MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee:ROWENA N. LONTAYAO Name of Rater: AMY R. FRANCISCO

Position: TEACHER II I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - FEBRUARY 2023 Date of Review: FEBRUARY 20, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating

Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 1. 1. Applied August Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio Content knowledge of 2022- 7% (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n Knowle content within and February observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services dge and across curriculum 2023 done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
Pedago teaching areas. face / in-person classroom Quarter
gy (PPST 1.1.2) observation.

If onsite / face-to-face / in-

person classes are not
implemented, Efficiency No CO yet
conducted
● through observation of for the 1st
synchronous / and 2nd
asynchronous Quarter
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool No CO yet
Educatio teaching strategies (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n that enhance observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services learner done through onsite / face-to- Quality and 2nd
achievement in face / in-person classroom Quarter
literacy and observation.
numeracy skills. Efficiency
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
(PPST 1.4.2)
person classes are not
implemented,
Timeliness No CO yet
● through observation of conducted
synchronous / for the 1st
asynchronous and 2nd
teaching in other Quarter
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n strategies to observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services develop critical and done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
creative thinking, face / in-person classroom Quarter
as well as other observation.
higher-order Efficiency No CO yet
If onsite / face-to-face / in- conducted
thinking skills.
person classes are not
(PPST 1.5.2) for the 1st
implemented,
and 2nd
● through Quarter
observation of Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session

Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet

Educatio Learnin classroom structure (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n g to engage learners, observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services Environ individually or in done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
ment groups, in face / in-person classroom Quarter
and meaningful observation.
Efficiency No CO yet
Diversit exploration, conducted
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
y of discovery and for the 1st
person classes are not
Learner hands-on activities implemented, and 2nd
s within a range of Quarter
physical learning ● through observation of
environments. synchronous /
(PPST 2.3.3) asynchronous teaching in Timeliness
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n constructively by observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services applying positive done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
and non-violent face / in-person classroom Quarter
discipline to ensure observation.
learning-focused Efficiency No CO yet
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
environments. conducted
person classes are not
(PPST 2.6.2) implemented, for the 1st
and 2nd
● through observation of Quarter
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration Timeliness
teaching* via LAC
session.
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n developmentally observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services appropriate done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
learning face / in-person classroom Quarter
experiences to observation.
address learners’
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
gender, needs, person classes are not Efficiency No CO yet
strengths, interests implemented, conducted
and experiences. for the 1st
(PPST 3.1.2) ● through observation of and 2nd
synchronous / Quarter
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a Timeliness
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 3. 7. Planned, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet

Educatio Curricul managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n um and implemented observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services Plannin developmentally done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
g sequenced face / in-person classroom Quarter
teaching and observation.
learning processes
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
to meet curriculum
person classes are not
requirements and implemented,
varied teaching Efficiency No CO yet
contexts. (PPST conducted
● through observation of
4.1.2) for the 1st
synchronous /
asynchronous and 2nd
Quarter
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
teaching in other Timeliness
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance Quality No LAC yet
collegial in LAC sessions / conducted
discussions that FGDs / meetings / for the 1st
use teacher and other collegial and 2nd
learner feedback to discussions Quarter
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC
Efficiency
sessions / FGDs /
practice. (PPST
meetings / other
4.4.2)
collegial discussions
on use of teacher and
learner feedback to
enrich teaching Timeliness No LAC yet
practice conducted
3. Reflection notes of for the 1st
teachers on their and 2nd
demonstration of Quarter
teaching practices
following participation
from LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings /
other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
form/document that
highlights the
objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n organized and observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services used appropriate done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
teaching and face / in-person classroom Quarter
learning resources, observation.
including ICT, to
address learning If onsite / face-to-face / in- Efficiency No CO yet
goals. person classes are not conducted
(PPST 4.5.2) implemented, for the 1st
and 2nd
● through observation of Quarter
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of Timeliness
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio Assess selected, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n ment and used observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services and diagnostic, done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
Reportin formative and face / in-person classroom Quarter
g summative observation.
assessment
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies
person classes are not
consistent with implemented,
curriculum
requirements. ● through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session. Efficiency No CO yet
conducted
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality .
Educatio evaluated learner following: --E-class
n progress and ● Individual Learning record for
Services achievement using Monitoring Plan (ILMP) the 1st and
learner attainment 2nd Quarter.
● Peer assessment data
data.
(PPST 5.2.2) ● Sample of learners’
output with reflection /
self-assessment
● Progress
charts/anecdotal records
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g., Individual Learning Efficiency
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Timeliness
--E-class
record for
the 1st and
2nd Quarter.

Basic 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the Quality

Educatio promptly and following: --Minutes
n clearly the learners’ ● A sample of corrected of Meetings
Services needs, progress test paper of a learner in a ---Report
and achievement to Card
learning area with parent’s
key stakeholders,
or guardian’s signature
including
parents/guardians
and date of receipt
(PPST 5.4.2) ● Minutes of meetings
with key stakeholders
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
● Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
● Communication with key Efficiency
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS Timeliness
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

5. 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Quality Submitted

Persona personal that highlights the one DLL
l Growth philosophy of application of a learner- with
and teaching that is centered teaching reflection of
Professi learner- philosophy in the lesson learner-
onal centered
centered. plan or community work
Develop philosophy.
ment
(PPST 7.1.2)
Efficiency Submitted
one DLL
with
reflection of
learner-
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
centered
philosophy.
14. Set 1. Certification from the Quality --Submitted
professional ICT Coordinator / School IPCRF-DP
development Head / Focal Person in Conducted
goals based on charge of e-SAT --Mid-year
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP review
Efficiency --Submitted
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
IPCRF-DP
Standards for (MRF)
Conducted
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP --Mid-year
(PPST 7.5.2) from Phase II review
Timeliness --Submitted
IPCRF-DP
Conducted
--Mid-year
review
Basic Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality Attended,
Educatio Factor various related ● committee involvement; performed
n works / and
● involvement as
Services activities that involved in
module/learning material different
contribute to writer/validator; commitee,
the teaching- ● involvement as a speaking
learning process
resource ngagement
person/speaker/learning ,
facilitator in in the advisership
RO/SDO/school-initiated and
coordinator
TV/radio-based
ship within
instruction; and
 Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Mid-year Review
Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher)
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline t per Means of Verification Results
nce Ratin
KRA Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
● book or journal beyond the
authorship/ co- school and
community.
authorship/contributorshi
Efficiency Attended,
p; performed
● and
advisorship/coordinators involved in
hip/ chairpersonship; different
● participation in commitee,
demonstration teaching; speaking
● participation as ngagement
,
research presenter in a
advisership
forum/conference; and
● mentoring of pre- coordinator
service/in-service ship within
teachers; school
● conducted research Timeliness
within the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how

it contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.
AMY R. FRANCISCO ROWENA N. LONTAYAO REY M. BUENO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority