The Development of an Web-based Faculty

Evaluation System for Bulacan Polytechnic College (Main Campus)

Dear Respondent:
Greetings!
Your involvement in this study is entirely optional. Your suggestions will be crucial to our study
for the Bachelor of Science in Information Systems. There are no known dangers connected to
this study. You can leave the survey at any time if you feel uncomfortable answering any of the
questions. Your survey responses will be treated in absolute confidence, and only the Bulacan
Polytechnic College will get data from this study. Your information will be encrypted and kept
private.
I appreciate your time and help very lot.
******************************************************************************
************
PART I: SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

Hardware requirements for the system should be at least 1.6 GHz or faster processor, 8GB of
RAM (8 GB if running on a virtual machine), 2 GB of available hard disk space5400 RPM hard
disk drive, and DirectX 9-capable video card (1024 x 768 or higher resolution). Hardware
Requirements is needed for the functionality of the system. The minimum requirement is
important to avoid necessary system failure.
Software Requirements
In developing Faculty Evaluation System, PHP / XAMPP Control Panel is the programming
software and MySQLi is the database.
XAMPP– is a free and open-source cross-platform web server solution stack package developed
by Apache Friends.
from Microsoft. It is used to develop computer programs for multiple operating systems,
including Windows, macOS, and Linux.
MySQLi - is a PHP extension that provides an improved and more feature-rich interface for
interacting with MySQL databases.
It is used for a variety of database-related tasks when developing web applications using PHP as
the server-side scripting language.
 PART II. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Direction: Please evaluate the existing system by using the given scale and placing a check mark under the
corresponding rating.

Rating Equivalent Range Interpretation

5 4.51 – 5.00 Highly Acceptable (HA)

4 3.51 – 4.50 Acceptable (A)

3 2.51 – 3.50 Moderately Acceptable (MA)

2 1.51 – 2.50 Unacceptable (UA)

1 1.00 – 1.50 Highly Unacceptable (HU)

A. Accuracy – The data on the system, the validation, and the records that are added to the database are all
correct.

EXISTING
ATTRIBUTES 5 4 3 2 1
HA A MA UA HU

1. Did the faculty member's course materials accurately

reflect the subject matter being taught.

2. Did the faculty member demonstrate consistency and

fairness in grading assignments and exams?

3. Did the faculty member provide timely and accurate

feedback on assignments and exams?

B. Efficiency – The system aims to achieving maximum productivity without wasting time.

EXISTING
ATTRIBUTES 5 4 3 2 1
HA A MA UA HU

1. How effectively does the faculty member manage their

time to prepare for lectures, conduct classes, and provide
support to students outside of class hours?

2. Does the faculty member incorporate technology and

online resources efficiently into their teaching methods to
enhance learning?

3. How efficiently does the faculty member provide

support and feedback to students, addressing their
questions and concerns in a timely manner?

C. Reliability – the quality of the system to not fail during execution.

 EXISTING
ATTRIBUTES 5 4 3 2 1
HA A MA UA HU

1. How efficiently does the faculty member provide

support and feedback to students, addressing their
questions and concerns in a timely manner.

2. Is the faculty member consistently available to provide

support and assistance to students during office hours or
by appointment.

3. Does the faculty member consistently engage in

professional development activities to enhance their
knowledge and skills in their field?

D. User-friendliness – the system is not difficult to learn or understand.

EXISTING
ATTRIBUTES 5 4 3 2 1
HA A MA UA HU

1. Is the interface of the faculty evaluation system intuitive

and easy to navigate?

2. Can faculty members easily access their evaluation

results and feedback in a user-friendly format?

3. How satisfied are users (evaluators, faculty members,

administrators) with the user-friendliness and usability of
the faculty evaluation system?

E. Security – the data should be kept secure from external threats.

EXISTING
ATTRIBUTES 5 4 3 2 1
HA A MA UA HU

1. Are there any specific suggestions or recommendations

from users on how to improve the user-friendliness of the
system?

2. Are the evaluation reports presented in a clear and

understandable manner, making it easy for faculty members
to interpret the feedback?

3. Is the system responsive and web-based friendly,

allowing users to access and complete evaluations on
 various devices, including personal computer?

Thank you very much for taking your time and support to give thoughtful responses. Kindly write any other
comments or suggestions that may help the researcher for the improvement of the study.
Comments / Suggestions:
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________

_______________________________________
SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME