Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPERVISED BY
SURVEYOR OGUNJOBI & MR ADEEKO ISAAC
JUNE 2023
CERTIFICATION
We certify that this report has been conducted by all the listed members of the group under the
supervision of Surveyor Ogunjobi & MR Adeeko, Faculty of Environmental Studies The
polytechnic, Ibadan.
In conclusion, according to ghilani and Wolf (2006), Route survey are made to plan, design and
construct highways, railroads, pipelines and other projects,They normally begin at one control
point and progress to another in the most direct manner permitted by field conditions.
According to Uren (1994), a longitudinal section provides information only along the canter line
of a proposed project, for works such as pipeline, which are only of narrow extent in the form of
a trench cut along the surveyed center line, a longitudinal section provides sufficient data or
construction to be planned and carried out. As for cross sectioning, this is essential because once
any new road formation or construction is proposed, it is certain to involve cut and fill, then there
is urgent need to define the limits of both before construction starts. A useful convention is that of
the width of cross sections of the road has to be marked with pegs. This done purposely to indicate
the extent if the new route to be constructed.
Route survey can be explained as a survey of the earth surface along a particular route in the
compilation and updating of topographical, geological, soil, and other maps and the correlation of
selected contours and objects with geodetic reference or land point during linear surveys, and also
in the study of the dynamics of natural and socioeconomic phenomena in a narrow strip of terrain.
For small projects involving widening or minor improvement of an existing facility, the survey
may be relatively simple and may include only the obtaining of sufficient information for the
designer to prepare plans and specification defining the work to be done.
In order to plan and perform in carrying out this survey, the surveyor must be familiar with:
1. The geometry of horizontal and vertical curves and how they are used in the routes
alignment procedure in the aspects of methods of acquiring terrain data utilized in the route
design procedure.
2. Establishing on the ground a system of stakes or the other markers, both in plane and
elevation from which measurement of earthworks and structure can be taken conveniently by
thee construction force.
3. Given line and grade as needed either to replace stakes disturbed by construction or to reach
additional points on the structure itself.
4. Making measurement necessary to verify the location of completed parts of the structure (as-
built-survey) and to determine the volume of work actually performed
CHAPTER THREE
3.0. Methodology
This aspect of the project outlines the methodology and procedure adopted in executing the aim of
the aim of the project with a view of achieving the best of result by considering several
predisposing factors such as:
3.1 Reconnaissance
Reconnaissance is an extensive duty of an entire area that might be used for a road or airfield( both
office planning and field reconnaissance). Its purpose is to eliminate those routes or sites which
are impractical or unfeasible and to identify the more promising routes or sites.
3.1.1 Office Reconnaissance
This aspect involves deciding the purpose of the project, the accuracy at which the work is to be
executed, the equipment to be used and the location of existing set of controls needed for
orientation. Consecutive controls were selected for the fact that there were no initial controls on
the ground, so the used controls were newly emplaced, purposely for proper and convenient
execution of the project.
Table 3.1: Source of control pillar data (from the file of coordinates of The polytechnic, Ibadan)
STATION NORTHINGS EASTINGS HEIGHT
A B
The collimation errors that were obtained for both horizontal and vertical circle readings indicated
that the instrument was in good working condition and could be used for the project.
3.3.1.1 Horizontal Collimation
This test was carried out to ensure that the Theodolite line of sight is perpendicular to the horizontal
(Trunnion) axis. This was achieved as follows:
While the instrument was still leveled, next was focusing, by turning the focusing screw to remove
the parallax and turning eye-piece so as to bring the cross-hair to the field of view.
A well-defined distance object was bisected with the cross-hair and observation made to it on both
faces that is face left and face right, horizontal circle readings were taken and recorded as shown
in the table below.
Table 3.2: Horizontal Collimation Error Test
Theoretically, for any instrument to be free of horizontal collimation error, the difference should
be 180°, with permissible error of ±30 seconds. Hence, the result obtained indicates that the
instrument has a collimation error of 19.0 seconds i.e.
