Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(a)Let's denote the applied force as appliedFapplied, the horizontal frictional force as frictionFfriction,
and the angle of 25 degrees as θ.
First, we'll resolve the applied force into horizontal and vertical components:
horizontal=applied⋅cos()Fhorizontal=Fapplied⋅cos(θ)
vertical=applied⋅sin()Fvertical=Fapplied⋅sin(θ)
Since the load is moving at a constant speed, the net force in the horizontal direction is zero
(Newton's first law). Therefore:
horizontal=frictionFhorizontal=Ffriction
horizontal=applied⋅cos(25∘)Fhorizontal=Fapplied⋅cos(25∘)
470 N=applied⋅cos(25∘)470N=Fapplied⋅cos(25∘)
applied=470 Ncos(25∘)Fapplied=cos(25∘)470N
Using a calculator:
applied≈514.69 NFapplied≈514.69N
So, the average value of the force that will enable the load to move at a constant speed is
approximately 514.69 Newtons.
b)
Force (F) = 514.69 N
Distance (d) = 2500 m
Angle (θ) = 25 degrees
W ≈ 1151771.875 joules
So, the work done on the load by the force is approximately 1,151,771.875 joules.
c)
Now, you need to convert the time from hours to seconds because the work was
done over 1.2 hours:
So, the average power required to move the load is approximately 267.21 watts.
c)
When an athlete pulls a load uphill at a constant speed, it means they are doing work
against gravity to overcome the gravitational potential energy difference between
the initial and final positions of the load. The minimum average power required in
this scenario is greater compared to pulling the load on a horizontal surface at the
same speed because of the additional work done against gravity.
Let's break it down in terms of kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) changes:
In summary, when pulling a load uphill, the athlete must do extra work against
gravity to raise the load's potential energy. This additional work increases the
average power requirement compared to moving the load on a horizontal surface at
the same speed, where the change in potential energy is minimal. The energy used
to overcome gravity contributes to the increased power demand in uphill motion.
Q-2)
Q3)
Q-4)
Q-5)