Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sheet : Page 1 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Revision 00 01 02
Signature Signature Signature
Date
Originated by
Approved by
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 2 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Matrices
1. Assessment of Severity – with the existing risk controls in consideration, each Risk Assessment Team (RAT) member is to rate the most likely severity
outcome of the possible injury or ill-health identified: see Table 1 below.
Table 1
Serious injuries or life-threatening occupational disease (includes amputations, major fractures, multiple injuries, occupational
(4) Major
cancer, acute poisoning).
Injury requiring medical treatment or ill-health leading to disability (includes lacerations, burns, sprains, minor fractures,
(3) Moderate
dermatitis, deafness, work-related upper limb disorders).
(2) Minor Injury or ill-health requiring first-aid only (includes minor cuts and bruises, irritation, ill-health with temporary discomfort).
2. Assessment of Likelihood – with the existing risk controls in consideration, each Risk Assessment Team (RAT) member is to rate the likelihood hazard
that may cause the possible injury or ill-health: see Table 2 below.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 3 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Table 2
3. Risk Matrix provides the useful framework to classify risks identified: see Table 3 below.
Likelihood (L)
(1) Rare (2) Remote (3) Occasional (4) Frequent (5) Almost Certain
Severity (S)
(5) Catastrophic (5) Medium (10) Medium (15) High (20) High (25) High
(4) Major (4) Medium (8) Medium (12) Medium (16) High (20) High
(3) Moderate (3) Low (6) Medium (9) Medium (12) Medium (15) High
(2) Minor (2)Low (4) Medium (6) Medium (8) Medium (10) Medium
(1) Negligible (1) Low (2) Low (3) Low (4) Medium (5) Medium
[Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)]
Table 3
4. Action for Risk Level – the following actions are to be implemented based on the current Risk Level, as shown in Table 4 below.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 4 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Table 4
Risk Control
Hierarchy of Control
The control of hazards and reduction of risks can be accomplished by following the WSH Hierarchy of Control (see Figure 1). These control measures are not usually mutually
exclusive. Generally, it may be more effective to use multiple control measures, for example, engineering controls work better with administrative controls like training and
Safe Work Procedures.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 5 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Figure 1
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 6 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 7 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 8 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 9 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 10 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 11 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
6 Maintenance of Equipment
Mechanic injury and Tool box meeting sure be Ensure proper
4 3 12 4 2 8
fatality. conducted between mechanic team coordination Safety Sup
Damaged of and operator before carry out of between Mechanic Crane Operator
4 3 12 4 2 8
equipments. duties. and operator. Boring Operator
Maintenance of Crane and Injury of the mechanic.
6.1 Boring Rig at site. Injuries or fatality Ensure barricaded or cordon off Mechanic
cause by machinery area at all time to avoid any 4 3 12 Use proper hand 4 2 8 (Before/During
moving part unauthorized entry. glove. works)
8 Excavation Works
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 12 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
9 Installation of Casing
Pre-determined the boring depth
Damage to existing Monitoring
with reasonable size auger to
Installation of casing property. vibration limits
reduce the vibration during 4 3 12 4 2 8
using vibro hammer. near the existing
installation of temporary steel Lifting Sup
property closely.
Damaged of casing. Banksman
9.1 Casing Installation.
equipments. Use short length (Before/during
Operating vibro
casing with casing excavation works)
hammer cause Use high frequency vibro hammer
Worker injury or drive adaptor to
vibration to nearby to minimize the vibration on the 4 3 12 4 2 8
fatalities. minimize the
structures. nearby structures
duration of
vibration.
10 Extraction of Casing
Ensure Lifting
Under capacity of crane
Lifting Supervisor & Engineer to Supervisor check
or vibro hammer lead to Damage to existing identify the crane capacity used and 4 3 12 and comply with 4 2 8
collapse or toppling of property. capacity of vibro hammer deployed. Safe Work Lifting Sup
crane. Damaged of Procedure. Banksman
10.1 Casing Extraction. equipments.
PE design check on the lifting Ensure regular (Before/during
Failure of temporary Worker injury or 4 3 12 4 2 8
points of temporary casing. checks and excavation works)
casing lifting points or fatalities.
maintenance the
lifting gears. Check lifting points and correct
4 3 12 lifting points 4 2 8
lifting gear prior to lifting. properly.
