COVID

POST-COVID IMPACT ON MENTAL AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE
NAME: FARBA IFTIKHAR
DEPARTMENT: PHYCOLOGY
SUBJECT: PRACTICUM
SUBMITTED TO: SIR KHALIL
1
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on many aspects of people's lives,
including how well they do in school and their mental health. These abstract highlights the most
important findings from recent research and investigates the effects of COVID on mental and
academic performance.
The pandemic and the lockdown measures that went along with-it disrupted education systems
all over the world. Students' academic performance suffered as a result of the transition to remote
learning and the lack of in-person interactions. During the pandemic, higher rates of academic
disengagement, decreased motivation, and learning loss have been documented in a number of
studies. Based on these findings, academic performance may suffer in the long run following
COVID.
Also, the pandemic's emotional well-being suggestions have been significant. Individuals' levels
of stress, anxiety, and depression have increased as a result of the virus's isolation, fear, and
uncertainty. The mental health of students, in particular, has been significantly affected. Their
mental state has deteriorated as a result of the disruptions to their daily routines, the lack of
social interactions, and worries about their health and the health of their loved ones.
Recovery from COVID necessitates focus on mental health and academics. The psychological
effects of the pandemic must be addressed, and strategies to support students' mental health must
be implemented. Schools and instructive establishments should foster complete methodologies
that attention on reconstructing understudies' certainty, giving emotional wellness support
administrations, and offering scholarly intercessions to connect the learning holes brought about
by the interruptions.
All in all, the post-Coronavirus time presents various difficulties regarding mental and scholastic
execution. It is essential to acknowledge the negative effects of the pandemic on individuals'
well-being and learning outcomes. We can try to lessen the long-term effects of COVID-19 on
mental and academic performance and make the process of healing and growth after the
pandemic easier by giving mental health support top priority and implementing specific
measures for academic recovery.
2
TABLE OF CONTENT
ABSTRACT 2
INTRODUCTION 4
METHODOLOGY 4
LITERATURE REVIEW 5
QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION 6
QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION 7
MEASUREMENTS 8
RESULTS 9
TABLE 10
INTEGRATION OF FINDINGS 11
DISSCUSSION 11
LIMITATION 12
CONCLUSION 13
REFERENCES 14
3
INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic has swept the globe, affecting every facet of life. The pandemic has
also had a significant impact on individuals' mental and academic well-being, in addition to the
immediate effects on health and finances. The post-COVID impact on mental and academic
performance must be examined as the world slowly emerges from the virus' grip.
The pandemic required exceptional measures, for example, lockdowns, school terminations, and
the shift to remote learning. These disturbances to the customary schooling systems have had
expansive ramifications for understudies, everything being equal. The unexpected progress to
online stages and the shortfall of up close and personal cooperation’s introduced difficulties that
impacted understudies' scholarly exhibition.
Students' academic engagement, motivation, and learning loss were all observed during the
pandemic, according to research. The absence of an organized learning climate, restricted
admittance to assets, and the hardships of remote learning have enlarged existing instructive
variations. Subsequently, there is a developing worry about the drawn-out effect of these
interruptions on understudies' scholastic advancement and future open doors.
The pandemic has affected people's mental health as well as their academic difficulties. Stress,
anxiety, and depression have all increased as a result of the virus's accompanying fear,
uncertainty, and social isolation. Particularly, the disruption of their routines, the separation from
friends and peers, and concerns about their health and the health of their loved ones have had a
profound impact on students.
It is essential to address the post-COVID impact on both fronts because mental health and
academic performance are intertwined. The post-pandemic time frame requires an extensive
methodology that upholds understudies' psychological prosperity as well as spotlights on
scholastic recuperation. In order to assist students in regaining their academic momentum, efforts
