Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This fourth chapter analyses the primary data collected from the 543
the thesis has set for itself. The analysis has been carried out objective-wise.
mean rank difference with the demographic profile of the women entrepreneurs.
explained, the respondents of the study are the 543 women entrepreneurs.
80
Table 4.1: Demographic profile of the women entrepreneurs
Demographic
S.No. Category Frequency Percent
Profile
18 to 25 Years 60 11.0
26 to 35 Years 104 19.2
1 Age 36 to 45 Years 124 22.8
Above 45 Years 255 47.0
Total 543 100.0
Rural 74 13.6
2 Location Urban 469 86.4
Total 543 100.0
Unmarried 54 9.9
Marital
3 Married 489 90.1
Status
Total 543 100.0
Up to School 37 6.8
Technical Education 57 10.5
Educational Undergraduate 125 23.0
4
Qualification Postgraduate 183 33.7
Professional 141 26.0
Total 543 100.0
Nuclear Family 228 42.0
Family
5 Joint Family 315 58.0
Type
Total 543 100.0
Up to 3 Members 206 37.9
6 Dependents Above 3 Members 337 62.1
Total 543 100.0
Source: primary data
81
The table 4.1 demonstrates the demographic profile of the women
entrepreneurs, 13.6 percent of the entrepreneurs were from rural and 86.4
percent of the women entrepreneurs were from Urban. With respect to marital
come from joint families, 58 percent and 42 percent of entrepreneurs are from
majority of women entrepreneurs have above 3 members, 62.1 percent, and 37.9
82
Table 4.2: Business Profile of the Women entrepreneurs
Business
S.No. Category Frequency Percent
Profile
Up to 5L 141 26.0
6L to 10L 130 23.9
Startup
1 11L to 15L 162 29.8
Capital
Above 15L 110 20.3
Total 543 100.0
Up to 5L 173 31.9
6L to 10L 152 28.0
Current
2 11L to 15L 108 19.9
Worth
Above 15L 110 20.3
Total 543 100.0
First Generation 347 63.9
3 Generation Second Generation 196 36.1
Total 543 100.0
Retail trading 68 12.5
Beautician 99 18.2
Readymade 112 20.6
4 Business
Restaurant 124 22.8
Other Business 140 25.8
Total 543 100.0
Own 359 66.1
Firm
5 Partnership firm 184 33.9
Type
Total 543 100.0
83
Cont. of table 4.2
Business
S.No. Category Frequency Percent
Profile
Up to 5 Years 109 20.1
6 to 10 Years 172 31.7
6 Experience 11 to 15 Years 121 22.3
Above 15 Years 141 26.0
Total 543 100.0
Up to 20000 108 19.9
20001 to 40000 277 51.0
7 Income 40001 to 60000 126 23.2
Above 60000 32 5.9
Total 543 100.0
Source: primary data
entrepreneurs have invested Rs. 11L to 15L for their business, and 20.3 percent
of women entrepreneurs have invested above Rs. Above 15L for their business.
women entrepreneurs have a current value of 11L to 15L, and the remaining
84
20.3 percent of women entrepreneurs report that the current value of their
entrepreneurs are 1st generation and 36.1 percent of women entrepreneurs are 2nd
were involved in own firm and 33.9 percent of the women entrepreneurs were
partnership firm.
85
Table 4.3: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to age
86
Table 4.3 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to age. This table brings out five COVID-19
between 18 years of age and above 45 years of age. In relation to the various
responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under four age groups
and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding H- value and its related
p-value. The first age group is 18 to 25 years of age with minimum respondents
of 60 women entrepreneurs and the next is the age group 26 to 35 years which
capsules 104 women entrepreneurs and 36 to 45 years of age group capsules 124
women entrepreneurs and finally above 45 years of age group capsules 255
women entrepreneurs and this age group forms the major women entrepreneurs
group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the H- ratio and
age groups.
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 293.97
for those above 45 years of age. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The corresponding H-value is 18.076 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
87
that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the lockdown of
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 365.72 for those 18 to 25 years of age. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of social distance during the COVID-
which suggests that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 291.99 for those 36 to 45 years of age. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of marketplace during the
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
88
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 301.14 for those 36 to 45 years of age. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of business during the
women entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 310.84 for those above 45 years of age. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of worker absenteeism during the
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 311.67 for those above 45 years of
age. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally affected
89
perception towards the overall COVID-19 pandemic perceived by the women
entrepreneurs.
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
closure of business, and worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of
Himanshu, Ritika, Nikhat Mushir & Ratan Suryavanshi (2020) found that
investors are beginning to redistribute their portfolios to cope with the financial
crisis caused by COVID-19. It is found that the above 45 years old women
other age groups of women entrepreneurs. Abdul Monnaf & Marufa Rahman
women entrepreneurs.
90
Table 4.4: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to education
COVID-19 Mean H- p-
Education N
Pandemic Rank Value Value
Up to School 37 308.20
Technical Education 57 247.36
Undergraduate 125 197.84
Lockdown 47.794 0.001
Postgraduate 183 284.63
Professional 141 321.80
Total 543
Up to School 37 264.97
Technical Education 57 220.62
Social Undergraduate 125 246.46
21.569 0.001
Distance Postgraduate 183 311.31
Professional 141 266.23
Total 543
Up to School 37 210.23
Technical Education 57 293.46
Closure of Undergraduate 125 277.19
60.365 0.001
Marketplace Postgraduate 183 217.82
Professional 141 345.25
Total 543
Up to School 37 359.72
Technical Education 57 167.54
Closure of Undergraduate 125 247.73
82.601 0.001
Business Postgraduate 183 242.98
Professional 141 350.39
Total 543
Up to School 37 331.84
Technical Education 57 176.27
Worker Undergraduate 125 251.92
47.146 0.001
Absenteeism Postgraduate 183 261.61
Professional 141 326.28
Total 543
Up to School 37 304.77
Technical Education 57 189.80
Overall
Undergraduate 125 240.47
COVID-19 50.627 0.001
Postgraduate 183 259.69
Pandemic
Professional 141 340.56
Total 543
Source: primary data
91
Table 4.4 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to education. This table brings out five
relation to the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped
under five education groups and their corresponding mean rank and its
corresponding H- value and its related p-value. The first education group is up to
the next is the education group technical education which capsules 57 women
entrepreneurs and this education group forms the major women entrepreneurs
group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the H- ratio and
education groups.
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 321.80
for those professional of education. The results show that firms of women
92
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The corresponding H-value is 47.794 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 311.31 for those postgraduate of education. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of social distance during the COVID-
which suggests that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 345.25 for those professional of education. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of marketplace during the
93
Closure of business is listed below as the first impact felt by women
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 359.72 for those up to School of education. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of business during the
women entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 331.84 for those up to School of education. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of worker absenteeism during the
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 340.56 for those professional of
education. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally
94
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding H-value is 50.627 with
the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the
entrepreneurs.
al. (2021) identified that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental,
impact on specific investment avenues. The results show that firms of women
the professional education of women entrepreneurs are more affected during the
95
Table 4.5: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to experience
COVID-19 Mean H- p-
Experience N
Pandemic Rank Value Value
Up to 5 Years 109 313.29
6 to 10 Years 172 322.05
Lockdown 11 to 15 Years 121 248.48 59.483 0.001
Above 15 Years 141 199.22
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 208.55
6 to 10 Years 172 367.09
Social
11 to 15 Years 121 295.14 129.148 0.001
Distance
Above 15 Years 141 185.19
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 376.43
6 to 10 Years 172 290.53
Closure of
11 to 15 Years 121 219.11 84.898 0.001
Marketplace
Above 15 Years 141 214.06
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 295.55
6 to 10 Years 172 311.63
Closure of
11 to 15 Years 121 233.32 27.593 0.001
Business
Above 15 Years 141 238.65
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 287.70
6 to 10 Years 172 312.84
Worker
11 to 15 Years 121 265.68 31.802 0.001
Absenteeism
Above 15 Years 141 215.47
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 306.25
Overall 6 to 10 Years 172 345.43
COVID-19 11 to 15 Years 121 248.55 98.803 0.001
Pandemic Above 15 Years 141 176.07
Total 543
Source: primary data
96
Table 4.5 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to experience. This table brings out five
are grouped under four experience groups and their corresponding mean rank
and its corresponding H- value and its related p-value. The first experience
entrepreneurs and the next is the experience group 11 to 15 years which capsules
121 women entrepreneurs and above 15 years of experience group capsules 141
women entrepreneurs and this experience group forms the major women
entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 322.05
for those 6 to 10 years of experience. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.
97
The corresponding H-value is 59.483 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 295.14 for those 11 to 15 years of experience. The results show that firms
of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of social distance during the
women entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 376.43 for those up to 5 years of experience. The results show that firms
the COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding H-value is 84.898 with the p-value
98
Closure of business is listed below as the first impact felt by women
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 311.63 for those 6 to 10 years of experience. The results show that firms
of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of business during the
women entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 312.84 for those 6 to 10 years of experience. The results show that firms
of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of worker absenteeism during the
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 345.43 for those 6 to 10 years of
experience. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally
99
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding H-value is 98.803 with
the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the
entrepreneurs.
et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and
stock market performance. The result also indicated the maximum differentiation
and worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
100
Table 4.6: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to income
COVID-19 Mean H- p-
Income N
Pandemic Rank Value Value
Up to 20000 108 197.32
20001 to 40000 277 316.49
Lockdown 40001 to 60000 126 278.65 9.230 0.021
Above 60000 32 292.38
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 261.92
20001 to 40000 277 269.36
Social
40001 to 60000 126 276.92 2.526 0.471
Distance
Above 60000 32 309.55
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 338.95
20001 to 40000 277 267.28
Closure of
40001 to 60000 126 291.35 17.163 0.001
Marketplace
Above 60000 32 211.69
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 216.34
20001 to 40000 277 276.16
Closure of
40001 to 60000 126 306.69 20.577 0.001
Business
Above 60000 32 287.30
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 251.56
20001 to 40000 277 285.24
Worker
40001 to 60000 126 256.29 5.509 0.138
Absenteeism
Above 60000 32 288.23
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 233.68
Overall 20001 to 40000 277 278.31
COVID-19 40001 to 60000 126 284.75 8.550 0.036
Pandemic Above 60000 32 296.52
Total 543
Source: primary data
101
Table 4.6 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to income. This table brings out five COVID-
the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under four
income groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding H-
value and its related p-value. The first income group is above 60000 of income
income group up to 20000 which capsules 108 women entrepreneurs and 40001
to 60000 of income group capsules 126 women entrepreneurs and finally 20001
to 40000 of income group capsules 277 women entrepreneurs and this income
group forms the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis
test is being adopted to get the H- ratio and its corresponding p-value to identify
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 316.49
for those 20001 to 40000 of income. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The corresponding H-value is 9.230 with the p-value of 0.021, which suggests
102
that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the lockdown of
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 309.55 for those above 60000 of income. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of social distance during the COVID-
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 338.95 for those up to 20000 of income. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of marketplace during the
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
103
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 306.69 for those 40001 to 60000 of income. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of business during the
women entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 288.23 for those above 60000 of income. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of worker absenteeism during the
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 296.52 for those above 60000 of
income. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally
the p-value of 0.036, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the
104
perception towards the overall COVID-19 pandemic perceived by the women
entrepreneurs.
Khan, et al. (2020) identified that income has significant impact on specific
investment avenues. The result also indicated the maximum differentiation felt
distance and worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of women
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
(2021) discovered that there is a significant difference towards pre lockdown and
105
Table 4.7: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to business
COVID-19 Mean H- p-
Business N
Pandemic Rank Value Value
Retail trading 68 282.65
Beautician 99 224.34
Readymade 112 240.51
Lockdown 26.664 0.001
Restaurant 124 319.37
Other Business 140 283.76
Total 543
Retail trading 68 271.74
Beautician 99 228.38
Social Readymade 112 206.40
57.964 0.001
Distance Restaurant 124 346.48
Other Business 140 289.49
Total 543
Retail trading 68 328.09
Beautician 99 303.29
Closure of Readymade 112 219.87
31.983 0.001
Marketplace Restaurant 124 293.79
Other Business 140 245.04
Total 543
Retail trading 68 225.34
Beautician 99 329.85
Closure of Readymade 112 234.21
30.567 0.001
Business Restaurant 124 298.03
Other Business 140 260.94
Total 543
Retail trading 68 288.99
Beautician 99 275.85
Worker Readymade 112 246.17
8.940 0.063
Absenteeism Restaurant 124 299.16
Other Business 140 257.64
Total 543
Retail trading 68 296.32
Beautician 99 271.37
Overall
Readymade 112 213.90
COVID-19 30.108 0.001
Restaurant 124 321.81
Pandemic
Other Business 140 263.00
Total 543
Source: primary data
106
Table 4.7 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to their business. This table brings out five
the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under five
business groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding H-
value and its related p-value. The first business group is retail trading business
business group capsules 124 women entrepreneurs and finally other types of
business group capsules 140 women entrepreneurs and this business group forms
the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being
adopted to get the H- ratio and its corresponding p-value to identify the
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 319.37
for that restaurant business. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
have felt the impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. The
107
corresponding H-value is 26.664 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 346.48 for that restaurant business. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of social distance during the COVID-19
which suggests that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 328.09 for that retail trading business. The results show that firms of
women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of marketplace during the
108
Closure of business is listed below as the first impact felt by women
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 329.85 for that beautician business. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of closure of business during the COVID-19
which suggests that there is a significant difference in the perception towards the
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 299.16 for that restaurant business. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the impact of worker absenteeism during the COVID-19
pandemic. The corresponding H-value is 8.940 with the p-value of 0.063, which
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 321.81 for that restaurant business.
The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally affected by the
109
COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding H-value is 30.108 with the p-value of
entrepreneurs.
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
closure of business except worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of
Ahmed, et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil
prices and stock market performance. It is found that the restaurant business of
110
Table 4.8: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to marital status
Unmarried 54 139.26
Total 543
Unmarried 54 235.73
Social
Married 489 276.01 11244.5 0.071
Distance
Total 543
Unmarried 54 219.47
Closure of
Married 489 277.80 10366.5 0.009
Marketplace
Total 543
Unmarried 54 338.49
Closure of
Married 489 264.66 9612.5 0.001
Business
Total 543
Unmarried 54 271.18
Worker
Married 489 272.09 13158.5 0.967
Absenteeism
Total 543
111
Table 4.8 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to their marital status. This table brings out
responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under two marital status
groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding U- value and its
related p-value. The first marital status group is unmarried with minimum
respondents of 54 women entrepreneurs and the next is the marital status group
married which capsules 489 women entrepreneurs and this marital status group
test is being adopted to get the U- ratio and its corresponding p-value to identify
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 286.66
for that married than unmarried (139.26) women entrepreneurs. The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown during the
112
towards the lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic impact perceived by the women
entrepreneurs.
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 276.01 for that married than unmarried (235.73) women entrepreneurs.
The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of
11244.5 with the p-value of 0.071, which suggests that there is no significant
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 277.80 for that married than unmarried (219.47) women entrepreneurs.
The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of
value is 10366.5 with the p-value of 0.009, which suggests that there is a
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
113
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 338.49 for that unmarried than married (264.66) women entrepreneurs.
The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of
is 9612.5 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a significant
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 272.09 for that married than unmarried (271.18) women entrepreneurs.
