Market 2211

November 2022
Trends in the Money Market in Japan

Results of the Tokyo Money Market Survey (August 2022)
Financial Markets Department

Bank of Japan
Please contact the email address below to request permission before reproducing or
copying the contents of this paper for commercial purposes.
Financial Markets Department, Bank of Japan
E-mail: post.fmd35@boj.or.jp
Please credit the source when reproducing or copying the contents of this paper.
November 2022
Financial Markets Department
Bank of Japan
Trends in the Money Market in Japan

Results of the Tokyo Money Market Survey (August 2022)
■ Introduction ■
The Financial Markets Department of the Bank of Japan (the Bank) has conducted the Tokyo
Money Market Survey since 2008 to understand developments in the Japanese money market.
Initially, this series of surveys was conducted every other year. However, to observe market
trends more precisely, the Bank decided to conduct the survey annually, beginning with the
2013 survey. In August 2022, the 13th survey in the series was carried out (the survey was
conducted as of the end of July 2022).
As with the previous surveys, this survey covers eligible counterparties in the Bank's market
operations, as well as other major participants in the money market. The number of
respondents in the survey was 383 (with a response rate of 100 percent).
The Bank intends to capture comprehensively and from various angles the situations and
structural changes in the money market, utilizing the results of this survey as well as the
results of the Bond Market Survey. The Bank will continue to enhance dialogue with market
participants by taking advantage of the Meeting on Market Operations and the Bond Market
Group Meeting to actively support the relevant parties in their efforts to enhance Japanese
financial markets, including the money market. The Bank intends to contribute significantly
to such endeavors in its capacity as Japan's central bank.
Number of Respondents in the Tokyo Money Market Survey
2021 survey 2022 survey
Total respondents 381 383
Eligible counterparties in the Bank's

354 356
market operations
Note: In addition to the eligible counterparties in the Bank's market operations, several major
life insurance companies, general insurance companies, and asset management
companies participated in the survey.
1
■ Overview ■
The amounts outstanding in the money market increased from the levels of the previous year
on both the cash borrowing side and the cash lending side.1
This was because (1) repo transactions increased due to growing demand for bonds
particularly by non-residents and (2) yen fund transactions with overseas counterparties
increased, due to factors such as higher demand for dollar funds caused by heightening
uncertainty over the outlook for U.S. interest rates as well as an increase in yen equivalents
resulting from the yen's depreciation. Meanwhile, (3) transactions with the Bank decreased
compared to the previous year as the amount outstanding of the Special Funds-Supplying
Operations to Facilitate Financing in Response to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) 2
(hereinafter referred to as the "Special Operations in Response to COVID-19") decreased due
to maturity, following the Bank's completion of the fund-provisioning against private debt
pledged as collateral.
With respect to the functioning of the money market (as of the end of July 2022), nearly 90
percent of all respondents answered that it remained "mostly unchanged" from the previous
year. However, at the same time, the share of respondents who answered that it had
"improved" (4 percent) decreased somewhat, whereas the share of respondents who answered
that it had "declined" (9 percent) increased somewhat, compared to the previous survey.
The Bank intends to continue to closely monitor the developments in the money market
through day-to-day monitoring activities, the implementation of the Tokyo Money Market
Survey, and dialogue with market participants.
1
The discrepancies between the figures on the cash lending side and borrowing side are due to
constraints regarding the counterparties covered by this survey (e.g., non-residents are not included),
and the fact that some types of transactions are recorded only on one side (e.g., transactions with the
Bank are recorded only on the cash borrowing side, while treasury discount bills [T-Bills] are
recorded only on the cash lending side).
2
For details, see "Special Funds-Supplying Operations to Facilitate Financing in Response to the
Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)"
(https://www.boj.or.jp/en/mopo/measures/mkt_ope/ope_v/index.htm/) on the Bank of Japan's
website. Note that the fund-provisioning against private debt pledged as collateral was completed at
the end of March 2022.
2
Amount Outstanding in the Money Market
Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side
tril. yen tril. yen

500 500
450 450
400 400
121
350 350
132
300 300 48
52
250 250
48 48
200 52 200
22
150 202 150
165
100 145 100 126
50 50
36 38 36 38
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Transactions with the Bank T-Bills
CD/CP, CD/CP repos CD/CP, CD/CP repos
Yen fund transactions with overseas counterparties Yen fund transactions with overseas counterparties
Repo transactions Repo transactions
Call (collateralized/uncollateralized) transactions Call (collateralized/uncollateralized) transactions
3
1. GC Repo Transactions Increased from the Previous Year
Of repo market3 transactions, the amount outstanding of general collateral (GC) repos4
increased from the previous year.
On the cash borrowing side, bond lending from tanshi companies and foreign securities
companies to non-residents and some foreign securities companies increased. Moreover,
some city banks pointed out that they had increased their cash borrowing on the back of
an increase in the unused allowances of macro add-on balances after the Benchmark Ratio
applied to financial institutions' current account balances at the Bank was raised, and a
decline in the repo rate reflecting growing demand for bonds.
On the cash lending side, bond borrowing by tanshi companies and foreign securities
companies increased. It was pointed out that non-residents' demand for bonds had
increased due to the depreciation of the yen and the widening of U.S. dollar/yen basis.
Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Investor Type
Cash Borrowing (Bond Lending) Side Cash Lending (Bond Borrowing) Side
tril. yen tril. yen
130 130
120 120
20
110 110
100 100
90 13 90
80 50 80 40
70 70 29
38
60 60
50 50
24 28
40 30 40
23
30 30
20 15 20 20
16 22
10 10
4 9 9 6
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Tanshi/Securities finance companies Tanshi/Securities finance companies
Foreign securities companies Foreign securities companies
Japanese securities companies Japanese securities companies
Trust banks Trust banks
City banks City banks
3
In this paper, the market for securities repurchase (gensaki) transactions and cash-collateralized
securities lending (gentan) transactions is called the "repo market."
4
These are repo transactions in which the securities to be used as collateral are not specified.
4
2. SC Repo Transactions Increased from the Previous Year
The amount outstanding of special collateral (SC) repos5 increased from the previous
year.
On the cash borrowing side, bond lending from tanshi companies, foreign securities
companies, and some city banks to non-residents, foreign securities companies, and
Japanese securities companies increased. In addition, some trust banks increased the
arbitrage trading by lending bonds via SC repos while lending cash using GC repos.
On the cash lending side, bond borrowing by tanshi companies, foreign securities
companies, and Japanese securities companies increased. These institutions pointed out
that there was an increase in demand to borrow bonds via SC repos on the back of an
expansion of short positions of non-residents, some foreign securities companies, and
some Japanese securities companies.
Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Investor Type
tril. yen tril. yen
80 80
70 12 70
60 60
18
50 50 27
11
40 14 40
10 19
30 30
3 21
20 20
27 9
10 22 10
12 14
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Tanshi /Securities finance companies Tanshi /Securities finance companies
Foreign securities companies
Japanese securities companies
Trust banks
5
These are repo transactions in which the securities to be used as collateral are specified.
5
3. Uncollateralized Call Transactions Remained Unchanged from the Previous Year
The amount outstanding of transactions in the uncollateralized call market remained

