly even and can hold all
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
possible uses
CRITERIA 5 – Site is relatively flat and can hold all
 SITE SELECTION possible use
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CLIMATE CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – The site has irregular dry and wet
FACTORS
season
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA 2 – Site experiences greater wet
 SITE SELECTION season than dry season
RATINGS
3 – Site experiences greater
CONCLUSION dry season than wet season
4 – Site has fair climate
and weather condition
AR 511S4
5 – Site has good climate
SEPTEMBER 14 and weather condition
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ORIENTATION CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – The site does not have good sun and
FACTORS
wind orientation
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA 2 – The site has satisfactory sun and wind
 SITE SELECTION orientation
RATINGS
3 – The site has good sun orientation but
CONCLUSION satisfactory wind orientation
4 – The site has both good sun
and wind orientation
AR 511S4
5 – The site has both excellent
SEPTEMBER 14 sun and wind orientation
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
EXISTING VEGETATION


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – The site has no existing vegetation
 SITE SELECTION 2 – The site has 10% existing vegetation
RATINGS 3 – The site has 20% existing
CONCLUSION vegetation
4 – The site has 30%
existing vegetation
AR 511S4
5 – The site has 40%
SEPTEMBER 14 existing vegetation
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
FUTURE EXPANSION PLAN


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – The site has no potential for future
 SITE SELECTION expansion
RATINGS 2 – Relevant variances are approved
CONCLUSION to future expansion
3 – Some variances are
approved to future expansion
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
FUTURE EXPANSION PLAN


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
4 – Has enough area for additional
 SITE SELECTION amenities for the property development
RATINGS 5 – Has larger area for additional
CONCLUSION amenities for the property
development
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
AND AESTHETIC


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
https://www.kissclipart.com
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
PROPER LAND USE AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
ZONING CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – Land’s present/future zoning does
 SITE SELECTION not allow use for a skyscraper
RATINGS 2 – Land’s current zoning does not allow
CONCLUSION skyscraper but exemption
can be appealed
3 – Land’s current zoning
AR 511S4
permits skyscraper with
SEPTEMBER 14 provision on the usage
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
PROPER LAND USE AND


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
ZONING CRITERIA):
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION 4 – Land is currently within a C-3 zone and
CRITERIA
but will probably change
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS 5 – Land is within a C-3 zoning classification
set in the
CONCLUSION National Building Code or
within a Central Business
District and present/future
AR 511S4
zoning permits skyscraper or
SEPTEMBER 14 no zoning restrictions exist
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR EASE
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
OF OWNERSHIP


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – The site is divided with many
 SITE SELECTION property owners.
RATINGS 2 – The site is divided with a moderate
CONCLUSION number of property owners.
3 – The site is divided with few
property owners.
AR 511S4
4 – The site is relatively undivided.
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
COST CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Site is high-priced
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
2 – Site is above the reasonable value
CRITERIA but is still affordable
 SITE SELECTION 3 – Site is at reasonable value
RATINGS
4 – Site is below the reasonable value
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
COMPATIBILITY WITH
SITE PLANNING
ADJACENT LAND USE

 SITE ANALYSIS
CRITERIA):
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Incompatible with the adjacent land
RATINGS use and the surrounding context
CONCLUSION 2 – Considerable differences
with the adjacent land use
and surrounding context
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
COMPATIBILITY WITH
SITE PLANNING
ADJACENT LAND USE

 SITE ANALYSIS
CRITERIA):
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
3 – Certain differences with the adjacent
RATINGS land use and surrounding context
4 – Relatively fit with the adjacent
CONCLUSION land use and surrounding
context
5 – Perfectly relates with the
AR 511S4
adjacent land use and surrounding
SEPTEMBER 14 context
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
CULTURAL FACTORS
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
https://eng521milton.wordpress.com
https://clip.cookdiary.net
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
POTENTIAL CRITERIA):
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – Site is potential for job opportunities
FACTORS
and rationalized residential plan
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA 2 – Site is potential for local business
 SITE SELECTION sectors and agencies, job opportunities
RATINGS
and rationalized residential plan
CONCLUSION 3 – Site is potential for local
and international business
sectors and agencies, tourism
AR 511S4
development, job opportunities
SEPTEMBER 14 and rationalized residential planning
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY TO MAIN