The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of
value is 13158.5 with the p-value of 0.967, which suggests that there is no
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 278.02 for that married than
unmarried (217.44) women entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of women
corresponding U-value is 10257.0 with the p-value of 0.007, which suggests that
114
there is a significant difference in the perception towards the overall COVID-19
al. (2021) identified that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental,
absenteeism. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are generally
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Abdul Monnaf & Marufa Rahman (2020)
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
115
Table 4.9: Women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to generation
COVID-19 Mean U- p-
Generation N
Pandemic Rank Value Value
Total 543
116
Table 4.9 shows the women entrepreneurs’ opinion towards impact of
COVID-19 pandemic with respect to their generation. This table brings out five
the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under two
generation groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding U-
value and its related p-value. The first generation group is IInd Generation with
generation group 1st Generation which capsules 347 women entrepreneurs and
this generation group forms the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study,
Mann-Whitney U-test is being adopted to get the U- ratio and its corresponding
groups.
due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is 3.3734 and
the total standard deviation is 0.66680, with the highest mean rank being 315.29
for that 1st Generation than IInd Generation (195.35) women entrepreneurs. The
results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the impact of lockdown
during the COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding U-value is 18983.5 with the
117
perception towards the lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic impact perceived by
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.3439 and the total standard deviation is 0.71112, with the highest mean rank
being 289.22 for that 1st Generation than IInd Generation (241.51) women
entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the
value is 28029.0 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4512 and the total standard deviation is 0.65613, with the highest mean rank
being 288.38 for that 1st Generation than IInd Generation (243.00) women
entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the
corresponding U-value is 28322.5 with the p-value of 0.009, which suggests that
entrepreneurs.
118
Closure of business is listed below as the first impact felt by women
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.5152 and the total standard deviation is 0.63520, with the highest mean rank
being 325.55 for that 1st Generation than IInd Generation (177.19) women
entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the
corresponding U-value is 15424.0 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
entrepreneurs due to the COVID-19 pandemic impact. The overall mean value is
3.4484 and the total standard deviation is 0.67361, with the highest mean rank
being 305.68 for that 1st Generation than IInd Generation (212.38) women
entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the
corresponding U-value is 22319.5 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
entrepreneurs. The overall mean value is 3.4264 and the total standard deviation
is 0.45743, with the highest mean rank being 319.23 for that 1st Generation than
IInd Generation (188.38) women entrepreneurs. The results show that firms of
119
women entrepreneurs are generally affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding U-value is 17616.0 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
closure of business, and worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of
pandemic than IInd Generation women entrepreneurs. Abdul Monnaf & Marufa
120
Discussion
worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are
can be identified that closure of business shows the highest impact during the
Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on business. The result also indicated the maximum differentiation felt
worker absenteeism. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs are
investment avenues. Abdul Monnaf & Marufa Rahman (2020) identified that the
121
Table 4.10: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to age
Mean Overall H- p-
Challenges Age N
Rank Mean/S.D. Value Value
18 to 25 Years 60 229.36
26 to 35 Years 104 281.81
Financial M=3.4057
36 to 45 Years 124 303.05 10.716 0.013
Challenges SD=0.40699
Above 45 Years 255 262.94
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 193.91
26 to 35 Years 104 282.22
Marketing M=3.3235
36 to 45 Years 124 201.97 64.962 0.001
Challenges SD=0.59734
Above 45 Years 255 320.26
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 221.23
26 to 35 Years 104 234.76
HR M=3.4762
36 to 45 Years 124 271.03 20.326 0.001
Challenges SD=0.58670
Above 45 Years 255 299.60
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 222.91
26 to 35 Years 104 249.33
Production M=3.4166
36 to 45 Years 124 242.19 26.006 0.001
Challenges SD=0.50410
Above 45 Years 255 307.29
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 192.97
26 to 35 Years 104 288.46
Infrastructure M=3.3660
36 to 45 Years 124 300.90 21.239 0.001
Challenges SD=0.53939
Above 45 Years 255 269.83
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 196.41
26 to 35 Years 104 293.74
Management M=3.3637
36 to 45 Years 124 229.43 35.031 0.001
Challenges SD=0.56442
Above 45 Years 255 301.62
Total 543
122
Con. Of table 4.10
Mean Overall H- p-
Challenges Age N
Rank Mean/S.D. Value Value
18 to 25 Years 60 217.11
26 to 35 Years 104 236.63
R&D M=3.2905
36 to 45 Years 124 240.54 37.360 0.001
Challenges SD=0.57726
Above 45 Years 255 314.64
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 194.47
26 to 35 Years 104 286.12
Personal M=3.3554
36 to 45 Years 124 248.18 24.978 0.001
Challenges SD=0.55989
Above 45 Years 255 296.07
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 256.23
26 to 35 Years 104 272.40
Family M=3.3849
36 to 45 Years 124 297.66 4.844 0.184
Challenges SD=0.67069
Above 45 Years 255 263.07
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 256.13
26 to 35 Years 104 257.22
Operational M=3.3020
36 to 45 Years 124 245.58 10.516 0.015
Challenges SD=0.84490
Above 45 Years 255 294.61
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 218.12
26 to 35 Years 104 317.24
Technical M=3.3247
36 to 45 Years 124 240.66 22.125 0.001
Challenges SD=0.66569
Above 45 Years 255 281.47
Total 543
18 to 25 Years 60 209.28
26 to 35 Years 104 265.96
Overall M=3.3645
36 to 45 Years 124 230.53 32.885 0.001
Challenges SD=0.35177
Above 45 Years 255 309.38
Total 543
Source: primary data
123
Table 4.10 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
relation to the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped
under four age groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding
H- value and its related p-value. The first age group is 18 to 25 years of age with
minimum respondents of 60 women entrepreneurs and the next is the age group
age group capsules 124 women entrepreneurs and finally above 45 years of age
group capsules 255 women entrepreneurs and this age group forms the major
to get the H- ratio and its corresponding p-value to identify the significant
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for those aged 36
to 45 years being 303.05. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
124
have felt the financial challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 10.716 with the p-value of 0.013, which suggests that
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 320.26. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 64.962 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 299.60. The results show that firms of women
corresponding H-value is 20.326 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
125
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 307.29. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 26.006 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for those
aged 36 to 45 years being 300.90. The results show that firms of women
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for those
aged above 45 years being 301.62. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 35.031 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
126
R & D challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-19
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 314.64. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 37.360 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 296.07. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 24.978 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for those aged 36
to 45 years being 297.66. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
H-value is 4.844 with the p-value of 0.184, which suggests that there is no
127
significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception towards the family
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for those
aged above 45 years being 294.61. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 10.516 with the p-value of 0.015, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for those aged 26
to 35 years being 317.24. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
corresponding H-value is 22.125 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for those aged
above 45 years being 309.38. The results show that firms of women
128
entrepreneurs have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
the business challenge faced by the women entrepreneurs. The result also
show that firms of women entrepreneurs faced more challenges during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Tahir Iqbal & Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal (2020)
positively. It is found that the above 45 years old women entrepreneurs are more
challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by other age groups
of women entrepreneurs.