180° 00’ 19” − 180° 00’ 00”
= 00° 00’ 9.5”
2
3.3.1.2 Vertical Collimation
This check was carried out to ensure that the horizontal axis of the instrument is truly horizontal,
with the same bisected object, vertical circle readings were taken on both faces and recorded
accordingly as shown below;
Table 3.3: Vertical Collimation Error Test
Instrument Face Vertical Reading Sum
Face Left
87° 33’ 42”
Face Right
272° 24’ 42” 359° 59’ 24”
360° 00’ 00” − 359° 59’ 24”
= 00° 00’ 18”′′
2
From the reading, the index error was 18 second of arc, that is, half the difference between the
sum of two reading and complete circle of 360 degree. In view of this, the result of the two tests
conducted, the error obtained was minimal, to conclude that the collimation of the instruments to
be used for the project was in order. The collimation errors that were obtained for both horizontal
and vertical circle readings indicated that the instrument was in good working condition and could
be used for the project.
3.3.2 Level Instrument Test (Two Peg Test)
The level instrument test is also known as the two-peg test method. To carry out this, two points
A and B were chosen and marked on a fairly level terrain 30metres apart and two leveling staves
were each held at both ends of the line with the level instrument set midway between the points.
Back and foresights readings were taken on the two staves and recorded. The instrument was later
moved and then set up 10metre away from A towards B and the back sight and foresight readings
equally taken and recorded as shown below:
10 20
This was embarked upon to determine the stability of the control, whether they are still in good
order, control check is done to mark sure the controls as not been tampered or shifted from its
actual point.
The instrument was set on control pillar PBN 30347 and a back sight on face left and face right is
observed to control pillar PBN 30346 a foresight observation was taken on face left to control
pillar PBN 30348 and the instrument was transited to face right and an observation to control pillar
PBN 30348 was taken and recorded. The table below shows the observation for the control check.
Table 3.4 Angular Observations on Control Pillars.
303467 PBN303468 R2 344 ̊ 09’ 18” 164 ̊ 10’ 8” 164 ̊ 10’ 09”
247 ̊ 18’ 10.2’’ 180.734 - 41.956 - 100.313 378971.509 163636.019 PBN 30348
Table 3.6 back computation of closing controls.
Dist. Northings Eastings
Station Bearing ∆n ∆e Station to
(m) (m) (m)
380201.036 162422.178 PBN 30285
315’18’0.17’’ 59.142 42.038 - 41.6 380243.074 162380.578 PBN 30286
3.5 Field Operations And Procedures
It entails set of methods, all necessary tasks, principles adopted and performed in the field, in order
to acquire data which are necessary for the production of both cross section and profile plan of the
road. The following procedures were adopted to achieve our aim:
i. Theodolite Traversing
ii. Detailing
iii. Leveling Operation
iv. Plotting
3.6 Theodolite Traversing
The following steps are the procedures taken for theodolite traversing. The steps/adjustment are
grouped into four. These are; Setting, Centering, Levelling and Focusing.
i Tripod legs was equally spaced and head was approximately level
ii Level Head was directly over survey point.
iii The Instrument was mounted on Tripod using tribrach and its clamp.
iv Secured with centering screw while bracing the instrument with the other hand.
v Focus the optical plummet on the plummet on the survey point survey point
vi The leveling foot screws were adjusted to center the survey point in the optical
plummet reticle.
vii The bubble was centered in the circular level by adjusting the tripod legs adjusting
the tripod legs
The horizontal clamp was loosened and the instrument, turned until plate level was parallel to two
of the leveling foot screws.
iv. The bubble was centered using the leveling screws- the bubble was moved towards the screw
and is turned clockwise. The instrument was rotated 90 degrees and level using the using the
3rd leveling screw leveling screw
v. The survey point was observed in the optical plummet and we centered the point by loosening
the plummet and the centering screw and sliding the entire instrument
vi. After re-tightening the centering screw check to make sure the plate level bubble is levelled
in several directions
3.7 Detailing
Detailing was used to fix the road in order to determine the shape, length, width and its direction.
Existing structures such as building, electric poles, culvert were fixed in the process.
Actually, combinations of successive points previously determined in the main and subsidiary
traverse served as base stations for the fixing of all existing building, culverts, roads, electric poles
and other utilities found along the route. Traverse rays and chain survey methods were effectively
combined during this exercise to fix those features.
The instrument and the target were set respectively on the control points. The necessary temporary
adjustment were done, observation were made to the back target and recorded. Forward
observation were made with the aid of ranging pole mounted on the control point to a point marked
‘1’ which are numbered serially on the reccee diagram; which shows the numbering of the features
observed, the values were recorded in the field book. The target man is then moved to the next
point ‘2’, the values for this point were also recorded. These went on until all point needed to be
observed on that stations were done. The instrument is then moved to the next station to repeat the
above procedures.
