2227033

NISHANKRAJ J

CASE FACTS:

 INDCO was fortune 500 Manufacturing Company

 Presence across 50 Countries
 80,000 Employees
 Follows 70:20:10 philosophy
70On the Experience
20Coaching, Mentoring
10Classroom-Based Training
 INDCO officers Underwent 80 Hours of training every Year
 MRD was set up in 2016

PROBLEMS:

 Customizing Training Program

 Lack of Internal Trainers with Unique Quality
 Short Period of Time
 Not Suitable Date
 Shortage of Budget
 Consulting Assignment  High Price

PROBLEM STATEMENT: Should Mehta Design and Deliver the training program
herself/Outsource, to meet the companies [Indco Management Development Centre] and
Anand’s Expectation to increase the strategic performance of the team members?

CRITERIA:

 Cost
 Time
 Satisfaction
 Performance
 Risk Mitigation
 High Expectation
 Process Laps

ALTERNATIVES:

 Mehta herself design and deliver the training

 Outsource to Pathak
 Build a Training model – Team Training
 Reach a HR Consultant
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES:

 Mehta herself Design and Deliver the Training

As Mehta herself has 19 years of experience in HRM, She can design a suitable
training program based on the requirements and deliver the program. This will Cost
and time effective for INDCO
 Outsource to Pathak
Since Pathak is a professor and mehta herself listened to his training program she can
hire him. Anand was also satisfied with pathak’s proposal for the training
 Build a training Model
Mehta can build a training model based on the requirements of Anand. Team Building
Model will best suit his requirements to create strategic thinking, planning among his
teammates
 Reach to HR Consultant
Mehta can get guidance from a HR Consultant to design a proper and effective
training program which is customized to Anand’s Requirements

CONCLUSION: Mehta should bring a training model required by anand and she herself
should deliver the training session. As there are only 30 days left with the limited time this
will be a more effective solution.