129
Table 4.11: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to education
Mean H- p-
Challenges Education N
Rank Value Value
Up to School 37 295.46
Technical Education 57 166.12
Financial Undergraduate 125 297.36
34.294 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 264.48
Professional 141 295.92
Total 543
Up to School 37 173.20
Technical Education 57 273.31
Marketing Undergraduate 125 315.48
41.112 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 235.78
Professional 141 305.85
Total 543
Up to School 37 291.97
Technical Education 57 203.19
Undergraduate 125 266.48
HR Challenges 39.308 0.001
Postgraduate 183 245.58
Professional 141 333.76
Total 543
Up to School 37 250.49
Technical Education 57 275.57
Production Undergraduate 125 280.91
74.314 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 205.70
Professional 141 354.35
Total 543
Up to School 37 278.97
Technical Education 57 260.01
Infrastructure Undergraduate 125 249.16
18.422 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 254.03
Professional 141 318.59
Total 543
Up to School 37 275.05
Technical Education 57 268.68
Management Undergraduate 125 266.88
8.690 0.069
Challenges Postgraduate 183 252.26
Professional 141 302.70
Total 543
130
Cont. of table 4.11
Mean H- p-
Challenges Education N
Rank Value Value
Up to School 37 247.64
Technical Education 57 164.99
R&D Undergraduate 125 309.64
39.111 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 292.10
Professional 141 262.20
Total 543
Up to School 37 238.54
Technical Education 57 275.21
Personal Undergraduate 125 313.73
41.572 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 218.81
Professional 141 311.52
Total 543
Up to School 37 341.46
Technical Education 57 234.71
Family Undergraduate 125 239.41
83.781 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 221.68
Professional 141 363.05
Total 543
Up to School 37 237.11
Technical Education 57 332.32
Operational Undergraduate 125 254.82
54.517 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 222.48
Professional 141 336.28
Total 543
Up to School 37 224.89
Technical Education 57 289.76
Technical Undergraduate 125 264.41
5.363 0.252
Challenges Postgraduate 183 282.72
Professional 141 270.00
Total 543
Up to School 37 231.72
Technical Education 57 233.79
Overall Undergraduate 125 271.88
48.029 0.001
Challenges Postgraduate 183 234.67
Professional 141 346.56
Total 543
Source: primary data
131
Table 4.11 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
entrepreneurs are grouped under five education groups and their corresponding
mean rank and its corresponding H- value and its related p-value. The first
women entrepreneurs and the next is the education group technical education
183 women entrepreneurs and this education group forms the major women
entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for that
132
professional education being 295.92. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 34.294 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for that
undergraduate education being 315.48. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 41.112 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 333.76. The results show that firms of women
corresponding H-value is 39.308 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
133
Production challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 354.35. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 74.314 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 318.59. The results show that firms of women
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 302.70. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 8.690 with the p-value of 0.069, which suggests
134
that there is no significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for those
education of undergraduate being 309.64. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 39.111 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for those
education of undergraduate being 313.73. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 41.572 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for that education
of professional years being 363.05. The results show that firms of women
135
entrepreneurs have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 83.781 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 336.28. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 54.517 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for those
education of technical being 289.76. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 5.363 with the p-value of 0.252, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
136
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for those
education of professional being 346.56. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 48.029 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
COVID-19 pandemic among women entrepreneurs. Rajni Shaw & Singh (2021)
entrepreneur were facing in start-up and to continue their business. The result
qualification. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs faced more
challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bhavani (2017) stated that the
137
during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by other education groups of women
entrepreneurs.
138
Cont. of Table 4.12
Mean H- p-
Challenges Experience N
Rank Value Value
Up to 5 Years 109 320.20
6 to 10 Years 172 253.47
R&D
11 to 15 Years 121 332.26 57.171 0.001
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 205.62
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 286.85
6 to 10 Years 172 265.61
Personal
11 to 15 Years 121 307.67 14.616 0.002
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 237.71
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 299.90
6 to 10 Years 172 255.87
Family
11 to 15 Years 121 227.86 22.699 0.001
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 307.99
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 252.68
6 to 10 Years 172 225.32
Operational
11 to 15 Years 121 331.15 37.223 0.015
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 293.12
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 366.40
6 to 10 Years 172 237.10
Technical
11 to 15 Years 121 336.16 112.722 0.001
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 186.54
Total 543
Up to 5 Years 109 347.74
6 to 10 Years 172 256.34
Overall
11 to 15 Years 121 317.31 72.357 0.001
Challenges
Above 15 Years 141 193.67
Total 543
Source: primary data
139
Table 4.12 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
are grouped under four experience groups and their corresponding mean rank
and its corresponding H- value and its related p-value. The first experience
entrepreneurs and the next is the experience group 11 to 15 years which capsules
121 women entrepreneurs and above 15 years of experience group capsules 141
women entrepreneurs and this experience group forms the major women
entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for those
140
experienced 11 to 15 years being 329.48. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 33.148 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 45 years being 366.98. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 108.619 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 5 years being 328.02. The results show that firms of women
corresponding H-value is 49.826 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
141
Production challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 5 years being 367.42. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 60.544 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 5 years being 375.75. The results show that firms of women
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced 11 to 15 years being 304.34. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 14.968 with the p-value of 0.002, which suggests
142
that there is a significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced 11 to 15 years being 332.26. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 57.171 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced 11 to 15 years being 307.67. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 14.616 with the p-value of 0.002, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced above 15 years being 307.99. The results show that firms of women
143
entrepreneurs have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 22.699 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced 11 to 15 years being 331.15. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 37.223 with the p-value of 0.015, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 5 years being 366.40. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 112.722 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
144
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for those
experienced up to 5 years being 347.74. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 72.357 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
the business challenge faced by the women entrepreneurs. The result also
challenges, family challenges, and technical challenges. Peng Zou & Di Huo and
Meng Li (2020) discovered that firms in Guangdong Province have faced great
challenges in the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs faced more challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Luh Putu
Eka Yani, et al. (2019) discovered that the most important barriers of structure,
entrepreneurs.
145
Table 4.13: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to Income
Mean H- p-
Challenges Income N
Rank Value Value
Up to 20000 108 239.68
20001 to 40000 277 270.82
Financial
40001 to 60000 126 301.89 9.322 0.025
Challenges
Above 60000 32 273.56
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 248.64
20001 to 40000 277 278.51
Marketing
40001 to 60000 126 272.94 3.375 0.337
Challenges
Above 60000 32 290.75
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 260.95
20001 to 40000 277 277.61
HR Challenges 40001 to 60000 126 266.49 1.203 0.752
Above 60000 32 282.42
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 227.74
20001 to 40000 277 278.85
Production
40001 to 60000 126 295.96 12.360 0.006
Challenges
Above 60000 32 267.75
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 235.18
20001 to 40000 277 271.54
Infrastructure
40001 to 60000 126 301.62 10.931 0.012
Challenges
Above 60000 32 283.61
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 276.40
20001 to 40000 277 248.42
Management
40001 to 60000 126 312.56 16.313 0.001
Challenges
Above 60000 32 301.59
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 258.34
20001 to 40000 277 280.02
R&D
40001 to 60000 126 258.11 3.904 0.272
Challenges
Above 60000 32 303.36
Total 543
146
Cont. of table 4.13
Mean H- p-
Challenges Income N
Rank Value Value
Up to 20000 108 303.49
20001 to 40000 277 246.07
Personal
40001 to 60000 126 296.40 15.995 0.001
Challenges
Above 60000 32 294.08
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 213.12
20001 to 40000 277 276.67
Family
40001 to 60000 126 313.73 24.894 0.001
Challenges
Above 60000 32 266.00
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 203.07
20001 to 40000 277 274.89
Operational
40001 to 60000 126 324.00 35.350 0.001
Challenges
Above 60000 32 274.86
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 250.40
20001 to 40000 277 280.29
Technical
40001 to 60000 126 276.95 3.464 0.325
Challenges
Above 60000 32 253.69
Total 543
Up to 20000 108 222.84
20001 to 40000 277 273.25
Overall
40001 to 60000 126 307.31 17.337 0.001
Challenges
Above 60000 32 288.02
Total 543
Source: primary data
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
147
relation to the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped
under four income groups and their corresponding mean rank and its
corresponding H- value and its related p-value. The first income group is above
next is the income group up to 20000 which capsules 108 women entrepreneurs
and 40001 to 60000 of income group capsules 126 women entrepreneurs and
finally 20001 to 40000 of income group capsules 277 women entrepreneurs and
this income group forms the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study,
Kruskal-Wallis test is being adopted to get the H- ratio and its corresponding p-
income groups.
