Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT REPORT
ON
“INFRASTURCTURE FOR ELECTRIC
VECHILE CHARGING STATION”
Submitted to
Savitribai Phule Pune University
In the partial fulfillment for the requirement of
Third Year in
Electrical Engineering
By
1. Gunwant Kalidas Nazirkar
PROF.J. PUROHIT
(Assistant Professor)
Department Of
Electrical Engineering
S.R.E.S’s
Shree Ramchandra college of Engineering, Pune - 412216.
2023-2024
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that thesis entitled “Infrastructure for electric vechile charging station ” submitted to the Savitribai
Phule Pune university (Maharashtra) towards partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree TE
Engineering in Electrical is a bonafide record of the work carried out by us under our supervision and guidance.
( ) (Prof. Dr.A.D.Desai)
External Examinar Principal
First of all we would like to thank our parents for their blessing and the trust they have shown for pursuing our
T.E. degree. We wish to express our pleasure of acknowledging and thanks towards Prof. J. Purohit, Our Project
Supervisor for providing the technical guidelines and constructive suggestions regarding the lines of this work. They
encourages us all the times for doing this quality research work in tuned with the target puts before us. We have been very
fortunate to have guidance during our stay at the department.
We would like to place on record our deep sense of gratitude to Prof. V.M.Venkateswara Rao Head of
Department of Electrical Engineering for his generous guidance, help and useful suggestions to improve our work as well
as while carefully reviewing our project report.
We also wish to extent our sincere thanks to our concerned teaching staff or their insightful comments and
suggestions to improve our performance during our presentations at the department.
In addition, we would also like to thanks Prof. Dr. A. D .Desai, Principal of SRES’S Shree Ramchandra College
of Engineering for providing us necessary resources and support granted throughout our bachelor’s fellowship.
We also thank to our friends those have rendered their help during the course of this work.
Contents
Abstract i
List of Figures ii
List of Tables Iv
List of Appendix v
List of Abbreviations vi
Chapter Chapter Name Page
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Objectives 1
2 Literature Survey 2
2.1 Literature survey 2
2.2 Summary 2
3 An Overview on EV Charging Infrastructure 3
3.1 Characteristics of EV supply Equipment 3
3.2 Battery specification of different EV segments 3
3.2.1 Charging methods 4
3.2.2 Power Ratings 5
4 EV charging standards 7
4.1 Indian standards for AC charging 7
4.2 Indian standards for DC charging 7
5 Classification of EV Charging Infrastructure 8
5.1 Classification 8
5.1.1 Public Charging 8
5.1.2 Semi-Private Charging 9
5.1.3 Private Charging 10
5.2 Hardware Infrastructure 11
5.2.1 Data Management 11
5.2.2 Maintenance and Service 12
5.3 Technical Details 12
5.3.1 Slow AC Charging 12
5.3.2 Moderate AC Charging 12
5.3.3 DC fast Charging 13
6 Connecting EVs to Electricity Grid 14
6.1 Type of Electricity Connection 14
6.1.1 Arranging Electricity Supply for Charging 14
i
LIST OF FIGURES
ii
LIST OF TABLES
iii
LIST OF APPENDIX
Appendix - A
Annexure 1 EV charging incentives under state EV policies 23
iv
ABBREVIATIONS
2W: Two-Wheeler
3W: Three-Wheeler
4W: Four-Wheeler
AC: Alternating Current
BEE: Bureau Of Energy Efficiency
BIS: Bureau Of Indian Standards
CEA: Central Electricity Authority
CMS: Central Management System
CNA: Central Nodal Agency
CPO: Charge Point Operator
C-rate: Charge Rate
DC: Direct Current
DDC: Dialogue And Development Commission Of Delhi
DER: Distributed Energy Resources
DERMS: Distributed Energy Resources Management System
DHI: Department Of Heavy Industry
DISCOMs: Distribution Companies
DT: Distribution Transformer
ECS: Equivalent Car Space
EESL: Energy Efficiency Services Limited
e-MSPs: E-Mobility Service Providers
EV: Electric Vehicle
EVCI: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
EVSE: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment
FC: Fast Charger
HT: High Tension
IEC: International Electrotechnical Commission
kV: Kilovolt
kW: Kilowatt
v
kWh: Kilowatt Hour
kWp: Kilowatt Peak
LCV: Light Commercial Vehicle
LEV: Light Electric Vehicle
MCV: Medium Commercial Vehicle
OCPI: Open Charge Point Interface
OCPP: Open Charge Point Protocol
OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer
Open ADR: Open Automated Demand Response
PCS: Public Charging Station
PPAs: Power Purchase Agreements
PSU: Public Sector Undertaking
RTA: Regional Transport Authority
SC: Slow Charger
SERC: State Electrical Regulatory Commission
SLD: Service Line Cum Development
ToD: Time-Of-Day
ToU: Time-Of-Use
TWh: Terawatt Hours
vi
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Electric vehicles (EVs) can be charged in various ways, depending on location
and requirements. Accordingly, charging infrastructure for EVs is of different
types and designed for different applications. Specifications and standardsfor EV
chargers, also known as electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE), vary from
country to country, based on available EV models in the market and the
characteristics of the electricity grid.