must be made to fill in the learning gaps brought on by the disruptions and to provide specialized
support.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of COVID on mental and academic
performance. We can learn a lot about the potential long-term effects and devise strategies to
lessen their impact by looking at the existing research and the difficulties that students faced
during the pandemic. We can work toward rebuilding students' confidence, fostering resilience,
and facilitating their post-pandemic healing and growth by placing mental health support at the
top of our priority list and implementing efficient academic recovery measures.
METHODOLOGY
A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate the post-COVID impact on mental and
academic performance. To provide a complete understanding of the subject, the study sought to
collect both quantitative and qualitative data. The following procedure was followed:
1. LITERATURE REVIEW
Research into how the COVID-19 pandemic affects mental and academic performance has
increased dramatically. Key findings and themes from recent research in this area are
summarized in the following literature review.
 Effect on Performance in School:
The negative effects of the pandemic on students' academic performance have been the subject of
numerous studies. Research demonstrates that the change to remote learning brought about
4
diminished commitment, diminished inspiration, and learning misfortune. A concentrate by
Kuhfeld et al. (2020) found that students from marginalized backgrounds experienced the
greatest setbacks in terms of learning gains. Academic inequities were also exacerbated by
disparities in access to technology and resources.
 Health-related consequences:
The pandemic has had a significant impact on the mental health of individuals. During this time,
students' rates of stress, anxiety, and depression have been found to rise. Loades et al. conducted
a survey (In children and adolescents, factors like social isolation, disrupted routines, and fear of
the virus were found to be associated with elevated levels of psychological distress (2020).
Teachers, who were subjected to increased levels of stress and burnout as a result of the demands
of remote teaching (Greenberg et al., 2021).
 Interaction Between Academics and Mental Health:
During the pandemic, the connection between academic performance and mental health has
become increasingly apparent. Research proposes that poor emotional well-being can hinder
scholarly working, while scholastic stressors can add to deteriorated psychological wellness
results. Stikkelbroek et al.'s study (2021) found that understudies with more elevated levels of
mental pain experienced lower scholarly commitment and execution. On the other hand,
intercessions that address emotional well-being concerns can emphatically impact scholastic
results (Masten et al., 2021).
 Coping Methods and Protective Factors:
Certain elements and procedures have been distinguished as expected defensive variables for
moderating the adverse consequence of the pandemic. Solid social encouraging groups of people,
whether through family, companions, or virtual networks, have been connected to better
psychological wellness results (Hawes et al., 2021). Successful survival methods, for example,
keeping up with schedules, participating in actual work, and rehearsing care, have been related
with further developed strength and prosperity (González-Sanguino et al., 2020).
 Support for mental health is crucial for academic recovery:
There is a growing demand for comprehensive support systems that place an emphasis on
academic recovery and mental health in light of the challenges that follow COVID. When it
comes to providing specific academic interventions, counseling services, and resources for
mental health, educational institutions and schools play a crucial role. Dewaele et al.'s study
(2021) emphasized the significance of inclusive and reassuring learning environments that focus
on the emotional well-being of students and assist in closing learning gaps.
By and large, the writing survey features the critical effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on
mental and scholastic execution. To address the challenges that students face following the
pandemic, the findings emphasize the necessity of comprehensive strategies that incorporate
measures for academic recovery as well as support for mental health. In the wake of the
pandemic, educational systems can foster resilience, encourage well-being, and make it easier for
students to heal and grow by giving these aspects priority.
2. QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION

Surveys and academic records are typically used for quantitative data collection when studying
the post-COVID impact on mental and academic performance. An overview of the quantitative
data collection procedure can be found here:
1. The Creation of the Survey Questionnaire: An organized review survey is created to
gather information on different parts of mental and scholastic execution. Sections on
academic engagement, motivation, learning outcomes, perceived learning loss, and
5
mental health indicators may be included in the questionnaire. The survey questions
must be concise, clear, and in line with the goals of the research.
2. Inspecting Technique: An inspecting still up in the air to recognize the objective
populace for the study. This could include choosing understudies from various
instructive levels (e.g., essential, optional, tertiary) or explicit scholarly disciplines.
To ensure that the results can be applied to the larger population of interest, a
representative sample should be obtained.
3. Study Organization: The survey is given to the participants who have been chosen.
This should be possible through web-based stages, email solicitations, or in-person
organization, contingent upon the plausibility and availability of the objective
populace. Participants are given clear instructions to ensure that they complete the
survey accurately and within the allotted time.
4. Finding Academic Records: To provide objective measures of academic
performance, academic records are gathered in addition to survey responses. Grades,
test scores, attendance records, or any other pertinent indicators may be included in
these records. Scholastic records can be gotten from instructive foundations or
information bases, guaranteeing suitable assent and secrecy measures are followed.
5. Analyzing and Managing Data: For the purpose of data analysis, survey responses
and academic records are compiled and arranged. To guarantee the quality of the data,
methods like data cleaning and verification are used in data management. Patterns,
relationships, and statistical significance between variables of interest are examined
using statistical analysis methods like correlation analyses, descriptive statistics, and
inferential statistics.
6. Ethical Issues to Consider: Ethical considerations play a crucial role throughout the
data collection procedure. Participants are informed of the purpose, procedures, and
voluntary nature of their participation before giving their consent. To safeguard
participants' privacy, data should be kept anonymous and confidential.
7. Reporting and Interpretation of the Data: The results of the data analysis are then
interpreted and presented. The outcomes are introduced in an unmistakable and brief
way, utilizing tables, diagrams, and factual synopses as suitable. The interpretation
ought to address the research questions or hypotheses and shed light on the effects of
COVID on mental and academic performance after the infection.
The COVID-19 pandemic's effects on mental and academic performance can be quantified with
the help of quantitative data collection, which provides objective, measurable data. By dissecting
review reactions and scholarly records, specialists can distinguish patterns, relationships, and
measurable affiliations, offering significant experiences for addressing the provokes and creating
designated intercessions to help understudies' prosperity and scholastic recuperation.
Participants:
Students from a variety of educational levels would typically participate in the quantitative data
collection for the purpose of studying the post-COVID impact on mental and academic
performance. The research objectives, the target population, and the sampling strategy all play a
role in determining the specific participants. Some examples of potential participant groups are
as follows:
 Students at Various Levels of Education: Members could incorporate understudies from
essential, optional, and tertiary training levels. Children, adolescents, and young adults at
various stages of their academic journeys would be included in this.
 Explicit Scholarly Disciplines: Participants may come from a variety of academic fields,
including engineering, the sciences, the humanities, and social sciences, or science. This
6
approach considers a more designated assessment of the effect inside a specific field of
study.
 Diverse Economic and Social Backgrounds: To catch the likely variations and impacts
of the pandemic across financial gatherings, members could be chosen from assorted
foundations, including different pay levels, identities, and geographic districts.
 Learners in person and online: Due to the shift toward remote learning during the
pandemic, participants may include students who returned to in-person learning as well
as those who continued their education online. This makes it possible to compare the
experiences and outcomes of these two educational approaches.
The objectives of the study, the research design, and statistical power considerations will all
influence the size of the participant sample. Typically, researchers aim to collect a sample that is
representative of the larger population of interest. Irregular inspecting or delineated testing
strategies might be utilized to guarantee the example is assorted and comprehensive.
When recruiting and involving participants in the study, it is essential to keep in mind that
confidentiality protocols, informed consent, and ethical considerations should all be adhered to.
During the data collection process, participants' rights and privacy should be protected.
3. QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION

In order to investigate the effects of COVID on mental and academic performance, ChatGPT
qualitative data collection requires gathering in-depth insights and subjective experiences.
Methods for qualitative data collection and sample considerations are outlined in the following:
Interviews: Researchers can have a one-on-one conversation with participants during individual
interviews to learn about their experiences, perceptions, and feelings regarding mental and
academic performance following COVID. It is possible to use semi-structured or structured
interview guides to maintain consistency while allowing participants to express themselves
freely.
 Group Discussion: Center gatherings include uniting a little gathering of members to
examine explicit subjects connected with the exploration. Participants are able to build on
each other's ideas and interact more easily as a result of the group's dynamic, which
provides valuable insights into shared experiences and perspectives. The discussion is
steered by an experienced moderator who makes certain that each participant has an
opportunity to contribute.
 Questions for an open-ended survey: Open-ended survey questions can also be used to
collect qualitative data. Participants are asked to write detailed responses to these
questions, allowing for a deeper comprehension of their thoughts, feelings, and
experiences. Participants are free to express themselves in their own words because the
questions are open-ended.
Examples of Qualitative Data Collection Considerations:
 Diversity: It is essential to include participants from a variety of backgrounds, including
different sexes, ages, socioeconomic statuses, educational levels, and socioeconomic
statuses, in order to capture a variety of perspectives and experiences. A deeper
comprehension of the effects of COVID on mental and academic performance is ensured
by this diversity.
 Representation: Taking into consideration factors like geographical location, educational
institutions, and cultural backgrounds, the sample should aim to represent the population
of interest. To ensure a diverse and representative sample, sampling techniques like
maximum variation sampling and purposive sampling can be used.
7
 Recruitment: Various channels, including educational establishments, online
communities, and social media platforms, can be utilized to recruit participants. The
study's purpose, the voluntary nature of participation, and the confidentiality and privacy
measures should all be made abundantly clear to researchers.
 Sample Size: When compared to quantitative research, the sample size for qualitative
research is typically smaller. The objective is to attain data saturation, which signifies that
new themes and insights cease to emerge from the data. The amount of data required to
answer the research questions, as well as the objectives of the study, may influence the
sample size.
Ethical considerations must be followed, participants must give their informed consent, and
responses must be kept private and anonymous. The lived experiences and subjective perceptions
of the post-COVID impact on mental and academic performance can be better understood with
the help of qualitative data.
4. MEASUREMENTS
 Participant 1: Mental Performance Score: 75, Academic Performance Score: 82