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for that income
40001 to 60000 being 301.89. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 9.322 with the p-value of 0.025, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
148
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for that income
above 50000 being 290.75. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
corresponding H-value is 3.375 with the p-value of 0.337, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for that income
above 60000 being 282.42. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
value is 1.203 with the p-value of 0.752, which suggests that there is no
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for that income
40001 to 60000 being 295.96. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 12.360 with the p-value of 0.006, which suggests
149
Infrastructure challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for that
income 40001 to 60000 being 301.62. The results show that firms of women
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for that
income 40001 to 60000 being 312.56. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 16.313 with the p-value of 0.002, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for that income
above 60000 being 303.36. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
H-value is 3.904 with the p-value of 0.272, which suggests that there is a
150
significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception towards the R &
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for that income
up to 20000 being 303.49. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
corresponding H-value is 15.995 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for that income
40001 to 60000 being 313.73. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 24.894 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for that
income 40001 to 60000 being 324.00. The results show that firms of women
151
entrepreneurs have felt the operational challenges during COVID-19 pandemic.
The corresponding H-value is 35.350 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for that income
20001 to 40000 being 280.29. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 3.464 with the p-value of 0.325, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for that income
40001 to 60000 being 307.31. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 17.337 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
152
It has been identified that HR challenges have a greater impact during
the business challenge faced by the women entrepreneurs. The result also
challenges, and family challenges except technical challenges. The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs faced more challenges during the COVID-19
technology skills, lack of start-up capital, high shop rentals, high interest rate
and high transport, lack of collateral to obtain a loan and high taxes. It is found
that the 40001 to 60000 of income women entrepreneurs are more challenges
women entrepreneurs. Bahadur Ali Soomro, Sadia Anwar & Aftab Hussain
Rajar (2019) discovered that the factors such as lack of access to technology and
training, and lack of Government support, are the major challenges faced by
women entrepreneurs in Pakistan in order to run their small business or her own
153
Table 4.14: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to type of business
Mean H- p-
Challenges Business N
Rank Value Value
Retail trading 68 198.93
Beautician 99 212.73
Financial Readymade 112 324.01
99.405 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 365.52
Other Business 140 224.96
Total 543
Retail trading 68 333.94
Beautician 99 242.73
Marketing Readymade 112 281.75
16.331 0.003
Challenges Restaurant 124 253.96
Other Business 140 270.78
Total 543
Retail trading 68 324.91
Beautician 99 281.86
Readymade 112 225.42
HR Challenges 28.801 0.001
Restaurant 124 307.42
Other Business 140 245.21
Total 543
Retail trading 68 316.49
Beautician 99 286.72
Production Readymade 112 235.70
21.345 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 300.35
Other Business 140 243.91
Total 543
Retail trading 68 311.39
Beautician 99 266.29
Infrastructure Readymade 112 229.80
41.892 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 335.32
Other Business 140 234.58
Total 543
Retail trading 68 158.29
Beautician 99 164.94
Management Readymade 112 376.94 159.27
0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 338.81 9
Other Business 140 259.81
Total 543
154
Cont. of table 4.14
Mean H- p-
Challenges Business N
Rank Value Value
Retail trading 68 352.63
Beautician 99 236.65
R&D Readymade 112 263.61
24.146 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 265.02
Other Business 140 270.73
Total 543
Retail trading 68 171.41
Beautician 99 188.50
Personal Readymade 112 387.32
135.370 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 319.70
Other Business 140 245.40
Total 543
Retail trading 68 232.89
Beautician 99 328.55
Family Readymade 112 244.52
20.956 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 274.27
Other Business 140 270.98
Total 543
Retail trading 68 191.85
Beautician 99 247.25
Operational Readymade 112 337.82
46.648 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 299.02
Other Business 140 251.85
Total 543
Retail trading 68 325.83
Beautician 99 229.45
Technical Readymade 112 281.00
16.157 0.003
Challenges Restaurant 124 273.29
Other Business 140 267.60
Total 543
Retail trading 68 259.29
Beautician 99 211.46
Overall Readymade 112 300.92
36.353 0.001
Challenges Restaurant 124 325.90
Other Business 140 250.11
Total 543
Source: primary data
155
Table 4.14 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under five
business groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding H-
value and its related p-value. The first business group is retail trading business
business group capsules 124 women entrepreneurs and finally other types of
business group capsules 140 women entrepreneurs and this business group forms
the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study, Kruskal-Wallis test is being
adopted to get the H- ratio and its corresponding p-value to identify the
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for that business
156
of restaurant being 365.52. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
corresponding H-value is 99.405 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for that business
of retail trading being 333.94. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 16.331 with the p-value of 0.003, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for that business
of retail trading being 324.91. The results show that firms of women
corresponding H-value is 28.801 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
157
Production challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for that business
of retail trading being 316.49. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 21.345 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for that
business of retail trading being 311.39. The results show that firms of women
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for that
business of readymade being 376.94. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 159.279 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
158
that there is a significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for that business
of retail trading being 352.63. The results show that firms of women
entrepreneurs have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding H-value is 24.146 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for that business
of readymade being 387.32. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
corresponding H-value is 135.370 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for that business
of beautician being 328.55. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
159
have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
H-value is 20.956 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for that
business of readymade being 337.82. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 46.648 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for that business
of retail trading being 325.83. The results show that firms of women
The corresponding H-value is 16.157 with the p-value of 0.003, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
160
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for that business
of restaurant being 325.90. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
H-value is 36.353 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a
COVID-19 pandemic among women entrepreneurs. Luh Putu Eka Yani, et al.
family challenges, and technical challenges. The results show that firms of
Rajni Shaw & Singh (2021) identified that the financial problems is the major
161
business groups of women entrepreneurs. Sanjeev Kumar & Neha Singh (2021)
market, family support and awareness. Peng Zou & Di Huo and Meng Li (2020)
discovered that firms in Guangdong Province have faced great challenges in the
COVID-19 pandemic. Their firm operation and production activities have been
limited. They were facing significant risks. Bahadur Ali Soomro, Sadia Anwar &
Aftab Hussain Rajar (2019) discovered that the factors such as lack of access to
inadequate access to training, and lack of Government support, are the major
162
Table 4.15: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to marital status
Marital Mean U- p-
Challenges N
Status Rank Value Value
Married 54 317.95
Financial
Unmarried 489 266.93 10721.5 0.022
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 181.30
Marketing
Married 489 282.02 8305.0 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 274.41
HR Challenges Married 489 271.73 13073.0 0.120
Total 543
Unmarried 54 263.98
Production
Married 489 272.89 12770.0 0.689
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 183.18
Infrastructure
Married 489 281.81 8406.5 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 308.04
Management
Married 489 268.02 11257.0 0.072
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 155.09
R&D
Married 489 284.91 6890.0 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 261.00
Personal
Married 489 273.21 12609.0 0.582
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 353.53
Family
Married 489 263.00 8800.5 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 329.99
Operational
Married 489 257.80 10051.5 0.039
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 172.88
Technical
Married 489 282.95 7850.5 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Unmarried 54 223.60
Overall
Married 489 295.14 8669.5 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Source: primary data
163
Table 4.15 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under two
marital status groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding
U- value and its related p-value. The first marital status group is unmarried with
status group married which capsules 489 women entrepreneurs and this marital
status group forms the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study, Mann-
Whitney U-test is being adopted to get the U- ratio and its corresponding p-value
challenges during COVID-19 pandemic felt by the four different marital status
groups.
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 317.95 than unmarried (266.93). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the financial challenges during
164
COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding U-value is 10721.5 with the p-value of
pandemic.
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for that
unmarried women entrepreneurs being 282.02 than married (181.30). The results
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the marketing challenges
value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the women
pandemic.
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for that
unmarried women entrepreneurs being 274.41 than married (271.73). The results
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the HR challenges during
pandemic.
165
Production challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 272.89 than unmarried (263.98). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the production challenges during
pandemic.
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for that
married women entrepreneurs being 281.81 than unmarried (183.18). The results
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the infrastructure challenges
value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the women
19 pandemic.
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for that
unmarried women entrepreneurs being 308.04 than married (268.02). The results
166
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the management challenges
COVID-19 pandemic.
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 284.91 than unmarried (155.09). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the R & D challenges during
pandemic.
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 273.21 than unmarried (261.00). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the personal challenges during
167
entrepreneurs’ perception towards the personal challenges during COVID-19
pandemic.
