Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Professor’s Name
Sociobiology is one of the latest theories of evolution. Edward O. Wilson (2000) defined
it as a systematic study of biological basis on social behaviors amongst all living things,
including human beings. The theory suggests that social behavior changes instigate the rise of
new species because behavior changes an organism's gene frequency. Though sociobiology is
related to other scientific disciplines like comparative psychology and ethology, Wilson merged
it with another different behavioral biology branch in his publication Sociobiology: The New
Synthesis in 1975. The publication is precise, detailed, and technical, with examples of insects,
animal, and human behavior. His publication has caused controversies and critics between
social scientists, especially sociologists, and biological and evolutionary scientists to date.
The Debate
longstanding debate. The controversy pits the notion of human destiny being determined solely
by genes against the idea that the environment determines an individual's behaviors. People have
different views concerning this issue. Some have regarded sociology as non-scientific. They
believe Edward O. Wilson overstretched the scientific powers into areas it was not valuable
(Rosenfeld, 1981). They argue that culture and human behavior cannot be reduced to biological
terms. Also, they hold that his attempts are futile because the aspect of culture is approached
with different models and principles. Also, moral codes cannot be fashioned by restructuring the
evolution of the mind or outlining the neurochemical responses. Wilson’s idea continues to face
critics because people believe social behavior is experienced and earned, not inherited. It is
thought to social behavior is developed through culture, education, learning, incentives, or social
programs.
3
Evolution theory has several agents that different renowned geneticists and biologists have
forwarded. However, none of them included sociobiology, social behavior, animal behavior, or
altruism as an evolution agent, hence deeming Wilson's theory non-scientific. They believe that
Opinion
I'm afraid I have to disagree with critics deeming sociobiology as not scientific. It is
unbelievable how anyone who reads Wilson's book could think his idea is not scientific at all.
Wilson claims something that happens around humans daily. To an extent, which an individual
is or how he/she behaves is a result of genetic makeup. Genes do not determine behavior; they
influence what an individual does or why they do it, such as looking into a family with different
behavioral traits. Perhaps the father suffers from anger and the mother from depression. Some
Alternatively, it does not matter what his idea is; science is all about attempting to
measure and master the empirical data while understanding it. It the duty of other scientists to
interpret and even correct other theories when necessary, not disbanding them altogether. The
Society is free to discuss the problems that might arise from the new piece of information.
Conclusion
The debate has been there for years, and it will not die; in fact, it will continue to be
propelled by people’s growing need to understand sociobiology. Like all other scientific
4
theories, sociobiology has passed through the ideology sieve, and it has been shredded and
strained. Only the half-truths and implications are remaining. Sociobiology is here to stay; it just
References