OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

NAME OF EMPLOYEE: CHONA R. OCSING NAME OF RATER: CHERYLL V. BERMUDO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL I POSITION: ASST. SCHOOLS DIVISON SUPERINTENDENT (Elementary)
OFFICE/DIVISION: FABIAN R. DE MESA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATE OF REVIEW: August 7, 2023
RATING PERIOD: August 2022-July 2023

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ON SITE
TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
LEADING 1.1. Communicated the August 2022 6.50% Outstanding Consistently communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school
STRATEGICALLY DepEd vision, mission - July 2023 (5) community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs,
and core values to the projects and activities
wider school community
Very Satisfactory Frequently communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school
to ensure shared
(4) community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs,
understanding and projects and activities
alignment of school
Quality

Satisfactory Occasionally communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school
policies, programs, community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs,
(3) 5 5
projects and activities projects and activities

Unsatis factory Rarely communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school
(2) community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs,
projects and activities

Poor Failed to communicate the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school
(1) community to ensure shared understanding and alignment of school policies, programs,
projects and activities
Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community
using any five (5) of the following modalities such as:
1. Flyers 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
2. Tarpaulin
3. Video Clip
Basic Education Services

4. Face-to-face
Outstanding 5. Newspaper/School Paper
(5) 6. Online
7. SRC
8. Radio
Efficiency

9. Video
10.Letter of invitation to stakeholders
5 5

Very Satisfactory Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community
using any four (4) of the identified modalities.
(4)
Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community
Satisfactory using any three (3) of the identified modalities
(3)
Unsatis factory Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the wider school community
(2) using any one or two (1 or 2) of the identified modalities
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
1.2. Developed and August 2022 - 6.50% Development plan was enhanced and fully implemented with the
Outstanding
implemented with the July 2023 community performing the leadership roles, and the school provided
(5)
planning team school technical support
plans aligned with
institutional goals and
Ba

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives
1.2. Developed and August 2022 - 6.50% RATING 60% RATING (40%)
implemented with the July 2023
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
planning team school
plans aligned with Development plan was evolved and fully implemented through the shared
institutional goals and Very Satisfactory leadership of the school and the community stakeholders
policies (4)

Quality
Development plan guided by the school's VMG was developed through the
Satisfactory leadership of the school and participation of some invited community 5 5
(3) stakeholders

Unsatis factory Development plan was developed and implemented through the
(2) leadership of the school

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
Outstanding 100% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(5)
Very Satisfactory 91-99% of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
(4)

Efficiency
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Satisfactory 81-90% of school PPAs per approved AIP were
implemented/complemeted 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory 71-80% of school PPAs were implemented/completed
(2)
Poor 70% and below of school PPAs per approved AIP were
(1) implemented/completed

Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and
(5) Project Management Team (PMT)

Very Satisfactory Conducted 3 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and
(4) Project Management Team (PMT)
Timeliness

Satisfactory Conducted 2 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and
Project Management Team (PMT) 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted 1 quarterly meeting with the School Planning Team(SPT) and
(2) Project Management Team (PMT)
Poor No quarterly meeting conducted
(1)
1.3. Utilized available August 2022 6.50% Outstanding Community stakeholders' led the regular review and improvement process;
monitoring and - July 2023 (5) the school stakeholders facilitated the process.
evaluation processes
Very School community stakeholders worked as full partners and led the
Basic Education Services

and tools to promote

learner achievement Satisfactory continual review and improvement of development plan
(4)
Quality

Satisfactory School led the review and improvement of the development plan
(3) 5 5

Unsatis factory School conducted review of development plan

(2)
No acceptable evidence presented
Poor
(1)
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325

Outstanding Periodic utilization of DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools

(5)
Very Satisfactory Periodic utilization of DepEd-framed and infrequent use of school-framed
(4) M & E tools
eliness

5 5
Bas
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
Timeliness QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE

Satisfactory Infrequent/irregular utilization of DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E

(3) tools 5 5

Unsatis factory Infrequent/irregular utilization of school-framed M&E tools

(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
2. MANAGING 2.1. Managed school data August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently performed management of school data using technology,
SCHOOL and information using July 2023 Outstanding including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations.
OPERATIONS technology, including ICT (5)
AND to ensure efficient and
RESOURCES effective school Very Satisfactory Frequently performed management of school data using technology,
(4) including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations.
operations.

Quality
Satisfactory Occasionallyperformed management of school data using technology,
including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations. 5 5
(3)

Unsatis factory Rarely performed management of school data using technology, including
(2) ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations.

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
Managed gathering and submission of school data to 5 out 6 online
systems required by the Department of Education
1. LIS
2. EBEIS
Outstanding 3. WinS
(5) 4. DPDS
5. e SAT
6. IPCRF/ORCF Online link
Basic Education Services

Managed gathering and submission of school data to 4 out 6 online

Very Satisfactory systems required by the Department of Education
(4)
Efficiency

5 5
Managed gathering and submission of school data to 3 out 6 online 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
systems required by the Department of Education
Satisfactory
(3)

Managed gathering and submission of school data to 1 or 2 out 6 online

Unsatis factory systems required by the Department of Education
(2)

No acceptable evidence presented

Poor
(1)

Outstanding Submitted all online and offline required reports indicated in the MOV on or
(5) before the deadline

Very Satisfactory Submitted seven (7) to eight (8) online and three (3) offline required
(4) reports indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
Timeliness

Satisfactory Submitted five (5) to six (6) online and two (2) offline required reports
(3) indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
5 5
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)

Timeliness
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E
5 T AVE Q E
5 T AVE
Submitted three (3) to four (4) online reports and one (1) offline required
Unsatis factory report indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
(2)

Poor Failed to submit all online and offline required reports indicated in the MOV
(1) on or before the deadline
2.2. Managed finances August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and
adhering to policies, July 2023 Outstanding
(5) issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned
gudielines and issuances with school plan
in allocation,
procurement, Very Satisfactory Frequently managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and
disbursement and (4) issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned
liquidation aligned with with school plan

Quality
school plan. 5 5
Satisfactory Occasionally managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and
(3) issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned
with school plan

Unsatis factory Rarely managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and issuances in
(2) allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation aligned with school
plan
Poor
(1) No acceptable evidence presented
Basic Education Services

Outstanding Utilized and liquidated an average of 96-100% of the MOOE and/or other
(5) funds
Very Satisfactory Utilized and liquidatedan average of 91-95% of the MOOE and/or other
(4) funds
Efficiency

Satisfactory Utilized and liquidatedan average of 86-90% of the MOOE and/or other 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
(3) funds 5 5
Unsatis factory Utilized and liquidated an average of 81-85% of the MOOE and/or other
(2)
funds
Poor Utilized and liquidated an average of 80% and below of the MOOE and/or
(1)
other funds
Outstanding Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds for all quarters
(5)
Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds for the 3 of the four
Very Satisfactory quarters
Timeliness

(4)

Satisfactory Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds for the 2 of the four 5 5
(3) quarters
Unsatis factory Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds for 1 of the four
(2) quarters
Poor Zero utilization
(1)
2.3. Managed school August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to
facilities and equipment in July 2023 Outstanding policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization,
adherence to policies, (5) repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
guidelines and issuances
on acquisition, recording, Frequently managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to
neutralization, repair and Very Satisfactory policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization,
maintenance, storage and (4) repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
disposal.
Quality

Occasionally managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to 5 5

Satisfactory policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization,
(3) repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
 guidelines and issuances
on acquisition, recording,
neutralization, repair and
TO BE maintenance,
FILLED DURING storagePLANNING
and TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
disposal. DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
Quality
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
5 5

QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
Rarely managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to policies,
Unsatis factory guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording, neutralization, repair
(2) and maintenance, storage and disposal. 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Basic Education Services

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
Outstanding Updated 100% of the reports required
(5)
Updated 90% of the reports required
Very Satisfactory
(4)

Efficiency
Satisfactory Updated 80% of the reports required 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory Updated 70% of the reports required
(2)
Poor Updated 60% and below of the reports required
(1)
3. FOCUSING ON 3.1. Assisted teachers in August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and
Outstanding implementation of learning standards to make the curriculum relevant for the
TEACHING AND the review, July 2023
(5) learners.
LEARNING contextualization and
implementation of Very Satisfactory Frequently assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and implementation
learning standards to Quality (4)
make the curriculum 5 5
relevant for the learners Satisfactory Occasionally assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and implementatio
(3)
Unsatis factory Rarely assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and implementation of l
(2)
Poor No technical assistance provided
(1)
Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to ensure that it
Outstanding makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired learning
(5) outcomes, directly improves community life and is benchmarked by other
schools.
Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to ensure that it
Very Satisfactory makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired learning
Efficiency

(4) outcome, and directly improves community life.

5 5.00 0.325 5 5.00 0.325 0.325
Localized curriculum is implemented to ensure that it makes learning more
Satisfactory meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired learning outcome, and directly
(3) improves community life.
Unsatis factory The implemented curriculum is localized to make it more meaningful to the
(2) learners and applicable to life and community.
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Outstanding Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 3 days after a
(5) month
Very Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 4-5 days after
(4) a month
Timeliness

Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 6-7 days after
(3) a month 5 5
Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 8-9 days after
asic Education Services

Unsatis factory
(2) a month
Poor Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 10 days after a
(1) month
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE
Basic Education Services

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
3.2. Utilized learning August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
outcomes in developing July 2023 Outstanding interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
data-based interventions (5) performance indicators
to maintain learner
achievement and attain Frequently utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
other performance Very Satisfactory interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other

Quality
indicators (4) performance indicators 5 5
Satisfactory Occasionally utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
(3) interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
Unsatis factory performance
Rarely utilizedindicators
learning outcomes in developing data-based interventions
(2) to maintain learner achievement and attain other performance indicators
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1) 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Utilized developed materials in 8 or more learning areas to improve
Outstanding performance
(5)
Utilized developed materials in 6-7 learning areas to improve performance
Very Satisfactory

Efficiency
(4)
5 5
Satisfactory Utilized developed materials in 4-5 learning areas to improve performance
(3)
Unsatis factory Utilized developed materials in 1-3 learning areas to improve performance
(2)
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
3.3. Provided TA to August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools,
teachers in using learning July 2023 Outstanding strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to ensure
assessment tools, (5) accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
strategies and results
consistent with curriculum Frequently provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools,
requirements to ensure Very Satisfactory strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to ensure
accountability in (4) accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
Quality

achieving higher learning

outcomes Occassionally provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment 5 5
Satisfactory tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to
(3) ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
Rarely provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools,
Unsatis factory strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to ensure
(2) accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1) 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
School assessment results were used to develop learning programs that
Outstanding are suited to community, and customized to each learners' context, results
(5) of which are used for collaborative-decision-making.

Very Satisfactory School assessment results wre used to develop learning programs that are
(4) suited to community.
Efficiency

Satisfactory Assessment tools were reviewed by the school community and

asic Education Services

assessment results are shared with community stakeholders. 5 5

(3)
The assessment tools were reviewed by the school and assessment
Unsatis factory results are shared with schools' stakeholders.
(2)

Poor The assessment tools were reviewed by the school.

(1)
Basic Education Services

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
4. DEVELOPING 4.1. Implemented August 2022 - 6.50% Leaders consistently assumed responsibility for their own training and
SELF AND professional development July 2023 development. School leaders working individually or in groups, coach, and
OTHERS initiatives to enhance mentor one another to achieve their VMG through the conduct of at least
Outstanding
strengths and address four (4) need-based professional development initiatives to enhance
(5)
performance gaps among strengths and address performance gaps among school personnel by
school personnel establishing Community of Practice (COP)

Leaders frequently undertook training modes that are convenient to them

(on-line, ofline, modular, group, or home-based) and which do not disrupt
the regular functions, leaders monitor and evaluate their own learning
Very Satisfactory
progress through the conduct of three (3) need-based professional
(4)
development initiatives to enhance strengths and address performance

Quality
gaps among school personnel 5 5

Structures developed by the leaders were in place and analysis of the

competency and development needs of leader was conducted; result was
Satisfactory used to develop a long-term training and development program through
(3) the conduct of two (2) need-based professional development initiatives to
enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school
personnel
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Unsatis factory Leaders conducted one (1) need-based professional development initiative
(2) to enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school
personnel
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Outstanding Conducted at least four (4) need-based professional development
(5) initiatives to enhance strengths and address performance gaps among
school
Conductedpersonnel
three (3) need-based professional development initiatives to
Very Satisfactory enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school
(4) personnel
Efficiency

Satisfactory Conducted two (2) need-based professional development initiatives to

(3) enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school 5 5
Unsatis factory personnel
Conducted one (1) need-based professional development initiative to
(2) enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school
personnel
No acceptable evidence presented
Poor
(1)

4.2. Provided August 2022 - 6.50% Outstanding 86-100% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and
opportunities to July 2023 (5) responsibilities
individuals and teams in
71-85% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and
performing leadership Very Satisfactory responsibilities
roles and responsibilities (4)
Quality

Satisfactory 56-70% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and 5 5
Basic Education Services

(3) responsibilities
Unsatis factory 41-55% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and
(2) responsibilities
Poor 40% of the school personnel and below had performed leadership roles
(1) and responsibilities

4.50 0.293 5.00 0.325 0.306

 performing leadership
roles and responsibilities

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Basic Education Services

DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
Developed and supported personal and professional development of
individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities
in the conduct of the following:
1. SLAC
Outstanding 2. School-INSETs
(5) 3. Assignments to task forces/committees/special projects
4. Job Rotations 4.50 0.293 5.00 0.325 0.306
5. Benchmarking
6. Coaching and Mentoring

Developed and supported personal and professional development of

Efficiency
Very Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities
(4) in the conduct of any five (5) of the identified HRD initiatives 4 5

Developed and supported personal and professional development of

Satisfactory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities
(3) in the conduct of any four (4) of the identified HRD initiatives

Developed and supported personal and professional development of

Unsatis factory individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities
(2) in the conduct of any three (3) of the identified HRD initiatives
Developed and supported personal and professional development of
Poor individual and school management teams by providing equal opportunities
(1) in the conduct of any one (1) or two (2) of the identified HRD initiatives

4.3. Implemented a August 2022 - 6.50% Outstanding A community-accepted performance accountability, recognition and
school rewards system to July 2023 (5) incentive system is being practiced CONSISTENTLY.
recognize and motivate
A community-level accountability system is FREQUENTLY evolving from
learners, school Very Satisfactory school-led inititatives.
personnel and other (4)
Quality

stakeholders for
exemplary performance Satisfactory Performance accountability is practiced at the school level 5 5
and/or continued support (3) OCCASIONALLY.
Unsatis factory Performance accountability is RARELY practiced at the school level.
(2)
Poor Performance accountability is not practiced at the school level.
(1)
Conducted at least five (5) of the following activities:
1. Issuance of school policy guidelines/memo aligned with Division
Memorandum No. 113, s. 2020 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
2. Creation of Rewards and Recognition Committee
Outstanding 3. Selection of applicants
(5) 4. Development of selection criteria per category
5. Sourcing of funds (for prizes)
6. Awarding/Recognition ceremony/ies
Efficiency

5 5
Very Satisfactory Conducted at least four (4) of the identified activities
(4)
Satisfactory Conducted at least three (3) of the identified activities
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted at least two (2) of the identified activities
(2)
cation Services

Poor Conducted at least one (1) of the identified activities

(1)
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
Basic Education Services

QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE

5. BUILDING 5.1. Built constructive August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues,
CONNECTIONS relationships with July 2023 Outstanding parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive
authorities, colleagues, (5) environment for learners
parents and other
stakeholders to foster an Frequently built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues,
Very Satisfactory parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive
enabling and supportive (4)
environment for learners environment for learners

Quality
Occasionally built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues,
Satisfactory 5 5
parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive
(3) environment for learners
Rarely built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, parents
Unsatis factory and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive environment
(2) for learners
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Conducted at least 7 activities with parents and other stakeholders across
Outstanding four quarters with complete required documents. 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
(5)

Conducted at least 5-6 activities with parents and other stakeholders

Very Satisfactory across four quarters with complete required documents.
(4)
Efficiency

Conducted at least 3-4 activities with parents and other stakeholders

Satisfactory across four quarters with complete required documents. 5 5
(3)

Conducted 1-2 activities with parents and other stakeholders across four
Unsatis factory quarters with complete required documents.
(2)

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

(1)
5.2. Communicated August 2022 - 6.50% Consistently communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to
effectively in speaking July 2023 teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of
and in writing to teachers, Outstanding communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and
(5)
learners, parents and support.
other stakeholders
through positive use of Frequently communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to
communication platform teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of
to facilitate information Very Satisfactory
communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and
sharing, collaboration and (4)
support.
support.
Occasionally communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to
teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of
Quality

Satisfactory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and

5 5
(3) support.

