Topic: Indus River

Human Activities and their Impacts

The Indus River provides water for irrigation, hydropower generation, and domestic use
for millions of people in Pakistan, India, and China. Human activities in the Indus River basin
have changed significantly over time, with consequences that are beneficial and detrimental for
the river's ecosystem and the areas around it.
Irrigation and Agriculture
Human activities such as irrigation and agriculture have had major effects on the Indus
River. Irrigation systems built along the river's banks have been instrumental in keeping
agriculture afloat in the area (Macklin & Lewin, 2015). Here is a comprehensive analysis of this
factor:
Positive Impacts
Economical Importance
Agriculture has played an important role in the economy of the Indus River basin for
centuries. Because of the river's accessibility and the area's fertile soils, agriculture has thrived
there, and people have been able to stay (Shiklomanov, 1998).
Irrigation Systems
There are extensive irrigation systems in place to take advantage of the Indus River's
water supply. These infrastructures channel water to farmland, guaranteeing a steady supply for
crop cultivation (Dhawan, 2017). The Indus Basin Irrigation System is the most well-known
example because it is one of the largest irrigation networks in the world (Simons et al., 2020).
Canal Networks
Irrigation in the Indus River basin relies heavily on a complex network of canals. There is
a system of canals that takes water from the river and distributes it to different farms. These
canals allow for the regulated distribution of water, improving the efficiency with which farmers
can irrigate their fields and conserve water (Briscoe, 2005).
Enhanced Agricultural Productivity
Because of the availability of water from irrigation systems, agricultural output in the
Indus River basin has increased dramatically. As a result, farmers no longer have to rely solely
on rain to grow their crops, and they are better able to weather the effects of drought and other
weather extremes (Basharat, 2019). Irrigation enables controlled and efficient use of water,
leading to greater agricultural productivity (Chai et al., 2015).
Crop Diversity
Irrigation has made it possible for farmers in the area to grow a wider variety of crops
(Bastiaanssen, Molden & Makin, 2000). Wheat, rice, sugarcane, cotton, fruits, and vegetables are
just some of the crops that farmers have been able to successfully grow. The increased
agricultural production and trade opportunities that result from this diversification help local
economies thrive (Chand, 2012).
Extension of Cultivable Land
Increase in Farmable Area Irrigation systems have greatly increased the amount of
farmable land in the Indus River valley. This has increased the total amount of farmable land by
cultivating areas that were previously desert or semiarid. This growth has allowed farmers to
raise output to meet rising food demands (Angelakis et al., 2020).
Negative Impacts
Regardless of its many benefits, irrigation and farming along the Indus River are not
without their share of difficulties.
Water Scarcity
Reduced downstream flow due to increased upstream abstraction has resulted in water
scarcity in some regions in Indus River. To strike a balance between agricultural water needs,
environmental requirements, and the needs of downstream communities, sustainable water
management practices are required (Munia et al., 2016).
Soil Degradation
Degradation of Soil Quality and Agricultural Productivity as a result of inadequate
irrigation practices soil salinization and water logging can result from insufficient irrigation in
Indus River (Qureshi et al., 2008).
Consumption of Energy
Water pumping and distribution in irrigation systems of Indus River require electricity,
adding to the global demand for energy and its negative effects on the environment (Hunt et al,
2021).
Dam Construction
 The construction of dams along the Indus River has affected many things, including
agriculture and irrigation, both positively and negatively (Memon & Thapa, 2010). The
following is an in-depth analysis of the results of dam building:
Positive impacts
Hydroelectric Power Generation
The primary motivation for building dams on the Indus River like Tarbela Dam and
Mangla Dam was to generate hydroelectric power. These dams are crucial to the region's energy
infrastructure because they generate enough electricity to power homes, factories, and farms.
Increased agricultural output is the result of a steady flow of electricity supporting agricultural
activities and improving irrigation systems (Bhutto, Bazmi, & Zahedi, 2012).
Water Flow Regulation
Water Flow Control Dams play a significant role in controlling the Indus River's water
flow. They regulate water flow during high-risk flood times, protecting communities
downstream from damage. This rule helps keep farmland and infrastructure safe from floods,
making farming a more secure endeavor (Tariq & Giesen, 2012)
Water reservoirs for Irrigation
Dams act as reservoirs, storing water during times of high flow, making them useful for
storing water for irrigation purposes. With this water reserve in place, irrigation can proceed
without interruption even during dry periods. By reducing farmers' reliance on seasonal rains and
increasing the amount of time they can spend cultivating crops, water management improves
agricultural output (Richter & Thomas, 2007).
Negative Impacts
Altered River Flow and Ecological Impacts
Dam construction can disrupt the Indus River's natural flow patterns and have ecological
consequences. Dams' controlled releases of water can affect aquatic habitats and riparian
vegetation further downstream. Alterations to the river's normal flow pattern can have negative
effects on the ecosystem's delicate balance, threatening the river's biodiversity and overall health
(Dudgeon, 2000).
Displacement of Communities
Relocating people who live in the reservoir area of a dam or in areas where the dam's
supporting infrastructure will have an impact is a common consequence of building large dams.
It is possible that displaced communities will no longer have access to their agricultural lands,
forcing them to seek other means of subsistence (Stanley & Doyle, 2003).
Sedimentation and River Morphology
Dams prevent sediment from flowing downstream, which changes the morphology of
rivers and reservoirs. The loss of sediment has repercussions downstream, where it hinders the
replenishment of agriculturally-useful soils through natural processes. Furthermore, altered
sediment transport may affect river morphology, which in turn may modify the stability of
riverbanks and erosion patterns (Henry, Murphy & Cowie, 2018).
Downstream Water Availability
Dams' ability to control water flow has consequences for downstream water availability.
Since less water is flowing downstream, irrigators in areas far from the dam may face water
shortages, which in turn could reduce agricultural output in those areas near Indus River (Magsi
& Atif, 2012).
Effect on Fish Population
  Because dams can block fish from getting to their spawning grounds in Indus River,
they have an effect on fish populations. There may be consequences for the fishing industry and
the people whose livelihoods depend on it if this disruption persists (Postel & Richter, 2012).
Operational and potential monitoring tools to conserve or to recover the biome
In order to conserve and restore the Indus River's biome, reliable monitoring tools are
necessary for gauging the ecosystem's current health and charting its evolution over time. Some
current and future monitoring tools that could aid in preservation and restoration efforts are as
follows:
Water Quality monitoring
Checking the water's temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrient levels, and pollution
levels on a regular basis is essential for determining the river's ecological status. Sensors and
monitoring stations positioned along the river's length can help with this. In the event of water
pollution incidents, real-time monitoring systems can provide timely data for quick action
(Ustaoğlu, Tepe & Taş, 2022).
Ecological Surveys
It is crucial to conduct ecological surveys in order to evaluate the richness and variety of
plant and animal life in the Indus River Basin. Species inventories, biodiversity assessments, and
fieldwork fall under this category. Conservation planning and management can benefit greatly
from the data gleaned from these surveys of important habitats, species at risk, and ecosystem
services (Prasad et al., 2002).
Remote Sensing and GIS
According to Butt et al., (2015), land cover, land use changes, and vegetation dynamics
along the river can all be better understood with the help of remote sensing and GIS technologies
like satellite imagery and aerial surveys. Spatial analysis and monitoring of the river's biome,
including changes in vegetation cover, encroachments, and habitat fragmentation, are possible
thanks to the integration of remote sensing data with Geographic Information Systems (GIS).
Hydrological Monitoring
Keeping an eye on the Indus River's water flow, sediment transport, and river
morphology can shed light on the river's natural processes and reveal any changes brought on by
human interference or climate shift. Tools used for hydrological monitoring include stream
gauges, sediment samplers, and river cross-section surveys (Newson, 2008).
Community-oriented Monitoring
Involving community members in monitoring programmes is a powerful tool for
collecting information and fostering a culture of stewardship. Community members can help by
reporting any changes they observe in the water, fish populations, or habitat conditions in their
area. Community-based monitoring programmes give people a voice and a stake in the Indus
River's recovery from environmental degradation (Ramesh et al., 2017).
Analysis of Environmental DNA (eDNA)
Extraction of DNA from water samples for the purpose of detecting the presence of
specific species or evaluating biodiversity is known as environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis.
The diversity and distribution of aquatic species in the Indus River can be better understood with
this non-invasive approach, even for elusive or endangered species (Ruppert, Kline & Rahman,
2019).
Initiatives of Citizen Science
Engaging the public as monitors through citizen science initiatives can increase the scope
of data collection. Citizens can report incidents like pollution, wildlife sightings, and habitat
changes by using mobile applications or online platforms. These activities raise public interest
and engagement, and provide useful information for preservation and restoration initiatives
(Pocock et al., 2018)
Scenario Analysis and Modeling
Computer simulations and hypothetical scenario analysis can help determine how various
factors might affect the Indus River ecosystem. Taking into account variables like dam
operations, land use changes, and climate change, integrated water resources, hydrological, and
ecological models can simulate a wide variety of scenarios. These resources help people foresee
and prepare for the long-term effects of their actions (Amin, Iqbal, Asghar & Ribbe, 2018).
Conclusion
Incorporating these monitoring tools into a holistic monitoring programme that includes
collaboration between academics, governments, and communities is crucial. The sustainable
conservation and recovery of the Indus River biome relies on regular data collection, analysis,
and interpretation in order to inform conservation strategies, adaptive management, and policy
interventions.
 References