generally unchanged from the previous year.
On the cash borrowing side, while cash borrowing by securities companies decreased,
some city banks pointed out that they had increased their cash borrowing mainly due to
an increase in the unused allowances of macro add-on balances after the Benchmark Ratio
applied to financial institutions' current account balances at the Bank was raised.
On the cash lending side, while keitou/shinkin banks reduced their cash lending, some city
banks mentioned that they had increased their cash lending by extending their credit line
to avoid having policy-rate balances in their current account balances at the Bank.
Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Investor Type
tril. yen tril. yen

35 35
5
30 10 30 5
11 2
25 25 6 5
5
20 6 20 4
15 15
17
15
10 15 10 16
5 5
4 5
2
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Securities companies Keitou/Shinkin banks
Regional banks and regional banks II Regional banks and regional banks II
6
4. Collateralized Call Transactions Remained at Low Levels
The amount outstanding of transactions in the collateralized call market has continued to
be at a significantly low level since the introduction of the negative interest rate policy.
It was pointed out that transactions have continued to be at low levels as there have not
been major changes in the stance of trust banks, which are the main cash lenders.
Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Investor Type

tril. yen tril. yen
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Tanshi companies Tanshi companies
Securities companies Regional banks and regional banks II
Foreign banks
Trust banks
Regional banks and regional banks II
7
5. Investment in T-Bills Remained Unchanged, while Investment in CP Increased
from the Previous Year
The amount outstanding of investment in T-Bills remained generally unchanged from the
previous year, while the amount outstanding of investment in CP increased from the
previous year.
Regarding the investment in T-Bills, although demand for the purpose of obtaining
collateral for the Special Operations in Response to COVID-19 decreased, demand for T-
Bills by city banks continued to be seen for other collateral purposes and for cash lending
purposes.
Regarding the investment in CP, it was pointed out that the demand from city banks and
trust banks in particular had increased, due to an increase in the amount of issuance of CP
reflecting an expansion in firms' cash borrowing need.
Amount Outstanding of Investment in T-Bills Amount Outstanding of Investment in CP

tril. yen tril. yen
60 25
4
20
45 4
4
7 8
15
5
30
10 8
35 36 6
15
5
6
4
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Securities companies Securities companies
8
6. Perceptions of Market Participants on the Functioning of the Money Market
With respect to the functioning of the money market, nearly 90 percent of all respondents
answered that it remained "mostly unchanged" from the previous year. However, the share
of respondents who answered that it had "improved" (4 percent) decreased somewhat,
whereas the share of respondents who answered that it had "declined" (9 percent)
increased somewhat, compared to the previous survey.
By type of transaction, regarding the JGB repo transactions, the share of respondents who
answered that the functioning had "declined" increased from the previous year, due to a
decline in liquidity of the JGB market after the middle of June 2022. As for the
uncollateralized call transactions, although the share of respondents who answered that
the functioning had "declined" increased somewhat from the previous year, nearly 90
percent of all respondents answered that they remained "mostly unchanged." As for the
collateralized call transactions, almost all respondents answered that the functioning
remained "mostly unchanged."
Perceptions of Market Participants on the Functioning of the Money Market 6
%
100 0 3
4 4 6 7
10 12
80 Improved
60
Mostly unchanged
87 86 78
100 97 90
87 84
40
Declined
20
15
9 10
3 4 4
0 0 0
21 22 21 22 21 22 21 22
The Money Market Uncollateralized Call Collateralized Call JGB Repo Transactions
Transactions Transactions
6
For "The Money Market," responses were obtained only from those that were engaged in some kind
of contracts for call transactions or JGB repo transactions. For "Uncollateralized Call Transactions,"
"Collateralized Call Transactions," and "JGB Repo Transactions," responses were obtained only
from those that were engaged in uncollateralized call transactions, collateralized call transactions,
and contracts for JGB repo transactions, respectively.
9
[BOX 1] Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks for Derivative Transactions after
the Cessation of JPY LIBOR
This box provides the results of a survey on the usage of Japanese yen (JPY) interest rate
benchmarks for derivative transactions after the cessation of JPY LIBOR at the end of
2021 as well as the issues for the future.7
(1) Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks in New Transactions
Among the 383 respondents of this survey, 114 respondents who engaged in new
derivative transactions referencing JPY interest rate benchmarks after the beginning of
2022 were asked whether they had used JPY alternative interest rate benchmarks to
replace JPY LIBOR. Approximately 90 percent of the respondents answered that they
used the Tokyo Overnight Average Rate Compounding (Fixing in Arrears) (hereinafter
referred to as "TONA"), approximately 50 percent indicated that they used the Tokyo
Interbank Offered Rate (TIBOR), and less than 10 percent answered that they used other
interest rate benchmarks including the Tokyo Term Risk Free Rate (TORF) (multiple
answers were allowed; Chart 1, left panel).
TONA is used in many transactions by numerous respondents irrespective of the investor

