Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REGION: I
DIVISION: PANGASINAN II
DISTRICT: VILLASIS II
Instruction: Use the matrix on the next page as a guide in assessing the gap between your Division Targets (A) and school performance (B). In particular, you can fill out the matrix by answering
the following questions for each Division Target:
B1. Data needed – What data do we need to assess our school performance against this Division Target?
B2. Currently contributing – Is our current school performance contributing to the attainment of this Division Target? How is it contributing or not contributing? Explain.
B3. Inhibiting Factors – If contributing, what are the factors that prevent us from contributing further to this Division Target? If not contributing, what are the factors that prevent us from contributing
to this Division Target? Include the most pressing needs or problems from available data.
B4. Projects implemented – What school projects being implemented are geared towards the attainment of this Division Target? If no such projects are being implemented, leave it blank.
B5. Groups that require attention – Are there groups in our school that require specific attention concerning the attainment of this Division Target? (e.g., considering gender, socio-economic status,
ethnicity).
DATE ACCOMPLISHED
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B5. GROUPS
B3.
B2. CURRENTLY B4. PROJECTS THAT
A. DIVISION TARGETS INHIBITING
CONTRIBUTING IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
B1. DATA NEEDED FACTORS
ATTENTION
YES/
EXPLANATION
NO
Intermediate Outcome 1: Access (All school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults have access to relevant basic learning opportunities.)
Strategy 2: Strengthen schools’ capacity to ensure learners’ continuity to next stage.
Dropout data
Grade level Baseline S.Y. S.Y. S. Y.
SY 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020-
2018 2019 2020 2021
KD 0 0 0 0
Gr-1 0 0 0 0
1. Conducted
Continuous
Gr-2 0 0 0 0 Home-Visitation
1.
Dropout SY SY202 SY Gr-3 0 0 0 0
2022- 3- 2024- 2. Intensified Disadvantaged
0% drop-out rate
2023 2024 2025 YES implementation learners
Gr-4 0 0 0 0 was maintained
Elem of the Drop-Out
Reduction 2. PARDOS
Gr-5 0 0 0 0
Program
(DORP) in
Gr-6 0 0 0 0
School
Total 0 0 0 0
1. Strengthen
instructional
REPETITION RATE supervision to
enhance
Repetitio SY SY2023- SY Repetition rate for
teaching skills of
n Rate 2022- 2024 2024- Baseline SY SY SY SY the last 3 years
2023 2025 SY 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- YES teachers 1. Pupils
were maintained as
Elem 0.70% 0.57% 0.44% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2. Conduct of
0%
Repetitio 1.11 0.67 0 0 0 InSeT/ LAC
n Rate Sessions to
capacitate
teachers
TRANSITION RATE
Transitio SY SY2023- SY
n Rate 2022- 2024 2024- Baseline SY SY SY SY
2023 2025 SY 2017- 2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- N/A
Elem 101.90 102.52% 103.14% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
% Transitio
n Rate
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B5. GROUPS
B3.
B2. CURRENTLY B4. PROJECTS THAT
A. DIVISION TARGETS INHIBITING
CONTRIBUTING IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
B1. DATA NEEDED FACTORS
ATTENTION
YES/
EXPLANATION
NO
Data of Pupils with Special Needs Enrolled in School:
SY SY SY SY SY
2018- 2019- 2020- 2021- 2022- 1. Self learning/
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 school initiated
1. Pupils with
trainings to
KD 1 special needs enroll
SY SY2023- SY teachers to
in nearby school/s
2022- 2024 2024- I 1 handle pupils
2023 2025 offering special
II 1 with special
No. of 116 186 255 programs 1. Pupils with
YES needs
Schools III 1 1 special needs
Offering 2. Teachers are not
inclusion IV 1 1 2. Request for
program trained to handle
V 1 1 assessment of
children with special
VI 1 1 the suspected
needs
learners with
special needs
Learners with special needs are accepted &
mainstreamed in regular classes.
Percentage of schools with appropriate teacher- YES 1. The school has 1. Intensify
complete teachers Home Visitation
learner ratio
Grade Teacher-Learner Ratio with exact teaching program 1.
Teachers SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024-
2023 2024 2025 level loads with different Marginalized
Elem coordinatorship 2. learners
Baseline SY 2019- SY2020- SY which require them Implementation
KD: 25 learners per session or maximum of 30
SY 2018- 2020 2021 2021- to render extra of more
learners per session (1 teacher per 2 sessions) 2019 2022 services so often. programs/
G1-G2: 30 learners per class, max of 35 learners KD 1:23 1:52 1:22 1:30 projects to
(1 teacher per class)
2. Low enrolment attract maximum
G3: 30 learners per class, max of 35 learners (7
Gr-1 1:36 2:44 2:45 intake because enrolment
teachers for every 6 classes or 7:6 as
some school aged
specialization factor)
Gr-2 1:38 2:46 1:19 pupils enroll to other
G4-G6: 40 learners per class, max of 45 learners
schools
7 teachers for every 6 classes or 7:6 as
specialization factor) Gr-3 1:38 2:43 2:50
3. OSYs are
enrolled in ALs
Gr-4 2:40 2:40 2:48
Intermediate Outcome 3. Quality (Learners complete K-12 basic education having attained all learning standards that equip them with the necessary skills and attitudes to pursue their chosen
paths)
Strategy 3: Strengthen the competence of teachers and instructional leaders in areas as content knowledge and pedagogy/instruction, curriculum and planning, responding to learner diversity,
and assessment and reporting
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B5. GROUPS
B3.
