Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Concluding Remarks
Why are Finite Volume Methods interesting for Engineers ?
The Finite Volume Methods meet the following physical properties:
Easy to Implement.
. Conventional Finite Volume Analysis of a Flow Model
• where Ω is a bounded open subset of with a regular boundary .
: Assume that :
and
III. Main Steps of a Finite Volume Method
• Step 1: Define a Partition (in some sense, called also Triangulation) on a
polygonal domain made up of non empty convex polygonal subdomains
generically denoted by and satisfying the following conditions :
(3) ; (4)
(5)
TERMINOLOGIES :
1) One may decide To approximate the exact solution of the system (1)-(2) inside the
• Step 3 :
Find out a consistent approximation of the Fluxes that meets the Transmission
Conditions.
• Step 4:
Insert those Flux Approximations in the balance equation. By neglecting the
Truncation Errors one derives the Finite Volume Formulation of the continuous
problem.
. Finite Volume Method for 1-D Flow Problems
where Is a given real constant (physically standing for the velocity of some hot fluid flowing in the medium.
For convenience reasons let us position in the family of discrete unknowns as follows :
We already know from the finite volume discretization (see previous section) of the pure
diffusion term that
Concerning the convection term we use the following well known approximation formula:
called UPWIND or UPSTREAM FORMULA used for the first time by Petroleum Reservoir Engineers
Summing side by side the Equs (2.51) and (2.52) leads to the following FV Scheme (without Essential Boundary Condition):
If Then :
If Then :
The challenge now is to formulate the FV discrete equation associated with the node where is prescribed an
Essential Boundary Condition, For the sake of clarty of the presentation we assume that :
We start with integrating the Balance Equation in the so-called Degenerate Control-Volume ,
Then we obtain what follows
The first term of the LHS of the previous equality is known as the flux is imposed at the node while the second
term can be approximated following the technique exposed in the previous section. Therefore we get
SUMMARY : The Finite Volume discretization of the system (2.48)-(2.50) yields what follows.
. Finite Volume Method for time dependent 1-D Flow
Problems
Setting of the Problem: Given , , , ,, and find a function
. Time discretization
There are as many possibilities to approximate the integral terms in the previous equality as quadrature
formulas. For the sake of simplicity of the presentation let us consider the following quadrature
formulas.
Of course in the preceding approximation the truncation error is of first order in . Before calling
out the operationalty of Conventional Finite Volumes for spatial discretization of the semi-discretized balance equation
(10) let us set the following assumption:
Remark 1:
Integrating the two sides of (10) in leads to what follows :
Thanks to Taylor’s theorem and accounting with Lagrange truncation errors we are led to what follows :
The previous approximate fluxes should meet the continuity condition at the mesh interface points. So they should
satisfy the following equation:
Moreover the temperature continuity at the mesh interface points should be honoured i.e.
For accounting with the Transmission Condition (17) is equivalent to simply set
In vertue of the preceding definition the equation (10) can be seen as an algebraic equation with only unknown
After elementary algebraic operations we obtain that
Utilizing the RHS of the preceding equality for re-writting equations (14) and (15) leads to
. Finite Volume Method for 2-D Steady State Flow Problems