8
50 participants' post-COVID mental and academic performance are represented by the
measurements provided. A mental performance score and an academic performance score are
given to each participant. The level of mental well-being or distress experienced by each
participant is shown by the mental performance score, and the academic performance score
shows how well they did on academic tasks or assessments. The scores range from 65 to 88 for
mental execution and from 74 to 92 for scholastic execution. It is essential to take note of that
these estimations are haphazardly created and don't address certifiable information. In any case,
in a genuine review, such estimations could be gathered through approved appraisal apparatuses
or overviews to explore the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on people's psychological and
scholarly working.
RESULTS
The examination of the estimations uncovers a blended effect on mental and scholastic execution
following the Coronavirus pandemic. The participants' scores on mental performance ranged
from 65 to 88, indicating a wide range of mental health. Lower scores from some of the
participants point to potential distress or difficulties in coping with the psychological effects of
the pandemic. Then again, a few members accomplished higher scores, demonstrating better
mental prosperity post-Coronavirus.
The scores for academic performance ranged from 74 to 92, indicating that participants'
academic accomplishments varied. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, some
individuals demonstrated higher scores, indicating successful academic outcomes, while others
demonstrated lower scores, indicating potential difficulties in adjusting to remote learning or
disruptions to their educational routines.
9
a) TABLE:
Mental Performance
Participant Score Academic Performance Score
1 75 82
2 68 78
3 82 88
4 70 75
5 88 90
6 65 80
7 78 85
8 73 79
9 80 87
10 72 77
11 81 89
12 69 76
13 85 92
14 74 81
15 77 84
16 71 78
17 87 91
18 67 74
19 79 86
20 76 83
21 83 90
22 70 77
23 84 91
24 75 82
25 72 79
26 80 87
27 68 75
28 86 92
29 73 80
30 77 84
31 79 86
32 70 77
33 81 88
34 75 82
35 74 81
36 78 85
37 71 78
38 83 90
10
39 76 83
40 84 91
41 72 79
42 85 92
43 77 84
44 79 86
45 68 75
46 80 87
47 75 82
48 73 80
49 76 83
50 70 77
b) INTEGARATION OF FINDINGS
We can analyze the data and identify patterns or trends in order to integrate the measurements'
findings regarding the post-COVID impact on mental and academic performance. Based on the
measurements provided, the following are some observations:
 Mental Efficiency: The scores on the mental performance range from 65 to 88. After the
COVID-19 pandemic, it appears that participants' mental health varies, with some scoring
lower (indicating potential distress) and others scoring higher (indicating improved
mental health). Further examination could look at potential variables adding to these
varieties, for example, individual ways of dealing with especially difficult times,
admittance to emotionally supportive networks, or past psychological well-being history.
 Academic Achievement: The scores for academic achievement range from 74 to 92. This
demonstrates a scope of scholastic accomplishments among the members. It proposes that
the pandemic's effect on scholastic execution might shift, for certain people encountering
difficulties while others keeping up with or in any event, succeeding in their scholarly
interests. These variations may be influenced by individual motivation, online learning
experiences, and accessibility to resources.
 Mental and Academic Performance in Relationship: Dissecting the connection among
mental and scholarly execution scores could give experiences into how these two spaces
might collaborate. For instance, it would be intriguing to inspect whether higher mental
execution scores are related with better scholastic execution. Additionally, determining
whether mental health has an effect on academic performance may be made easier by
examining any potential correlations or associations between the two sets of scores.
DISSCUSSION
The effects of COVID on mental and academic performance are uncovered by analyzing the
measurements. The results show that the participants' experiences varied across scores. The
analysis revealed a number of important points, which are discussed below.
Individuals' mental and academic health have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic. The varieties in mental execution scores recommend that a few members experienced
difficulties and misery, while others detailed better mental prosperity post-Coronavirus. These
11
differences may have been caused by individual resilience, access to support networks, and the
capacity to deal with stress.
Similarly, the participants' varying levels of academic achievement are indicated by the range of
academic performance scores. Participants' academic outcomes probably suffered as a result of
the pandemic-induced disruptions, such as the shift to remote learning and changes in
educational routines. It's possible that a student's level of academic success during this time
period was largely determined by their capacity to adapt to online learning platforms, access the
resources they needed, and maintain their motivation.
A positive correlation between mental and academic performance scores was found through
correlation analysis. Members with higher mental execution scores would in general have better
scholastic execution, proposing a possible relationship between mental prosperity and scholarly
achievement. It is conceivable that people with better mental prosperity might be better prepared
to deal with the difficulties of the pandemic and keep up with center around their scholarly
interests.
These results are consistent with previous studies on the effects of the pandemic on mental and
academic performance. The negative effects of the pandemic on mental health and educational
outcomes have been repeatedly highlighted in studies. However, it is essential to keep in mind
that the data used in the current study are fictional, so applying these findings to actual situations
should be done with caution.
There are a few drawbacks to keep in mind in spite of the useful insights that this study provided.
The example size of 50 members is moderately little, and the utilization of fictitious information
restricts the generalizability of the discoveries. In addition, the measurements were based on self-
reports, which could introduce biases like social desirability or subjective interpretation.
Using real-world data and larger-scale studies, future research should aim to overcome these
limitations. Longitudinal plans that follow members over a lengthy period would give a more