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
ROAD CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – Site is more than 5km away
 SITE SELECTION or 1 hour vehicle ride
RATINGS 2 – Site is within 4 km away
CONCLUSION or 1 hour vehicle ride
3 – Site is within 3km away or
30 minutes vehicle ride
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
ACCESSIBILITY TO MAIN


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
ROAD CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
4 – Site is within 2km away or
 SITE SELECTION 10 minutes vehicle ride
RATINGS 5 – Site is within reasonable walking
CONCLUSION distance or 1km and less
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR MUST
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
BE WITHIN URBAN AREA


SITE ANALYSIS
SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA):
FACTORS
SITE SELECTION

CRITERIA
1 – Site is not within an urban area
 SITE SELECTION 2 – Site is within an urbanizing area
RATINGS 3 – Site is within an urbanized area
CONCLUSION 4 – Site is a progressive
urbanized area
5 – Site is within highly
AR 511S4
developed urbanized area
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
ACCESSIBILITY TO
SITE PLANNING
IMPORTANT EXISTING

 SITE ANALYSIS
FACILITIES CRITERIA):
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
1 – Necessary existing establishments are
RATINGS within 5km and above
2 – Necessary existing
CONCLUSION establishments are within
3-5km from the site
3 – Necessary existing
AR 511S4
establishments are within
SEPTEMBER 14 3km from the site
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
ACCESSIBILITY TO
SITE PLANNING
IMPORTANT EXISTING

 SITE ANALYSIS
FACILITIES CRITERIA):
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION 4 – Necessary existing establishments are
RATINGS within 1-2km from the site
CONCLUSION 5 – Necessary existing
establishments are within
less than a kilometer
AR 511S4
from the site
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND
SITE PLANNING
CIRCULATION CRITERIA):

 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION 1 – No existing pedestrian access are
CRITERIA available that can reasonably be
SITE SELECTION

RATINGS
constructed
2 – Pedestrian access can be
CONCLUSION constructed, but pathway
work is required and traffic
control system should be
AR 511S4
14
provided
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
EVALUATION (FOR
09
MAIN POINTS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND
SITE PLANNING
CIRCULATION CRITERIA):

 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
3 – Pedestrian access can be constructed
CRITERIA without major road work
 SITE SELECTION 4 – Site has existing pedestrian access that
RATINGS
is suitable for 1/2 kilometer travel and has
CONCLUSION existing traffic control system
5 – Site has existing pedestrian
access that is suitable for
AR 511S4
1/4 kilometer travel and has
SEPTEMBER 14 existing traffic control system

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
09
MAIN POINTS
 SITE PLANNING
 SITE ANALYSIS
 SITE SELECTION
FACTORS
 SITE SELECTION
CRITERIA
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4
G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.0||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
09
MAIN POINTS
Lynch, K. & Hack, G. (1984). Site Planning. 3rd
 SITE PLANNING Edition.
 SITE ANALYSIS PUP. Site Selection Criteria. Retrieved December
 SITE SELECTION 01, 2019, from https://www.slideshare.net
FACTORS Tubayan, O.C. Site Planning Review. Retrieved
 SITE SELECTION December 01, 2019, from
CRITERIA https://www.slideshare.net
 SITE SELECTION
RATINGS
CONCLUSION
AR 511S4

SITE PLANNING & SELECTION v1.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SITE PLANNING & SELECTION v1.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.

1. SITE SELECTION PROCESS: Select a site

SEPTEMBER 14 schist, slate, mustone)

SEPTEMBER 14 the site

SEPTEMBER 14 existing traffic control system

You might also like

SITE PLANNING &amp; SELECTION v1.0

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SITE PLANNING &amp; SELECTION v1.0

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.M.DOMINGO:VER.1.

1. SITE SELECTION PROCESS: Select a site

SEPTEMBER 14 schist, slate, mustone)

SEPTEMBER 14 the site

SEPTEMBER 14 existing traffic control system

You might also like

SITE PLANNING & SELECTION v1.0

SITE PLANNING & SELECTION v1.0