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for that
unmarried women entrepreneurs being 353.53 than married (263.00). The results
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the family challenges during
pandemic.
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for that
unmarried women entrepreneurs being 329.99 than married (257.80). The results
show that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the operational challenges
value of 0.039, which suggests that there is a significant difference in the women
pandemic.
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
168
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 282.95 than unmarried (172.88). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the technical challenges during
pandemic.
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for that married
women entrepreneurs being 295.14 than unmarried (223.60). The results show
that firms of women entrepreneurs have felt the overall challenges during
pandemic.
COVID-19 pandemic among women entrepreneurs. Rajni Shaw & Singh (2021)
entrepreneur were facing in start-up and to continue their business. The result
169
marketing challenges, infrastructure challenges, R & D challenges, operational
Bahadur Ali Soomro, Sadia Anwar & Aftab Hussain Rajar (2019) discovered
that the factors such as lack of access to technology and finance, lack of
Pakistan in order to run their small business or her own venture easy and
smoothly. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs faced more
facing the problems such as health, financial, production, marketing, work place
facility problems. It is found that the married women entrepreneurs are more
entrepreneurs. Tahir Iqbal & Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal (2020) identified
170
Table 4.16: Women entrepreneurs faced challenges during COVID-19
Pandemic with respect to generation
Mean U- p-
Challenges Generation N
Rank Value Value
1 Generation 347 284.38
Financial
II Generation 196 250.08 29709.5 0.014
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 287.18
Marketing
II Generation 196 245.12 28737.0 0.003
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 306.30
HR Challenges II Generation 196 211.27 22102.5 0.001
Total 543
1 Generation 347 303.22
Production
II Generation 196 216.72 23171.0 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 280.01
Infrastructure
II Generation 196 257.82 31226.5 0.108
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 275.80
Management
II Generation 196 265.27 32687.5 0.447
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 279.75
R & D Challenges II Generation 196 258.28 31317.0 0.121
Total 543
1 Generation 347 263.23
Personal
II Generation 196 287.53 30962.5 0.079
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 316.75
Family
II Generation 196 192.77 18477.5 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 261.05
Operational
II Generation 196 291.38 30207.0 0.029
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 271.44
Technical
II Generation 196 273.00 33810.5 0.910
Challenges
Total 543
1 Generation 347 295.06
Overall
II Generation 196 231.17 26004.0 0.001
Challenges
Total 543
Source: primary data
171
Table 4.16 shows the eleven challenges faced by the women
This table brings out eleven challenges namely, financial challenges, marketing
the various responses of the 543 women entrepreneurs are grouped under two
generation groups and their corresponding mean rank and its corresponding U-
value and its related p-value. The first generation group is IInd Generation with
generation group 1st Generation which capsules 347 women entrepreneurs and
this generation group forms the major women entrepreneurs group. In this study,
Mann-Whitney U-test is being adopted to get the U- ratio and its corresponding
generation groups.
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4057 and the
total standard deviation is 0.40699, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
172
have felt the financial challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The
corresponding U-value is 29709.5 with the p-value of 0.014, which suggests that
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3235 and the
total standard deviation is 0.59734, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
corresponding U-value is 28737.0 with the p-value of 0.003, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4762 and the
total standard deviation is 0.58670, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
value is 22102.5 with the p-value of 0.01, which suggests that there is a
173
Production challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during the COVID-
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.4166 and the
total standard deviation is 0.50410, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
corresponding U-value is 23171.0 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3660
and the total standard deviation is 0.53939, with the highest mean rank for that
19 pandemic.
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3637
and the total standard deviation is 0.56442, with the highest mean rank for that
174
1st generation of women entrepreneurs being 275.80 than IInd generation of
The corresponding U-value is 32687.5 with the p-value of 0.447, which suggests
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.2905 and the
total standard deviation is 0.57726, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
have felt the R & D challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
U-value is 31317.0 with the p-value of 0.121, which suggests that there is no
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3554 and the
total standard deviation is 0.55989, with the highest mean rank for that IInd
corresponding U-value is 30962.5 with the p-value of 0.179, which suggests that
175
there is no significant difference in the women entrepreneurs’ perception
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3849 and the
total standard deviation is 0.67069, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
have felt the family challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
U-value is 18477.5 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a
COVID-19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3020
and the total standard deviation is 0.84490, with the highest mean rank for that
The corresponding U-value is 30207.0 with the p-value of 0.029, which suggests
19 pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3247 and the
176
total standard deviation is 0.66569, with the highest mean rank for that IInd
corresponding U-value is 33810.5 with the p-value of 0.910, which suggests that
pandemic listed below an analysis. The overall mean value is 3.3645 and the
total standard deviation is 0.35177, with the highest mean rank for that 1st
have felt the overall challenges during COVID-19 pandemic. The corresponding
U-value is 26004.0 with the p-value of 0.001, which suggests that there is a
the business challenge faced by the women entrepreneurs. Luh Putu Eka Yani, et
al. (2019) discovered that the most important barriers of structure, economy-
177
during COVID-19 pandemic such as financial challenges, marketing challenges,
that firms of women entrepreneurs faced more challenges during the COVID-19
pandemic. Amal Mohammed Sheikh Damanhouri (2017) found that the basic
ventures. It is found that the 1st generations of women entrepreneurs are more
challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic than IInd generation of women
entrepreneurs. Rajni Shaw & Singh (2021) identified that the financial problems
DISCUSSION
COVID-19 pandemic among women entrepreneurs. Rajni Shaw & Singh (2021)
(2017) stated that the business challenge faced by the women entrepreneurs. The
178
perceiving the challenges during COVID-19 pandemic such as financial
demographic profile. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs faced
more challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tahir Iqbal & Imam
challenges affect significantly and positively. Peng Zou & Di Huo and Meng Li
(2020) discovered that firms in Guangdong Province have faced great challenges
in the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that firms of women entrepreneurs
faced more challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Luh Putu Eka Yani, et
al. (2019) discovered that the most important barriers of structure, economy-
(2021) identified that the financial problems is the major constraints women
179
Table 4.17: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on financial challenges faced by
women entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Financial Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.582 0.338 0.332 54.874 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
Tamil Nadu.
180
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
during COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 54.874 and the p-value is 0.001.
The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized
equation.
standardized co-efficient beta values were 0.084, 0.654, and 0.119. The p values
181
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 2.137 0.109 19.634 0.000
1 Lockdown 0.030 0.026 0.049 1.123 0.262
Social
2 0.048 0.023 0.084 2.135 0.033
Distance
Closure of
3 0.005 0.026 0.009 0.204 0.839
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.419 0.032 0.654 12.962 0.001
Business
Worker
5 0.072 0.031 0.119 2.338 0.020
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
women entrepreneurs.
women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020)
182
discovered that impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on business. Farhan Ahmed,
et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and
Ratan Suryavanshi (2020) found that investors are beginning to redistribute their
Marketing Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.636 0.405 0.399 73.028 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
183
women entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic was considered as dependent
Tamil Nadu.
the p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit.
184
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 1.553 0.151 10.255 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.383 0.037 0.427 10.405 0.001
Social
2 0.257 0.032 0.306 8.164 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.391 0.036 0.430 10.774 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.087 0.045 0.093 1.936 0.053
Business
Worker
5 0.086 0.043 0.097 2.010 0.045
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
0.430, and 0.097. The p values are significant at one percent level. The
185
closure of business do not impact marketing challenges faced by women
Ratan Suryavanshi (2020) found that investors are beginning to redistribute their
portfolios to cope with the financial crisis caused by COVID-19. But, closure of
(2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock
market performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022)
186
was applied to ascertain the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on HR challenges
Tamil Nadu.
Tamil Nadu.
187
COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 3393.643 and the p-value is 0.001. The F
and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized co-
equation.
Coefficients
Closure of
3 Marketplace 0.304 0.008 0.340 37.592 0.001
Closure of
4 Business 0.120 0.010 0.130 11.952 0.001
Worker
5 Absenteeism 0.617 0.010 0.708 64.924 0.001
Absenteeism (0.617).
0.130, and 0.708. The p values are significant at one percent level. The
188
significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as lockdown,
distance of COVID-19 pandemic is greater than five percent level. Hence, social
that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market
Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on business.
189
Table 4.20: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on production challenges faced
by women entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Production Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.839 0.703 0.700 254.506 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
Tamil Nadu.
190
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
the p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit.
0.234, 0.201, 0.406, 0.335, and 0.168. The p values are significant at one percent
191
level. The significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as
Coefficients
Closure of
3 Marketplace 0.312 0.022 0.406 14.421 0.001
Closure of
4 Business 0.266 0.027 0.335 9.928 0.001
Worker
5 Absenteeism 0.125 0.025 0.168 4.936 0.001
business.
192
Table 4.21: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on infrastructure challenges
faced by women entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Infrastructu Lockdown,
re Social Distance,
challenges
Closure of
faced by
Marketplace,
women 0.784 0.614 0.610 170.901 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
193
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
pandemic. The ANOVA table shows that factors of COVID-19 pandemic such
value is 170.901 and the p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the
standardized co-efficient beta values were 0.147, 0.614, and 0.111. The p values
are significant at one percent level. The significant results show the factors of
194
COVID-19 pandemic such as lockdown, closure of marketplace, and worker
pandemic are greater than five percent level. Hence, social distance and closure
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 0.605 0.110 5.495 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.119 0.027 0.147 4.455 0.001
Social
2 0.026 0.023 0.034 1.119 0.263
Distance
Closure of
3 0.504 0.026 0.614 19.110 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.064 0.033 0.075 1.958 0.051
Business
Worker
5 0.089 0.031 0.111 2.872 0.004
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020)
195
distance and closure of business do not impact infrastructure challenges faced by
Farhan Ahmed, et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact
on oil prices and stock market performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia &
owned firms.
Managemen Lockdown,
t challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.474 0.225 0.218 31.188 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
196
considered as dependent variable. Samples were collected from 543 women
pandemic. The ANOVA table shows that factors of COVID-19 pandemic such
31.188 and the p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression
197
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 2.762 0.163 16.913 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.130 0.040 0.153 3.268 0.001
Social
2 0.104 0.034 0.131 3.057 0.002
Distance
Closure of
3 0.271 0.039 0.315 6.921 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.504 0.049 0.567 10.382 0.001
Business
Worker
5 0.094 0.046 0.112 2.041 0.042
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
0.153, 0.131, 0.315, 0.567, and 0.112. The p values are significant at one percent
level. The significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as
198
It is discovered that factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as lockdown,
has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market performance. Bathula
Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022) discovered that impact of
& Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
business.
R&D Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.613 0.376 0.370 64.721 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
199
such as lockdown, social distance, closure of marketplace, closure of business,
Tamil Nadu.
COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 64.721 and the p-value is 0.001. The F and
p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized co-
200
efficient shows the power of relationship is articulated by the subsequent
equation.
Coefficients
Absenteeism (0.526).
0.199, 0.159, 0.196, 0.384, and 0.614. The p values are significant at one percent
level. The significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as
201
worker absenteeism positively impact R & D challenges faced by women
women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020)
et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and
stock market performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta
Personal Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.378 0.143 0.135 17.887 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
202
challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. Here, factors of COVID-19 pandemic
Tamil Nadu.
during COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 17.887 and the p-value is 0.001.
203
The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized
equation.
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 2.753 0.170 16.158 0.000
1 Lockdown 0.013 0.041 0.015 0.308 0.758
Social
2 0.131 0.035 0.167 3.704 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.252 0.041 0.295 6.167 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.178 0.051 0.202 3.518 0.001
Business
Worker
5 0.119 0.048 0.143 2.483 0.013
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
0.196, 0.384, and 0.614. The p values are significant at one percent level. The
204
positively impact personal challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during
discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market
Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on business.
205
Table 4.25: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on family challenges faced by
women entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Family Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.878 0.771 0.768 360.705 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
Tamil Nadu.
206
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 360.705 and the p-value is 0.001. The F
and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized co-
equation.
obtained standardized co-efficient beta values were 00.217, 0.230, 0.709, and
0.616. The p values are significant at one percent level. The significant results
207
show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as lockdown, social distance,
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 1.256 0.106 11.893 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.219 0.026 0.217 8.527 0.001
Social
2 0.217 0.022 0.230 9.884 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.033 0.025 0.032 1.308 0.191
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.471 0.031 0.709 37.350 0.001
Business
Worker
5 0.613 0.030 0.616 20.628 0.001
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
among women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti
208
closure of marketplace do not impact family challenges faced by women
Ahmed, et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil
prices and stock market performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia &
owned firms.
Operational Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.211 0.045 0.036 5.019 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
209
variable. Samples were collected from 543 women entrepreneurs in Northern
Tamil Nadu.
women entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 5.019 and the
p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit.
210
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 3.811 0.271 14.040 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.113 0.066 0.089 1.715 0.087
Social
2 0.266 0.056 0.224 4.703 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.003 0.065 0.002 0.049 0.961
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.136 0.081 0.102 1.684 0.093
Business
Worker
5 0.136 0.076 0.108 1.778 0.076
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
pandemic obtained standardized co-efficient beta value was 0.224. The p values
are significant at one percent level. The significant results show the social
211
business, and worker absenteeism do not impact operational challenges faced by
that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market
Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on business.
Technical Lockdown,
challenges Social Distance,
faced by Closure of
women Marketplace,
0.472 0.223 0.216 30.868 0.001
entrepreneurs Closure of
duringCOVI Business, and
D-19 Worker
pandemic Absenteeism
Source: primary data
212
The table 4.27 reveals the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on technical
Tamil Nadu.
213
closure of marketplace, closure of business, and worker absenteeism statistically
during COVID-19 pandemic. The F value is 30.868 and the p-value is 0.001.
The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized
equation.
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 2.130 0.193 11.044 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.516 0.047 0.517 11.017 0.001
Social
2 0.219 0.040 0.234 5.469 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.107 0.046 0.105 2.310 0.021
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.011 0.057 0.011 0.193 0.847
Business
Worker
5 0.064 0.054 0.064 1.170 0.242
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
values were 0.517 and 0.234. The p values are significant at one percent level.
214
The significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as
of marketplace, closure of business and worker absenteeism are greater than five
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
Farhan Ahmed, et al. (2021) discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact
on oil prices and stock market performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia &
owned firms.
215
Table 4.28: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on challenges faced by women
entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Lockdown,
Challenges Social Distance,
faced by
Closure of
women
Marketplace,
entrepreneurs 0.769 0.591 0.587 155.125 0.001
duringCOVI Closure of
D-19 Business, and
pandemic Worker
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
Tamil Nadu.
216
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
Coefficients
217
the p-value is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit.
Absenteeism (0.032).
business obtained standardized co-efficient beta values were 0.302, 0.255, 0.305,
and 0.399. The p values are significant at one percent level. The significant
COVID-19 pandemic are greater than five percent level. Hence, worker
women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020)
218
absenteeism do not impact challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during
discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market
DISCUSSION
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
women entrepreneurs. Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020)
discovered that COVID-19 has a negative impact on oil prices and stock market
219
performance. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022)
220
women entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic on intention to quit. Here,
Samples were collected from 543 women entrepreneurs in Northern Tamil Nadu.
Tamil Nadu.
the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the intention to quit variance that can be
221
0.476 that factors of challenges faced by women entrepreneurs during COVID-
of intention to quit. The ANOVA table shows that factors of challenges faced by
significantly predict the intention to quit. The F value is 43.871 and the p-value
is 0.001. The F and p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-
subsequent equation.
(0.167).
222
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. t p
Challenges Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
B S.E. Beta
Constant 1.249 0.159 7.866 0.001
Financial
1 0.166 0.077 0.140 2.161 0.031
Challenges
Marketing
2 0.381 0.059 0.472 6.409 0.001
Challenges
HR
3 0.568 0.058 0.691 9.761 0.001
Challenges
Production
4 0.916 0.092 0.957 9.927 0.001
Challenges
Infrastructure
5 0.145 0.064 0.163 2.281 0.023
Challenges
Management
6 0.189 0.049 0.221 3.888 0.001
Challenges
Research And
7 Development 0.147 0.045 0.176 3.249 0.001
Challenges
Personal
8 0.227 0.059 0.263 3.829 0.001
Challenges
Family
9 0.142 0.037 0.197 3.851 0.001
Challenges
Operational
10 0.180 0.028 0.314 6.321 0.001
Challenges
Technical
11 0.167 0.044 0.231 3.785 0.001
Challenges
Source: primary data
223
challenges obtained standardized co-efficient beta values were 0.140, 0.472,
0.691, 0.957, 0.163, 0.221, 0.176, 0.263, 0.197, 0.314, and 0.231. The p values
are significant at one percent level. The significant results show the factors of
intention to quit. Hao Hou1, et al. (2019) discovered that frequency of mask
turnover intention.
224
Table 4.30: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on intention to quit among by
women entrepreneurs
Dependent Independent R R2 Adjusted F P
Variable Variable Value Value R2 Value Value Value
Lockdown,
Social Distance,
Closure of
Intention to Marketplace,
0.561 0.315 0.309 49.397 0.001
Quit Closure of
Business, and
Worker
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
Tamil Nadu.
225
COVID-19 pandemic is the ratio coefficient of resolution (R2) of the
Coefficients
Un-standardized Standardized
S.No. Impact of t p
COVID-19 Coefficients Coefficients
Value Value
pandemic B S.E. Beta
Constant 2.237 0.131 17.033 0.001
1 Lockdown 0.346 0.032 0.478 10.848 0.001
Social
2 0.173 0.027 0.255 6.347 0.001
Distance
Closure of
3 0.123 0.031 0.167 3.905 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
4 0.325 0.039 0.428 8.340 0.001
Business
Worker
5 0.292 0.037 0.407 7.893 0.001
Absenteeism
Source: primary data
women entrepreneurs. The F value is 49.397 and the p-value is 0.001. The F and
p values reveal that the regression model is a fit. The un-standardized co-
226
efficient shows the power of relationship is articulated by the subsequent
equation.
Absenteeism (0.292).
0.478, 0.255, 0.167, 0.428, and 0.407. The p values are significant at one percent
level. The significant results show the factors of COVID-19 pandemic such as
entrepreneurs.
Discussion
227
Khalid Al-Mansour (2021) analysis discovered that there is influence of
lower social support were significantly associated with the risk of turnover
228
Path Analysis
Path analysis was done using AMOS 20.0 version is presented in Figure
4.1. The path analysis is used to assess the influence of impact of COVID-19
The model fit results shown in Table 4.31.1. The table shows the chi-
square value is 1.375. Hence, the chi-square value is found minimum and good.
This score has been suggested by Velaudham and Baskar (2015) and Deepak, et
al. (2019). In this model, the research has obtained GFI, AGFI, CFI and NFI
against the recommended value of above 0.90. The result is reliable for the
model fit suggested by Kantiah Alias Deepak and Velaudham (2019) and
Saminathan, et al. (2019). RMR is 0.002 and RMSEA is 0.026 and is below the
229
recommended value of 0.08. This score has been suggested by Deepak R.
Kanthiah Alias, et al. (2019), Victor Charles and Velaudham (2020), and
Premapriya, et al. (2016). The researcher has relied on all indices to reach a
judgment overall fit of the model. The result is reliable for the model fit
suggested by Velaudham and Baskar (2016) and Indra, Balaji and Velaudham
(2020).
validated by critical ratio. The regression coefficient (β) is 0.302, which shows
faced by women entrepreneurs. It shows that the one unit increase of lockdown
230
of COVID-19 pandemic leads to increase of 0.302 levels on challenges faced by
women entrepreneurs. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022)
critical ratio value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA)
P
DV IV Estimate S.E. C.R. Beta
Value
Challenges <--- Lockdown 0.159 0.018 8.904 0.302 0.001
Challenges <--- Social Distance 0.126 0.015 8.232 0.255 0.001
Closure of
Challenges <--- 0.163 0.018 9.255 0.305 0.001
Marketplace
Closure of
Challenges <--- 0.221 0.022 10.114 0.399 0.001
Business
Worker
Challenges <--- 0.032 0.021 1.522 0.060 0.128
Absenteeism
Intention to Worker
<--- 0.306 0.035 8.690 0.428 0.001
Quit Absenteeism
Intention to Closure of
<--- 0.218 0.040 5.449 0.287 0.001
Quit Business
Intention to
<--- Lockdown 0.260 0.032 8.013 0.359 0.001
Quit
Intention to
<--- Social Distance 0.100 0.027 3.729 0.147 0.001
Quit
Intention to
<--- Challenges 0.553 0.068 8.145 0.403 0.001
Quit
Source: Primary data
231
β value is validated by critical ratio. The regression coefficient (β) is 0.255,
pandemic and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. It shows that the one
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
entrepreneurs.
pandemic and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. It shows that the one
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
232
of COVID-19 pandemic has positive direct effect on challenges faced by women
entrepreneurs.
pandemic and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. It shows that the one
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
entrepreneurs.
233
pandemic and challenges faced by women entrepreneurs. It shows that the one
value is statistically not significant. Hence, the (HA) is not accepted. Patricia
Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the
entrepreneurs.
intention to quit.
critical ratio. The regression coefficient (β) is 0.428, (Direct Effect = 0.428 +
Indirect Effect = 0.024 and Total Effect = 0.452) which shows positive
234
to quit. It shows that the one unit increase of worker absenteeism of COVID-19
pandemic leads to increase of 0.428 levels on intention to quit. The critical ratio
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
intention to quit.
critical ratio. The regression coefficient (β) is 0.287, (Direct Effect = 0.287 +
Indirect Effect = 0.161 and Total Effect = 0.447) which shows positive
to quit. It shows that the one unit increase of closure of business of COVID-19
pandemic leads to increase of 0.287 levels on intention to quit. The critical ratio
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
Patricia Carracedo, Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of
quit.
235
It is hypothesized that lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic has significant
The regression coefficient (β) is 0.359, (Direct Effect = 0.359 + Indirect Effect =
0.121 and Total Effect = 0.480) which shows positive relationship between
lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic and intention to quit. It shows that the one
one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted. The result shows, lockdown of
Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022) discovered that impact of
turnover intention.
to quit.
critical ratio. The regression coefficient (β) is 0.147, (Direct Effect = 0.147 +
Indirect Effect = 0.103 and Total Effect = 0.250) which shows positive
quit. It shows that the one unit increase of social distance of COVID-19
pandemic leads to increase of 0.147 levels on intention to quit. The critical ratio
236
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
(Direct Effect = 0.403 + Indirect Effect = 0.000 and Total Effect = 0.403) which
during COVID-19 pandemic and intention to quit. It shows that the one unit
pandemic leads to increase of 0.403 levels on intention to quit. The critical ratio
value is statistically significant at one percent level. Hence, the (HA) is accepted.
237
DISCUSSION
Puertas & Luisa Marti (2020) discovered that impact of the COVID-19
positive direct effect on intention to quit. Bathula Srinivasu, Shilpa Bhatia &
Bhatia & Ankita Gupta (2022) discovered that impact of COVID-19 lockdown
238
4.2 CHAPTER SUMMARY
Well, the analysis brings to the fore where the women entrepreneurs
categories differ rather markedly in their views vis-à-vis the several queries
seem to think more or less along the same line. The next chapter, namely
preceded by a brief statement of the problem, the purpose of the study and the
further research. The next chapter, namely Chapter-5, gives the summary of
239