MS Database Matrix

Strategic Performance Management System Database

DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
7A Issued Excavation Permits
in accordance with D.O. 26 s not in accordance with D.O. 26
Q - - -
100% Initial Evaluation/Assessment of all submitted documents by 2011 s 2011
7A.1 Public/Private utility agencies for Excavation Permit Applications
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 70% Below
conducted in accordance with D.O. 26 s 2011 in 1 wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd
100% Joint Site Inspection/Verification with the Public/Private utility in accordance with D.O. 26 s not in accordance with D.O. 26
Q - - -
agencies to validate actual site conditions of proposed 2011 s 2011
7A.2 excavation/restoration activities as part of the evaluation for
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 70% Below
Excavation Permit Applications conducted in accordance with D.O. 26 s
2011 in 1 wd T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd
in accordance with D.O. 26 s not in accordance with D.O. 26
100% Final Evaluation/Assessment of the submitted documents Q - - -
2011 s 2011
relative to the Issuance of Excavation Permit based from the results of
7A.3
the validation on actual site conditions conducted in accordance with E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 70% Below
D.O. 26 s 2011 in 1 wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q No error 1 minor error 2 minor errors 3 minor errors major error

DPWH PERMITS 100% Excavation Permit issued to the Utility Agencies, if submitted
7A.4 documents is in conformance with D.O. 26 S 2011 prepared with 2 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
minor errors in 1 wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q N/A - - - N/A
7A.5 100% Excavation Permits reviewed and signed in 1 wd
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q N/A - - - N/A
100% Excavation Permits reviewed and recommended for approval in
7A.6
2 hrs E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
T 45 mins 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs more than 3 hrs

Q N/A - - - N/A
7A.7 100% Excavation Permits approved in 1 hr
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
T 30 mins 45 mins 1 hr 2 hrs more than 2 hrs
### 7B Other Issued Permits/Certifications

Q N/A - - - N/A
100% Initial Evaluation/Assessment of all submitted documents for
7B.1 Drainage/Fence/Building/Sign Clearance/Permit as requested by LGU's E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
or concern agencies conducted in 1 wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd
100% Joint Site Inspection/Verifications with concern agency to Q N/A - - - N/A
validate actual site conditions of various proposed
7B.2 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
Drainage/Fence/Building/Sign as part of the evaluation of the
Permit/Certifications, as scheduled conducted in 1 wd T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q N/A - - - N/A
100% Final Evaluation/Assessment on the submitted documents
7B.3 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
relative to the issuance of Permit/Clerance conducted in 1 wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q No error 1 minor error 2 minor errors 3 minor errors major error

100% Permit/Clearance issued to concern agency, if submitted
7B.4 documents and actual site conditions prepared with 2 minor errors in 1
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
wd
DPWH PERMITS T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q N/A - - - N/A
100% Other Issued Permits/ Certifications reviewed and signed in 1
7B.5 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
wd
T 4 hrs 6 hrs 1 wd 2 wd 3 wd

Q N/A - - - N/A
100% Other Issued Permis/ Certifications reviewed and recommended
7B.6 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below
for approval in 2 hrs
T 45 mins 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs more than 3 hrs

Q N/A - - - N/A

7B.7 100% Other Issued Permits/Certification approved in 1 hr E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % 99% Below

T 30 mins 45 mins 1 hr 2 hrs more than 2 hrs

Page 1 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
2A Approved
80% Plans,Plans & POWs
Program for Maintenance
of Works Activities
(POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis
(DUPA), Purchase Request, Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC)
Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
and Project Procurement Management P (PPMP) for implementation of
2A.1
Routine/Roadside Maintenance Activities along National Roads &
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
Bridges within area of jurisdiction prepared with 4-6 minor error in 28
2D days
Justification on the Remaining Noted Defects by BOM Inspector
ROUTNE/ ROADSIDE not in accordance with the
MAINTENANCE OF 100% Justification including supporting documents on the Remaining In accordance with D.O 41 Series
Q Recommended Action per DO 41
NATIONAL ROADS AND Noted Defects along National Roads and Bridges identified during the 2016 Series 2016
5th day of
BRIDGES 2D.1 BOM Inspection prepared with no error in five (5) working days upon
the week E 100% Below 70%
(Inspection/ Validation) receipt of the Memorandum from the DPWH Secretary, copy furnish
the Regional Office T 5 days 2 weeks
100% Sets of documents relative to the Justification including
supporting documents on the Remaining Noted Defects along National Q N/A N/A
Roads and Bridges identified during the BOM Inspection, reviewed and
2D.2 E 100% Below 70%
signed with no error in five (5) working days upon receipt of the
Memorandum from the DPWH Secretary, copy to furnished the
T 1day 5days
Regional Office
3A Approved Plans & POWs for Maintenance Projects (for funding)