3.8 Levelling Operation
One of the requirements of this project was to provide height values at the centre of the road.
Levelling is a general term applied to any of the various processes by which elevations of points
or difference in elevations are determined. It is a vital operation in producing necessary data for
mapping, engineering design and construction.
The automatic level was set, at the control point where the height was transferred to chainage, 00
+ 00 after temporary adjustment were done, the leveling staff was placed to the other control point,
observation was made to 3 decimal places, while the staff carrier was later directed to move to the
central point of the road, the values were recorded before it was moved to the centre of the road at
next chainage (25m) observation was also taken and recorded in field book. The back observation
was recorded as back sight reading ‘BS’ while the centre of the road readings were recorded as
intermediary sight ‘I/S of the road level ‘RL’, whereas, change of points ‘CP’ were done when
necessary.
The usefulness of the linen tape cannot be over emphasized in that 25meters was measured away
from the instrument, the leveling staff was placed there, observation were made and recorded as
fore sight ‘FS’.
Henceforth, another 25meters previous was measured forward which the level instrument now
occupied, the fore station is now the back sight at the new setup, observation were made as in the
previous station and recorded accordingly
All these procedures was done throughout the entire length of the route.
3.8.1 Cross Section
The level instrument was set up on a convenient place between a known point and my first
chainage point. The staff on the known point was observed and recorded as our back sight and
then turn to the staffs held vertically on 3.0m and 6.0m (left and right side) perpendicularly to the
chainage point and reading was observed and recorded as intermediate sight. The perpendicularly
sides of other chainage points (25m intervals) visible from the place of the instrument were
observed and recorded as intimidate sight. The instrument station was changed when it could no
longer intercept the staff again and the reading last sighted to the point last seen is taken and
recorded as foresight. Without changing the position of the last staff, the instrument was moved
and set up again and the staff was read for the second time and recorded as back sight. The same
procedure was repeated to all other chainage points. It was later closed on the foresight to a known
3.9 Plotting
3.9.1 Plotting Of Traverse Lines
The traverse lines were plotted with the corrected coordinates obtained in the traverse computation.
3.9.2 Plotting Of Profile
The profile was plotted to show the existing ground level of the centre line and the proposed
formation level. Perpendicular lines were drawn at each horizontal chainage i.e. 25m and the
difference in height between the reduced reduced level and the datum were scaled out on the
perpendicular lines. Then, the points were then joined to form the profile.
3.9.3 Plotting Of The Cross Sections
With the arbitrary datum given, the reduced level of both sides of the route was plotted. The cross
section was perpendicular to the profile.
3.9.4 Plotting Of Details
Every existing detail such as roads, buildings, drainage, electric poles etc. were plotted with
reference to the main traverse along the centre line of the road.
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 DATA PROCESSING, COMPUTATION AND PRESENTATION OF RESULT
The focus of this chapter part is to present the results obtained from the processed data and
undertake a detailed analysis of the results to achieve the objectives stated in ‘CHAPTER ONE’
4.1 Data Processing
This procedure involves various checks for the traverse and leveling, traverse computation and
levelling computation.
The total time spent on computation is much more to the time spent on field work. The following
were the computational approaches used after completion of the field work; Checking of field
observation; Setting up traverse angles and distances of traverse legs; Deduction of bearing;
Checking the bearing misclosure; Distributing the bearing misclosure; Calculation of the
coordinates of traverse stations; Calculation of the closing error; Balancing of consecutives
coordinates; Calculation of independent coordinates.
4.1.1. Field Book Reduction
The horizontal angles were reduced by subtracting the face left (FL) reading of the back station
from that FR reading of fore station and face right (FR) of back station from FR forestation, then
take the mean between the two to give observed horizontal angle (OA). For the vertical angle, face
left reading was subtracted from 90 degree and 270 degrees subtracted from face right, reading.
The two were equally averaged to find the slope angle.
4.1.2. Levelling field book reduction
The Back sight (BS) was subtracted from the Intermediate sight (IS) answer in either rise(+) or
fall(-), then the first (IS) was subtracted from the second(IS) to get the next answer, this process
was repeated continuously till we have a new Change point (CP), where the (IS) is subtracted
from the Foresight (FS)for next answer and then (BS) subtracted from next(IS) same process was
repeated to the end.
4.1.3 Leveling Computation
The Level readings were reduced using Rise and Fall method, i.e. the vertical distance from the
datum to the instrument line of sight.
The formulae used in these methods are as follows;
HI = RL + BS ……………………………… (i)
RL = HI – IS ……………………………… (ii)
RL = HI – FS ……………………………… (iii)
Where;
BS – Back sight
IS – Intermediate Sight
FS – Foresight
For the leveling, the computation commenced from the control station with a given height above
mean sea level. In all total number of loops were computed for misclosure. All loops were checked
for conformity with the accepted limit before they were being distributed proportionally to the
number of foresights or change-points. This was achieved using the formulae ;
24mm√K …………………………….. (xviii)
Where;
K is the total distance level in Kilometer.
The results of these are as shown in the levelling field book.
4.2 Data Computation
This consists of reduction of angle, correction to the measured distances, bearing deduction,
provisional coordinates and linear accuracy computations
4.2.1 Backward Computation
After writing the coordinates for the computation consisting of the Northings, Eastings and the
stations by the left, there will be a dash (------) on the first line after the coordinate by the right
side, then we move to the second line by subtracting the second coordinate from the first e.g ^N=
C2-C1, ^E=D2-D1 to get or our delta Northings and delta Eastings with sign either (+) or (-), also
√((^N)2+(^E)2) to get for distance.
Lastly, Shift tan ^E/^N= bearing, but knowing the quadrant which the bearing of the ^N and ^E
fall to by doing necessary addition and subtraction.
4.2.2 Forward Compuation
This was started by first computing the initial bearing and distance by punching calculator, from
the given coordinates of the initial control points using the formulae;
Bearing (θ) = (ΔE / ΔN)…………………………….. (i)
Distance (L) = √ (ΔE² + ΔN²)…………………………….... (ii)
Where;
ΔE – is the difference in Eastings of initial control
ΔN – is the difference in Northings of initial control
FB= BB + OA………………………………. (iii)
Here, where the angular result is more than 360º, 360º is subtracted from it to give the forward
bearing of such line. The same computation procedure was repeated until the bearing of the last
point was obtained.
4.2.3 Provisional And Final Coordinates
The partial coordinates (∆N and ∆E) of the points were added or subtracted to the coordinates
(Northing and Easting) of the adopted control in a cumulative way in order to get the provisional
coordinates of each point using the formula below:
Provisional Northing=northing of the initial station ±∆N of the new station
Provisional Easting=easting of the initial station ± ∆ Eof the new station
The last provisional coordinates of the closing control was compared with given final coordinates
of the control and the corrections obtained were applied to the provisional coordinates of other
stations to get their final coordinates using the transit method of adjustment. Thus:
Correction per station (Northing) = arithmetic sum of the station x correction in northing
Total arithmetic sum
Correction per station (Easting) = arithmetic sum of the station x correction in easting
Total arithmetic sum
In getting the final corrected coordinate;
Final coordinates = partial coordinates + correction per stations
e.g : partial northing coordinates of peg 1 + correction per stations
= 863971.288 + 0.004 = 863971.292
The Linear accuracy was computed to know limits of the accuracy of the work:
Formula for linear accuracy = 1
√ (∆N) 2+ (∆E) 2
Total distance
Where:
∆ N = Error in northing co-ordinate
∆ E = Error in easting co-ordinate
4.2.3.1 Check On Bearing Misclosure
This was checked to ensure it falls within permissible limit using the formula;
Permissible error = 30" √n …………………… (iv)
Where, n = number of stations
4.2.3.2 Calculation Of Coordinates
The latitude and departure of a survey line is termed as the coordinates measured parallel and at
right angle respectively to the assumed meridian. It is of great importance to enter these entities in
their correct columns.
The latitude of a line is obtained by multiplying its length by the cosine of its bearing. The departure
of a line is obtained by multiplying its length by the sine of its bearing.
If l is the length and Ѳ is the forward bearing of the traverse leg, then;
Latitude ∆N = l x cosine …………………………………… (v)
Departure ∆E = l x sine ……………………………………... (vi)
The latitude and departure of any station with respect to the preceding station are known as the
consecutive coordinates or dependent coordinates.