type and approximately two-thirds of the respondents indicated that they used TONA in
more than 80 percent of their transactions in terms of volume (Chart 1, right panel). Some
of the respondents pointed out that the transition from JPY LIBOR to TONA had
progressed in 2021 under the TONA First initiative,8 and that the usage of JPY Overnight
Index Swap (OIS) transactions, which exchange fixed interest rates with TONA, had been
increasing significantly,9 partly in view of recent fluctuations in interest rates in Japan.
TIBOR is used by around half of the respondents that use TONA, while there are some
respondents who only use TIBOR. Some of these respondents mentioned that they used
TIBOR in transactions of loans combined with derivatives (swaps).
7
For details on the cessation of JPY LIBOR and matters related to the transition, see "Review of JPY
LIBOR Transition and Future Initiatives" (May 2022) by the Bank of Japan and the Financial
Services Agency.
8
For details on the TONA First initiative, see "Preparations for the discontinuation of LIBOR in the
JPY interest rate swaps market" (March 2021) and "Transition of Quoting Conventions in the JPY
interest rate swaps market ("TONA First")" (July 2021) by the Cross-Industry Committee on
Japanese Yen Interest Rate Benchmarks.
9
See Chart 22 on page 31.
10
(Chart 1) Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks in New Transactions
[Usage of JPY Interest Rate [Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

Benchmarks by Investor Type] in Terms of Volume of Transactions]
%
100
Overall
90
City banks
80
70 Regional banks and regional banks II
60 Japanese and foreign securities TONA TIBOR
50 companies
40 ＋ Others
30
20
10
0 0% 1-39% 40-59% 60-79% 80-99% 100%
TONA TIBOR その他
Others
Note: Responses were obtained from 114 respondents who have engaged in new derivative transactions after the
beginning of 2022. The left panel is based on the number of respondents, and the right panel is based on
the notional amounts outstanding.
(2) Outlook for the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks and Issues in Increasing and
Starting Transactions
When all the respondents of this survey were asked about an outlook for the usage of JPY
interest rate benchmarks in derivative transactions, many indicated that they would use
TONA and TIBOR. The usage of TONA is expected to grow, as many responded that
they planned to either increase the number of transactions referencing TONA compared
to their current level or begin conducting transactions referencing TONA in the future. As
for TIBOR, a certain amount of usage is expected to continue (Chart 2).
(Chart 2) Outlook for the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks
160 Number of Respondents
140 More or less the same as now

Will increase
120
Have prospects for future transactions
100
Will reduce/discontinue (inverse scale)
80
60
40
20
0
-20
TONA TIBOR Others
Note: Responses were obtained from all the respondents of the survey (383 respondents).
11
As for the issues in increasing and starting derivative transactions referencing JPY interest
rate benchmarks, approximately 60 percent of the respondents answered that there were
no particular issues. On the other hand, some respondents pointed to issues that individual
parties are expected to work on, such as upgrading their IT systems in view of an increase
in the number of TONA-referencing transactions and improving operational rules and
procedures (Chart 3).
(Chart 3) Issues regarding the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

in Derivative Transactions
Nothing in particular
Improving operational rules and procedures
Upgrading IT systems
Reviewing the framework of managing risks and

the ALM framework
Preparing financial statements and legal work
Discussing with customers and revising contracts
Issues regarding market structures and market practices
Increasing the trading volume and the number of