80% Site Inspection conducted to identify affected road sections Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
and/or damaged structures within area of jurisdiction by taking 5th day of
3A.1 E 100% 90-99.99% 80-89.99% 70-79.995 Below 70%
geotagged pictures and collecting pertinent data/details for possible the week
inclusion in the Priority Lists of Maintenance Projects (for funding) T 3 days 4 days 5 days 1 week 2 weeks
80 % Plans, Program of Works (POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
(DUPA), Geotagged Pictures and other pertinent documents required
1 week/
3A.3 in the requests for possible funding of proposed Maintenance E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
project
Projects along National Roads & Bridges prepared within area of
jurisdiction T 3 days 5 days 1 week 1 week & 2 days 2 weeks

3B Approved Plans & POWs for Maintenance Projects (for implementation)

In accordance with approved DPWH not in accordance with approved

MAINTENANCE Q Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 100% As-Stake/Joint Survey conducted with the Contractor for the
every 2
Implementation of Maintenance Projects such as Preventive E 100% Below 70%
I. Roads 3B.1 weeks as per
Maintenance, FCDS, OPB, Road Slope, RWCSF and other Special
II. Bridges DOTS D.O 72
Projects T
III. Flood Control and
###Drainage System (FCDS) T 2 weeks as per DOTS D.O 72 3 weeks as per DOTS D.O 72
IV. Other Public Buildings
(OPB) 80% Plans, Program of Works (POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis Q
In accordance with approved DPWH not in accordance with approved
V. Road Slope (DUPA) and Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) for Maintenance Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
VI. Rainwater Collector Projects (for Implementation) along National Roads & Bridges within
System Facilities 3B.2 area of jurisdiction prepared with minor error. E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
(RWCSF) * For Roads/
Bridges/ Flood Control and Drainage System, Rain Water Collector
T 10 days 12 days 14 days 20 days 1 month
System Facilities and other public buildings

3C Implemented Maintenance Projects

in accordance with the approved not in accordance with approved

80% Implementation of Maintenance Projects along National Roads Q DPWH Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
and Bridges Supervised/Inspected upon issuance of Notice to Proceed Project
3C.1 E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
to ensure conformance with the approved plans and specifications Duration
physically accomplished within schedule within the given Project
T Project duration Duration
beyond the given Project Duration

3E Approved Maintenance Projects Related Documents

80% Variation Orders / Work Suspension Orders / Work Resumption Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
Orders and/or Contract Time Extensions with other supporting E 100% 90-99.99% 80-89.99% 70-79.99% Below 70%
3E.1
documents on Maintenance Projects handled as PE/PI reviewed and
signed with 4-6 minor error in 1 week T 3 days% 4 days 1 week 1 week & 2 days 2 weeks

Page 2 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
4.1 Prepare and Submit Maintenance Reports to the Regional Office for consolidation and forwaded to the central office

Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
80% Monthly Reports on the Status of Maintenance Project/s (FCDS,
B. OPB, RWCSF, Solid Waste, etc) with Transmittal prepared & submitted E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
with 4-6 minor error in 1 day
T 3 hours 6 hours 1 day 4days 5days

80% Quarterly Status/Accomplishment Reports (Highway Maintenance Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
APPROVED
### Activity Card or TAD 2.2, RWCSF, RROW & Inventory of Pavement
MAINTENANCE REPORTS C. E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
Markings) with Transmittal prepared & submitted to the Regional
Office with 4-6 minor error in 3 days
T 1 day 2 days 3 days 1wk 2 weeks

Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
80% Other Annual Reports (Inventory of FCDS, OPB & etc) with
E. Transmittal prepared & submittted to the Regional Office with 4-6 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
minor error in 2 months
T 1 month 1 month & 2 weeks 2 months 2months & 15days 3 months

