RESULTS

TABLES AND GRAPHS:

TABLE – 1: Comparing Age in Group – A and Group – B

Equal variances assumed

GROUP N Mean Standard t-value df table p-value
Deviation value

A 15 58.867 4.438 0.306 28 2.048 0.762

B 15 58.333 5.094

GRAPH-1: Comparing Age in Group-A and Group-B

70
58.867 58.333
60

50

40

30

20

10

0
GROUP A GROUP B

MEAN

TABLE –1 AND GRAPH -1 : Comparing Age in Group – A and Group – B

From the table and graph we observe that for the age in Group-A which has 15 subjects the
average score is 58.867 and SD is 4.438, similarly in Group-B which has 15 subjects the
average score is 58.333 and SD is 5.094, corresponding calculated unpaired t-value is 0.306
and p-value is 0.762 > 0.05. Hence it shows that there is no significant difference in the
group’s average scores, so the mean age group in both the groups is approximately same.
GROUP A:

TABLE – 2: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

N Mean Standard t – value Df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 2.5 0.463

test -16 14 2.145 0.000

Post- 15 3.033 0.442

test

GRAPH-2: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

3.5
3.033
3
2.5
2.5

1.5

0.5

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –2 AND GRAPH -2: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in

Group – A

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Oxford in Group-A which has
15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 2.5 and SD is 0.463, similarly in post-test average
score is 3.033 and SD is 0.442, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -16 and p-value is
0.00 < 0.05.
Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test Oxford score is increased, which
means pelvic floor strengthening has been effective in improving oxford.

TABLE– 3: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 35.86 2.761

test 12.163 14 2.145 0.000

Post- 15 25.927 3.302

test

GRAPH– 3: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

40
35.86
35

30 25.927
25

20

15

10

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –3 AND GRAPH -3: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in

Group – A

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of UDI in Group-A which has 15
subjects, their pre-test average score is 35.86 and SD is 2.761, similarly in post-test average
score is 25.927 and SD is 3.302, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -12.163 and p-
value is 0.00 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test UDI score is decreased, which means
pfm strengthening has been effective in decreasing urinary symptoms.

TABLE– 4: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 1.707 0.587

test -1.468 14 2.145 0.164

Post- 15 1.72 0.571

test

GRAPH– 4: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

1.8 1.707 1.72

1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –4 AND GRAPH -4: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test
in Group – A
From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Right AST in Group-A which
has 15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 1.707 and SD is 0.587, similarly in post-test
average score is 1.72 and SD is 0.571, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -1.468 and
p-value is 0.164 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.164 > 0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in pre-test to post-test Right
AST score.

TABLE– 5: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 1.613 0.517

test -1 14 2.145 0.334

Post- 15 1.627 0.502

test

GRAPH– 5: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – A

 1.8 1.627
1.613
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –5 AND GRAPH -5: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in
Group – A

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Left AST in Group-A which
has 15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 1.613 and SD is 0.517, similarly in post-test
average score is 1.627 and SD is 0.502, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -1and p-
value is 0.334 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.334 > 0.05, it indicates that there is no significant difference in pre-test to post-test Left
AST score.

GROUP B:
TABLE – 6: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

N Mean Standard t – value Df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 2.6 0.471

test -10.583 14 2.145 0.000

Post- 15 3.267 0.258

test

GRAPH-6: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

3.5 3.267

3
2.6
2.5

1.5

0.5

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –6 AND GRAPH -6: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in

Group – B

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Oxford in Group-B which has
15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 2.6 and SD is 0.471, similarly in post-test average
score is 3.267 and SD is 0.258, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -10.583 and p-
value is 0.00 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test Oxford score is increased, which
means pfm strengthening along with hip rotator strength has been effective in increasing
oxford grading scale.

TABLE– 7: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 36.127 3.102

test 41.327 14 2.145 0.000

Post- 15 23.3 3.109

test

GRAPH– 7: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

40 36.127
35

30
23.3
25

20

15

10

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –7 AND GRAPH -7: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in

Group – B
From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of UDI in Group-B which has 15
subjects, their pre-test average score is 36.127 and SD is 3.102, similarly in post-test average
score is 23.3 and SD is 3.109, corresponding calculated paired t-value is 41.327 and p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test UDI score is decreased, which means
pfm strengthening along with hip rotator strengthening has been effective in decrease in UDI
symptoms.

TABLE– 8: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 1.7 0.902

test -3.106 14 2.145 0.008

Post- 15 2.333 0.880

test

GRAPH– 8: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

 2.5 2.333

2
1.7

1.5

0.5

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –8 AND GRAPH -8: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test
in Group – B

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Right AST in Group-B which
has 15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 1.7 and SD is 0.902, similarly in post-test
average score is 2.333 and SD is 0.880, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -3.106 and
p-value is 0.008 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.008 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test Right AST score is increased, which
means pfm strengthening along with hip rotator strengthening has been effective in
improving hip rotator strength.

TABLE– 9: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

N Mean Standard t – value df Table p – value

Deviation value

Pre- 15 1.5 0.707

test -8.5 14 2.145 0.000

Post- 15 2.067 0.651

test
GRAPH– 9: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group – B

2.5
2.067
2

1.5
1.5

0.5

0
PRE POST

MEAN

TABLE –9 AND GRAPH -9: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in
Group – B

From the table and graph we observe that for the parameter of Left AST in Group-B which
has 15 subjects, their pre-test average score is 1.5 and SD is 0.707, similarly in post-test
average score is 2.067 and SD is 0.651, corresponding calculated paired t-value is -8.5 and p-
value is 0.00 < 0.05.

Table value at 95 % level of significance with 14 degrees of freedom is 2.145. Since p-value
is 0.00 < 0.05, it is significant that pre-test to post-test Left AST score is increased, which
means pfm strengthening along with hip rotator strengthing has been effective in improving
hip rotator strengthening.

GROUP A VERSUS GROUP B:

TABLE– 10: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and

Group-B

N Mean Standard Standard

Deviation Error of
Mean

Pre-test Group A 15 2.5 0.463 0.120

 Group B 15 2.6 0.470 0.121

Post-test Group A 15 3.033 0.442 0.114

Group B 15 3.267 0.258 0.067

t-test for Equality of means Table

value
t-value Df p-value

Pre-test Equal
Variances -0.587 28 0.562
Assumed 2.048
Post-test Equal
Variances -1.766 28 0.088
Assumed

GRAPH– 10: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and

Group-B
 3.5 3.267
3.033
3
2.5 2.6
2.5

1.5

0.5

0
GROUP A GROUP B

PRE POST

TABLE –10 AND GRAPH -10: Comparing Oxford Pre-test and Post-test
in Group–A and Group-B

From the table and graph we observe that pre-test Group-A average score is 2.5 and SD is
0.463, whereas Group-B average score is 2.6 and SD is 0.470 and corresponding calculated
unpaired t-value is -0.587, p-value is 0.562 > 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of
significance with 28 degrees of freedom is 2.048. Since the p-value is 0.562 > 0.05, it means
there is no significant difference in Group-A and Group-B in pre-test Oxford scores.

Similarly in post-test Group-A average score is 3.033 and SD is 0.442, whereas Group-B
average score is 3.267 and SD is 0.258 and corresponding calculated unpaired t-value is -
1.766, p-value is 0.088 > 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of significance with 28 degrees of
freedom is 2.048. Since p-value is 0.088 > 0.05, it means there is no significant difference in
Group-A and Group-B in post-test Oxford scores.

Improvement in oxford grading scale has seen in both the groups without significant
difference between the two groups.

TABLE– 11: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and

Group-B
 N Mean Standard Standard
Deviation Error of
Mean

Pre-test Group A 15 35.86 2.761 0.713

Group B 15 36.127 3.102 0.801

Post-test Group A 15 25.927 3.302 0.853

Group B 15 23.3 3.109 0.803

t-test for Equality of means Table

value
t-value Df p-value

Pre-test Equal
Variances -0.249 28 0.805
Assumed 2.048
Post-test Equal
Variances 2.243 28 0.033
Assumed

GRAPH– 11: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and

Group-B
 40 36.127
35.86
35

30 25.927
23.3
25

20

15

10

0
GROUP A GROUP B

PRE POST

TABLE –11 AND GRAPH -11: Comparing UDI Pre-test and Post-test in
Group–A and Group-B

From the table and graph we observe that pre-test Group-A average score is 35.86 and SD is
2.761, whereas Group-B average score is 36.127 and SD is 3.102 and corresponding
calculated unpaired t-value is -0.249, p-value is 0.805 > 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of
significance with 28 degrees of freedom is 2.048. Since the p-value is 0.805 > 0.05, it means
there is no significant difference in Group-A and Group-B in pre-test UDI scores.

Similarly in post-test Group-A average score is 25.927 and SD is 3.302, whereas Group-B
average score is 23.3 and SD is 3.109 and corresponding calculated unpaired t-value is 2.243,
p-value is 0.033 < 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of significance with 28 degrees of
freedom is 2.048. Since p-value is 0.033 < 0.05, it means there is significant difference in
Group-A and Group-B in post-test UDI scores.

Improvement in UDI is seen in both the groups, but Group –B shows a greater significant
difference than Group –A.

TABLE– 12: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and
Group-B
 N Mean Standard Standard
Deviation Error of
Mean

Pre-test Group A 15 1.707 0.587 0.152

Group B 15 1.7 0.902 0.233

Post-test Group A 15 1.72 0.571 0.147

Group B 15 2.333 0.880 0.227

t-test for Equality of means Table

value
t-value Df p-value

Pre-test Equal
Variances 0.024 28 0.981
Assumed 2.048
Post-test Equal
Variances -2.265 28 0.031
Assumed
GRAPH– 12: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A
and Group-B

2.5 2.333

2
1.707 1.72 1.7

1.5

0.5

0
GROUP A GROUP B

PRE POST

TABLE –12 AND GRAPH -12: Comparing Right AST Pre-test and Post-
test in Group–A and Group-B

From the table and graph we observe that pre-test Group-A average score is 1.707 and SD is
0.587, whereas Group-B average score is 1.7 and SD is 0.902 and corresponding calculated
unpaired t-value is 0.024, p-value is 0.981 > 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of
significance with 28 degrees of freedom is 2.048. Since the p-value is 0.981 > 0.05, it means
there is no significant difference in Group-A and Group-B in pre-test Right AST scores.

Similarly in post-test Group-A average score is 1.72 and SD is 0.571, whereas Group-B
average score is 2.333 and SD is 0.880 and corresponding calculated unpaired t-value is -
2.265, p-value is 0.031 < 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of significance with 28 degrees of
freedom is 2.048. Since p-value is 0.031 < 0.05, it means there is significant difference in
Group-A and Group-B in post-test Right AST scores.

Improvement in hip rotator strength is not seen in both groups , Group –B shows a greater
significant difference than Group –A.
TABLE– 13: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and
Group-B

N Mean Standard Standard

Deviation Error of
Mean

Pre-test Group A 15 1.613 0.517 0.133

Group B 15 1.5 0.707 0.182

Post-test Group A 15 1.627 0.502 0.130

Group B 15 2.067 0.651 0.168

t-test for Equality of means Table

value
t-value Df p-value

Pre-test Equal
Variances 0.501 28 0.620
Assumed 2.048
Post-test Equal
Variances -2.073 28 0.047
Assumed

GRAPH– 13: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test in Group–A and
Group-B
 2.5
2.067
2
1.613 1.627
1.5
1.5

0.5

0
GROUP A GROUP B

PRE POST

TABLE –13 AND GRAPH -13: Comparing Left AST Pre-test and Post-test
in Group–A and Group-B

From the table and graph we observe that pre-test Group-A average score is 1.613 and SD is
0.517, whereas Group-B average score is 1.5 and SD is 0.707 and corresponding calculated
unpaired t-value is 0.501, p-value is 0.620 > 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of
significance with 28 degrees of freedom is 2.048. Since the p-value is 0.620 > 0.05, it means
there is no significant difference in Group-A and Group-B in pre-test Left AST scores.

Similarly in post-test Group-A average score is 1.627 and SD is 0.502, whereas Group-B
average score is 2.067 and SD is 0.651 and corresponding calculated unpaired t-value is -
2.073, p-value is 0.047 < 0.05 and table value at 95 % level of significance with 28 degrees of
freedom is 2.048. Since p-value is 0.047 < 0.05, it means there is significant difference in
Group-A and Group-B in post-test Left AST scores.

Improvement in hip rotator strength is not seen in both groups., group B shows a greater
significant difference than group A

MASTER CHART
 GROUP A PF
S.NO AGE PRE TEST POST TEST
OXFOR UDI RIGH LEFT OXFOR UDI RIGH LEFT
D T AST AST D T AST AST

1 55 2 33.3 1 1 2.5 27.3 1.1 1

2 53 3 34.3 1 1 3.5 26.3 1 1.1
3 50 2.5 33.3 1.5 1.4 3 26.2 1.5 1.5
4 62 2 41.1 1.2 1.2 2.5 30.2 1.2 1.2
5 60 3 36.2 2.3 2.2 3.5 28.5 2.3 2.2
6 65 2 35.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 24.2 1.5 1.4
7 59 2 33.3 2.1 2 2.5 23.2 2.1 2
8 56 3 34.2 1.5 1.3 3.5 25.4 1.5 1.3
9 65 3 33.3 1 1 3.5 24.5 1.1 1
10 57 2 36.2 2.2 2 3 26.1 2.2 2
11 58 2.5 34.3 1.2 1.1 3 22.8 1.2 1.2
12 61 3 36.4 2.7 2.5 3.5 23.9 2.7 2.5
13 64 3 35.5 2.6 2.2 3.5 25.7 2.6 2.2
14 56 2.5 41.4 2.1 2.1 3 34.2 2.1 2.1
15 62 2 39.6 1.7 1.7 2.5 20.4 1.7 1.7
MEA 58.867 2.5 35.86 1.707 1.613 3.033 25.927 1.72 1.627
N

GROUP B PF AND HS
S.NO AGE PRE TEST POST TEST
 OXFOR UDI RIGH LEF OXFOR UDI RIGHT LEFT
D T AST T D AST AST
AST

1 51 3 34.8 0.5 0.5 3.5 23.4 1 1

2 54 2 33.8 1 1 3 21.2 1.5 1.5

3 58 3 33.3 2.5 2.5 3.5 20.6 3 3

4 67 2.5 42.6 0.5 0.5 3 29.6 1 1.5

5 57 3 34.3 3 2.5 3.5 19.5 3.5 3

6 63 2 36.8 2 1.5 3 22.4 3 2

7 64 2 33.3 1.5 1 3 20.8 2 1.5

8 54 3 36.3 2 1.5 3.5 22.1 3 1.5

9 53 3 41.6 0.5 1.5 3.5 29.4 1 2.5

10 65 2 33.3 0.5 0.5 3 22.5 3.5 1.5

11 53 3 35.2 3 2.5 3.5 21.3 2 3

12 62 2.5 40.5 2 1.5 3 26.5 2.5 2

13 54 3 33.4 2 2 3.5 21.2 2.5 2.5

14 61 3 35.9 2 1.5 3.5 23.6 2.5 2

15 59 2 36.8 2.5 2 3 25.4 3 2.5

MEA 58.333 2.6 36.127 1.7 1.5 3.267 23.3 2.333 2.067
N