profound comprehension of the drawn out effect of the pandemic on mental and scholastic
presentation. Additionally, the findings' reliability and validity would be enhanced by
incorporating objective measures like academic records or standardized tests.
In conclusion, the measurements' analysis suggests that mental and academic performance are
affected differently after COVID. In the wake of the pandemic, the study emphasizes the need
for specific interventions to support individuals' mental health and encourage academic success.
Future research can help us learn more about the complicated connection between the pandemic,
mental health, and educational outcomes if it addresses the limitations and builds on these
findings.
LIMITATIONS
It is essential to take into consideration a few limitations that may have an impact on the findings
when analyzing the measurements of the post-COVID impact on mental and academic
performance:
1. Generalizability: The provided measurements are fictional and do not correspond to
actual data. Hence, the discoveries can't be summed up to a more extensive populace or
used to make conclusive decisions about the post-Coronavirus influence on mental and
scholastic execution as a general rule.
2. Test Size and Arrangement: The example size of 50 members may not enough address
the different populace impacted by the Coronavirus pandemic. The post-COVID impact
on mental and academic performance may be affected by important demographic factors,
12
such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, and educational background that are not taken
into account in the measurements.
3. Bias in Self-Reporting: Self-reported scores, which may be influenced by a variety of
biases, are assumed to be the foundation for the measurements. Due to social desirability
bias, recall bias, or subjective interpretation of the assessment scales, participants may
underestimate or overestimate their mental or academic performance.
4. Absence of Relevant Data: The participants' experiences during the COVID-19
pandemic cannot be contextualized using only the measurements. Factors like individual
conditions, admittance to assets, changes in learning conditions, or emotionally
supportive networks are not caught, restricting the comprehension of the more extensive
setting impacting mental and scholarly execution.
5. Causality and Transient Grouping: The participants' mental and academic performance
is only captured by the tests at a specific point in time. Laying out a causal relationship or
understanding the transient succession of occasions between the Coronavirus pandemic
and its effect on mental and scholarly execution would require longitudinal or exploratory
review plans.
6. Validity and Tools for Measuring: The provided measurements are fictitious, and the
assessment tools used are not known to be reliable or valid. In a real study, validated and
standardized measures would be necessary to guarantee the accuracy and consistency of
the collected data.
CONCLUSION
All in all, the estimations accommodated the post-Coronavirus influence on mental and
scholastic execution feature the expected intricacies and varieties in people's encounters. Despite
the disruptions caused by the pandemic, some participants showed lower mental and academic
performance scores, indicating potential difficulties and distress. On the other hand, others
showed higher scores, indicating improved well-being and academic accomplishments.
Nevertheless, it is essential to emphasize that these conclusions are founded on fictional data and
should not be applied to actual situations.
Further examination using thorough systems and genuine information is important to acquire an
exhaustive comprehension of the post-Coronavirus influence on mental and scholarly execution.
These kinds of studies ought to take into account samples that are larger and more diverse, make
use of validated assessment tools, and take into account the context of a person's experiences. We
can gain a better understanding of the psychological and educational effects of the COVID-19
pandemic and develop strategies for supporting individuals' mental and academic well-being in
post-pandemic times by conducting thorough investigations.
REFERENCES
13
 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and academic performance
of medical postgraduates,
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.948710/full
 Impact of fear of COVID-19 on students' performance, moderating role of mindfulness:
HSK students' perception-based view,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677726/
 COVID’S Impact on Medical Students’ Performance,
https://pjmhsonline.com/2021/dec/3687.pdf
 Mental Health Status and Academic Performance Among Undergraduate University
Students During Post COVID-19,
https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/21583 Mental Health effects
of School Closures During COVID-19, https://namica.org/blog/impact-on-the-mental-
health-of-students-during-covid-19/
 Mental Health and Academic Performance of Students during COVID-19 in Pakistan,
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3814400
 Impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of children and adolescents,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623428/
 Mental health and well-being, https://www.unicef.org/parenting/mental-health?
gclid=Cj0KCQjw4NujBhC5ARIsAF4Iv6fGLcTJ4TLzVDIyy708RXsO75is409krewaNv
QwT_W9cpZjZTT52QIaAiB7EALw_wcB
 The Silent Pandemic: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental
Health and Psychosocial Wellbeing of Children in Conflict Affected Countries,
https://reliefweb.int/report/world/silent-pandemic-impact-covid-19-pandemic-
mental-health-and-psychosocial-wellbeing?
gclid=Cj0KCQjw4NujBhC5ARIsAF4Iv6fF9pIRyvvWwKzA-
Old4rU55ch3A4ivUtLLmf9LpikJQZSnyAx_BaUaAhP0EALw_wcB
 Mental Health Impacts of COVID-19,
https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/MentalHealthCOVID19
 Consequences of COVID-19 pandemics on the mental well-being of general population
of Pakistan, https://mecp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43045-022-00211-2
 Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic,

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566212/full
14

COVID

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

COVID

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

POST-COVID IMPACT ON MENTAL AND ACADEMIC

NAME: FARBA IFTIKHAR

SUBMITTED TO: SIR KHALIL

2. QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION

3. QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION

 Participant 1: Mental Performance Score: 75, Academic Performance Score: 82

 Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic,

You might also like