B2. CURRENTLY B4. PROJECTS THAT
A. DIVISION TARGETS INHIBITING
CONTRIBUTING IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
B1. DATA NEEDED FACTORS
ATTENTION
YES/
EXPLANATION
NO
1. Continuous
provision of
Number of SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- Teachers of the
upskilling & 1. Teachers w/
inducted 2023 2024 2025 2023 2024 2025 school has 6 &
teachers YES reskilling school 0-3 years in
Number of 100% 100% 100% more years in the
Elem 100% 100% 100% inducted teachers based InSeTs/ the service
service
LAC Sessions to
teachers
KPIs SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- Data on proficiency in Stage 3 numeracy and literacy
2023 2024 2025 standards
Percentage of 48.18% 50.18% 52.18%
Grade 2/3
learners
attaining at least
the minimum
level of
proficiency in
Reading and
Listening
comprehension
increased
Percentage of 43.04% 45.04% 47.04%
Grade 2/3
learners
achieving at
least the
minimum level of
proficiency in
English
Percentage of 59.31% 61.31% 63.31%
Grade 2/3
learners
achieving at
least the
minimum level of
proficiency in
Filipino
Percentage of 56.65% 58.65% 60.65%
Grade 2/3
learners
achieving at
least the
minimum level of
proficiency in
Mother Tongue
(excluding
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B5. GROUPS
B3.
B2. CURRENTLY B4. PROJECTS THAT
A. DIVISION TARGETS INHIBITING
CONTRIBUTING IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
B1. DATA NEEDED FACTORS
ATTENTION
YES/
EXPLANATION
NO
Tagalog
speakers)
Intermediate Outcome 4. Resiliency and Well-Being (Learners are resilient and know their rights, and have skills to protect themselves and exercise their education related rights, while being
aware of their responsibilities as individuals and as members of society)
Strategy 1: Ensure that learners know their rights and have the life skills to claim their education-related rights from DepEd and other duty-bearers to promote learners’ well-being, while also
being aware of their responsibilities as individuals and as members of society
1. Strengthen
values
integration in all
classes to avoid
misbehaviors to
pupils
SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024-
SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024-
2023 2024 2025 The school has
2023 2024 2025 2. Constant use
Establishment of 100% 100% 100%
Establishment of 100% 100% 100% maintained a Child
School YES of “Catching
Protection
School Protection Protection
Committee (Yes Each Others’
Committee (Yes Committee
or No)
or No) Doing Right” 1. Pupils
principle to build
up enthusiasm
among pupils to
display
wholesome
attitudes
Strategy 2: Protect learners and personnel from death, injury, and harm brought by natural and huma-induced hazards
1. InSeT on
Improving
SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024-
Mental Wellness
2023 2024 2025 SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- The school
Percentage of 2023 2024 2025 Among
conducts MPHSS 1. SH
School Percentage of 100% 100% 100% Teachers
personnel School personnel YES training/s/ LAC
capacitated on capacitated on Sessions among 2. Teachers
2. Conduct of
providing providing MPHSS teachers
MPHSS team building
activities among
the teachers
SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- YES The school 1. Provision of 1. SH
2023 2024 2025 2023 2024 2025 implements the 1 the activity
Percentage of Percentage of 100% 100% 100%
School learners School learners week MPHSS sheets to all 2. Teachers
ANNEX 3 Gap Analysis Template
B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE
B5. GROUPS
B3.
B2. CURRENTLY B4. PROJECTS THAT
A. DIVISION TARGETS INHIBITING
CONTRIBUTING IMPLEMENTED REQUIRE
B1. DATA NEEDED FACTORS
ATTENTION
YES/
EXPLANATION
NO
learners &
thorough
discussions in
activities to all the the class
capacitated on
providing
capacitated on classes every
providing MPHSS beginning of 2. Supervision 3. Pupils
MPHSS
classes on the conduct
of the 1 week
MPHSS lessons
Strategy 2: Improve and modernize internal systems and processes for a responsive and efficient financial management resources
1. SH
SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- SY 2022- SY2023- SY 2024- The school has
Lack of
2023 2024 2025 2023 2024 2025 limited resources to 1. Strengthen
School SBM Level 2 3 4 resources 2. Teachers
No. of Schools NO be used to qualify linkages to
with SBM Level (Human &
for a higher SBM stakeholders
4 Data on School SBM level Materials) 3. Other
levels
stakehoders