Pablo Borbon

Alangilan Campus
Campus

College of Engineering – Department of Electrical Engineering

TITLE OF THE DETECTION TASK

In partial fulfillment for

Cogante/Elective 3

Submitted by:

Submitted to:

Alangilan, Batangas City, Philippines +63 43 425 - 0139 loc. 2121

www.batstate-u.edu.ph coe.alangilan@g.batstate-u.edu.ph
 Pablo Borbon
Alangilan Campus
Campus

College of Engineering – Department of Electrical Engineering

INTRODUCTION: Brief introduction and background of your chosen dataset, discuss the problem
statement and objective (at least 3 paragraphs)

METHODOLOGY: Discuss all the methodology perform in Object detection task.

RESULT: Discuss the result in \based on the following:

Epoch (Graphical representation of the loss and validation loss vs number of epoch)
 Model Inferencing (Discuss the model you used for model inferencing, discuss the result of the
model inferencing based on ACCURACY, PRECISION, RECALL and F1 Score.
 Provide screenshot of the result of the model inferencing.

CONCLUSION: Your conclusion of the task.

RECOMMENDATION: What suggestion or recommendation you can give to improve your work.

RUBRICS:

Criteria Excellent (5) Proficient (3) Basic (1)

INTRODUCTION Exceptionally clear and concise
introduction with a
comprehensive background of
the chosen dataset. Clearly
articulates the problem
statement and objectives with
depth and relevance. Engages
the reader effectively.
Clear introduction with Introduction lacks clarity and
a solid background of conciseness.Limited
the dataset.Discusses discussion on the dataset
the problem statement background, problem
and objectives statement, and objectives.
adequately. Engagement with the reader
Demonstrates a good is minimal.
level of engagement.

METHODOLOGY Thorough and detailed Provides a good Explanation of

explanation of all the
methodologies used in the
object detection task.Provides a
clear rationale for each method
chosen.Demonstrates a deep
understanding of the chosen
methodologies.
explanation of the methodologies is superficial
methodologies used in and lacks depth. Rationale
the object detection for method choices is
task. Offers a rationale minimal. Understanding of
for most methods methodologies is basic.
chosen. Demonstrates a
solid understanding of
the chosen
methodologies.

RESULT: Epoch Graphical representation of loss Graphical Graphical representation is

and validation loss is clear,
well-labeled, and insightful.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of the training
process over epochs. Draws
relevant conclusions from the
graph.
representation is clear unclear or lacks proper
and labeled, providing labeling. Limited
a good overview of the understanding of the training
training process. process over epochs.
Shows understanding Conclusions drawn from the
of the training process graph are vague or incorrect.
over epochs. Draws
reasonable conclusions
from the graph.

Alangilan, Batangas City, Philippines +63 43 425 - 0139 loc. 2121

www.batstate-u.edu.ph coe.alangilan@g.batstate-u.edu.ph
 Pablo Borbon
Alangilan
College of Engineering – Department of Electrical Engineering
RESULT: Model Thorough discussion of the
Inferencing model used for inferencing,
including architecture details.
Detailed analysis of results
based on accuracy, precision,
recall, and F1 Score. Provides
insightful interpretations of the
model's performance. Includes
screenshots that enhance
understanding.
CONCLUSION Exceptionally well-written
conclusion that effectively
summarizes key findings.
Draws insightful conclusions
from the results. Connects the
conclusion to the problem
statement and objectives.
RECOMMENDATION Provides well-thought-out and
realistic recommendations for
improving the work.
Demonstrates a deep
understanding of potential areas
for enhancement.
Recommendations are
actionable and specific.
Alangilan, Batangas City, Philippines
www.batstate-u.edu.ph
Campus
Campus
Provides a good Model discussion is brief and
discussion of the model lacks detail. Analysis of
used for inferencing. results is basic, covering
Analysis of results only a few performance
includes accuracy, metrics. Limited
precision, recall, and understanding of the model's
F1 Score. performance.Screenshots
Demonstrates a solid may be missing or
understanding of the insufficient.
model's performance.
Includes relevant
screenshots.
Clear and concise Conclusion is vague or lacks
conclusion that clarity.- Limited connection
summarizes key to key findings, problem
finding Draws statement, and objectives.
reasonable conclusions Conclusions drawn are
from the results. generic.
Connects the
conclusion to the
problem statement and
objectives.
Offers reasonable Recommendations are
recommendations for generic or lack depth.
improving the work. Limited awareness of
Demonstrates potential areas for
awareness of potential enhancement.
areas for enhancement. Recommendations are not
Recommendations are well-defined or practical.
somewhat actionable
and specific.
+63 43 425 - 0139 loc. 2121
coe.alangilan@g.batstate-u.edu.ph