Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by:
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Simulation result and analysis of using distributed power electronics on end of life performance of
PV system ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 5
Reference .............................................................................................................................................. 6
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page i
Abstract
The paper tries to show impact of using distributed power electronics in photovoltaic (PV)
systems in terms of end-of-life energy-capture performance and reliability as compared to
the conventional pv system by doing simulation of PV installations over system lifetime at
various degradation rates and various coefficient of variation (CV).The result [2] shows that
module-level or submodule-level power converters can decrease variations in cell
degradation over time and hence effectively increasing the system lifespan by 5–10years as
compared to the conventional PV system and even in the case of unrecoverable failures of
the power electronics converters, DPP PV-to-bus subMICs consistently improve the energy
yield and notably extend the end-of-life performance of PV systems by more than 5years.
KEYWORS: subMICs, Sub module integrated converter; micro inverters; lifetime; reliability
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page ii
1. Introduction
Even though many researchers shown that the use of solar energy is growing exponentially over
the last 20 years its price per watt is still the main issue. It is highly depends on installation cost
and efficiency of the whole PV system over its operational periods. During installation of pv
system Modules are connected in series to form a string and series connected modules are highly
vulnerable to cell mismatch and this may be due to manufacturing tolerances, partial shading,
dirt, thermal gradients, or aging. Hence cell mismatches have negative effects on the energy
output of conventional PV systems and it may hide maximum power point tracking operation.
Mismatched cells may become reverse biased and dissipate power when we use bypass diodes
instead and it may producing an undesired temperature increase of the cell or a hot spot. Hence
undesired temperature increase of the cell may accelerate the end of life of PV system and finally
the reduction of reliability of the PV system and this was the statement of problem of this
research article. To solve mismatch effects and enhance the end of life of PV system many PV
architectures based on module-distributed or sub module distributed power electronics have been
proposed and simulation has been done to show how module-distributed or sub module
distributed power electronics enhance the end of life of PV system as compared to conventional
PV system. Similarly the paper tries to show the impact of distributed power electronics on the
reliability of PV system by considering converter failure model.
Just like other material crystalline silicon cells of PV system degraded linearly from time to time
and degradation rates of the nominal power are within 0.5% – 0.8%/year mostly reported number
being 0.6%/year. Due to that PV system have end of life in energy capturing performance and
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 1
mostly it should give 80% of the initial energy output at the end of 25 years and this value is
taken as the end of life of energy capturing performance criteria. Similarly As the time goes or
aging of the pv system leads increasing the coefficient of variation (CV) of the short-circuit
current and it is about 1% when the module is new, and it increases from 0.36%/year, up to 10%
in year 25 [3].When we come to the point the paper is try to show the impact of using distributed
power electronics in the end of life and reliability of the pv system based on various degradation
rates and coefficients of variation.
Figure 1 a. Scenario 1 with full set of eight strings [2] Figure 1 b. Scenario 1 with one string only [2].
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 2
The above figure shows Level curves for 80% of the nominal power in the utility scale
photovoltaic (PV) system of scenario I, with different degradation rates and coefficients of
variation (CVs). Solid line represents conventional central inverter whereas dashed line points
PV-to-bus sub MICs and dash-dotted line represents PV-to-PV sub MICs. The circle shows
the point for a degradation rate of –0.6%/year and a CV of 0.36%/year, which approximately
matches the energy yield of a conventional PV system after 25years. The square marks point
out that, in a conventional system, the 80% output power at year 30 can only be achieved if
either the CV and/or the degradation rates are smaller. The triangle mark illustrates that the
PV-to-bus architecture yields approximately the same performance of the conventional
approach after 35years that is, increasing the lifespan of the system by 10years.Figure 1b
shows nearly the same results with only one string as compared to eight strings case. This
result shows that string-level inverters do not provide important lifetime energy yield
improvements with current PV technologies.
Figure 2.Level curves for 80% of the nominal power in the utility-scale photovoltaic (PV)
system of scenario I [2].
Here from the above figure 2 Solid lines shows full power processing (FPP) MICs and dash
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 3
Dotted line shows FPP sub MICs similarly dashed line is for differential power processing
(DPP) PV-to-bus sub MICs and also Dotted line is for sub MIC-enhanced micro inverters.
The diamond mark suggests that FPP MICs yield an 80% power output after 30years,
whereas FPP sub MICs meet this requirement after 35years (star mark)[2]. Hence the end of
life of conventional PV system increased by 5 – 10 years due to the use of distributed power
electronics.
Finally as we have seen from the simulation results with the two scenarios the lifespan of PV
systems can be considerably extended due to the use of distributed power electronics. In both
cases we have seen that 80% of the nominal power can be able to capture by PV system after
30 and 35 years of use and it can be able to extend the end of life of PV system by 5-10 years
due to the use of distributed power electronics. Specifically as we have seen from the
simulation result the architectures with sub module-level power electronics present
significant advantages over module-level approaches. The PV-to-bus sub MICs and the sub
MIC-enhanced micro inverters provide equal or better performance than the FPP sub MICs
for CV rates below the typical 0.4%/year, with smaller and less expensive sub MICs.
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 4
distributed power electronics on the reliability of the whole PV system and to show that the
same simulations have been performed with including random power converter faults for
different power electronics configurations. The failure model is based on a Weibull
probability density function accounting for 5 % failure rate of the converters after 25years
and 20 % after 50years.
The results [2] show that FPP solutions exhibit a high susceptibility to converter failure and
that they can even decrease the energy yield of the PV system in case of a fault. Only the sub
MIC-enhanced micro inverters could provide some advantage over the conventional system
if the failure rates and cost of a central inverter are large enough to outweigh the negative
effects of sub MIC and micro inverter faults. In contrast, DPP approaches provide consistent
improvements with respect to the conventional approach, and they show the lowest
dependence on converter failures and PV mismatch of all the distributed power electronics
architectures analyzed in the paper. Even in the case of unrecoverable failures of the power
electronics converters, DPP PV-to-bus sub MICs consistently improve the energy yield and
notably extend the end-of-life performance of PV systems by more than 5 years.
Conclusion
In the first set of simulations result, it has been conclude that power electronics can prolong
the lifetime of PV systems or, equivalently, improve their performance at 25year end-of-life.
Specifically FPP module-level approaches, such as DC optimizers, improve the lifetime of
PV systems by roughly 5years, whereas FPP and DPP approaches at the sub module level
can extend the system life time to 35years.
In the second set of simulations result with considering power converter failures we can
conclude that failures of the power electronics converters in DPP PV-to-bus subMICs
consistently improve the energy yield and notably extend the end-of-life performance of PV
systems by more than 5years.This proves that the reliability of pv system is not affected by
distributed power converter failure specifically in this type of arectectures and hence
distributed power electronics have a potential for reducing the levelized cost of energy of PV
systems.
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 5
Reference
1. Progress in photovoltaics: research and applications prog. Photovolt: res. appl. 2017;
25:821–835.
2. Published online 26 April 2017 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI:
10.1002/pip.2893.
3. Jordan D, Wohlgemuth J, Kurtz S. Technology and climate trends in PV module
degradation, In 27 the European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition,
PVSEC, Frankfurt, Germany, 2012; 3118–3124.
Paper Review on Impact of distributed power electronics on the life time and Reliability of PV
system Page 6