market participants
Others
%
0 20 40 60 80
Note: Responses were obtained from all the respondents of the survey (383 respondents). Multiple answers were
allowed.
12
[BOX 2] Stance on the Management of Current Accounts at the Bank
This box summarizes the results of the stance on the management of current accounts at
the Bank, taking into account the impact of a decrease in the amount outstanding of the
Special Operations in Response to COVID-19. Continuing from the previous 2021 survey,
entities that have current accounts at the Bank were surveyed.
First, on the arbitrage trading that took advantage of the current accounts at the Bank,
(1) approximately 50 percent of the respondents answered that they conducted arbitrage
trading with regard to the unused allowances in basic balances and/or macro add-on
balances, and (2) approximately 40 percent answered that they conducted arbitrage trading
with regard to the policy-rate balances (Charts 1 and 2). These results are similar to that
of the previous survey,10 and it suggests that regional banks continued to borrow cash,
even with a decline in unused allowances in macro add-on balances affected by the
decrease in the amount outstanding of the Special Operations in Response to COVID-19,
while a wide range of investors continued to lend cash.
Second, among the respondents who answered that they conducted arbitrage trading,
(1) around half of the respondents with unused allowances in basic balances and/or macro
add-on balances and (2) around one-third of the respondents with policy-rate balances
responded that they "engaged in arbitrage trading to the extent that administrative costs
were balanced out." Furthermore, when asked about the size of the spread that balances
out administrative costs (the spread between the rate on arbitrage trading and the interest
rate applied according to their current account balances), the share of respondents who
answered "around 0.0 bps to 2.5 bps" increased somewhat for both (1) basic balances
and/or macro add-on balances and (2) policy-rate balances, compared to the previous
survey (Chart 3). This suggests a slightly increasing trend of financial institutions to either
use their unused allowances in the macro add-on balances or reduce the policy-rate
balances even if profit margins are small.
10
For details on the previous survey, see BOX 2 of "Trends in the Money Market in Japan – Results
of the Tokyo Money Market Survey (August 2021) –"
(https://www.boj.or.jp/en/paym/market/market2112.htm/) .
13
(Chart 1) Stance on Unused Allowances in Basic Balances
and/or Macro Add-on Balances
Overall By Investor Type
Reserve maintenance period (RMP) RMP
Apr - Jun 22
City banks
.
Outlook
Regional banks Apr - Jun 22
Apr - Jun and regional
.
22 banks II Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
T rust banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Foreign banks
.
Outlook
Keitou/Shinkin Apr - Jun 22
Outlook
.
banks Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Others
.
Outlook
0 50 100 0 50 100
% %
In principle, utilize all unused allowances through arbitrage trading
Utilize a part of unused allowances through arbitrage trading to the extent that administrative costs are balanced out (it is profitable)
Do not engage in any arbitrage trading due to administrative or system constraints
Others (e.g., do not have unused allowances to begin with)
(Chart 2) Stance on Policy-Rate Balances

RMP RMP
Apr - Jun 22
City banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun
and regional
.
22 Outlook
banks II
Apr - Jun 22
T rust banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Foreign banks
.
Outlook
Outlook Keitou/Shinkin Apr - Jun 22

.
banks Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Others
.
Outlook
0 50 100 0 50 100
% %
Do not hold any policy-rate balances due to arbitrage trading
Adjust policy-rate balances to the extent that administrative costs are balanced out
Hold policy-rate balances to the extent that positive interest rates on basic balances offset negative interest rates on policy-rate balances
Do not engage in arbitrage trading due to administrative or system constraints (do not reduce policy-rate balances)
Others (e.g., do not have policy-rate balances to begin with)
With respect to the outlook for the stance (in the reserve maintenance periods from
October 2022 to March 2023) on arbitrage trading, financial institutions were not
expecting major changes to their stance. In particular, the shares of respondents who
selected (1) "Others (e.g., do not have unused allowances to begin with)" for the unused
allowances in basic balances and/or macro add-on balances and (2) "conduct arbitrage
trading" for the policy-rate balances increased somewhat. This indicates that some
14
regional banks have been shifting from the cash borrowing side to the cash lending side11
in situations where they expected to see a decline in the unused allowances and to hold
some policy-rate balances due to the amount outstanding of the Special Operations in
Response to COVID-19 maturing. Reflecting this trend, the share of respondents who
have answered to decrease their cash borrowing and increase their cash lending, increased
in the uncollateralized call market going forward (Chart 4).
(Chart 3) Spread that Matches Administrative Costs12

%
60
Policy-rate balances
50 Unused allowances in basic balances

and/or macro add-on balances
40 Dashed lines represent the results of the 2021

survey
30
20
10
0
around 0.0 bps around 2.5 bps around 5.0 bps around 7.5 bps over 10.0 bps
to 2.5 bps to 5.0 bps to 7.5 bps to 10.0 bps
(Chart 4) Transactions in the Uncollateralized Call Market

Decreased / Will decrease
Mostly unchanged / Will remain mostly unchanged
Increased / Will increase
%
100
80
60
40
20
0
Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook
RMP RMP
Uncollateralized call Uncollateralized call
cash borrowing side cash lending side
Note: Respondents who chose "do not engage/do not plan to engage" are excluded.
11
The impact of the decision made at the Monetary Policy Meeting in September 2022 to phase out
the Special Operations in Response to COVID-19 was not incorporated in this survey.
12
In order to examine the changes from the previous survey, Chart 3 indicates responses from those
who participated in both the 2021 survey and the 2022 survey.
15
Charts
Chart 1 Amount Outstanding in the Money Market 17

Chart 2 Amount Outstanding in the Money Market by Investor Type 18
Chart 3 Amount Outstanding of Fund Lending by Institutions Eligible and Those 19
Not Eligible for Remuneration
Chart 4 Amount Outstanding in the Call Market and the Ratio of Collateralized 19
Transactions
Chart 5 Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Investor Type 20
Chart 6 Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market and the Ratio of 20
Non-Group Direct Dealing (DD) Transactions
Chart 7 Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Term 21
Chart 8 Number of Credit Lines Established 21
Chart 9 Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Investor Type 22
Chart 10 Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Term 22
Chart 11 Frequency of Call Transactions 23
Chart 12 Amount Outstanding in the Repo Market 24
Chart 13 Amount Outstanding in the Repo Market by Settlement Type 25
Chart 14 Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Investor Type 26
Chart 15 Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Term 26
Chart 16 Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Starting Date 27
Chart 17 Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Investor Type 28
Chart 18 Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Term 28
Chart 19 Frequency of Repo Transactions 29
Chart 20 Amount Outstanding of Investment in T-Bills and CP 29
Chart 21 Amount Outstanding of Japanese Yen Fund Transactions with Overseas 30
Counterparties by Investor Type
Chart 22 Yen Overnight Index Swap Market 31
Chart 23 Amount Outstanding in the Equity Repo Market 32
Chart 24 JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks for Derivative Transactions after the Cessation 33
of JPY LIBOR
Chart 25 Stance on the Management of Current Accounts at the Bank 35
Chart 26 Perceptions of Market Participants on Money Market Transactions 38
Chart 27 Degree of Concentration in Each Market 40
16
Chart 1: Amount Outstanding in the Money Market
tril. yen tril. yen