1.2 Objectives
The objectives are
Improvement of charging infrastructure for EVs.
Developing and demonstrating user-friendly charging stations and
innovative charging solutions
1
Chapter 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
If you’ve spent some time in the UK over the past few months, you might
have witnessed first-hand the familiar tea-time break during one of the European
Football Championship games. While many had kettles boiling midway through the
final games of the tournament, how about their electric vehicles (EV), were they also
charging at the same time?[2]
However, given the novel characteristics of this new infrastructure type, there
is a need to customize it to the unique Indian transport ecosystem and build capacity
among stakeholders to support its on-ground expansion. A contextual approach is
needed to ensure the efficient and timely implementation of EV charging
infrastructure, such that it meets local requirements and is optimally integrated within
the electricity supply and transportation networks. [3]
2.2 Summary
Overviews of recent literature on EV charging infrastructure have been
discussed and identified common aspects in each of the reviewed papers. This allows
identifying directions for further research.
2
Chapter 3
An Overview of EV Charging Infrastructure
3
E-cars (1st generation) 21 kWh 72 V
4
Fig. 3.1 Charging Methods
5
Normal power AC charging is adequate for e-2Ws, e-3Ws and e-cars. Normal
power DC charging is unique to India, due to the prevalence of LEVs, and the use of
low-voltage batteries in e-cars. Single-phase AC chargers, with a maximum power
rating of 7kW, are adequate for LEVs and cars with single phase on-board chargers.
Three-phase AC chargers, with a power rating up to 22kW, are required for e-cars
with larger onboard chargers. Input power supply for normal power charging can be
provided from the standard electricity distribution network.
For high-voltage e-cars with battery capacities between 30-80kWh, high-
power DC charging of 50kW is used. The power level of DC chargers in the market
ranges between 25kW and 60kW. However, higher powered DC chargers will be
available soon. While high-power DC charging takes less time for e-cars, it requires
higher electricity supply with additional infrastructure. Normal power charging points
are therefore adequate for most charging requirements, including slow or overnight
charging of e-cars.
6
Chapter 4
EV Charging standards
Standards ensure interoperability and compatibility of any EVSE with all EVs.
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the national standards body of India, is
responsible for formulating EV charging standards for the country. BIS is a member
of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), which is the global body that
is developing reference standards to ensure interoperability and minimize trade
barriers for electric vehicles and their components. While Indian standards for EV
charging are compliant with global standards, local climate considerations and the
difference in vehicle types available in the country necessitate modifications that are
specifically applicable to India.
7
Chapter 5
Classification of EV Charging Infrastructure
5.1Classification
Broadly speaking, the governance of EV charging infrastructure depends on its
ownership and use. Broadly, EV charging infrastructure can be classified as
By Service
public,
semi-public
private.
Locations: Public parking lots, on-street parking, charging plazas, petrol pumps,
highways, metro stations
Operation: CPO-managed
8
Fig. 5.1 Public charging
These are not fixed categories, and some charging facilities may demonstrate
hybrid characteristics. For instance, charging infrastructure owned by EV fleet
owners/operators for captive use is considered private, but it can be opened to the
public as a paid charging service when fleets are in circulation. EV charging
infrastructure at bus depots or metro station parking may be semi-public or public,
depending on whether they are open only for transit users or for all EV users.
9
The complexity of governance arrangements and degree of regulatory
oversight vary considerably between categories. Private charging typically involves
fewer stakeholders and requires less regulatory compliances, as we will see through
the handbook.
Operation: CPO-managed
Usage: Dedicated charging for personal EV or EV fleet owned by one entity Locations:
Independent homes, dedicated parking land availability
10
Operation: Self-operated or CPO-managed (for EV fleet charging)
11
5.2.1 Data management
EVs and EV chargers are continually generating important data on the state of
charge of the battery, the rate of charge of the battery, the kilowatt-hours (kWh) used
in charging, price signals from a utility, demand response signals from a demand
manage system, and other pieces of information that the network operator or user may
find useful.
Charging management software is designed to manage and administer
charging stations and their networks. Network software promotes the quick
deployment and configuration of EV charging stations and facilitates a two-way flow
of data between the charging station and its network control center. This functionality
allows operators to remotely configure, manage, and update software; set and control
driver access to charging; set pricing; manage billing; and run usage reports. Software
applications also allow drivers to locate and reserve available charging stations.
Software tools can be configured to send notifications to operators and drivers.
12
capabilities and deliver about 5–15 km of range per hour, depending on plug and
vehicle type. Although this is the most common form of charging today, we expect
moderate and fast AC charging to quickly become the default mode of charging in
India as the market develops over the next few years.
Some vehicles charge at 20 kW and draw more than 80 amps. Charging rates
between 3 and 7.7 kW deliver between 25 and 65 km of range per hour charging for
cars and between 60 and 150 for two-wheelers, respectively.
The below points apply to moderate AC charging in India today:
Most Indian electric cars and motorcycles can be charged directly using the
IEC 60309 connector.
Most global OEMs use an IEC 62196 Type 2 connector that requires an
adaptor to connect with IEC 60309 charging stations.
Most electric two-wheelers sold in India have a three-pin home charger that is
used along with the IEC 60309-to-15-amp adaptor.
Many electric two-wheelers are designed with a removable battery to enable
the charging to take place in the home or workplace and do not always require
a curbside charging system.
13
charging stations require the installation of dedicated three-phase power supply
equipment that that draws significantly higher amperage than AC charging options.
Fast charging, sometimes called quick charging in India, is significantly more
expensive to install and operate. It is rarely used as the primary mode of private
vehicle charging and almost never used as a dedicated charger for an individual car.
DC fast charging is common for captive high utilization electric fleets that require
rapid charging speeds and can overcome the higher upfront and operational costs.
Stations are often deployed in public areas and are owned and operated by a charging
network operator that provides charging services to EV owners at a set cost. Heavy
duty and medium duty vehicles and buses typically require some form of DC fast
charging to achieve a reasonable recharge time for their larger batteries.
14
Chapter 6
This chapter explores the regulatory and governance provisions that impact
EV charging connections and lays out three methods for arranging electricity supply
to private or public charging facilities.
The type of connection – i.e., single-phase LT, three phase LT, or high-tension (HT)
– is decided based on the required sanctioned load, and directly impacts the cost and
time for getting a connection, the tariffs, and the need for ancillary upstream
infrastructure like Distribution Transformers (DTs). An HT connection attracts higher
installation and monthly demand charges, involves more time for energization, and
requires the set-up of ancillary electrical infrastructure by the applicant. The
sanctioned load ceilings for LT and HT connections vary significantly between states.
The first step in arranging for the electricity supply for EV charging is to
estimate the required power demand in kilowatts (kW). This is equivalent to the sum
of the rated input requirements of all the charging points that are part of the planned
installation at a given location. In case of a battery charging system, this would be
equivalent to the power required to simultaneously charge the total number of
15
batteries housed in the
16
charging system. Once the required power demand is known, an EV owner or CPO
may choose from three options to provide electricity for the EV charging
infrastructure: i Draw electricity from an existing power connection ii Arrange for a
new electricity connection iii Use a captive renewable energy generation system.
