Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Since the experiment began with color coding each resistor, it is perceived
that to successfully identify the actual values of a resistor, the computed values from
the color codes are vital. In between the computation of the color codes and the
measured value from the multimeter, there has always been a percentage error as
seen in Figure 1. The gathered data from the components of the circuit must be
accurate to record the following values like the current and voltage of each resistor
as well. Since an assumption is made that each component on the circuit affects the
other, the experiment itself proves that once a circuit component malfunctions, the
rest of the circuit is affected. It may lead to a short circuit or a busted resistor. Hence,
there will be an expected error, on the following computations on the other
components of the circuit.
Starting with the experiment involving a total of two leading to a total of four
resistors situated in a series circuit, measuring the total resistance was aided with
the help of individually measuring each resistor with the multimeter and
consequently, summing up the values measured. To verify, the measured values are
compared to the color code values computed beforehand as seen in Figure 2. Upon
observing the results from both experiments, series circuits can handle low
resistances since the current that travels from one resistor has the same value as
what travels to and from the other resistors.
Figure 3. Computed and measured values of voltage through each resistor with
resulting total voltage and current
Yet the same conclusions cannot be proven when it comes to parallel circuits.
Parallel circuits require a certain resistance value especially when dealing with
batteries such as a 9V battery because any resistor lower than 100 ohms will
malfunction and overload. The total resistance can be calculated by getting the sum
of resistances but in the form of 1/R1-1. Another point is that the voltages and currents
in both circuits are different. While the current is the same throughout the whole
series circuit, the current on parallel decreases as it distances the source. That also
shows the same as the idea of voltage. Since the voltage in a series circuit
experiences a voltage drop, the voltage significantly decreases as it approaches
each resistor. It needs to be added in each measurement in a resistor to get the total
voltage of the whole circuit.
Similar to the previous experiment, the process began with identifying the
actual values of the resistors using color codes; there was a noticeable percentage
error between computed values and those measured with the multimeter (Figure 4).
This underscores the importance of accuracy in data collection, especially when
dealing with interconnected components in a parallel circuit, as deviations in one
resistor's value can affect the overall equivalent resistance.
Figure 4. Data on percentage error
One notable observation was the minimal impact of thermal effects in parallel
circuits compared to series configurations. Unlike in series, where resistors in the path
of current experienced significant heating, resistors in parallel maintained relatively
stable resistance values. This knowledge is invaluable for engineers designing
circuits that require consistent voltage across multiple branches.
As shown by the present table with resistor values and color codes, the overall
resistance (RTOTAL) falls when adding additional resistors to a parallel circuit. Because
each resistor offers several paths of current transfer under a parallel configuration,
this reduction in overall resistance will occur. The measured values highlight the
inverse relationship between resistance and the number of parallel pathways,
confirming the expected behavior of parallel circuits.
To sum up, a series circuit varies from a parallel circuit, initially from its
structure to each circuit flow upon operation. Parallel circuits are more effective than
series circuits for real-life applications since continuity of current is well achieved
without dependence on the other resistors in the circuit. In reviewing Figure 5, there
are various changes with the circuit resistors since a parallel circuit demands greater
resistance to ensure circuit stability despite the voltage source.
Experiment 2 can be divided into two distinct parts: the Series-Parallel circuit
and the Delta-Wye network. Similar to Experiment 1, this experiment also placed
significant emphasis on accurate measurement and the identification of resistor
values, particularly during the transition from color code calculations to multimeter
measurements. A consistent percentage error was observed, with two of the resistors
reaching a high 90% percentage error in the Series-Parallel Circuit alone. This can be
attributed to tolerance discrepancies or unexpected variations in the resistors. To
elaborate, these percentage errors are from the compared true value and observed
value. Additionally, in this instance, there were more resistors involved as compared
to Experiment 1. Some of the resistors were retained from Experiment 1, and higher
ohmic values were employed to prevent thermal degradation as the circuit worked
(See Figure 1).
As shown in Figure 6 the resistance table for the Series-Parallel Circuit shows
that the total resistance values of the experimental and actual are nearly equal. The
resistance values in this experiment were obtained by measuring each resistor with a
multimeter and validating their accuracy against pre-calculated values derived
from their color codes. To calculate the total resistance, the resistors connected in
series and those connected in parallel were identified. The total resistances for both
series and parallel configurations were then combined to determine the overall total
resistance.
In Figure 4, the table shows the percentage error between the experimental
and actual values of a resistor. The percentage error for resistor R5 is the highest, at
90.79%. This means that the experimental value for resistor R5 is significantly different
from the actual value. These discrepancies are due to the chemical and mechanical
differences that may have happened during the manufacturing of the resistor. The
percentage error for resistor R4 is the lowest, at 0.45%. This means that the
experimental value for resistor R4 is very close to the actual value claiming that there
could only be minimal differences despite the manufacturing errors it may have
undergone. It is desirable to have a low percentage error when measuring the
resistance of a resistor. This is because a high percentage error can lead to
inaccurate results in electrical circuits considering that the circuit is highly
dependent on the value of resistances connecting the circuit.
Overall, the table demonstrates that each resistor has a different percentage
error. This is likely caused by several elements, the position of the measurement
about the environment, and the caliber of the resistors applied. Hence, a 0% error is
possible as the resistances are dependent on the chemical and mechanical
structure of the resistor.
Overall, the experimental measurements for some resistors in the table show
commendable accuracy with minimal discrepancies, while most of the resistors,
voltages, and current notably display inconsistency. These inconsistencies could be
due to measurement inaccuracies from the equipment, experiment limitations,
equipment limitations, environmental factors, or other experimental factors.