Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment Topic and Tasks: Run Partial Correlation based on data provided.
A. Case Study
B. Research Variables
C. Research Objective
D. Conceptual Framework
E. Hypothesis
A researcher surveyed 210 respondents about the corporate social responsibility of their
organizations. The questionnaire consisted of five parts. Respondents filled in their demographic
information in Part A. Meanwhile, Part B measures the awareness of the organization’s CSR
initiatives (AW); Part C measures the congruence between the organization and CSR initiatives
(FT); Part D measures the organizational motives for engaging in CSR initiatives (MT); and
lastly, Part E measures the employees’ attitude toward the organization (AT).
2. Research Variables
1.
2.
2.2. Dependent Variables: CSR Awareness, CSR Congruence, CSR Motivation Employees
3. Research Objective
This study aims to identify the relationship between the level of education and the
organization’s CSR initiatives (AW), the motivation for engaging in the CSR initiatives (MT),
the congruence between the organization and CSR initiatives (FT) and the employees’ attitude
3.
4. Hypothesis
Ho : Level of education is not the factor towards the organization’s CSR initiatives (AW),
the motivation for engaging in the CSR initiatives (MT), the congruence between the
organization and CSR initiatives (FT) and the employees’ attitude toward the organization
(AT).
Ha: Level of education is the factor towards the organization’s CSR initiatives (AW), the
motivation for engaging in the CSR initiatives (MT), the congruence between the
organization and CSR initiatives (FT) and the employees’ attitude toward the organization
(AT).
5. Theoretical framework
CSR awareness
Level of education
CSR congruence
a. SPM/STPM
6. Results
According to Table 1, there is a significant effect of level of education towards the four
dependent variables [F (5.848), p = 0.000, <0.05]. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis and accept
the alternative hypothesis. Level of education is the factor towards the organization’s CSR
initiatives (AW), the motivation for engaging in the CSR initiatives (MT), the congruence
between the organization and CSR initiatives (FT) and the employees’ attitude toward the
organization (AT).
Table 1: Multivariate Pillai’s Trace Tests (a) for Effects of marital status towards
interpersonal relationship
MANOVA test analysis (Table 2) was done to dependent variables which generally showed
that there was a significant difference between level of education and all dependent variables.
This result indicated that level of education influenced their CSR awareness, CSR motivation,
By referring to the mean value in Table 3 for each dependent variables across the level of
education, it was found that diploma/degree holders have higher CSR awareness, CSR FT score,
CSR motivation and attitude score towards the organizations compared to SPM/STPM and
master/PhD holders.
The Type III Sum of Squares values for each variable indicate the amount of variance
explained by the level of education. Higher values suggest a stronger or more dominant influence
of education on the variable. In this case, ScoreMT has the highest values, followed by ScoreFT,
ScoreAT and ScoreAW. The findings of this research are similar to previous research, where that
different level of education shows different activeness in CSR activities (Taylor, 1989). Joe and
Jake (2013), mentioned degree participants in their survey are more likely to join the CSR
activities in their communities and offer helps to those who needed. Moreover, education has
been an important factor of individuals’ motivation towards CSR according to Smith and
Jackson (2020). This outcome is also supported by Barry (2014) and Oliver (2016).
8. Implication of the study
Higher levels of education may make people more aware of CSR initiatives, according to the
substantial association between education and CSR awareness (ScoreAW). Organizations should
take into account the possibility that educational programs or training may have an impact on
how well their workforce understands and practices corporate social responsibility.
Organizations can create targeted strategies and interventions to promote a CSR-oriented culture
and increase staff participation in CSR projects by understanding the importance of education in
these fields. Organizations can empower employees with information and skills, generating a
9. Future recommendations
of education on CSR variables in order to inform future study and practice in CSR and
organizational behavior. It's crucial to investigate cross-cultural differences and assess how well
academic institutions helps advance CSR knowledge and abilities. Finally, businesses should
make education a top priority in their CSR plans by offering training opportunities and
encouragement for further study. These suggestions will aid in improving knowledge of the
connection between education and CSR and encourage the development of future generations
10. Appendix
Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Education 1 SPM / STPM 53
2 Diploma / Degree 131
3 Master / PhD 26
Descriptive Statistics
Education Mean Std. Deviation N
ScoreAW SPM / STPM 22.6415 2.35416 53
Diploma / Degree 23.8550 1.81922 131
Master / PhD 22.8846 3.03746 26
Total 23.4286 2.20203 210
ScoreFT SPM / STPM 24.2264 2.59912 53
Diploma / Degree 25.9695 2.43986 131
Master / PhD 23.6538 4.30760 26
Total 25.2429 2.91721 210
ScoreMT SPM / STPM 32.2642 5.11089 53
Diploma / Degree 35.6641 2.51950 131
Master / PhD 33.6154 4.04056 26
Total 34.5524 3.82257 210
ScoreAT SPM / STPM 20.7170 2.50674 53
Diploma / Degree 22.0916 2.09560 131
Master / PhD 20.7308 3.65029 26
Total 21.5762 2.51624 210
Multivariate Testsa
Partial Eta
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Squared
Intercept Pillai's Trace .989 4639.694 b
4.000 204.000 .000 .989
Wilks' Lambda .011 4639.694 b
4.000 204.000 .000 .989
Hotelling's Trace 90.974 4639.694 b
4.000 204.000 .000 .989
Roy's Largest Root 90.974 4639.694b 4.000 204.000 .000 .989
D6 Pillai's Trace .201 5.737 8.000 410.000 .000 .101
Wilks' Lambda .805 5.848 b
8.000 408.000 .000 .103
Hotelling's Trace .235 5.959 8.000 406.000 .000 .105
Roy's Largest Root .196 10.030c 4.000 205.000 .000 .164
a. Design: Intercept + D6
b. Exact statistic
c. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance level.
Estimates
95% Confidence Interval
Dependent Variable Education Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
ScoreAW SPM / STPM 22.642 .294 22.062 23.221
Diploma / Degree 23.855 .187 23.486 24.224
Master / PhD 22.885 .420 22.057 23.713
ScoreFT SPM / STPM 24.226 .381 23.476 24.977
Diploma / Degree 25.969 .242 25.492 26.447
Master / PhD 23.654 .543 22.583 24.725
ScoreMT SPM / STPM 32.264 .486 31.306 33.222
Diploma / Degree 35.664 .309 35.055 36.274
Master / PhD 33.615 .694 32.247 34.983
ScoreAT SPM / STPM 20.717 .335 20.057 21.377
Diploma / Degree 22.092 .213 21.672 22.512
Master / PhD 20.731 .478 19.788 21.674
Pairwise Comparisons
95% Con
Mean Difference
Dependent Variable (I) Education (J) Education (I-J) Std. Error Sig.b Lower Bou
ScoreAW SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.213* .349 .002 -2
Master / PhD -.243 .513 1.000 -1
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.213 *
.349 .002
Master / PhD .970 .460 .108 -
Master / PhD SPM / STPM .243 .513 1.000 -
Diploma / Degree -.970 .460 .108 -2
ScoreFT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.743*
.451 .000 -2
Master / PhD .573 .663 1.000 -1
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.743* .451 .000
Master / PhD 2.316 *
.595 .000
Master / PhD SPM / STPM -.573 .663 1.000 -2
Diploma / Degree -2.316*
.595 .000 -3
ScoreMT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -3.400* .576 .000 -4
Master / PhD -1.351 .847 .337 -3
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 3.400 *
.576 .000 2
Master / PhD 2.049 *
.760 .023
Master / PhD SPM / STPM 1.351 .847 .337 -
Diploma / Degree -2.049*
.760 .023 -3
ScoreAT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.375*
.397 .002 -2
Master / PhD -.014 .584 1.000 -1
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.375* .397 .002
Master / PhD 1.361 *
.524 .030
Master / PhD SPM / STPM .014 .584 1.000 -1
Diploma / Degree -1.361*
.524 .030 -2
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
Multiple Comparisons
Tukey HSD
Mean Difference 95% Co
Dependent Variable (I) Education (J) Education (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Boun
ScoreAW SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.2135 *
.34858 .002 -2.0
Master / PhD -.2431 .51269 .884 -1.4
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.2135 *
.34858 .002 .3
Master / PhD .9703 .45972 .090 -.1
Master / PhD SPM / STPM .2431 .51269 .884 -.9
Diploma / Degree -.9703 .45972 .090 -2.0
ScoreFT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.7431 *
.45104 .000 -2.8
Master / PhD .5726 .66339 .664 -.9
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.7431 *
.45104 .000 .6
Master / PhD 2.3156* .59485 .000 .9
Master / PhD SPM / STPM -.5726 .66339 .664 -2.1
Diploma / Degree -2.3156 *
.59485 .000 -3.7
ScoreMT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -3.4000 *
.57602 .000 -4.7
Master / PhD -1.3512 .84722 .250 -3.3
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 3.4000 *
.57602 .000 2.0
Master / PhD 2.0487 *
.75968 .021 .2
Master / PhD SPM / STPM 1.3512 .84722 .250 -.6
Diploma / Degree -2.0487* .75968 .021 -3.8
ScoreAT SPM / STPM Diploma / Degree -1.3746 *
.39695 .002 -2.3
Master / PhD -.0138 .58384 1.000 -1.3
Diploma / Degree SPM / STPM 1.3746 *
.39695 .002 .4
Master / PhD 1.3608* .52352 .027 .1
Master / PhD SPM / STPM .0138 .58384 1.000 -1.3
Diploma / Degree -1.3608 *
.52352 .027 -2.5
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 5.946.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.