I. Check the type of connection available at the host establishment, and whether
the estimated power demand of the charging infrastructure can be supported
by the available sanctioned load. DISCOMs should provide a standard
operating
17
procedure for assessing whether the sanctioned load is adequate to
accommodate the power demand for EV charging.
II. If the sanctioned load of the existing connection is not sufficient, the owner of
the host facility must apply to the DISCOM for an increase in the sanctioned
load. This may entail additional charges and take time to become operational.
III. If the existing connection type is single phase LT or three-phase LT and the
increase in sanctioned load crosses the allowed power demand threshold for
the category (as stipulated in the state supply code), the owner of the host
establishment must apply for a three-phase LT connection or an HT
connection, respectively. This involves changing the meter, and the applicant
will have to pay certain fees such as Service Line cum Development (SLD)
charges, charges for meter change, etc.
This option is typically selected in cases where there is excess capacity in the
sanctioned load of the existing connection, or in cases where competitive tariffs
for EV charging are not an issue. It is best suited for private and semi-public
charging which is offered as an amenity by the host establishment for occupants
and visitors.
I. Check whether the estimated power requirement falls within single-phase LT,
three-phase LT or HT categories, and apply for a new connection following
the procedure defined by the DISCOM. If the state in which the charging
facility is being installed has a separate EV tariff category, the DISCOM
should have separate guidelines for application.
18
Fog. 6.2 System Augmentation for New Connections
II. For an HT connection, the CPO must install its own DT along with 33/11kV
cables. For an LT connection, the CPO should take the available hosting
capacity of the nearby DT into account when planning the charging
installation and required power demand at a given site. This can reduce the
need for expensive grid upgrades.
III. If a new DT needs to be installed to serve the new connection, the DISCOM
may undertake this as part of their planned grid upgrades. Alternatively, the
CPO may need to pay for the installation of a new DT, especially if it is for the
exclusive use of the charging facility. This will depend on the provisions of the
state supply code and may vary between states.
19
Chapter 7
Tariff design
7.1 Tariff design
Time of Use
Tariffs that utilize a time varying rate for both energy and power consumption can
significantly reduce the cost to serve a customer by lowering system upgrade costs
and maximizing use of lower cost electricity. Discoms should provide price signals to
customers to charge when power is least expensive or to manage aggregate load to
keep loads below system thresholds.
Critical Peak Pricing
For the few hours per year when the system is overly constrained, at distribution,
transmission, or generation levels, the use of critical peak pricing can help alleviate
demand for those few hours. Significantly increased cost per kWh can be applied to
strongly encourage users with flexibility to shift their load a few hours from time to
time.
Location-Based Incentives
Making use of distribution network capacity data, specifically areas of excess
capacity, to provide discounts or interconnection priority to customers willing to setup
their charging services there can allow for more optimal use of existing infrastructure
and delay the need for new infrastructure.
Fleet/Aggregated Demand Response
Developing a program that allows third parties to aggregate and manage large
numbers of individual loads to provide a flexible demand reduction capacity to the
discom can provide a low-cost capacity management option.
20
The fixed or demand charge for an electricity connection is levied on the
sanctioned load for the connection or the maximum power demand registered during
the billing period, which must be paid irrespective of the actual power usage.
Considering the low demand for charging during the early phase of EV adoption,
demand charge exemptions for EV charging connections can improve the business
case for setting up charging points.
Minus Metering
Large commercial and institutional establishments like malls, large office
buildings, entertainment parks, etc. are preferred locations for providing EV charging
points. Generally, these establishments have their own HT connections with exclusive
DTs and a high sanctioned load. In such circumstances, there is a convenient way to
provide a separate LT metered connection, for EV charging, from the existing HT
connection.