Rarely communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to teachers,

learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive use of
Unsatis factory communication platform to facilitate information sharing, collaboration and
(2) support.
ervices
 Q
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
Basic Education Services

No acceptable evidence
Poor presented
(1)

Accomplished, created and utilized five (5) of the following communication 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
platforms:
1. SMS
2. letters
3. tarpaulin
Outstanding 4. bandillo
(5) 5. FB page/FB account
6. radio broadcast
7. flyers
8. Others

Very Satisfactory Accomplished, created and utilized four (4) of the identified

Efficiency
(4) communication platforms:
5 5
Accomplished, created and utilized three (3) of the identified
Satisfactory communication platforms:
(3)

Accomplished, created and utilized one (1) or two (2) of the identified
Unsatis factory communication platforms
(2)
No acceptable evidence presented

Poor
(1)

5.3. Initiated partnerships August 2022 - 6.50% Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:
with the community such July 2023 • Mega School – at least 17
as parents, alumni, Outstanding • Large School – at least 14
authorities, industries and (5) • Medium School – at least 9
other stakeholders, to • Small School – at least 5
strengthen support for
learner development, as Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:
well as school and • Mega School – 13-16
community improvement. Very Satisfactory • Large School – 11-13
(4) • Medium School –7-8
• Small School – 4

Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:

• Mega School – 9-12
Satisfactory • Large School – 8-10
Quality

(3) • Medium School – 5-6 5 5

• Small School – 3
Basic Education Services

Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:

• Mega School – 5-8
Unsatis factory • Large School – 4-6
(2) • Medium School – 3-4 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
• Small School – 2
 Quali
5 5
Basic Education Services

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
Initiated partnership
activities based on the
school size:
Poor •
(1) Mega School – 0-4
• Large School – 0-3
• Medium School – 0-2
• Small School – 0-1
Outstanding Provided 7 partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner
(5) development and school and community improvement

Very Satisfactory Provided 5-6 partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner
development and school and community improvement

Efficiency
(4)
Satisfactory Provided 3-4 partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner 5 5
(3) development and school and community improvement
Unsatis factory Provided 1-2 partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner
(2) development and school and community improvement
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
6. Plus Factor Performed related tasks August 2022 - 2.50% Performed any 5 of the following:
July 2023 1. Facilitator/Resource speaker in trainings;
2. Acted as one of the writers of instructional materials/modules/manuals
in the division and/or higher level
3. Acted as consultant to any academic activities and/or any management
jobs;
4. Acted as member of district and/or higher level committees;
5. Conducted at least one (1) relevant research in any area within the
rating period;
Efficiency

6. Conducted innovation to address learning gaps;

Outstanding 7. Published educational article on any tabloid/spreadsheet/credible
(5)
Basic Education Services

online-site of wide circulation

8. Member of district and higher level QA team
9. Acted as instructional coach/ District LAC leader
10. Member of TWG in the district and/or higher level
11. District and/or higher level awardee
12. Finalist of any division-initiated competition/contest/search 5 5.00 0.125 5 5.00 0.125 0.125
13. Recipient of special citation/recognition in the district and higher level

Very Satisfactory any 4 of the enumerated items

(4)
Satisfactory any 3 of the enumerated items
(3)
Unsatis factory any 2 of the enumerated items
(2)
Poor any 1 of the enumerated items or no acceptable evidence
(1)

100% Final Rating 4.98

Adjectival Rating Scale O
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
DOCUMENT ON SITE

TIME LINE

RESULTS
WEIGHT

ACTUAL

RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS VALIDATION VALIDATION

SCORE

SCORE

FINAL
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives RATING 60% RATING (40%)
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE

CHONA R. OCSING CHERYLL V. BERMUDO RAYMUNDO M. CANTONJOS, CESO VI

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500- 5.000

Very Satisfactory. 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500-2.499
Poor 1.000-1.499
 Schools Division of Masbate
0
FABIAN R. DE MESA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
#REF!

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE RATING

SY 2022-2023

SELF-RATING

KRA 1 KRA 2 KRA 3 KRA 4 KRA 5 PLUS FACTOR RATING

OBJECTIVE 1 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.13
OBJECTIVE 2 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.31 0.33
4.981
OBJECTIVE 3 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33

AVERAGE RATING 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.13 O

Prepared by: NOTED:

CHONA R. OCSING #REF!

PRINCIPAL I #REF!