Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Factory Representative Ms. Pham Thi Nghia (Senior Manager, Sustainability Department)
• Factory management has not yet onboarded a Remediation Firm to carry out the remedial activities. As confirmed
by the factory management, factory’s internal staff has carried out the remediation measures for the issues
identified in the initial assessment report submitted by Inspection Firm and the team was led by Mr. Nguyen Phi
Phong (Maintenance Manager).
• The factory management has received the signed-off CAP to highlight the remediation plan for the issues identified
in the initial assessment reports submitted by Inspection Firm.
• The LABS representative (Phu Do) conducting the 3rd follow up visit informed the Factory management about the
purpose of the follow-up visit, agenda of the day, and addressed questions pertaining to need of engaging
Remediation Firm, remediation timelines and priority rating of findings that the factory representatives raised.
• The LABS representative reviewed all the issues with the factory management that were listed in the initial
assessment reports and the CAP signed-off by the Inspection Firm and explained in detail the remediation
timeframe for these issues as per the LABS Methodology and Standards.
• The Factory management updated the LABS representative on the corrective actions taken by the factory as per
the signed-off CAP.
• The LABS representative conducted a factory walkthrough along with the factory management to observe the
issues which are reported as remediated by the factory management.
• According to Summary of Priority Actions lists given in the Structural, Fire and Electrical reports submitted by IF,
there were total 20 issues identified by the Inspection Firm during the Initial Assessment, out of which the factory
reported 20 issues as remediated and 0 issues as not remediated as highlighted below:
Overall Progress
0%
100%
Remediated
Remained
80
60
40
20
0
Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4
• The factory has gone through the initial steps of remediation. Further remedial actions will be needed by the
factory under the guidance of Remediation Firm to ensure all issues are closed as per the requirements of LABS
Standards.
• The factory management was also informed that once all the issues are remediated, the IF will carry out a CAP
Closure visit at the factory to verify that all the issues reported as remediated by the factory management have
been closed as per the LABS Standards and will subsequently mark the CAP as closed over the FFC Platform.
• The factory management was informed about the timelines of CAP Process, Factory Ranking Policy and the need
for remediating the issues within the defined timelines.
• The factory management was informed that the Follow up visit reports will be shared with the local Brand
representative and will be then shared further with the Factory by the local Brand representative.
• In addition, the factory management were informed that the CAP Closure visit tentative is in April 2023, and the
inspection firm will contact the factory management to schedule the visit.
Glossary:
1. FFC Fair Factories Clearinghouse
2. CAP Corrective Action Plan
3. RF Remediation Firm
4. IF Inspection Firm
Appendix 1: Issues reported as remediated by the Factory Management during the 1st follow up visit.
I Fire
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
II Electrical
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
III Structural
Document Number: LABS/FVR/4.1/Revision Date – 21st October 2022
13
Follow-up Visit Report
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
Appendix 1a: Issues reported as remediated by the Factory Management during the 2nd follow up visit.
I Fire
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
II Electrical
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
III Structural
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
Appendix 1b: Issues reported as remediated by the Factory Management during the 3rd follow up visit.
Document Number: LABS/FVR/4.1/Revision Date – 21st October 2022
20
Follow-up Visit Report
I Fire
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
II Structural
Issue
Description Photo (as remediated)
ref
Appendix 2: Issues reported as remediated by the Factory Management (open issues) from the 2nd follow up visit in
October 2022.
I Fire
Issue
Description Before After
ref
II Electrical
Issue
Description LABS Standards ref Status
ref
Appendix 3: Observations reported to the factory during 3rd follow up visit which will have to be worked upon
in consultation with the Remediation firm/Technical team
Issue
Description Photo
ref
Supervisor 6 4 10
Manager 0 1 1
Trainer 1 1 2
4. Capacity building:
To progressively increase the number of women in senior positions across the teams)
Category Total
Women holding positions in Higher management or as Managers, Supervisors
1
and trainers
Implemented
Insufficient
Sufficient -
Initiated-
Initiated
Categ
Not -
Document Comments
ory
Safety Policy & Safety Committee Plan has been provided and
☐ ☐ ✓
Protocols implemented by OHS team
Safety Risk
Procedure for Health and Safety Risk Assessment has
Management ☐ ☐ ✓
(SRM)
been developed
Role,
Role, Responsibilities & Accountability have been
Responsibilities & ☐ ☐ ✓
defined in the Safety Committee Plan
Policies
Accountability
Corrective and Based on the Procedure for Health and Safety Risk
☐ ☐ ✓
Preventive Actions Assessment
Safety Risk Based on the Procedure for Health and Safety Risk
☐ ☐ ✓
Management Assessment
Safety Promotion ☐ ☐ ✓ Safety Training has been provided for all workers
Satisfactory
Very Good
Excellent
Average
Good
No. OHS Member questionnaire (Workers)
Comments/overall observations: