NEWTON'S THIRD LAW, LAWS AND THE CREATION ACCOUNT RECORDED IN GENESIS.

NEWTON’S THIRD LAW,

LAWS,

AND THE CREATION ACCOUNT

RECORDED IN GENESIS.

BY

OMOTAYO O. ONABAMIRO

(B. Sc Mechanical Engineering, University of Ibadan)

ABSTRACT

The creation account in Genesis Chapters 1-3 has been much debated about by Creationists and
Evolutionists. Majority of the former believe the account of creation given in the Bible, while most of the
latter think evolution has more evidence in its favor.

Also, among scientists, some physicists believe in the Big Bang theory. Time is said to have begun with
the Big Bang. This essay seeks to show that there are no contradictions in the Bible, and that science
does not actually contradict the account given in Genesis. The six days of creation are shown not to be
twenty-four-hour days, but time must have begun with the advent of light into the universe.

A quotation from the Bible is also used to show that there was a creation prior to this one in which the
heaven and the earth were destroyed by water. It is also postulated and later deduced that laws are dos
and don’ts, and from this a hypothesis is used to find the geometry of space in a region of light, from
which can be inferred that the geometry of space in a region of total darkness might be different.
NEWTON’S THIRD LAW, SPACE TIME, AND THE CREATION

ACCOUNT AS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE

Two of the hypotheses below are used to deduce laws of Nature later. These are hypotheses 1 and 3.

Hypothesis 1: All laws are simple laws, and they are dos and don’ts

Hypothesis 2: To every effort there is a measure and opposite effort.

Hypothesis 3: Newton’s third law which states that to every Action there is an equal and opposite
Reaction is not complete. It should continue

to go and state, to every Inaction there is no reaction.

Note that Newton’s Third law is not fulfilled in the case of two moving point charges setting up an
electromagnetic force between them, but it is fulfilled in a roundabout manner in the sense that the
Momentum is conserved. 1

SPACE – TIME THEORY AND RELATIVITY

The definition of an open statement in a single variable X is as follows:

An open sentence in a single variable X, is an expression of the form p(x, y) such that whenever x, y are
given specific value a, b, then p (a, b) is true of false. 2

1) p(x) meaning x is the capital of Nigeria is an open sentence in one

variable, p(Abuja) is true

2) X divides Y is an open sentence in x and y, p(4, 8) is true but p(6, 10) is false.
Definition: let S, T be two sets. A proportional function defined on S x T is an open sentence p(x, y)
where X takes value in S and Y in T

Examples: (i) Let S = the set of physicists

T = the set of theories discovered

p(x, y) meaning x discovered y is a prepositional function,

p(Isaac Newton, law of Gravitation) is true.

p(Isaac Newton, Quantum mechanics) is false

From Newton’s first law it can be inferred that:

(Body continues in uniform motion, no force) is true. This is probably true in the general case of
geodesics. Hence, also from Newton’s third law,

(no force, no reaction) is true. We now arrive at an important concept. It is known that all natural laws
are valid, not in a particular justifiable co-ordinate system but remain unaltered in the three–fold infinity
of systems which are in uniform motion with respect to this one, and for which the coordinates are
derivable one from the other by the Lorentz transformation. This equation 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2 is
invariant under the Lorentz transformation, and it is known that laws of nature obey the Lorentz
transformation. This equation when set to zero is also the equation for light, which travels in a sphere.
Assuming light behaved in a manner similar to the present observed behavior, we can take the equation
as valid at the beginning of the universe.

The concept of work as been defined in Physics as the distance traveled by an object, and the force
acting on it in the direction of the distance. This concept of work is independent of any coordinate
system. Since a rectangular Cartesian coordinate frame can be set up only in space possessing a
Euclidean metric, thus this assumption using 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2 is valid only if we use the concept of
work. The formula 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2s however not Euclidean.3 Since 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2is invariant to
the Lorentz transformation, and therefore valid in every reference frame, force also being four-
 dimensional and probably invariant, we can therefore use that fact and set this as a distance in space.
We will see below that one arrives from hyperbolic to Euclidean geometry, by a simple calculation. 3

Work = Force x Distance

Work = F x ( 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2 )½

Where F = Force

This implies

2 2 2 2 2
𝑥 + 𝑦 +𝑧 − 𝑐 𝑡 = 0
Solving for t, we get t = ( 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2 )½

.......................

And so, space is Euclidean in a region of light.

We then see that when the other part of the law stated earlier that there is no Reaction to every
Inaction, is in operation, space expands with time, then the age of the universe might be less than
hitherto thought.

Two things can be noted about this simple equation here. For certain boundary conditions the equations
( 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑧 2)½ is involved in the solution of the wave equation in physics and there might be more to
this than ordinary. Also, from the formula the geometry of space between a region of light might be
different from the geometry of a region of darkness. Other things like the relation between
electromagnetism and their relation to space-time might also be noted. The velocity of light is related to
the electromagnetic quantities e and m. I also want to say, time was much smaller at the beginning of
the beginning of creation, according to this formula, so this might explain why Adam and the
Antediluvians, lived for much longer periods, or much longer time.

Let us now look briefly at the account of creation recorded in the Bible in Genesis Chapter one.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And now the earth was without form and void
and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

And the Spirit moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, let there be light and there was light.

And God saw the light, which was good, and God divided the light from the Darkness

And God called the light Day and the darkness he called Night.

And the evening and the morning were the first day.

Genesis 1:1-5

From the account of the creation in the Bible, time began with the advent of light. Also from the Bible
account, before light and hence time, there was material substance in the form of water and substance
earth.

This, as is explained below, is from a previous creation.

Let us note that there are two beginnings recorded in Genesis chapter 1:1-5. The First is in Proverb 8:22
“The LORD possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old.” The other beginning is
the beginning of time when light came into the universe. In Proverbs 8: 22 the Hebrew word used in the
beginning of Genesis is also used - a derivative of the Hebrew word Bereshit.

Scientists talk about time beginning with the Big Bang, but why should time begin with any Big Bang?
What is time? It is my belief that the concept of time is not well understood. Time could only have begun
in the Universe only as light came to be in existence. Without light there can be no time. We just
assume, since we are familiar with the concept of time, since everything began with the Big bang, as
some say, then time must have begun with the Big Bang. But what is time?

In Genesis 1:16-18 the LORD made the stars to divide the day from the light, the original day which I call
a “Galactic Day.” This galactic day in the reference frame of the earth might be 240 million years or even
a billion years or any length of time because the stars divide into this galactic day, something that might
be inferred from physics.

It is useful to note that the Bible did not say all stars were made the same time as the sun and the moon,
the “Fourth Day.” What the Hebrew text says is just this- “and the stars.” Those who translated the text
in most Bibles put, “and He made the stars also.” I think they should just have left the original, “and the
stars,” - for this is accurate enough.

Also, the substance that made the earth, the sun and the moon, is thought to have come from the
remnant of a supernova explosion, and from that, material to make the earth, the sun and the moon.
This is probably what the Bible was saying in Genesis chapter 1:1-2: In the beginning God made the
heavens and the earth. And now the earth was without form and void. That is, the material to make the
earth had already existed prior to the formation of the earth.

Without a full understanding of time and the lack of very advanced physics on my part, the account in
Genesis leaves reason to believe also that time might have begun with the light of the sun coming into
being in the realm around the earth. The sun and the stars were to “divide between the day and the
night,” - the space-time geometry of space. Then, it is possible to say that the light did not actually
appear on earth until the Fourth Day after the forming of the light of the sun. This is in the use of the
Hebrew words ’Or, used in Genesis chapter one on the First day, from Me’orth, used for luminaries the
Fourth Day. However, time began with the advent of light according to the Bible.

What is the day in the Genesis creation story? The Hebrew word Yom is used for the day. It does not
mean the days were twenty-four-hour days. The Hebrew word Yom is also used for the entire seven-day
creation account. In the first day, a Cardinal number is used, rather than the ordinals that were used for
the other days (examples of Ordinal numbers are first, second third, fourth, etc.)The fact that a Cardinal
number was used for the first day (day One), implies the day could even have been millions of years,
even billions; it could have been any length of time.

Noteworthy also is the fact, in Genesis 1:20 in the King James Version of the Bible, the fowls of the air
came from the ocean and also from the land.

And God said, let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that
may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

Genesis 1:20
There are three special creations recorded in Genesis chapter one.

The Hebrew words Bara' and 'Asah are used in the Old Testament to refer to the English words create
and make respectively. Bara' is used if the LORD only is the one that does the creation. In Genesis
chapter one, it is used for the creation of the heavens and the earth, for the creation of sea animal life
and for the creation of Man. It is not used for plant life, which may have developed on their own, though
God commanded them to come forth. So that it is obvious, Man (mankind) did not develop from Apes or
animals, according to the Bible.

There was a universe and a world. or perhaps a galaxy and a world, earlier than the one presently.

We see this in 2 Peter 3:5-7. That earth that was then was standing in water and was in water. It is
different from the earth of Noah, which is usually mistaken for this previous earth. The universe and the
earth then were destroyed by water. The present one, the universe and the earth will be destroyed by
fire, as the Bible makes it clear. It sorts of reminds me of the many-universes theory in Astrophysics.
Hence, the Bible is also clear about the end of the earth. It will be destroyed by fire. Everything will be
burned up says the Bible, and this is similar to what scientists think. At least they say the Sun will
become a red Giant and all things on earth will be burned up. It might sure take the four billion years or
so for this to happen before Christ actually comes in his appearing or “Parousia,” though the
interpretation of Christ’s Parousia can have different meanings.

As stated above, scientists believe material for the sun moon and earth came from the remnants of a
supernova explosion. The quotation from 2 Peter 3:5-7 says in the King James Version.

knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts

And saying where is the promise of his coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as
they were from the beginning of the creation.

For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth
standing out of the water and in the water.
Whereby the world that then was, being overthrown with water perished. But the heaven and the earth,
which are now, by the same word, are kept in store reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and
perdition of ungodly men. 2 Peter 3:3-7.

The argument for thinking that this earth is different from the present one is the use of “the word” twice
in the passage above, whereas we are only given a single account of the creation by “the word” in the
Genesis account of creation.

The allegory in the life of a Christian in the use of water and fire is clear from the account given in
Mathew 3:11. The story in the Bible might also have tropological and anagogical meanings, apart from
the allegorical meaning.5 But the account of creation in the Bible does not contradict science and in fact
each one reinforces the other. As it has been noted, Man (mankind) is a unique creation of God and is
not to be thought of as descending from Apes. However, the Genesis account of the creation leaves
room for us to ponder whether Man developed further as a created being. This is because in the Hebrew
the word Adam is always with the article, and Man is always spoken of, as The Adam.

Only in Genesis 1:26 and 2:5 where the article seems to be inadmissible, the creation account in Genesis
1:2-20 always uses the article. This might suggest that Adam was a race of people. What is Adam or who
was Adam? As is seen from fossil records, it is evident animals died before the advent of man on the
scene. Fossil records of the Cro-Magnon Man and Neanderthal Man evidently show that they all died.

Actually, the Bible did not say man lived for ever in Gan Eden, the Garden of Eden. What the Bible says is
that if Man took of the tree of life, he would live for ever, and in fact after taking from the “tree of the
knowledge of Good and Evil,” it was as if Man’s banishment from the tree of life was eventually what led
to Man’s death. Genesis 3:22 – 24.

We have to try to understand the concepts in the Bible of what the Bible calls the tree of life, the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil, the garden of Eden, Nahash the Serpent, and Adam and Eve. The word
translated Eden simply means delight, pleasure, if I can so say. Everybody, or every Adam might have his
own Eden, which is a place where (geographic perhaps) he will find pleasure and rest from work. A place
of absolute rest from work. In this regard the works of Annick De Souzenelle might be of value in fully
understanding the creation stories and myths of the Bible.

These are Le Féminine de l'être and Le Symbolism du Corps Humain. 8 I have only seen excerpts of the
work, but I believe she is on the right track. I think in it, she explains that when Man moved from the
plains of shinar, they were m moving east of their destiny. In that story, she says where the Bible says
and they said one to another, go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for
stone, and slime had they for mortar - her interpretation of the words they had brick for stone is this.
The Hebrew word for brick is Lebenah which can be broken down to form these words Son of a woman.
The Hebrew word for stone is Eben, which can be broken down to form Son of a father. That is, they left
Son of a father for Son of a woman.

Bricks, especially stones and Babylon, run throughout the Bible. Bricks especially come into play where
slavery in Egypt is concerned, and Christ is called the Chief corner stone in the Bible.

It was in Babel that confusion in the human race commenced, and this confusion led to them speaking in
different languages. Originally the whole human race was of one language, Saphah and one speech,
Dabar - Genesis 11:1. As noted Babylon represents, apart from the geographic one, a Babylon internal to
one. It is a place where, the original husband, Jesus Christ the Stone, the Chief Corner Stone, is left for
Satan the adversary, the Serpent - Nahash.

So, in the story of Adam and Eve in the Bible in Genesis chapters one to three, a garden was planted east
of Eden, east of the geography of the soul, which manifests externally also. For example, if my Eden is
Nigeria, God might want me to marry from the eastern parts or tribes of Nigeria, the Nigeria which is my
Eden. So, this raises the question again, who was Adam? To me everyone is not an Adam. An Adam is
someone who is an image Tselem OR likeness Demuth of God that is a sort of bride of Christ. Let us
remembers that Jesus told some of the Jews Ye are of you father the devil - John 8:44 (KJV). They could
not be the children of God and in the image of God and still be the children of the devil. Hence, they
were not in the image OR likeness of God, like Adam.

An Adam is a bride of God or of Christ: someone who speaks the same language as God and Christ. I am
not saying God and Christ are the same, what I am saying is that an Adam is one that is a bride of God or
a bride of Christ. It is noteworthy that Christ is also called the last Adam himself usually but what the
Bible actually says is he is the Son of God; the Word made manifest. Every Adam has their origin back to
Christ. The genealogy of Christ is written, one of the two given in the Bible, back in line to Adam and
Adam, back in line also to the Son of God.

Adam is formed from the Hebrew word Dam blood, and this probably means those who have been
redeemed completely by the blood of the lamb, by our Lord Jesus Christ. They believe Jesus has washed
their sins completely, they do not believe in a partial salvation where they always must confess their
sins. They have a bedroom relationship with Christ.

And the first letter in Hebrew, the Hebrew letter Aleph which is also in Adam, means they are a sort of
firtsfruits. Also, the Hebrew letter Mem (M) in Adam which has a numerology of 40 (forty), means they
have passed through significant temptations and trials, to enable them to enter the bedroom by the
door, which is Jesus Christ: to the bedroom, the holy of Holies. The door, in this case to the holy of
Holies is represented by the letter Daleth in Hebrew, which has a door as its symbol, and which has a
numerology of 4 (four).

That is why the Bible in Proverbs 31:10-31 represents every verse of the Virtuous woman with every
letter of the Hebrew alphabet. She is like the one that speaks the same language as Christ. Also, Psalm
119 represents every eight verses with each letter of the Hebrew letter. Eight is an important Hebrew
number which, from Psalm 8 might have to do with the glory of God and Psalm 119 is about obedience
to the law the law of Christ. Let us note that the Bible says the commandments are also “a tree of life.”

The Hebrew number 8, Shemonah is similar to the Hebrew word Shemen for oil. Perhaps these people
the Adams are anointed for a special work, like Christ was. The basic meaning of anointing in the Bible is
to pour oil on something or pour it on someone. And Adam is both a name in the Bible and a generic
name for mankind in general. Among Adam (mankind), are the special ones -the Adams.

Jesus is called the word of God. There was confusion of language in Babylon. When the Holy Ghost
came down on the day of Pentecost in Acts chapter two, they spoke in tongues or in different languages.
Isn’t it significant that the first major sign which occurred after Christ departed was the manifestation of
tongues in different languages? Jesus himself being called the Word of God, isn’t that telling us
something; though some in the body of Christ have misconstrued this to mean when the Holy Ghost
comes down on someone, the manifestation is the so called “evidence” of speaking in tongues. The
Bible does not evidently support this, for they also prophesied in Acts 19:1-7 when the Holy Ghost came
down on someone and the gifts operate by walking in love and desiring the gifts (I Corinthians 14:1), and
they cease after someone is mature in love, (I Corinthians 13:11-13). All these about speaking in tongues
can be seen in I Corinthians chapters twelve to fourteen.

So not to digress further from the main topic, they spoke in tongues in Acts because God was telling us
about Adam, the one who speaks the same language of obedience of Christ with him, and about the one
speech and one language, a faithful bride. This is the main message in Acts chapter two, not that people
should babble and utter absolute nonsense.

In visions and revelations actually, people could sometimes be represented by serpents. So the serpent
in the Genesis story should be taken in its context. Also, the animals God showed Adam, to which he
gave names should be taken in its context. These animals might represent real people. As it were, it was
as if God was looking for a wife from the animals. So the animals were women to whom Adam could not
relate. Let us know, when God made a deep sleep Tardemah fall on Adam, the Bible had not said he had
woken up from his deep sleep. So he saw the woman in his sleep. He probably saw his other nature.
In the Hebrew Bible, the original document was written in consonants only. The Masorettes were the
ones who put vowels so that if we put vowels in the original document in the story of Adam and Ev: you
could get, where the Bible says it is not good that man should be alone; I would make a help meet for
him: you could get, “it is not good for man not to be 'fulfilled' or 'accomplished,' I will now make him to
see his hidden self. For this, I will pass the information to him through the flesh.

This is not to say the account in the Bible was written exactly like this. I have framed up many things and
ideas contained in the verses. For example, the word for flesh Basar (not pronounced as spelled) is also a
similar word for information in the Hebrew. So, Adam saw his “hidden side.”

The physical Eve was only an external representation of his hidden side. Also, the physical serpent and
its animosity to man might only represent what is internal to man.

So again what is Adam, who was Adam? What is the tree of life, the tree of the knowledge of Good and
Evil, and what is death?

In my opinion Adam as Mankind, is the representation of Christ the Word of God: those beings able to
operate speech: those beings able to manipulate speech, similar to their spiritual bridegroom the Christ,
who is the Word of God.

Adam as a person is that one who represents one that speaks one speech and language with Christ and
God. The tree of life is that which Adam has to take to attain a higher life.

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is that which he has not to touch OR do so that he attains
that higher life. That higher life that God offered Adam might have been the life of what the Bible calls
the hidden man of the heart, the second man not his physical man. His hidden man would be able to live
had he taken from the tree of life. This tree of life also reappears in this book of revelation where it is
seen in the paradise of God, to which Christ will give anyone who overcomes (Nikonti in Greek,
Conquering)- Revelation 2:7, Revelations 22:2. The Bible says of the New Jerusalem in Isaiah 65:17-25 in
verse 20.

There shall be no more hence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days for the child
shall die, a hundred years old, but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
It seems even in the New Jerusalem, there would still be physical death. This is why I believe the
mythological passage of Genesis chapter 3 more fully conveys to us more truth than had it been like the
scientific chapters one and two. So, I think what the Bible is talking about is really more of the “internal”
than the “external.” Though I believe the stories in the Bible, especially about the stories of Abraham,
Mistrayim (Egypt) and the stories in Exodus, sometimes I think they originated in another realm entirely,
from the one we know now. I think it is thought that there is no evidence, physical evidence, Israel was
ever in Egypt or that the cities in the days of Jericho ever had walls. That is not to say that the stories in
the Bible are not true. I think they actually represent the actual reality whatever that “actual reality” is.
It might be different from the present reality, but this does not mean the Bible is false.

So, if the whole story in Genesis is really a story of the soul (or heart) or inside of man, how should we
view it? In the Bible, the words used for everlasting, eternal is ‘Olam in the Hebrew and Zoe Aieonos
(eternal life) in the Greek. These words sometimes have meanings which do not mean time indefinitely,
but a long time.

So, Adam who lived in a geographic Eden is a representative of mankind. He developed into the “image”
OR “likeness” of God. He probably knew Eve before seeing her or a representation of her, in a dream.
Eve probably wanted sex from Adam, or was crafty in trying to attract Adam so the allusion to the
serpent.

I mean Eve wanted sex in a good, righteous way, hence the same use of the word ‘Arom for crafty of the
serpent and naked of both Adam and Eve. This is probably true for every Adam. The Eve would be
sexually attracted to her Adam.

The question remains, how many Adams are there? Are these the 144,000 that are always with Christ in
the book of revelation? The questions remain however, and I do not pretend to have all the answers to
these questions.

The Bible says in 1 Corinthians 15: 45 – 49 And so it is written, the first man Adam, was made a living
soul: the last Adam made a quickening spirit. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which
is natural, and afterward that which is spiritual.

The first man is of earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven.

As is the earthy, such are also that are earthy, and as is the heavenly, such are also that are heavenly.
And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

Adam could have been a race of people, with one particular man being the representative of the race.
That is, one could say man developed until one man could eventually be called by a proper name Adam
without the article. This would explain a lot of things, for example where Cain got his wife from and
whether there were other people living on the face of the earth at the time of Cain. However, as the
thought has been given above, this could still be construed as a conjecture.

It is also worth remembering that at the time of Cain, it was as if one could move all over the face of the
earth or even out of it. This is a quotation from the Bible.

And Cain said unto the LORD, my punishment is greater than I can bear Behold, thou hast driven me out
of this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a
vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass the every one that findeth me shall slay me. Genesis 4 :
13 – 14

The same word is sometimes used in the Hebrew for land and the earth, and this might be a conjecture
also. Let us know that the Bible as the word of God is infallible, and we might not fully understand it or
know everything in it.

Laws As Does and Don’ts

That all laws are dos and don’ts can be deduced by pondering on laws as they are observed in nature. A
law that says a person would not kill implies that a person can kill; so that if one obeys this law, he will
not kill. However, the possibility that he might kill remains. Then if he does, one might say he is obeying
another law; which simply states that he should kill.

Another example is this. Consider a person that always takes a plane flight from Lagos airport to
England. Since he never takes a plane flight to any other airport and has always been observed to take a
plane flight from Lagos to London Heathrow airport, one can say clearly that this is a law governing his
flight and we can then say that this is the do part of the law governing his flight.

However, there are many possibilities for the part of the law governing his flight; for it is possible that if
he only travels to London Heathrow airport, then we can say that he never takes a plane to Accra airport
or to the airport in New Delhi. This makes it obvious that after knowing the do part of a law, we have to
be specific about the don’t part of that law; for it is clear that if the traveler always goes to London
Heathrow airport and never goes to any other airport, the possibility of going to other airports remain.

This then makes obvious that one to say that there is do part of a law and don’t part implies a direct
relationship between the do part and the don’t part of this law. All these can be proved by the laws of
abstract Algebra.

Proof of Gauss’s law from The Formula for r 6,7

The derivation of Gauss’s theorem in three dimensions is as follows:

Consider a vector field F and a closed surface S enclosing a volume V. Gauss’s theorem states
that the flux of F through S is equal to the divergence of F within V:
∫S F⋅dA=∫V ∇⋅FdV
Now, let’s derive the inverse square relationship for gravitation from elemental masses using the
divergence theorem. Consider a point mass M located at the origin of a three-dimensional
coordinate system. The gravitational field g due to this mass is given by:
g =−r2GM r^
where G is the gravitational constant, r is the distance from the origin, and r^ is the unit
vector in the radial direction. The divergence of g is:
∇⋅g =−r21 ∂r∂ (r2gr )
where gr is the radial component of g . Using the product rule of differentiation, we can
simplify this expression to:
∇⋅g =−r34πGM
Now, let’s apply Gauss’s theorem to this expression. Consider a spherical surface S of radius r
centered at the origin. The flux of g through S is:
∫S g ⋅dA=−r2GM ∫S dA=−4πGM
where we have used the fact that the surface area of a sphere is 4πr2. The divergence of g
within the volume enclosed by S is:
∫V ∇⋅g dV=−r34πGM 34 πr3=−r24πGM
where we have used the fact that the volume of a sphere is 34 πr3. Equating these two
expressions, we get:
−r2GM ∫S dA=−r24πGM
which simplifies to:
∫S dA=4πr2
This is the surface area of a sphere of radius r. Therefore, we can conclude that the flux of g
through any closed surface enclosing a point mass M is equal to 4πGM. This is known as
Gauss’s law for gravity.
The inverse square relationship for gravitation follows from this law. Consider two point masses 
M1 and M2 separated by a distance r. The gravitational force between them is given by:
F=r2GM1 M2
Using Gauss’s law for gravity, we can write:
∫S g ⋅dA=4πGM1
where g is the gravitational field due to M1 and S is a closed surface enclosing M1 . The
flux of g through S is equal to the gravitational force between M1 and M2 . Therefore, we
have:
F=4πG1 ∫S g ⋅dA
Substituting the expression for g , we get:
F=−r2M1 M2
which is the inverse square relationship for gravitation.

We can see all these follows from the formula derived for time that distance in the region of light is
ggiven by r = ( 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2+ 𝑥 2 − 𝑐2 𝑡 2) ½ = rvi

This shows gravitation and the inverse square relations of gravitation and electrodynamics are
linked to the three dimensions of space,

Gauss Divergence Theorem Derivation:

 Start with the Divergence Theorem:
 ∫∫S F⋅dS=∭E ∇⋅FdV
 Express the Divergence:
 Write the divergence in terms of the components of F and the position vector r=(x,y,z):
 ∇⋅F=∂x∂Fx +∂y∂Fy +∂z∂Fz

 Apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:

 Define a scalar function ϕ such that ∇ϕ=F. Now, use the fundamental theorem of calculus to
relate the volume integral to a surface integral:
 ∭E ∇⋅FdV=∭E ∇⋅(∇ϕ)dV
 Apply the divergence theorem to ∇⋅(∇ϕ) and convert the volume integral to a surface integral
∭E ∇⋅(∇ϕ)dV=∫∫S (∇ϕ)⋅d
 ∫�(∇⋅�) ��∫∫∫V (∇⋅F)dV: This is the triple integral over the volume �V of the
divergence of the vector field �F. The symbol ∇⋅�∇⋅F represents the divergence of
the vector field.
 ∫∫��⋅� ��∫∫S F⋅ndS: This is the surface integral over the closed surface �S of
the vector field �F dotted with the outward unit normal �n. The dot product
�⋅�F⋅n ensures that only the component of the vector field perpendicular to the
 surface contributes to the integral.
In summary, the theorem states that the flux of the vector field �F through a closed surface
�S is equal to the integral of the divergence of �F over the volume �V enclosed by the
surface.
This suggests the reason why the exponent or the law is inverse square law for the charge of an electron
and for gravitational attraction. Other forms of inverse laws might be deduced from a deviation from the
symmetry of the sphere due to other interactions (for example the spheroid but one can say this inverse
square law is probably satisfied in a region of light where the geometry of space is given by the formula
for r above. In the whole of the universe in general it might not be satisfied in an area of darkness. This
might be te reason dark matter or dark energy has not been discovered.

THEOREM: if laws are dos and don’ts then all laws are dos and donts.

Let X represent law X, and Y represent law Y. Also let A represent the do part of law X, and C (A)
represent the don’t part of law X, where C (A) represents the complement of A in X.

Similarly, let B and C (B) be the same for law Y.

LAW X LAW Y

do = A, don’t = ∁(A) do = B, don’t = ∁ (B)

since the laws are said to be dos and don’ts

X x ∁ (B) U Y x ∁(A) = C (A x B), where A x B represents the Cartesian product of A and B.

Also

X x B U A x Y = C (C(A) x C(B) )

A x C (B) ∪ B x C (A) ∪ C (B) x A ∪ C (A) x B Ì is the subset or the equal of (A x B) ∪ (∁ (A) x ∁(B))

Thus if laws are dos and don’ts, they are never dos and dos, or don’ts and don’ts.

REFERENCES

1. Matveev. A.N Mechanics and theory of relatively, Mir publishers Moscow. PP 140-144. 1989.
2. Aderemi. O. Kuku. Abstract Algebra Ibadan University Press, Ibadan, Nigeria 1980. This book contains
much information about Abstract Algebra. Some of the general information contained in the book have
been used to deduce the extension of Newton’s third law.

3. Charles Proteus Steinmetz, Four Lectures on Relativity and space, Dover Publications Inc, New York,
1967. Information about spacetime geometry can be found in most books on the theory of relatively and
gravitation. This book is, however, a good one and explanatory enough for almost any reader.

4. Creation account recorded in Genesis Chapter One verses 11-13 Revised Standard Version of the
Bible.

5. The interpreter’s one-volume commentary on the Bible edited by Charles M. Laymon, Williams Collins
& Co. Ltd, London and Glasgow, pp917, 1972.

6. Philip M. Fitzaptrick, Principle of celestial mechanics, Academic Press, New York and London, pp 1-6,
1970. The general idea on the derivation of Gauss law can be found in the book.

7. Borisenko A.I and Terapov I.E. vector and Tensor analysis with applications, Prentice – Hall Inc,
Englewood Clifts, NJ pp137 – 145 1968.

8. Annick De Souzenelle (1) le féminin de l'être and, (2) Le symbolism du corps humain.

THE BUTLER AND THE BAKER

Genesis 40

King James Version

1 And it came to pass after these things, that the butler of the king of Egypt and his baker had offended
their lord the king of Egypt.
2 And Pharaoh was wroth against two of his officers, against the chief of the butlers, and against the
chief of the bakers.

3 And he put them in ward in the house of the captain of the guard, into the prison, the place where
Joseph was bound.

4 And the captain of the guard charged Joseph with them, and he served them: and they continued a
season in ward.

5 And they dreamed a dream both of them, each man his dream in one night, each man according to the
interpretation of his dream, the butler and the baker of the king of Egypt, which were bound in the
prison.

6 And Joseph came in unto them in the morning, and looked upon them, and, behold, they were sad.

7 And he asked Pharaoh's officers that were with him in the ward of his lord's house, saying, Wherefore
look ye so sadly to day?

8 And they said unto him, We have dreamed a dream, and there is no interpreter of it. And Joseph said
unto them, Do not interpretations belong to God? tell me them, I pray you.

9 And the chief butler told his dream to Joseph, and said to him, In my dream, behold, a vine was before
me;

10 And in the vine were three branches: and it was as though it budded, and her blossoms shot forth;
and the clusters thereof brought forth ripe grapes:

11 And Pharaoh's cup was in my hand: and I took the grapes, and pressed them into Pharaoh's cup, and I
gave the cup into Pharaoh's hand.

12 And Joseph said unto him, This is the interpretation of it: The three branches are three days:
13 Yet within three days shall Pharaoh lift up thine head, and restore thee unto thy place: and thou shalt
deliver Pharaoh's cup into his hand, after the former manner when thou wast his butler.

14 But think on me when it shall be well with thee, and shew kindness, I pray thee, unto me, and make
mention of me unto Pharaoh, and bring me out of this house:

15 For indeed I was stolen away out of the land of the Hebrews: and here also have I done nothing that
they should put me into the dungeon.

16 When the chief baker saw that the interpretation was good, he said unto Joseph, I also was in my
dream, and, behold, I had three white baskets on my head:

17 And in the uppermost basket there was of all manner of bakemeats for Pharaoh; and the birds did
eat them out of the basket upon my head.

18 And Joseph answered and said, This is the interpretation thereof: The three baskets are three days:

19 Yet within three days shall Pharaoh lift up thy head from off thee, and shall hang thee on a tree; and
the birds shall eat thy flesh from off thee.

20 And it came to pass the third day, which was Pharaoh's birthday, that he made a feast unto all his
servants: and he lifted up the head of the chief butler and of the chief baker among his servants.

21 And he restored the chief butler unto his butlership again; and he gave the cup into Pharaoh's hand:

22 But he hanged the chief baker: as Joseph had interpreted to them.

23 Yet did not the chief butler remember Joseph, but forgat him.

In the story above we see five personalities: 1) Pharaoh; 2) Joseph; 3) the captain of the guard; 4) the
chief of the butlers; 5) the chief of the bakers.
The Bible did not mention the crime the chief of the bakers or the chief of the butlers did commit; only
that Pharaoh was wroth with both. Though, because of their work, we might infer a crime that had to do
with the nature of the work. Pharaoh in this story represents God himself. Jesus says the whole Old
Testament, speaks of him, Jesus.

God told Adam and the woman not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil when they
were in the garden of Eden. They were driven from Eden. The Bible says the woman was deceived but
the man was not deceived. Even though the man was not deceived, yet he still partook in the woman's
disobedience. Jesus is the last Adam and we all are feminine in relation to God. Jesus came as the seed
of the woman and took the sin of mankind.

The Bible says in the book of Revelation there was war in heaven. The Bible says they overcame him
Satan by the blood of the lamb and the word of their testimony, and that they did not love their life unto
the death. Satan was able to deceive one third of the angels. They overcame him by the blood of the
lamb. So also, on earth, we overcome Satan by the blood of the lamb. If Satan as Lucifer was able to
deceive one third of the angels in heaven, how much more would he be able to deceive mere humans.

The captain of the guard in his own case, whether he was rich or poor or whatever; he was in charge of
prisoners. Whether he was rich or poor or whatever state he was, his abode was prison. The Bible did
not tell us anything about him in particular, only that as a captain of the guard, he is associated with the
prison. The captain of the guard represents Satan.

Revelation 12:12 says: Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters
of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he
knoweth that he hath but a short time. Whether we are rich or poor, whether we own fancy cars or
beautiful houses; whatever material possession we might own, this earth represents a prison.

Joseph did not commit any crime, yet he was in prison. Earlier the Bible mentions Potiphar's wife who
tries to seduce Joseph and having refused her overtures, he was wrongly imprisoned. Joseph in this
story represents Jesus who though he did not commit any sin, died for man's sin on earth.

The chief Butler saw a vine before before him and pressed the grapes into Pharaoh cup that was in his
hand. The Bible talks of the blood of the grapes and also tells us Jesus is the vine. The Butler did not add
anything of his own, he only appeared in the presence of Pharaoh on account of the blood.

The chief Baker had on his head three baskets and on the uppermost were all sorts of bakemeats for
Pharaoh. He thought he could please Pharaoh with the different sorts of bakemeat; only, they were the
food for the birds. Bread represents Jesus in the Bible. Birds are also symbolic of Satan. Anything of the
flesh is the food of Satan. Man is made of the dust of the earth and the dust is the food of the serpent as
we find in the book of Genesis. Man that is of the flesh is food for Satan.

On the earth we all are in prison. Whether we are rich or poor, whether we are intelligent or foolish;
whether we might own fancy cars or not, the earth is a prison. The Butler and the Baker represent the
two types of people in that prison - those that would be saved, and those that would be destroyed.

The first type of people, those that would be saved, approach God only on account of the blood of Jesus:
not on account of their own works. The second type of people, those that would be destroyed, approach
God with their own works not on account of the works of Jesus.

On earth situations and circumstances might make us sad, but we have Jesus. For example it is not
everytime we do the right thing, or we do what is right. Those who depend on the blood of Jesus, even
though they might be sad when they sin; ultimately they have joy, on account of the blood of Jesus. Just
as the Butler forgot Joseph many times we forget Jesus, but when we remember Jesus eventually, God is
glorified.

DOES SCIENCE CONTRADICT THE BIBLE?

What is it all about really? Einstein came about with his equation E=mc² where energy can be converted
into light and I said a body that moves at the speed of light experiences no force, in which I derived a
simple formula for time. Previously scientists talked about time without talking about what time really
is. Though, we have such concepts as the proper time in physics.

Is it possible a body can move at the speed of light, considering the theory of relativity and the concept
of general gravitation both proposed by Einstein, so that if it's not possible all these would negate all the
ideas I proposed; so that the formula for time I proposed, would be wrong? So that we cannot have a
particle moving in the inertial sense at the speed of light?

Leonard Susskind proposes the idea of a mass propelled under an infinite momentum. Under such a
momentum a body of any mass m just behaves according to classical physics and the plane
perpendicular to the plane it is moving contains the interacting forces. This is just similar to how
electromagnetic forces move in perpendicular planes to one another, the electric forces and the
magnetic forces. We all know light is conceptualized by the idea of photons, which are massless
particles. Under such a situation, would the masses ultimately become massless? Maybe they become
massless photons?
Energy is related to mass. Can we then think of light as a particular mass that is propelled under the
influence of infinite momentum? Obviously, the different qualities of light might then be due to the
different masses that form the light. This can also be inferred from the formula E=mc². With my idea
comes the fact that in a region of light, space is Euclidean. This means in a region where there is no light
the region may be non Euclidean, if that is indeed the case. So also comes my idea that all laws are
simple laws and they are dos and dont's and I remember the way scientists have gone about with the
concept of String theory, the beginning parts - that this idea and String theory might be related in a way.

Is it possible to relate time, space and gravity to the electromagnetic force and get a unifying theory for
unifying all the four known forces? My knowledge informs me, scientists think they have come across a
fifth force which is information. Should it be possible to relate everything together and one might even
fathom a situation or case where forces do not exist? I think not. We would always find laws are dos and
don’ts. I am not talking about a situation or case where forces counterbalance each other so it appears
there are no forces, but a situation where forces do not exist. As I said, however, laws are dos and don'ts
and we would be able to find a way in which the dos and don’ts counterbalance each other - so that
there is no force.

People talk about inertial reference frames and a lot of Physicists say we would not distinguish between
the motion of a person in a train in an inertial reference frame from the motion of an object on the
ground from which the train is moving past at constant velocity. This is wrong in my own opinion. We do
distinguish between the motions if we are on the train because of consciousness; because of our
consciousness that makes us distinguish between the motions because we are on the train.

What is true however, is that for a third observer stationary in a third inertial reference frame. This
person would not be able to distinguish if it were the train that was moving or if it were the object on
the ground that is moving. This is also due to consciousness: our consciousness. If you remember I
derived a formula for time in which it is related to the square root of the addition of the three
dimensions of space divided by the speed of light. Our consciousness, our consciousness of time, is
invariably linked to the three dimensions of space and it is also linked to the speed of light.

When I derived the formula, I used the speed of light in a sphere (which happens to be a null Geodesic)
and which is also invariant to the Lorentz transformation, with no force acting on any object that can
move along that path. There are actually two solutions for time from that formula - one imaginary from
complex numbers, the other real. Also, I suggested that this earth came from the explosion of a black
hole, and I also suggested there was an earth that was before this one, which was engulfed by a black
hole, or which destroyed by something cataclysmic
People talk about the Multiverse and about Infinite universes. The Bible makes us to know there was the
original creation of the universe and then this earth was created much later, from a black hole. Those
that canvass for the Multiverse and the Infinite universes also advance the theory of all the possible
outcomes in all these universes. For example, I am right here on earth, and I am wearing a blue shirt
now. In another universe another copy of me might be on another earth over there; only he might be
wearing a green shirt - and yet on another; he might be wearing a red shirt.

The fact that for this earth we have two solutions for space and time, one imaginary and the other real,
might mean there is yet a copy of me who is in the same three dimensions of space; only this time
imaginary to my space and time - my imaginary twin. At the same time, I am imaginary to him as well.
This leads to consciousness and to dreams and visions. Why do we dream? Is it our imaginary twin we
see in our visions and dreams or is it this imaginary space and time derived from complex numbers only
engraved in our consciousness; so that that the realm is what we dream about or see visions in - a type
of shadow to the actual reality?

These are some of the ideas we should ponder about. That imaginary reality might be related to the
Tachyon in a way - a particle some consider is the mother of all particles. I also remember the statement
in the bible which makes reference to the mother when Adam called his wife Eve; for she was the
“mother” of all living." Though, this statement about "the mother of all living" really refers to the church
and to the Christ and to how we were redeemed from sin.

In Control systems the complex equations always 'conspire' to bring out a real output and the equations
can usually be represented by polynomials, instead of the governing equations. I think why it has been
difficult to detect Dark matter and Dark energy is, what might govern them might be complex equations
rather than real numbers.

Evidently, something can also be deduced from the area of control systems, in trying to detect Dark
matter and Dark energy. Maybe this could be done remotely by guessing what goes on in various types
of control systems whose parameters are inferred from the governing equations specified by the laws
which govern the phenomenon concerned with Dark matter and Dark energy.

In statistics there is the p curve where entities could be related to one another. If the entities are not
related in two dimensions they are irregular shapes in three dimensions. Also, there is the bell curve in
statistics, which looks like a bell.

I do not know the exact shape of [(x² + y² + z²)½]/c, where x, y and z are the dimensions of space and c is
the speed of light, but I am about trying to get the exact shape. However, x² + y² + z² - c²t² = 0 is a three-
dimensional sphere that looks like two perfect- three -dimensional bell curves placed upon one another
in opposite directions. Which, as it could imply, the entities are related in some way. In Thermodynamics
any state in equilibrium can be described from only two properties like Pressure and Volume or like
Pressure and Temperature etc. All the laws of nature can be derived from Thermodynamics, so that we
see that all the laws of nature naturally follow from the fact that space is three dimensional. A lot of the
laws of nature have been discovered through Thermodynamics.

The Bible mentions the firmament which divides the water from above the firmament from the waters
below the firmament, suggesting two different areas

Genesis 1:6-8

King James Version (KJV)

6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from
the waters.

7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the
waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

We can see in the passage above what the scriptures refer to as the firmament, which divides the
waters above the firmament from the waters which were below the firmament. Dimensions like two
opposing sides of a sphere I referred to earlier.