Macklin, M. G., & Lewin, J. (2015). The rivers of civilization. Quaternary Science Reviews, 114,

228-244.

Shiklomanov, I. A. (1998). World water resources: a new appraisal and assessment for the 21st

century.

Dhawan, V. (2017, January). Water and agriculture in India. In Background paper for the South

Asia expert panel during the Global Forum for Food and Agriculture (Vol. 28, pp. 80-

85).

Simons, G. W. H., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Cheema, M. J. M., Ahmad, B., & Immerzeel, W. W.

(2020). A novel method to quantify consumed fractions and non-consumptive use of

irrigation water: Application to the Indus Basin Irrigation System of

Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management, 236, 106174.

Briscoe, J., Qamar, U., Contijoch, M., Amir, P., & Blackmore, D. (2005). Pakistan’s water

economy: Running dry. World Bank, Washington, DC, 4, 3540.

Basharat, M. (2019). Water management in the Indus Basin in Pakistan: challenges and

opportunities. Indus river basin, 375-388.

Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H. L., Waskom, R. M., Niu, Y., & Siddique, K. H. (2016).

Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A

review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 36, 1-21.

Bastiaanssen, W. G., Molden, D. J., & Makin, I. W. (2000). Remote sensing for irrigated

agriculture: examples from research and possible applications. Agricultural water

management, 46(2), 137-155.
Chand, R. (2012). Development policies and agricultural markets. Economic and Political

Weekly, 53-63.

Angelakιs, A. N., Zaccaria, D., Krasilnikoff, J., Salgot, M., Bazza, M., Roccaro, P., ... & Fereres,

E. (2020). Irrigation of world agricultural lands: Evolution through the

millennia. Water, 12(5), 1285.

Munia, H., Guillaume, J. H. A., Mirumachi, N., Porkka, M., Wada, Y., & Kummu, M. (2016).

Water stress in global transboundary river basins: significance of upstream water use on

downstream stress. Environmental Research Letters, 11(1), 014002.

Qureshi, A. S., McCornick, P. G., Qadir, M., & Aslam, Z. (2008). Managing salinity and

waterlogging in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management, 95(1), 1-

10.

Hunt, J. D., Falchetta, G., Parkinson, S., Vinca, A., Zakeri, B., Byers, E., ... & Wada, Y. (2021).

Hydropower and seasonal pumped hydropower storage in the Indus basin: pros and

cons. Journal of Energy Storage, 41, 102916.

Memon, J. A., & Thapa, G. B. (2011). The Indus irrigation system, natural resources, and

community occupational quality in the delta region of Pakistan. Environmental

management, 47, 173-187.

Bhutto, A. W., Bazmi, A. A., & Zahedi, G. (2012). Greener energy: issues and challenges for

Pakistan-hydel power prospective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5),

2732-2746.

Tariq, M. A. U. R., & Van De Giesen, N. (2012). Floods and flood management in

Pakistan. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 47, 11-20.

Richter, B. D., & Thomas, G. A. (2007). Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam

operations. Ecology and society, 12(1).

Dudgeon, D. (2000). Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: prospects for riverine

biodiversity: the construction of large dams will have an impact on the biodiversity of

tropical Asian rivers and their associated wetlands. BioScience, 50(9), 793-806.

Stanley, E. H., & Doyle, M. W. (2003). Trading off: the ecological effects of dam

removal. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(1), 15-22.

Henry, B., Murphy, B., & Cowie, A. (2018). Sustainable land management for environmental

benefits and food security. A synthesis report for the GEF. Washington DC, USA, 127.

Magsi, H., & Atif, S. (2012). Water management, impacts and conflicts: Case of indus water

distribution in Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Rural Studies.

Postel, S., & Richter, B. (2012). Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island

press.

Ustaoğlu, F., Tepe, Y., & Taş, B. (2020). Assessment of stream quality and health risk in a

subtropical Turkey river system: A combined approach using statistical analysis and

water quality index. Ecological indicators, 113, 105815.

Prasad, S. N., Ramachandra, T. V., Ahalya, N., Sengupta, T., Kumar, A., Tiwari, A. K., ... &

Vijayan, L. (2002). Conservation of wetlands of India-a review. Tropical Ecology, 43(1),

173-186.

Langat, P. K., Kumar, L., Koech, R., & Ghosh, M. K. (2021). Monitoring of land use/land-cover

dynamics using remote sensing: A case of Tana River Basin, Kenya. Geocarto

International, 36(13), 1470-1488.
Newson, M. (2008). Land, water and development: sustainable and adaptive management of

rivers. Routledge.

Ramesh, R., Abhilash, K. R., Purohit, M., Krishnan, P., Lakshmi, A., Purvaja, R., & Kingsley, P.

W. (2017). Involvement of community in managing coastal wetlands in South Asia:

Status, issues and challenges. Wetland Science: Perspectives From South Asia, 545-562.

Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J., & Rahman, M. S. (2019). Past, present, and future perspectives of

environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods,

monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17,

e00547.

Pocock, M. J., Chandler, M., Bonney, R., Thornhill, I., Albin, A., August, T., ... & Danielsen, F.

(2018). A vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science.

In Advances in ecological research (Vol. 59, pp. 169-223). Academic Press.

Amin, A., Iqbal, J., Asghar, A., & Ribbe, L. (2018). Analysis of current and future water

demands in the Upper Indus Basin under IPCC climate and socio-economic scenarios

using a hydro-economic WEAP model. Water, 10(5), 537.