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

Q with no erasures with 1 erasure with 2 erasures with 3 erasures with 4 erasures & beyond

11 or incomplete
E 12
12 Daily Time Record submitted with 2 erasures every 22nd day of the submission
Daily Time Records
month & 7th day of the following month
every 22nd day of every 23rd day of
every 21st day of the
every 20th day of the month & the month & 7th day the month & 8th every 24th day of the month &
T month & 6th day of the
5th day of the following month of the following day of the 9th day of the following month
following month
month following month

Q with no error with 1 minor error with 2 minor errors with 3 minor errors with 4 errors & beyond
Individual Performance
1 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form submitted E N/A N/A N/A
Commitment and Review (Semester)
with 2 minor errors every 2nd week of Jan/July
(IPCR)
every 2nd week of
T every 1st week of Jan/July beyond 7 months
Jan/July
Q N/A N/A N/A
Wearing of Complete
Complete uniform with ID, wore inside office premisses daily E N/A N/A N/A
Uniforms
T Daily

Q N/A N/A N/A

Attending Flag 100% of Flag Raising/ Lowering Ceremony attended every Mondays
E every Mondays and Fridays
Ceremonies and Fridays
T Punctual Late

AGREED BY:

BERNARDO P. ENGALAN CHITO G. PASTOLERO RENATO R. ALETA

Assistant Chief, Maintenance Section CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Mechanic
OIC-Head, Equipment Service Unit Maintenance Point Person - Area 5

AGLIPAY 2 MARIA A. OBERIO FRANCISCO T. PILAPIL ALEX E. DELA PEÑA

ENGINEER II CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Driver I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 1 Maintenance Point Person - Area 6

Page 3 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

RENE D. GOMEZ NOEL V. OROYAN JOSE DURIAS

ENGINEER II CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Heavy Equipment Operator I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 2 Foreman Area 2

ADRIAN C. YAGON EUTIQUIO CAÑIGA NILO A. LICMOAN

ENGINEER II Heavy Equipment Operator 1 Heavy Equipment Operator I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 3

ROLANDO G. CAMPEON RODOLFO MASAMAYOR IAN ROUMMEL BARONIA

CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE FOREMAN Heavy Equipment Operator I ENGINEER II
Maintenance Point Person - Area 4

JOHN NIKKO ERIC CABATBAT

ENGINEER II

FIELD OPERATIONS UNIT:

MUHAMMAD ABDULRAHIM JENELYN ROSE H. GILDORE JARED AARLAN PACLIBAR

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I BOOKBINDER II

KIYOE MAY COTAMORA NAGELLI JEAN FORNOLLES KIMBERLY L. AURE

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

DAREN GUMISAD JANICE POLINAR ZXYRAMAY A. OTOC

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

JAY-EL APRIJONE LORETO CARYL JANE GUIBAO DIANE JANOLINO

ENGINEERING AIDE ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ARCHITECT II

PRECIOUS JOY R. DACUTAN GLYDELLE KAYE OCTAVIO BUENA J. ALASAGAS

ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

LYWLYN ROLO-OS JHOANNE G. BERSABAL RYAN ARRIOLA

DRAFTSMAN I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

EQUIPMENT SERVICE UNIT:

JOSHOA EMMANUEL CAFÉ ANGELA NAQUILA DARYL GEORGE GUMBAN

ENGINEERING AIDE ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

Page 4 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

CARDIMAR LUAYON ROMULO DELALAMON NIÑA BULANADI

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

EMILY OMPOG
ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

EMILIO P. SUCALDITO, JR. RICHARD A. RAGASA REY PETER GILLE

CHIEF, MAINTENANCE SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER OIC - REGIONAL DIRECTOR
PMT, CHAIRMAN

Page 5 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
2A Approved
80% Plans,Plans & POWs
Program for Maintenance
of Works Activities
(POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis
(DUPA), Purchase Request, Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC)
Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
and Project Procurement Management P (PPMP) for implementation of
2A.1
Routine/Roadside Maintenance Activities along National Roads &
E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
Bridges within area of jurisdiction prepared with 4-6 minor error in 28
2D days
Justification on the Remaining Noted Defects by BOM Inspector
ROUTNE/ ROADSIDE not in accordance with the
MAINTENANCE OF 100% Justification including supporting documents on the Remaining In accordance with D.O 41 Series
Q Recommended Action per DO 41
NATIONAL ROADS AND Noted Defects along National Roads and Bridges identified during the 2016 Series 2016
5th day of
BRIDGES 2D.1 BOM Inspection prepared with no error in five (5) working days upon
the week E 100% Below 70%
(Inspection/ Validation) receipt of the Memorandum from the DPWH Secretary, copy furnish
the Regional Office T 5 days 2 weeks
100% Sets of documents relative to the Justification including
supporting documents on the Remaining Noted Defects along National Q N/A N/A
Roads and Bridges identified during the BOM Inspection, reviewed and
2D.2 E 100% Below 70%
signed with no error in five (5) working days upon receipt of the
Memorandum from the DPWH Secretary, copy to furnished the
T 1day 5days
Regional Office
3A Approved Plans & POWs for Maintenance Projects (for funding)

80% Site Inspection conducted to identify affected road sections Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
and/or damaged structures within area of jurisdiction by taking 5th day of
3A.1 E 100% 90-99.99% 80-89.99% 70-79.995 Below 70%
geotagged pictures and collecting pertinent data/details for possible the week
inclusion in the Priority Lists of Maintenance Projects (for funding) T 3 days 4 days 5 days 1 week 2 weeks
80 % Plans, Program of Works (POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
(DUPA), Geotagged Pictures and other pertinent documents required
1 week/
3A.3 in the requests for possible funding of proposed Maintenance E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
project
Projects along National Roads & Bridges prepared within area of
jurisdiction T 3 days 5 days 1 week 1 week & 2 days 2 weeks

3B Approved Plans & POWs for Maintenance Projects (for implementation)

In accordance with approved DPWH not in accordance with approved

MAINTENANCE Q Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED 100% As-Stake/Joint Survey conducted with the Contractor for the
every 2
Implementation of Maintenance Projects such as Preventive E 100% Below 70%
I. Roads 3B.1 weeks as per
Maintenance, FCDS, OPB, Road Slope, RWCSF and other Special
II. Bridges DOTS D.O 72
Projects T
III. Flood Control and
###Drainage System (FCDS) T 2 weeks as per DOTS D.O 72 3 weeks as per DOTS D.O 72
IV. Other Public Buildings
(OPB) 80% Plans, Program of Works (POW), Detailed Unit Price Analysis Q
In accordance with approved DPWH not in accordance with approved
V. Road Slope (DUPA) and Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) for Maintenance Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
VI. Rainwater Collector Projects (for Implementation) along National Roads & Bridges within
System Facilities 3B.2 area of jurisdiction prepared with minor error. E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
(RWCSF) * For Roads/
Bridges/ Flood Control and Drainage System, Rain Water Collector
T 10 days 12 days 14 days 20 days 1 month
System Facilities and other public buildings

3C Implemented Maintenance Projects

in accordance with the approved not in accordance with approved

80% Implementation of Maintenance Projects along National Roads Q DPWH Plans & Specs Plans & Specs
and Bridges Supervised/Inspected upon issuance of Notice to Proceed Project
3C.1 E 100% 90-99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
to ensure conformance with the approved plans and specifications Duration
physically accomplished within schedule within the given Project
T Project duration Duration
beyond the given Project Duration

3E Approved Maintenance Projects Related Documents

80% Variation Orders / Work Suspension Orders / Work Resumption Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
Orders and/or Contract Time Extensions with other supporting E 100% 90-99.99% 80-89.99% 70-79.99% Below 70%
3E.1
documents on Maintenance Projects handled as PE/PI reviewed and
signed with 4-6 minor error in 1 week T 3 days% 4 days 1 week 1 week & 2 days 2 weeks

Page 6 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
4.1 Prepare and Submit Maintenance Reports to the Regional Office for consolidation and forwaded to the central office

Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
80% Monthly Reports on the Status of Maintenance Project/s (FCDS,
B. OPB, RWCSF, Solid Waste, etc) with Transmittal prepared & submitted E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
with 4-6 minor error in 1 day
###
APPROVED T 3 hours 6 hours 1 day 4days 5days
MAINTENANCE REPORTS
Q No Error 1-3 Minor Errors 4-6 Minor Errors 1-2 Major Errors with 5 Major Errors
80% Other Annual Reports (Inventory of FCDS, OPB & etc) with
E. Transmittal prepared & submittted to the Regional Office with 4-6 E 100% 90 - 99.99% 80 - 89.99% 70 - 79.99 % Below 70%
minor error in 2 months
T 1 month 1 month & 2 weeks 2 months 2months & 15days 3 months

