INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-II
Name of Employee:  ANIMO, JESREL S. Name of Rater:  
Position:  TEACHER II Position:  
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: TAGAPUL-AN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL - WESTERN SAMAR Date of Review:  

Rating Period:  2021-2022  

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING
EVALUATION
Actual
Scor
Performance Indicators Result Rating
e
Weight s
Timelin
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Very
e Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
KRA Satisfactory
QET
Av
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
e
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied   24.00 Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated  
Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Education Knowledge knowledge of %
Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as
Services and content within shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Pedagogy and across rating rating rating rating rating
curriculum sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv
er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement
teaching
areas.
forms forms forms forms forms or No          
acceptable
evidence was
shown
Efficiency            

Timelines            
s
2. Ensured the   Quality Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that the Ensured that ICT No acceptable            
ICT used redefine ICT used augment ICT used modify are used but do evidence was
positive use of
and transform and enrich processes and not create a new shown
ICT to learning learning improve learning learning
facilitate the experiences and experiences and experiences and experience and/or
teaching and are documented are documented are documented are documented
properly and properly and properly and but not consistent
learning
consistently using consistently using consistently using with one
process any referencing any referencing any referencing referencing style
style as shown in style as shown in style as shown in as shown in the
the submitted the submitted the submitted submitted learning
learning material learning material learning material material

Efficiency            

Timelines            
s
 3. Applied a   Quality Applied teaching Applied teaching Applied teaching Applied teaching No acceptable  
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that lead evidence was
range of challenge learners require learners to require learners to learners along a shown
teaching to draw make connections describe and single path of
strategies to conclusions and using ideas explain ideas inquiry and/or to
develop justify their learned as shown learned as shown simple recall and
thinking or put in the submitted in the submitted rote memorization
critical and parts together to learning material learning material of concepts as
creative promote deeper shown in the
thinking, as understanding of submitted learning          
well as other ideas learned as material
shown in the
higher-order submitted learning
thinking skills. material

Efficiency            

Timelines          
 
s
2. Diversity 4. Established   24.00 Quality Utilized effective Utilized effective Utilized an Utilized a teaching No acceptable  
teaching teaching effective teaching strategy or evidence was
of Learners a %
strategies that are strategies that are strategy that is strategies that shown
& learnercentere appropriate in appropriate in appropriate in partially respond to
Assessment d culture by responding to responding to responding to learners’ linguistic,
and using teaching learners’ linguistic, learners’ linguistic, learners’ linguistic, cultural,
cultural, cultural, cultural, socioeconomic, or
Reporting strategies that
socioeconomic, or socioeconomic, or socioeconomic, or religious
respond to religious religious religious backgrounds as
their linguistic, backgrounds at an backgrounds at a backgrounds as shown in the
         
cultural, individual level* as group level* as shown in the submitted learning
shown in the shown in the submitted learning material
socioeconomi
submitted learning submitted learning material
c and religious material material
backgrounds Efficiency            

Timelines          
 
s
5. Planned   Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated            
Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
and delivered
Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as
teaching shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
strategies that rating rating rating rating rating
are responsive sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv
er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement
to the special
forms forms forms forms forms or No
educational acceptable
needs of evidence was
learners in shown
difficult Efficiency            
circumstances Timelines            
*, including: s
geographic
isolation;
chronic illness;
 displacement
due to armed
conflict, urban
resettlement
6. Used   Quality Provided learners Provided learners Provided learners Provided learners No evidence was  
with accurate, and with accurate, and with accurate, and with inaccurate shown
strategies for specific and specific general and/or destructive
providing directed constructive constructive feedback as
timely, constructive feedback as feedback as shown in the
accurate and feedback* as shown in the shown in the evidence
shown in the evidence evidence submitted
constructive evidence submitted submitted
feedback to submitted          
improve Efficiency            
learner MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted No evidence was
Timelines
performance shows feedback shows feedback shows feedback shows feedback shown
s given within 5 given within 6-10 given within 11-20 given beyond 20  
working days from working days from working days from working days from
submission** submission** submission** submission**

3. 7. Selected,   16.00 Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated  

Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
Curriculum developed, % Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as
and organized and shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Planning used rating rating rating rating rating
appropriate sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv sheets/interobserv
er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement er agreement
teaching and forms forms forms forms forms or No
learning acceptable
resources, evidence was          
including ICT, shown
to address Efficiency            
learning goals

Timelines          
s  

8. Set   Quality All of the learning Majority of the Half of the Less than half of No acceptable            
outcomes set are learning outcomes learning outcomes the learning evidence was
achievable aligned with the set are aligned set are aligned outcomes set are shown
and learning with the learning with the learning aligned with the
appropriate competencies as competencies as competencies as learning
learning shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV competencies as
submitted submitted submitted shown in the MOV
outcomes that submitted
are aligned
with learning Efficiency            

competencies Timelines            
s
4. 9. Built   24.00 Quality Sustained Secured Communicated Communicated No acceptable  
engagement with collaboration with with and obtained with parents/ evidence was
Community relationships % parents/ guardians parents/ guardians response from guardians and/or shown
Linkages with parents/ and/ or wider and/ or wider parents/ guardians wider school
and guardians and school community school community and/ or wider community to
Professional the wider to facilitate to facilitate school community facilitate
involvement in the involvement in the to facilitate involvement in the
Engagement school educative process educative process involvement in the educative process
& Personal community to as evidenced by 2 as evidenced by educative process but received no
Growth and facilitate or more of MOV one MOV no. 1 or as evidenced by response/reply as          
Professional involvement in no. 1 or 2 2 MOV No. 3 evidenced by MOV
No. 3
Developmen the educative
t process
Efficiency Submitted any 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable  
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable the acceptable evidence was
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV shown
Timelines          
 
s
10.   Quality Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any No acceptable  
professional professional professional professional evidence was
Participated in
network/ activity network/ activity network/ activity network/ activity shown
professional that requires that requires that requires that does not
networks to output* and proof output* and proof output* to share require output to
share of implementation of implementation knowledge and to share knowledge
** within the ** within the enhance practice and to enhance
knowledge
school to share department/grade as evidenced by practice as
and to knowledge and to level to share the submitted evidenced by the
enhance enhance practice knowledge and to MOV submitted MOV
practice as evidenced by enhance practice
the submitted as evidenced by          
MOV the submitted
MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 of the No acceptable  

different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable acceptable acceptable shown
MOV*** MOV*** MOV***
Timelines          
 
s
11. Developed   Quality Updated the Discussed Accomplished the Accomplished the No acceptable            
Development Plan progress on the Development Plan Strengths and evidence was
a personal
and approved by Development Plan from learning Development shown
improvement the rater during with the rater to objectives up to Needs portion of
plan based on Phase II of the check whether resources needed the Development
reflection of RPMS cycle Development to address Plan after self-
Needs were Development assessment at the
one’s practice
addressed Needs during beginning of the
and ongoing Phase I of the school year
professional RPMS cycle
learning
Efficiency Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the No acceptable  
IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with evidence was
any 4 of the any 3 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the shown
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
Supporting MOV* Supporting MOV* Supporting MOV* Supporting MOV
 Timelines            
s
5. Plus 12. Performed   12.00 Quality Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least Performed at least No acceptable  
1 related 1 related 1 related 1 related evidence was
Factor various related % work/activity that work/activity that work/activity that work/activity that shown
works/ contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the contributed to the
activities that teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning teaching-learning
contribute to process beyond process within the process within the process within the
the school/ school/ learning area/ class as evidenced
the teaching- Community Community department as by submitted MOV
learning Learning Center Learning Center evidenced by
process (CLC) as (CLC) as submitted MOV
         
evidenced by evidenced by
submitted MOV submitted MOV
Efficiency Submitted any 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable  
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable the acceptable evidence was
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV shown
Timelines            
s
RATING FOR OVERALL
   
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding

3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory

2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory

1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory

below 1.499 Poor

 
 
ANIMO, JESREL S. CARMELA R. TAMAYO, EdD CESO V 
Ratee Rater Approving Authority