Risk Assessment

Plumping
Location / Project: Levana village E – Packages # 84 & 85 Date: TRA No. ATC-RAS-0010

TRA Team: HSE & Construction Team Description of Work Activity: Plumping
 Potential Risk
S Activity
Hazard
Severity Likelihood
Value
Recommended Control Evaluation Risk After Control

Risk
• Everyone must take TBT about job &job Severity Likelihood
Value
Prepare job & person must doing by only combatant person.
Lake of knowledge of job 4 3 12
• All workers should be take site induction 4 1 4
& task briefing before entering job site.
• Proper full PPE to be used (respiratory
protection, cover all, rubber gloves, &
Plumping

Tripping Hazard, fall in to
Survey activities
excavation, hit by a vehicle
safety glasses).
• MSDS to be available at site.
• Adequate ventilation or respiratory
protection to be used.
4 4 16 4 1 4
• Dust, fumes, or mist generating
operation to be done in a habitat.
• All waste material to be collected in
bags and MSDS.
• Eye washers to be reedy at the
site.
 • Designate the access road for vehicles used
in excavation work activities and Away of
pedestrian walk ways.
• All equipment should be inspected and
certified by 3rd party.
• Loads must be secured so they do not
Collision with plant cause vehicle instability, and do not exceed
equipment, manufacturer's specification for the
Vehicle Access 4 5 20 4 1 4
Obstruction for other plant vehicle.
activities. • All vehicles to be fitted with reversing
alarms and flashing beacons
• All equipment to be formally inspected
prior to working to the site & fixed with a
certificate.
• A banks man / flagman to control the
vehicle movement
• The highest standards of housekeeping
shall be maintained at all times
• All sources of fire and / or explosion shall
be identified, eliminated and / or
adequately controlled. Air sampling shall
be implemented to monitor any explosive
Damaged electrical
4 4 16 gases, vapours and dust that may be 4 1 4
components
present
Using Excavator • Suitable extraction measures shall be
implemented during the work process to
extract and vapours and / or gases that may
enter the area whilst the work is in
progress.

All workers must use a dust mask all the

Expose to dust 4 3 12 4 1 4
time.

Incorrect use of hand tools /
Hand tools 'Home-made' hand tools
used
• Care MUST be taken to ensure that all
hand tools used are in good condition and
fit for purpose.
• No home-made hand tools are allowed on
work site
• Ensure that there is edge protection around
the edge of the excavation if it is over 1
metre deep.
3 3 9 • The Site Agent / Supervisor should ensure 3 1 3
that no person is allowed to enter an
excavation unless the sides are adequately
supported or battered.
• The Site Agent /Supervisor should
establish an emergency procedure and
communicate this to the employees for use
in the event of major incidents which can
occur.

• Care must be exercised by all personnel

when lifting loads greater than 25
Kilogram in weight. Where possible the
Using incorrect techniques
Manual Handling 3 3 9 load should be shared between two people. 3 1 3
Over exertion.
• Any load exceed the physical capabilities
of personnel MUST be lifted with the aid
of mechanical equipment.

Emergency Cases Risk of injury due to
3 3
Equipment Accident / Fire
• Trained First aider must be
appointed.
• A First Aid Kit & stretcher must be
available to use it in case of injury.
• Every equipment must be equipped
with First aid kit and operators are
trained to use it
• Emergency number must be posted.
• Equipment operator must attend a
9 3 1 3
Fire fighting training session.
• Incident/accident/near misses must
be reported immediately
• Every equipment/vehicle must be
equipped with one fire extinguisher
(inspected/colour coded
• 8- The injured person must not
be moved or given any liquids unless
by a first aid trained personal.
 Prepared by Checked by

Name: Hassan Shalaby Name: Eng. Amr Anwar

Position: HSE Manager Position: Project Manager

Signature: Signature:
Note:
For normal circumstances the risk management shall be reviewed on annual basis, and depending on the magnitude of risks and the potential severity of
hazards, these should be immediately reviewed by competent staff. As a typical issue for these reviews one should verify if the base assumptions have
changed since the original design was implemented or since the risks were reviewed previously i.e.:
• If the Plant/equipment performance lived up to the expectations of the original design in terms of accidents, incidents and equipment uptime.
• If there are changes in the work environment or the work practices concerning the hazard which the risk assessment addressed.
• There is evidence that the risk assessment is no longer valid.
• If someone is harmed from exposure to the hazard that the assessment dealt with.
• Are the Legislation and/or public perceptions changed regarding what is now considered acceptable/unacceptable?