500 500
450 450
400 400
121
350 350
132
300 300 48
52
250 250
48 48
200 52 200
22
150 202 150
165
100 145 100 126
50 50
36 38 36 38
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Transactions with the Bank T-Bills
Notes: 1. Among call transactions, the figures for uncollateralized call transactions are calculated as total transactions through tanshi
companies (money market brokers) and direct dealing (DD) transactions (only those made outside of the group; the same applies
to the remainder of the paper unless otherwise specified).
2. Transactions with the Bank denote Funds-Supplying Operations against Pooled Collateral, Purchase/Sale of Japanese
Government Securities with Repurchase Agreements, Purchases of CP with Repurchase Agreements, Funds-Supplying
Operations to Support Financial Institutions in Disaster Areas, Special Funds-Supplying Operations to Facilitate Financing in
Response to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), Funds-Supplying Operations to Support Financing for Climate Change
Responses, Provisioning Measure to Support Strengthening the Foundations for Economic Growth, and Fund-Provisioning
Measure to Stimulate Bank Lending and Complementary Lending.
3. The discrepancies between the figures on the cash lending side and borrowing side are due to constraints regarding the
counterparties covered by this survey (e.g., non-residents are not included), and the fact that some types of transactions are
recorded only on one side (e.g., transactions with the Bank are recorded only on the cash borrowing side, while treasury discount
bills [T-Bills] are recorded only on the lending side).
17
Chart 2: Amount Outstanding in the Money Market by Investor Type
tril. yen tril. yen

500 500
450 450
400 400
70
350 350
53
300 90 300
71 64
250 250
45
200 200 84
65 66 64
150 150
40 44
100 100 62
57
50 92 94 50
56 68
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Keitou/Shinkin banks Keitou/Shinkin banks
Foreign banks Foreign banks
18
Chart 3: Amount Outstanding of Fund Lending by Institutions Eligible and
Those Not Eligible for Remuneration
Institutions Eligible for Remuneration Institutions Not Eligible for Remuneration
300 tril. yen tril. yen

100
250
41 80
200
41 41 60
12
150
20 11
40
100 22
143 19
107
20
50
19 21
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
T-Bills T-Bills
Note: "Institutions Eligible for Remuneration" refers to respondents eligible for the Complementary Deposit Facility.
"Institutions Not Eligible for Remuneration" refers to respondents not eligible for the facility.
Chart 4: Amount Outstanding in the Call Market and the Ratio of

Collateralized Transactions
tril. yen %
40 80
4
3
30 60
20 34 35 40
10 20
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Collateralized call transactions
Uncollateralized call transactions
Ratio of collateralized call transactions (right-hand scale)
Note: Cash borrowing side.
19
Chart 5: Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Investor Type
tril. yen tril. yen

35 35
5
30 10 30 5
11 2
25 25 6 5
5
20 6 20 4
15 15
17
15
10 15 10 16
5 5
4 5
2
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Securities companies Keitou/Shinkin banks
Chart 6: Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market and the

Ratio of Non-Group Direct Dealing (DD) Transactions
tril. yen %
40 100
35
80
30
20
25 19 60
20
40
15
10
16 20
14
5
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
DD transactions
Transactions through tanshi companies
Ratio of DD transactions (right-hand scale)
Note: Cash borrowing side.
20
Chart 7: Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Term

tril. yen % tril. yen %
45 80 45 80
40 70 40 70
35 35
60 60
30 30
50 50
25 25
40 40
20 20
30 30
15 15
25 24 20 24 25 20
10 10
5 10 5 10
0 0 0 0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Open-ended Open-ended
Over three months Over three months
Over one month and up to three months Over one month and up to three months
Over one week and up to one month Over one week and up to one month
One week or less One week or less
Overnight Overnight
Ratio of overnight (right-hand scale) Ratio of overnight (right-hand scale)
Note: Includes intra-group transactions.
Chart 8: Number of Credit Lines Established
100 July 2008=100
90
80
70
60
0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Note: Number of respondents whose total number of credit lines established

could be confirmed for all years from 2008 to 2022. Adjusted for the
effects of mergers and other factors.
21
Chart 9: Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Investor Type

tril. yen tril. yen
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Securities companies
Foreign banks
Trust banks
Chart 10: Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Term

25 100 25 100
20 80 20 80
15 60 15 60
10 40 10 40
5 20 5 20
0 0 0 0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Over three months Over three months
Over one month and up to three months Over one month and up to three months
Overnight Overnight
22
Chart 11: Frequency of Call Transactions
%
100
No transactions
80
Less than a few times a

67 68 67 68 month
60
94 93 97 97 A few times a month
40
A few times a week
20
Almost every business
day
0
21 22 21 22 21 22 21 22
Uncollateralized call Uncollateralized call Collateralized call Collateralized call
(cash borrowing side) (cash lending side) (cash borrowing side) (cash lending side)
Note: The percentage of respondents is indicated by contract frequency for call transactions.
23
Chart 12: Amount Outstanding in the Repo Market
By Transaction Type
tril. yen tril. yen

250 250
200 200
76
150 150
62
48
100 40
100
126
50 97 50 102
86
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
SC repos GC repos SC repos GC repos
By Contract Type
GC Repos SC Repos
tril. yen tril. yen
140 80
120 70
26
41 60
100
17
50
80 28 40
28 40 14
60 11
63 30
45 50
40 34 41 45
20
34
29
20 10
23 22 23 21
0 0
18 19 20 21 22 18 19 20 21 22 18 19 20 21 22 18 19 20 21 22
Cash borrowing side Cash lending side Bond borrowing side Bond lending side
Cash-collateralized securities lending transactions Cash-collateralized securities lending transactions
Securities repurchase transactions (prior collateral allocation) Securities repurchase transactions

Securities repurchase transactions (subsequent collateral allocation)
24
Chart 13: Amount Outstanding in the Repo Market by Settlement Type

250 80 250 80
70 70
200 200
60 60
84 50 50
150 150
47
40 40
55
35
100 100
30 30
118 20 118 20
50 90 50 91
10 10
0 0 0 0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Not centrally cleared Not centrally cleared
Centrally cleared Centrally cleared
Ratio of centrally cleared (right-hand scale) Ratio of centrally cleared (right-hand scale)
Note: "Centrally cleared" refers to transactions cleared by Japan Securities Clearing Corporation (JSCC).
25
Chart 14: Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Investor Type

tril. yen tril. yen
130 130
120 120
20
110 110
100 100
90 13 90
80 50 80 40
70 70 29
38
60 60
50 50
24 28
40 30 40
23
30 30
20 15 20 20
16 22
10 10
4 9 9 6
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Tanshi/Securities finance companies Tanshi/Securities finance companies
Foreign securities companies Foreign securities companies
Japanese securities companies Japanese securities companies
Chart 15: Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Term

130 100 130 100
120 120
110 110
41 80 80
100 100
90 90
80 32 80 38
60 60
70 32 70 33
60 60
28
50 40 50 27 40
23
40 40
30 30
48 20 20
20 20
32 33
10 10 25
0 0 0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Over one month Over one month
Overnight Overnight
26
Chart 16: Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Starting Date
Overnight Transactions

50 50 50 50
40 40 40 40
30 30 30 30
44
20 20 20 20
31 30
24
10 10 10 10
0 0 0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
T+3 and over T+3 and over
T+2 (S/N) T+2 (S/N)
T+1 (T/N) T+1 (T/N)
T+0 (O/N) T+0 (O/N)
T+0 (O/N) ratio (right-hand scale) T+0 (O/N) ratio (right-hand scale)
Term Transactions
tril. yen tril. yen

80 80
4
70 70
5
5 26
60 60 5
19
50 21 50 15
40 40
30 30
47 47
20 39 20 41
10 10
0 0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
T+3 and over T+2 T+1 T+0 T+3 and over T+2 T+1 T+0
27
Chart 17: Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Investor Type
tril. yen tril. yen

80 80
70 12 70
60 60
18
50 50 27
11
40 14 40
10 19
30 30
3 21
20 20
27 9
10 22 10
12 14
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Tanshi /Securities finance companies Tanshi /Securities finance companies
Trust banks
Chart 18: Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Term

80 50 80 50
45 45
70 70
20 40 40
60 60
35 15 35
50 50
30 30
30
40 14 25 40 25
8 23
20 20
30 30
15 16 15
18 10 7
20 20
10 10
7 7
10 10 17
16 5 5
8 8
0 0 0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Over one month Over one month
One month or less One month or less
Overnight Overnight
Note: From the 2014 survey, "one month or less" has been subdivided into "one week or less" and "over one week and
up to one month."
28
Chart 19: Frequency of Repo Transactions
%
100
No transactions
80
Less than a few times a

75 month
60 78 76 77
89 89 91 92 A few times a month
40
A few times a week
20
Almost every business
day
0
21 22 21 22 21 22 21 22
GC repos GC repos SC repos SC repos
(cash borrowing side) (cash lending side) (bond borrowing side) (bond lending side)
Note: The percentage of respondents is indicated by contract frequency for repo transactions.
Chart 20: Amount Outstanding of Investment in T-Bills and CP
Amount Outstanding of Investment in T-Bills Amount Outstanding of Investment in CP
tril. yen tril. yen

60 25
4
20
45
4
8 4
7
15
5
30
10 8
35 36 6
15
5
6
4
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Trust banks
Trust banks
City banks
City banks
29
Chart 21: Amount Outstanding of Japanese Yen Fund Transactions with Overseas
Counterparties by Investor Type
Japanese Yen Borrowing Side Japanese Yen Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen
60 60
50 50
9 9
7
40 4 4 40
3
6 6
10
30 30
20 23 26 20 3
4
10 10
15
9 7 6
0 0
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Foreign securities companies Japanese securities companies
Japanese securities companies Keitou/Shinkin banks
Foreign banks
Foreign banks Regional banks and regional banks II
City banks Trust banks
City banks
Note: The total of yen lending/borrowing through FX swaps, euroyen transactions, and with overseas branches and overseas
group companies of financial institutions. Excludes transactions with institutional investors and business companies, and
other linked transactions.
30
Chart 22: Yen Overnight Index Swap Market
Volume and Number of Amount Outstanding

Yen OIS Transactions via Brokers in the Yen OIS Market
tril. yen transactions tril. yen
60 8,000 1,600
7,000 1,400
50
6,000 1,200 401
40
5,000 1,000
30 4,000 800 530
3,000 600
20
2,000 400
10 500
1,000 200
0 0 0
Jan-13 Jan-16 Jan-19 Jan-22 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Amounts With clients

Number of transactions (right-hand scale) With banks/securities companies (via brokers)
With banks/securities companies (DD)
Source: Money Brokers Association. Note: Includes transactions by overseas offices of financial
institutions. On the basis of notional amounts.
31
Chart 23: Amount Outstanding in the Equity Repo Market
By Investor Type

tril. yen tril. yen
20 20
15 15
8
6
10 10
2 7
2 5
5 5
6 7
4 4
0 0
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Others Others
Foreign securities companies Tanshi/Securities financing companies
Japanese securities companies Foreign securities companies
Trust banks Japanese securities companies
Note: Excludes the institutional credit trading, general margin trading, and equity lending between a financial instruments
business operator and a securities finance company. The same applies to the next chart.
By Settlement Type

tril. yen tril. yen
20 20
15 15
9
10 8 10 6
5
5 5
6 7 6 7
0 0
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Not centrally cleared Centrally cleared Not centrally cleared Centrally cleared
Note: "Centrally cleared" refers to transactions cleared at JASDEC DVP Clearing Corporation.
32
Chart 24: JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks for Derivative Transactions
after the Cessation of JPY LIBOR
Whether Derivative Transactions referencing JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks
have been Conducted after the Beginning of 2022
30%
70%
Conducted Transactions Not Conducted

Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks in New Transactions

[Usage in Terms of Volume of Transactions]
TONA TIBOR Others
0% 1-39% 40-59% 60-79% 80-99% 100%
beginning of 2022. Based on the notional amounts outstanding.
[Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks by Investor Type]

%
100
Overall
90
City banks
80
70 Regional banks and regional banks II
60 Japanese and foreign securities
50 companies
40 ＋ Others
30
20
10
0
TONA TIBOR その他
Others
beginning of 2022. Multiple answers were allowed. Based on the number of respondents.
33
Outlook for the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks
Number of Respondents
160
140 More or less the same as now
Will increase
120
Have prospects for future transactions
100
Will reduce/discontinue (inverse scale)
80
60
40
20
0
-20
TONA TIBOR Others
Issues regarding the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

in Derivative Transactions
Nothing in particular
Improving operational rules and procedures
Upgrading IT systems
Reviewing the framework of managing risks and

the ALM framework
Preparing financial statements and legal work
Discussing with customers and revising contracts
Issues regarding market structures and market practices
Increasing the trading volume and the number of

market participants
Others
%
0 20 40 60 80
Note: Responses were obtained from all the respondents of the survey (383 respondents). Multiple answers were allowed.
34
Chart 25: Stance on the Management of Current Accounts at the Bank
Stance on Unused Allowances in Basic Balances and/or Macro Add-on Balances

Reserve maintenance period (RMP) RMP
Apr - Jun 22
City banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun and regional
.
22 banks II Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
T rust banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Foreign banks
.
Outlook
Keitou/Shinkin Apr - Jun 22
Outlook
.
banks Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Others .
Outlook
0 50 100 0 50 100
% %
In principle, utilize all unused allowances through arbitrage trading
Utilize a part of unused allowances through arbitrage trading to the extent that administrative costs are balanced out (it is profitable)
Do not engage in any arbitrage trading due to administrative or system constraints
Others (e.g., do not have unused allowances to begin with)
Note: Respondents are only those that have current accounts at the Bank. Respondents were asked to provide their stance on
unused allowances in basic balances and/or macro add-on balances in borrowing and lending cash in the money market
during the reserve maintenance periods from April to June 2022 and an outlook for their stance (in the reserve maintenance
periods from October 2022 to March 2023).
Stance on Policy-Rate Balances

RMP RMP
Apr - Jun 22
City banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun
and regional
.
22 Outlook
banks II
Apr - Jun 22
T rust banks
.
Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Foreign banks
.
Outlook
Outlook Keitou/Shinkin Apr - Jun 22

.
banks Outlook
Apr - Jun 22
Others
.
Outlook
0 50 100 0 50 100
% %
Do not hold any policy-rate balances due to arbitrage trading
Adjust policy-rate balances to the extent that administrative costs are balanced out
Hold policy-rate balances to the extent that positive interest rates on basic balances offset negative interest rates on policy-rate balances
Do not engage in arbitrage trading due to administrative or system constraints (do not reduce policy-rate balances)
Others (e.g., do not have policy-rate balances to begin with)
Note: Respondents are only those that have current accounts at the Bank. Respondents were asked to provide their stance on
policy-rate balances in borrowing and lending cash in the money market during the reserve maintenance periods from April
to June 2022 and an outlook for their stance (in the reserve maintenance periods from October 2022 to March 2023).
35
Spread that Matches Administrative Costs
%
60
Policy-rate balances
50 Unused allowances in basic balances

and/or macro add-on balances
40 Dashed lines represent the results of the 2021

survey
30
20
10
0
around 0.0 bps around 2.5 bps around 5.0 bps around 7.5 bps over 10.0 bps
to 2.5 bps to 5.0 bps to 7.5 bps to 10.0 bps
Note: The spread between the rate on arbitrage trading and the interest rate applied according to their current account balances.
In order to examine the changes from the previous survey, this chart indicates responses from those that answered they
"engaged in arbitrage trading to the extent that administrative costs are balanced out" among the respondents who
participated in both the 2021 survey and the 2022 survey.
Money Market Transactions 1, 2
[Uncollateralized Call Transactions] [JGB Repo Transactions]

Decreased / Will decrease Decreased / Will decrease
Mostly unchanged / Will remain mostly unchanged Mostly unchanged / Will remain mostly unchanged
Increased / Will increase Increased / Will increase
% %
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook
RMP RMP RMP RMP
Uncollateralized call Uncollateralized call JGB repo JGB repo

cash borrowing side cash lending side cash borrowing side cash lending side
36
[Others]
Decreased / Will decrease
Mostly unchanged / Will remain mostly unchanged
Increased / Will increase
%
100
80
60
40
20
0
Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook Jun 22 Outlook
RMP RMP RMP
3
Purchases of T-Bills Purchases of CP Sales of Collateral
Notes 1: Respondents are only those that have current accounts at the Bank. Respondents who answered "do not
engage/do not plan to engage" are excluded from each item.
2: Respondents were asked to compare their stance in the June 2022 reserve maintenance period with that in the
March 2022 reserve maintenance period, and to compare their outlook (in the reserve maintenance periods from
October 2022 to March 2023) with their stance in the June 2022 reserve maintenance period.
3: "Collateral" indicates eligible collateral submitted to the Bank.
37
Chart 26: Perceptions of Market Participants on Money Market Transactions
Money Market1
[Functioning]2 [Profitability]3
Improved Mostly unchanged Declined % Improved Mostly unchanged Declined
% 100
100 4
10
18 23
80 80
60 60
87 62
87 61
40 40
20 20
19 15
9
0 3 0
21 22 21 22
Notes 1: Responses were obtained only from those counterparties that were engaged in call money transactions or JGB repo
transactions, or in both of them.
2: The question on "Functioning" was designed to find the perceptions of market participants on the change in the
functioning of the money market from the previous year, mainly taking into account whether respondents were
able to make transactions with intended rates, prices, terms, and counterparties. The same applies to the following
results.
3: The question on "Profitability" was designed to find the perceptions of market participants on the change in
profitability in the money market from the previous year, mainly taking into account investment yield, funding
cost, transaction amounts, and fixed cost. Responses also include those from counterparties who posted losses in
their total money market transactions. It is considered that they answered "improved (declined)" when their losses
shrank (or expanded) from the previous year. The same applies to the results that follow.
JGB Repo Transactions

[Functioning] [Profitability]
% Improved Mostly unchanged Declined Improved Mostly unchanged Declined
100 %
6 100
7
19
80 80
46
60 60
78 59
90
40 40
41
20 20
23
15 13
0 4 0
21 22 21 22
Note: Responses were obtained only from those that were engaged in JGB repo transactions.
38
Uncollateralized Call Transactions
Improved Mostly unchanged Declined % Improved Mostly unchanged Declined
% 100
100 4
12 14
24
80 80
60 60
60
86
84 58
40 40
20 20
26
18
10
0 4 0
21 22 21 22
Note: Responses were obtained only from those that were engaged in uncollateralized call transactions.
Collateralized Call Transactions
% Improved Mostly unchanged Declined % Improved Mostly unchanged Declined

100 0 3 100 3
17
80 80
60 60
100 90
97
80
40 40
20 20
7 3
0 0 0 0
21 22 21 22
Note: Responses were obtained only from those that were engaged in collateralized call transactions.
39
Chart 27: Degree of Concentration in Each Market
Call Market: Cash Borrowing Side Call Market: Cash Lending Side
% %
100 100
Share in cumulative amounts outstanding

80 80
2022 Uncollateralized calls 60

60
2022 Uncollateralized calls
40 40
2022 Collateralized calls

2022 Collateralized calls
20 20
2021 Collateralized calls 2021 Collateralized calls
0 0
0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30
% %
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents
Repo Market: Bond Borrowing Side Repo Market: Bond Lending Side
% %
100 100
80 80
60 60
2022 GC repos 2022 GC repos
2021 GC repos 2021 GC repos
40 40
2022 SC repos 2022 SC repos

20 20
2021 SC repos 2021 SC repos
0 0
0 10 20 0 10 20
% %
Percentage of respondents Percentage of respondents
40

Market 2211

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Market 2211

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

November 2022

Trends in the Money Market in Japan

Financial Markets Department

Trends in the Money Market in Japan

Number of Respondents in the Tokyo Money Market Survey

2021 survey 2022 survey

Total respondents 381 383

Eligible counterparties in the Bank's

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen

Amount Outstanding in the GC Repo Market by Investor Type

Amount Outstanding in the SC Repo Market by Investor Type

The amount outstanding of transactions in the uncollateralized call market remained

Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market by Investor Type

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen

Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Investor Type

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

Amount Outstanding of Investment in T-Bills Amount Outstanding of Investment in CP

Perceptions of Market Participants on the Functioning of the Money Market 6

(1) Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks in New Transactions

TONA is used in many transactions by numerous respondents irrespective of the investor

[Usage of JPY Interest Rate [Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

(Chart 2) Outlook for the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

160 Number of Respondents

140 More or less the same as now

(Chart 3) Issues regarding the Usage of JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks

Improving operational rules and procedures

Reviewing the framework of managing risks and

Preparing financial statements and legal work

Discussing with customers and revising contracts

Issues regarding market structures and market practices

Increasing the trading volume and the number of

(Chart 2) Stance on Policy-Rate Balances

Outlook Keitou/Shinkin Apr - Jun 22

(Chart 3) Spread that Matches Administrative Costs12

50 Unused allowances in basic balances

40 Dashed lines represent the results of the 2021

(Chart 4) Transactions in the Uncollateralized Call Market

Chart 1 Amount Outstanding in the Money Market 17

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen

Institutions Eligible for Remuneration Institutions Not Eligible for Remuneration

300 tril. yen tril. yen

Chart 4: Amount Outstanding in the Call Market and the Ratio of

Note: Cash borrowing side.

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen

Chart 6: Amount Outstanding in the Uncollateralized Call Market and the

Note: Cash borrowing side.

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

Note: Includes intra-group transactions.

Chart 8: Number of Credit Lines Established

100 July 2008=100

Note: Number of respondents whose total number of credit lines established

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

Chart 10: Amount Outstanding in the Collateralized Call Market by Term

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

Less than a few times a

Cash Borrowing Side Cash Lending Side

tril. yen tril. yen