April ____, 2023

MR./MS.
Position / subject
Name of the School
Address of the school

Dear Mr. _____:

Good day!

We are currently conducting a study entitled: YOUR RESEARCH TITLE, in partial fulfillment of the
course requirement in Practical Research 1 being pursued by the researchers at Pamantasan ng Lungsod
ng Marikina, Marikina City.

In view thereof, may we humbly request you to be one of the (Grammarian / Content Validator/
Psychometrician) of the attached survey questionnaire. This request is to make sure that the survey
questions made by the researchers answer the problem of their study.
Your suggestions and comments will truly be beneficial to the improvement of the final version of the
survey questionnaire.

Hoping for your favorable response regarding this matter. Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE RESEARCH GROUP REPRESENTATIVE

Noted by:

MS. SUNSHINE R. SARMIENTO,LPT

Research Adviser
 INSTRUMENT VALIDATION FORM
Name:____________________________________________Department:____________
Years of Teaching:_______________School: _________________________________
Instructions: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement on the statements
provided below by checking the box that corresponds to your answer. This form was modified
and adapted from the Mather’s Thesis of Ayeng (2008).
1 – Strongly Disagree 4 – Agree
2 – Disagree 5 – Strongly Agree
3 – Undecided

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
1. The instrument is long enough to give
the data needed.

2. The instrument is interesting and has

an appeal in such that the
respondents will be induced to
responding and accomplishing it
completely.

3. The instrument can obtain some

depth to the response and avoid
superficial answers.

4. The instrument can elicit responses

which are definite but not
mechanically forced.

5. The instrument’s statements and

questions are stated in a way that the
respondent concerned will not be
offended on the responses.

6. The instrument is formed in a

manner that the suspicion by the
respondent to the hidden purposes in
the questionnaire is avoided.

7. The instrument is neither narrow nor

restrictive (limited in its scope or
philosophy).

8. The response to the questionnaire,

when taken as a whole, could answer
the basic purpose for which the
questionnaire is designed and is,
therefore, considered valid.

TOTAL

COMMENTS AND/OR SUGGESTIONS:

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
____________________________________
Signature over Printed Name/Date