Presupposition – Meaning,

Types and Examples

Welcome to another fascinating aspect in the field of Pragmatics. I’m sure you
have read our post on Pragmatics. In this post titled, Presupposition – Meaning,
Types and Examples, we shall delve into the concept of presupposition; an
interesting linguistic phenomenon that plays a very crucial role in
communication, especially, in our day-to-day conversations, shaping the way we
communicate and interpret meaning.

Presupposition – Meaning, Types and

Examples
We will begin by looking at the meaning of presupposition of the definition of
presupposition before examining its different types and citing copious examples
for an easy understanding of this linguistic and pragmatic concept.

What is Presupposition in Pragmatics?

Presupposition refers to the implicit assumptions or beliefs underlying a
statement, which the speaker takes for granted or considers as already known. In
other words, presupposition is a pragmatic inference that enables us to derive
meaning from a statement beyond its literal interpretation. It goes beyond the
actual meaning of words, providing additional undertones or layers of meaning
and enabling effective communication. Presuppositions are woven into the fabric
of our language, influencing profoundly the way we understand and convey
information.
Types of Presupposition
Let us go ahead to consider the different types of presuppositions that we have.
Some people feel there are four (4) types of presupposition, some five (5) while
some believe that there are six (6) types of presupposition. While we will not
dispute anyone’s claim, we will provide, here, all the different types of
presupposition. Let us look at each type closely…

Lexical Presupposition
Lexical presupposition arises from the choice of words or expressions used in a
sentence. These words carry embedded presupposed information that the
speaker assumes to be true.

Let’s explore a couple of examples:

• John regrets selling his car. (This presupposes that John owned a
car.)
• The book is still on the shelf. (Presupposes that the book was
previously on the shelf.)
• Sarah stopped smoking. (Presupposes that Sarah used to smoke in
the past.)
• I want another cup of coffee. (Presupposes that the speaker has
already had a cup of coffee.)
Structural Presupposition
Structural presupposition stems from the way sentences are structured, implying
certain background information. That is, it relies on the structure or grammar of a
sentence and assumes the existence of certain elements or relationships based
on the sentence construction. We can say that specific linguistic constructions
generate these presuppositions.

See the following examples:

• She stopped smoking. (Presupposes that she used to smoke.)

 • The key to success is hard work. (Presupposes that there is, in fact, a
key to success.)
• The book that I bought is interesting. (Presupposes that the speaker
bought a book.)
• They blamed each other for the accident. (Presupposes that there
was an accident and both parties were involved.)
Speaker Presupposition
Speaker presupposition occurs when the speaker assumes that the listener shares
a particular belief or knowledge. These presuppositions are based on the
speaker’s perspective and assumptions about the listener.

Observe these examples:

• Did you buy milk? (Presupposes that the listener had the intention or
responsibility to buy milk.)
• You’re still working on that project? (Presupposes that the listener
was previously working on the project.)
Existential Presupposition
Existential presupposition involves assuming the existence or non-existence of
certain entities. The sentence presupposes the existence of something; that is, it
suggests that a particular entity or condition is assumed to be true or present.

See these examples:

• Sarah found the cat. (Presupposes that there is indeed a cat.)

• The car needs repairs. (Presupposes that the car exists.)
• John found the missing keys. (Presupposes that there were keys that
were missing.)
• Lisa sold her house. (Presupposes that Lisa had a house to sell.)
Factive Presupposition
Factive presupposition assumes the truthfulness or reality of a proposition. It
implies that a certain statement or action is known or accepted as a fact.
Considers these examples:

• Sara regrets eating the entire cake. (Presupposes that Sara indeed
ate the entire cake.)
• The professor denies the accusations. (Presupposes that there are
accusations made against the professor.)
Non-Factive Presupposition
Non-factive presupposition assumes that a proposition is not true or not
accepted as a fact. It implies that the speaker acknowledges or entertains an idea
or statement without endorsing its truthfulness.

See these examples:

• Peter thinks unicorns are real. (Presupposes that Peter holds the
belief in the existence of unicorns, but it doesn’t imply that unicorns
are real.)
• The article claims that aliens have visited Earth. (Presupposes that the
article makes the claim, but it doesn’t guarantee the truthfulness of
the claim.)
Counter-Factual Presupposition
Counter-factual presupposition assumes that a hypothetical or contrary-to-fact
situation is true for the sake of argument or discussion. It implies that the
presupposed situation does not align with reality.

Let us see some examples:

• If I were taller, I could reach the top shelf. (Presupposes that the
speaker is not tall enough to reach the top shelf.)
• She would have passed the exam if she had studied. (Presupposes
that she did not study and therefore did not pass the exam.)
Active Presupposition
Active presupposition refers to the presupposition triggered by specific linguistic
constructions. It involves the assumption of certain information based on the
form or structure of the sentence. This is like a structural or lexical presupposition

See these examples:

• John’s new car is faster than his old one. (Presupposes that John has
both a new car and an old car.)
• The baby didn’t cry. (Presupposes that there is a baby involved, even
though it doesn’t specify whose baby it is.)
Anaphoric Presupposition
Anaphoric presupposition occurs when a pronoun or a definite description in a
sentence presupposes the existence of an antecedent or a referent that is already
mentioned or established in the discourse. It relies on the context to make sense.

See the following examples:

• Pierce bought a new car. It is red. (Presupposes that there is a

specific car that Pierce bought, which is referred to as “it.”)
• Mary visited her parents. They were happy to see her. (Presupposes
that Mary has parents and refers to them as “they” and “her.”)
Anaphoric presupposition depends on the preceding linguistic context to
determine the meaning and reference of the pronoun or definite description
used. It assumes that the listener or reader can identify the antecedent or referent
being referred to based on the information provided earlier in the discourse.

Conventional Implicature
There is one more type of presupposition called Conventional Implicature. While
not strictly a presupposition in the same sense as the previous types,
conventional implicature involves additional meaning that is implied by specific
linguistic expressions or conventions. It is not a presupposition that is necessarily
triggered by a particular word or phrase but rather arises from conventional
usage or implicatures associated with certain expressions.

Let us see some examples:

• John ate some of the cookies, but not all of them. (The use of “but
not all of them” conventionally implies that John did not eat all of
the cookies.)
• Sarah is a vegetarian, but she still eats fish. (The phrase “but she still
eats fish” conventionally implies that fish is an exception to the
vegetarian diet.)
Conventional implicatures rely on shared linguistic conventions or pragmatic
inferences to convey additional meaning beyond the literal interpretation of the
words used. They are not presuppositions in the same sense as the previous
types but still contribute to the overall meaning and understanding of a sentence
or utterance. There is a further discussion on conventional implicature worth
looking at.

Presupposition Triggers
Some specific linguistic elements or constructions often trigger underlying
assumptions or presuppositions in a statement. There are four (4) main
presupposition triggers. They include the following:

Lexical Triggers
These are specific words or phrases that inherently carry presuppositions. For
example, words like “again,” “still,” or “already” presuppose a previous occurrence
or state.

Structural Triggers
These triggers involve sentence structures or grammatical constructions that
imply certain presuppositions.
Examples include:

Cleft sentences
• It was John who ate the cake.
Comparative constructions
• Mary is taller than her sister.
Embedded clauses
• I regret that I missed the meeting.
Semantic Triggers
These triggers rely on the semantic properties of certain words or phrases to
convey presuppositions.

For instance, verbs like “regret,” “remember,” or “forget” presuppose the

occurrence of an event.

Pragmatic Triggers
Pragmatic triggers depend on the context or pragmatic interpretation of a
statement to uncover presuppositions. They involve implicatures, entailments or
shared knowledge between the speaker and the listener.

For instance:

• Robert stopped smoking. (Presupposes that Robert used to smoke.)

• Have you stopped beating your brother? (Presupposes that you used
to beat your brother.)
We can also refer to pragmatic triggers as Implicatives. They are sentences or
utterances that imply a certain presupposition without explicitly stating it. They
rely on implicature, which is the understanding that arises from context, shared
knowledge or conversational implicatures.
These triggers can provide valuable insights into the underlying assumptions and
implications of a statement, helping to analyze and understand the speaker’s
intended meaning.

Triggers of Presupposition Further

Explained
In addition to the presupposition triggers we have discussed above, we can
further describe presupposition triggers in the following ways:

Definite Descriptions
Definite descriptions refer to noun phrases that identify a specific entity or
referent. They presuppose the existence of the entity being referred to.

For example:

• The cat is on the table.

In the sentence, the use of “the cat” assumes that there is indeed a cat and that it
is specifically identified as the one on the table.

Other examples include:

• The president of the United States is visiting tomorrow. (Presupposes

the existence of a president of the United States.)
• The Manager of Optimum Bank has resigned. (Presupposes the
existence of a manager of Optimum Bank.)
Change of State Verbs
These are verbs that describe a transition or transformation from one state to
another. They presuppose the existence of both the initial and final states.

For instance:
 • George stopped smoking
In the sentence, the verb “stopped” presupposes that George was previously
smoking or used to smoke.

Other examples include:

• He stopped visiting the city

• They used to play in the rain.
• We used to trek to school.
Factive verbs
Factive verbs are verbs that express an assumption or presupposition of the
truthfulness or reality of the complement clause. They presuppose that the
content of the complement clause is factual.

For example:

• I regret that I missed the meeting.

In the sentence, the verb “regret” assumes that the speaker did miss the meeting.

Other examples include:

• Mary regrets eating that cake. (Presupposes that Mary did eat the
cake.)

Presupposition and Accommodation

Presuppositions can present challenges in communication when the listener does
not share the presupposed knowledge. However, successful communication often
involves a process known as “accommodation.” Accommodation occurs when the
listener either accepts the presupposition as true or adjusts their interpretation to
align with the speaker’s assumptions.
Summary
I am sure that the post, Presupposition – Meaning, Types and Examples, has
opened your eyes to the world of the concept of presupposition which is a
fundamental aspect of pragmatics and a powerful tool embedded within our
language, providing additional layers of meaning beyond the literal
interpretation. By gaining a solid understanding of presupposition and exploring
its various types and triggers, we equip ourselves with the skills to navigate the
subtleties of communication more effectively.

So, when next you engage in a conversation, pay close attention to the
presuppositions embedded in the language and uncover the hidden layers of
meaning they convey. Do not forget to share this post with your circle of friends.
See you around!