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

Q with no erasures with 1 erasure with 2 erasures with 3 erasures with 4 erasures & beyond

11 or incomplete
E 12
12 Daily Time Record submitted with 2 erasures every 22nd day of the submission
Daily Time Records
month & 7th day of the following month
every 22nd day of every 23rd day of
every 21st day of the
every 20th day of the month & the month & 7th day the month & 8th every 24th day of the month &
T month & 6th day of the
5th day of the following month of the following day of the 9th day of the following month
following month
month following month

Q with no error with 1 minor error with 2 minor errors with 3 minor errors with 4 errors & beyond
Individual Performance
1 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form submitted E N/A N/A N/A
Commitment and Review (Semester)
with 2 minor errors every 2nd week of Jan/July
(IPCR)
every 2nd week of
T every 1st week of Jan/July beyond 7 months
Jan/July
Q N/A N/A N/A
Wearing of Complete
Complete uniform with ID, wore inside office premisses daily E N/A N/A N/A
Uniforms
T Daily

Q N/A N/A N/A

Attending Flag 100% of Flag Raising/ Lowering Ceremony attended every Mondays
E every Mondays and Fridays
Ceremonies and Fridays
T Punctual Late

AGREED BY:

BERNARDO P. ENGALAN CHITO G. PASTOLERO RENATO R. ALETA

Assistant Chief, Maintenance Section CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Mechanic
OIC-Head, Equipment Service Unit Maintenance Point Person - Area 5

AGLIPAY 2 MARIA A. OBERIO FRANCISCO T. PILAPIL ALEX E. DELA PEÑA

ENGINEER II CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Driver I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 1 Maintenance Point Person - Area 6

RENE D. GOMEZ NOEL V. OROYAN JOSE DURIAS

ENGINEER II CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE CAPATAZ Heavy Equipment Operator I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 2 Foreman Area 2

Page 7 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor

ADRIAN C. YAGON EUTIQUIO CAÑIGA NILO A. LICMOAN

ENGINEER II Heavy Equipment Operator 1 Heavy Equipment Operator I
Maintenance Point Person - Area 3

ROLANDO G. CAMPEON RODOLFO MASAMAYOR IAN ROUMMEL BARONIA

CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCE FOREMAN Heavy Equipment Operator I ENGINEER II
Maintenance Point Person - Area 4

JOHN NIKKO ERIC CABATBAT

ENGINEER II

FIELD OPERATIONS UNIT:

MUHAMMAD ABDULRAHIM JENELYN ROSE H. GILDORE JARED AARLAN PACLIBAR

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I BOOKBINDER II

KIYOE MAY COTAMORA NAGELLI JEAN FORNOLLES KIMBERLY L. AURE

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

DAREN GUMISAD JANICE POLINAR ZXYRAMAY A. OTOC

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

JAY-EL APRIJONE LORETO CARYL JANE GUIBAO DIANE JANOLINO

ENGINEERING AIDE ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ARCHITECT II

PRECIOUS JOY R. DACUTAN GLYDELLE KAYE OCTAVIO BUENA J. ALASAGAS

ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

LYWLYN ROLO-OS JHOANNE G. BERSABAL RYAN ARRIOLA

DRAFTSMAN I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

EQUIPMENT SERVICE UNIT:

JOSHOA EMMANUEL CAFÉ ANGELA NAQUILA DARYL GEORGE GUMBAN

ENGINEERING AIDE ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

CARDIMAR LUAYON ROMULO DELALAMON NIÑA BULANADI

ENGINEER II ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

Page 8 of 9
 MS Database Matrix
Strategic Performance Management System Database
DAVAO CITY DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE
MAINTENANCE SECTION
Database Matrix

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Due Date
Final Output Success Indicator 5 4 3 2 1
(Timeline)
Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
EMILY OMPOG
ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE I

PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY:

EMILIO P. SUCALDITO, JR. RICHARD A. RAGASA REY PETER GILLE

CHIEF, MAINTENANCE SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER OIC - REGIONAL DIRECTOR
PMT, CHAIRMAN

Page 9 of 9