4.2.3.3 Linear Accuracy
The difference between the computed coordinate and the coordinate of the control station gives a
closing error called linear misclosure. This error is then used to check for the linear accuracy.
This is given by;
Linear accuracy, L ………. (vii)
4.2.3.4 Transit Rule
This was adopted in distributing the linear misclosure in order to obtain the final corrected
coordinate.
Transit Rule is given as;
For Northing;
Correction = Total Error in Northing × Individual Line Arithmetic Sum …. (viii) Total
Arithmetic Sum of Northing
For Easting;
Correction = Total Error in Easting × Individual Line Arithmetic Sum …….(ix)
Total Arithmetic Sum of Easting
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND
RECOMMENDATION
5.1 SUMMARY
The aim of this project is to carry out research on route survey south to sewage in The Polytechnic,
Ibadan
The instruments used were collected from the school stores and tested so as to ensure that they
were in good working condition. The reconnaissance surveying was properly carried out, both the
office and field reconnaissance survey and this allowed for proper planning of the operation. Also
control check was carried out to ensure that the controls used are intact.
The fieldwork involved traversing, leveling i.e. (profile and cross section) and detailing whereby
prominent features close to each station along the project site were fixed, All necessary reductions
and computations which include forward and backward computations and leveling computation
were done according to survey rules and regulations, the supervisor`s instructions and
departmental instructions were equally strictly adhered to. All data computed were within the
expected.
Finally, the location plan, profile plan and cross section plan were produced on stable materials
in both analogue and digital format. A comprehensive technical report was written.
5.2 CONCLUSION
Looking at the analysis of the result obtained at various stages of the project, it was obvious that
the desired result and specifications were met; therefore, the aim was achieved.
This project has give me the opportunity to practice the surveying principles and techniques learnt
in the course of this program and thus enhance my practical knowledge. It has also helped to expose
my weakness and enabled me to build up strength in certain areas of survey techniques.
Finally, it has prepared me for any challenge that I may encounter after this National Diploma
Program.
5.3 PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED
The major problems encountered on the field were mentioned below;
1. Traffic along the route caused delay during the field observation. This was corrected by
changing direction traffic during the work.
2. Present of pot holes along the route.
3. Movement of both vehicles and human resulting in the project execution delay.
4. Weather condition such as high Sun leads to project execution delay instead of two (2)
days on site we spent (3-5) days.
5. Revisiting the site to re-observe where correction needs to be made.
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
i. I will recommend that provision should be made for a GIS laboratory so as to equip
students with efficient skills in Survey related software.
ii. Since surveying is basically about filed work, I will recommended students should have a
lot of practical work during their course of Study, this will prepare them for future
challenges and will also enhance their skills.
iii. I will also recommend that every instruments in the store that needs to be serviced should
be serviced in due time and that which requires calibration should be calibrated at the
appropriate time. Also, more instruments should be made available to enhance the students
pratical.
REFERENCES
Barnister and Raymond (1977): Defined surveying as the art of making measurement of relative
boundaries by permanent beacons.
Basak (2000): Leveling as the art of determining the relative vertical heights of different point on
the earth surface.
Brinker and minick (1987): Stated that tunnels, dams, sewer lines, pipelines and transmission lines
are engineering construction works having linear shapes which are classified as route.
Clark (1972): Defined Surveying as the position of natural and man-made features on the earth
surface and the plotting of the measurements to some suitable scale to form a map, plan or chart”.
Edmund Gunter (1620): He developed a surveying chain, which was superseded only by the steel
tape beginning in the late 19th century.
James Watt in (1771): Stadia hairs is a device for dividing a circle into degrees with great accuracy.
John Wildfrid Wright (2000): The establishment of marks to control construction or to indicate
land boundaries.
Reginnal (1968): Defined route survey as the survey necessary for the location and construction
of lines of transportation or communication such as highways, canals, transmission lines and
pipelines.
Thomas & Noriman (1961): Defined engineering surveying as expression for any survey work
carried out in connection with the construction of civil engineering and building project.
Vincent-Tao and El-Sheimy (2000): Define the best way of acquiring data and information during
the survey for the purpose of rehabilitation of a highway route could be done using mobile mapping
system.
Willebrord Snell in (1615): A Dutch mathematician, how to use an arc of meridian by instrumental
triangulation.
Wilson (1977): He said when there is need for design of road construction route should carried
out.