DISCOMs can consider the provision of “minus metering” whereby an exclusive
electricity connection for EV charging is drawn from the existing HT connection of
the host establishment and the energy consumption for EV charging is measured using
a submeter. The energy consumed for EV charging will then be billed based on the
applicable EV tariff. Such an arrangement is easy to execute and is more cost
effective than drawing a new LT connection for the charging points
22
Chapter 8
CONCLUSION
The first step in planning for an EV future is to build capacity across the key
stakeholders to ensure all parties have the fundamental knowledge required to have
productive planning discussions and understand the trade-offs and constraints each
group faces. In order to capture demand flexibility and optimize network build out
discoms, regulators, OEMS, and charge network operators need to understand the
forces driving adoption and work together to influence how those vehicles interact
with the grid.
23
References
[1] Progression of smart metering infrastructure for electric vehicle charging
stations. (Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart Systems
and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT 2020) IEEE Xplore Part Number:
CFP20P17-ART; ISBN: 978-1-7281-5821-1) Swapnil Y. Gadgune P.G.
Assistant Professor Department of Electrical Engineering Department of
Electrical Engineering P.V.P.I.T. Budhgaon, Sangli
swapnilgadgune@gmail.com Ms. Shruti N. Hewalekar Mr. Student P.V.P.I.T.
Budhgaon, Sangli shrutihewalekar1995@gmail.com
[2] HANDBOOK of ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPLEMENTATION NITI Aayog Amitabh Kant Randheer Singh Ministry of
Power (MoP) Sanjeev Kumar Kassi Department of Science and Technology
(DST) Ashutosh Sharma Sajid Mubashir Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)
Abhishek Sharma
[3] Electric vehicle charging infrastructure lighthouse discom programme a NITI
Aayog, RMI, INDIA + rocky mountain institute collaborative May 2020
24
APPENDIX
Annexure 1
Beyond the national level incentives, state EV policies have shown intent and
ambition to deploy EVSEs. Incentives include capital subsidies on plants and
equipment, discounted electricity, reimbursement of state goods and services tax
(SGST), interest subsidy and earmarking of land, etc.
DELHI
All new home and workplace parking to allocate 20% of all vehicles holding
capacity/parking required to be EV ready
100% subsidy for the purchase of charging equipment up to INR 6,000 per
charging point will be provided for the first 30,000 charging points at
residential and non-residential buildings
For public charging stations, ‘energy operators’ (EOs) will be invited to set up
charging and battery swapping stations across Delhi in multiple phases by
pooling and providing concessional locations at bare minimum lease rentals
Provision for providing capital subsidy for the cost of charger installation
Favorable electricity tariff for EOs and BSOs
MAHARASHTRA
A subsidy of 25% or INR 10 lakhs, whichever is less, on the first 250
charging stations that will be set up near bus depots, petrol pumps, and public
parking spots
UTTAR PRADESH
The state will facilitate land to PSUs at concessional rates in designated areas
Electricity supply at commercially viable rates—policy will be introduced by
Dept. of Power within three months of policy notification
Capital subsidy to service units setting up charging stations and exemption of
electricity duty for such service units.
KARNATAKA
Investment subsidy for first 100 chargers
25
EV charging manufacturing to avail of similar incentives as EV manufacturing.
TELANGANA
Government to set up first 100 fast charging stations in GHMC and other
cities Discoms will amend their policies
Government land will be offered on long term lease at subsidized rates and 2-
year moratorium period on rental
Apartment associations will be provided capital subsidy of up to 25%, capped
at 5 lakhs, for charging points in parking lots
Residential townships will be encouraged to develop charging stations with
capital subsidy of up to 25%, capped at 10 lakhs for each station with 4 fast
chargers
75% of SGST paid on plant and equipment will be reimbursed
PUNJAB
Public charging stations through PPP with PSPCL as the nodal body
25% capital subsidy for first 1000 charging points (50% for equipment
manufactured in Punjab). Limit of INR 50,000 per charging point (INR 1 lakh
for equipment manufactured in Punjab).
State to identify concessional lands
Private charging: one charging point for every three parking slots For non-
residential buildings, one charging point for every five parking slots for
residential plots
100% electricity duty exemption
TAMILNADU
Public charging infra will be setup by TANGEDCO or through PPP model
Charging points will be provided in the government office parking lots,
TANGEDCO will invest
One charging station to be set up at 25 km intervals on both sides of NHAI
and state highways
26