11 Chiselling Works
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 13 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
12 Bentonite Plant
Bentonite silos are over Ensure Bentonite plants set-up is
Ensure PE check
the high of nearby far away from the zone of silos 3 2 6 3 1 3
accordingly.
structures. collapse.
Damage of property. To provide full time
Ensure Stability’s of silo plant
Setting-out of Bentonite Silos The collapse of the Fatal or serious Lifting Supervisor
12.1 footing by constructing the silos 3 3 9 3 2 6
Plant. plant toward the injuries. for all lifting
footing using PE’s design. PE
structures would operation.
Lifting Sup
damage the nearby The plant set-up to be supervised Crane Operator
structure. by lifting supervisor and inspected 3 3 9 3 2 6 Rigger/Signalman
by Safety Supervisor. (Before/during lifting
Ensure all access to heights with a Appoint competent works)
suitable secured access ladder and 3 2 6 and experience 3 1 3
Damage of silo. use of safety belt. operator.
Toppling of silo from
12.2 Unloading and Loading Silos.
trailer. Fatal or serious To provide Lifting Supervisor and
injuries. trained rigger/signalman to control
3 2 6 3 1 3
the unloading or loading of silos
from trailer.
Provide dust masks, safety goggles
and adequate ventilation. Empty Safety Sup
3 3 9 3 2 6
Bentonite dust bag directly over the mixer to avoid Task specific Plantman
emission during mixing. emission. safety tool box talk (During mixing
Mixer Plant and Desander in Eye and hand injury works)
Provide MSDS and briefing to to the plantman.
12.3 Operation. cause by contact by 3 2 6 Ensure all the 3 1 3
(Bentonite Mixing) Cement or worker.
Ensure regular checks and plantman with
Bentonite. 3 2 6 3 1 3
Servicing of Plant & maintenance of the plants. proper PPE. Mechanic
Machinery. Provide monthly maintenance (monthly)
3 2 6 3 1 3
check list.
Bentonite transport by pipe lines
and ensure the pipe joints no 3 3 9 3 2 6
leaking. Brief all plantman
Safety Sup
Clean up spillage quickly after on the intended
3 3 9 3 2 6 Plantman
Damage to Workers may fall occurrence by hosing surface. sequence of
12.4 Bentonite Piping Network.
environment. and injury. operations.
(Before/during
Provide MSDS of Bentonite. 3 2 6 3 1 3 works)
Ensure good
Ensure the Bentonite is kept in condition of piping.
container or silo and to be disposed 3 3 9 3 2 6
at the designated area.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 14 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
13 Excavated Soil
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 15 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
17 Installation of Generator
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 16 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
19 Night Work
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 17 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
20 Emergency Provision
Task specific
Safety tool box to be conducted safety tool box talk
2 2 4 2 1 2
before actual operation commence. to be conducted as
Safety Sup
Operation team Worker injury or and when
20.1 Emergency Provision
uncoordinated fatalities. necessary to focus
Workers
Ensure all workers understand the (At all time)
location of the assembly area 2 2 4 the remedial action 2 1 2
during emergency. during the
emergency.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)
Revision : 00
Sheet : Page 18 of 18
HSL GROUND ENGINEERING PTE LTD Dated : 01.12.2013
PROJECT : TUNJUNGAN PLAZA 6
Risk Assessment for the BORED PILE & SECANT PILE
22 Pile Testing
Improper means of
access to kentledge Provide proper access or approved
4 3 12 4 2 8
during concrete blocks lifting man cage.
set-up.
Risk Level: H = High Risk (15 ~ 25) M = Medium Risk (4 ~ 14) L = Low Risk (1 ~ 3)