Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLARITO
Year & block : BPA-4B
I. INTRODUCTION
Quality public service has been the target of the government in the last
decades as it continually adopts to new public management and good public
administration. Public service is usually provided by government to people living
within its jurisdiction either directly or by financing provision services. Public
sector reforms have been forced through to enhance the administrative system
due to developmental constraints. The goal of reforms, particularly Public Sector
Governance Reform (PSGR), is to provide the public sector with high-quality
services and long-term performance. The government's efforts to modernize the
public service and make it more responsive and focused on the needs of the
citizenry remain largely dependent on these. Canlas (2018) stated that since
1986, the Philippine government, under a succession of political administrations,
has pursued a structural policy reform program on several fronts, both economic
and non-economic that leads to inclusive development. This paper seeks to
compare the policy reforms of Benigno Aquino III Administration and Rodrigo
Duterte administration in improving quality services in the Philippines.
II. TABLE OF COMPARISON
Table 1. Policy reforms in the Philippines under Aquino and Duterte
administration
Policy Reforms to Improve the Change without Transformation:
Quality Social Policy Reforms in the
of Public Services in the Philippines Philippines under Duterte
Author: Maria Fe Villamejor-Mendoza Author: Charmaine G. Ramos
Administration: Benigno Aquino, III Administration: Rodrigo Duterte
Tuwid na daan: “Kung walang corrupt, Social policy expansion through
walang mahirap" authoritarian leaders and ‘narrow
universalism.’
Open government that uses e-bidding Duterte's leadership in civil-rights
functions crushing "war on drugs"
Good governance and Anti-corruption Anti-drug operations as security
goals: Transparency, empowerment, threats rather than public health issue
public sector performance, anti-
corruption measures, policy
environment for good governance
Good governance initiatives: Philippine Use of public resources for social
Government Electronic Procurement spending: National health insurance
System (PhilGEPS) program, free tuition in public
universities
Bottom-up Budgeting Top-down approach
Improve Delivery of Public Service: Budgetary appropriations for
Seal of Good Governance, Anti-red country’s conditional cash transfer
Tape, Citizen Satisfaction Index scheme
Name : ANGELICA MAY C. CLARITO
Year & block : BPA-4B
The above table describes the different policy reforms undertaken by PNoy and
Duterte administration to improve the delivery of goods and services in the Philippines.
Both administrations have different strategies on how to cater developmental challenges
nevertheless seeks to be more efficient, effective and responsive. The first column
shows governance reforms of Aquino administration that focuses to combat corruption,
improve public service delivery to the poor and enhance business and economic
environment of the country as whole. This creates reforms in government procurement
through PhilGEPS, utilize bottom-up budgeting, good governance and anti-corruption
goals and use of open government. On the second column, the focus of the Duterte
administration is on social policy expansion that becomes a tool for political legitimation.
This administration focuses on expansion of access to social goods and services - the
narrow universalism spectrum. Ramos (2020) emphasized social policy reforms of
Duterte that includes “war on drugs,” free tuition fee in public universities, national
health insurance program and the conditional cash transfer scheme to cover the effects
of higher indirect taxes. Top-down process was utilized as mobilizational power of
liberal middle classes.
References:
[1] Canlas, D. (2018) . “Philippine policy reforms and infrastructure development: a
historical account.” The Philippine Review of Economics. University of the Philippines
School of Economics. Vol. LIV No. 2, December 2017 pp. 61-87
[2] Reforms to Improve the Quality of Public Services in the Philippines1 Maria Fe
Villamejor-Mendoza, DPA https://ncpag.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/The-
Quality-of-Public-Services-in-the-Philippines_Villamejor-Mendoza.pdf
[3] Ramos, C.G. Change without Transformation: Social Policy Reforms in the
Philippines under Duterte https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dech.12564
[4] Timberman, D. (2019) . “Philippine Politics under Duterte: A Midterm Assessment.”
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/01/10/philippine-politics-under-duterte-midterm-
assessment-pub-78091