Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
Outcome
Description of
criterion
Problem definition

15.0 to >11.9 pts 11.9 to >10.4 pts 10.4 to >8.9 pts 8.9 to >7.4 pts 7.4 to >4.5 pts 4.5 to >0 pts
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
Demonstrates the Demonstrates a Demonstrates the ability Demonstrates an Develops a Unable to or poorly
ability to construct comprehensive to construct a problem ability in identifying problem demonstrates an
a clear and knowledge of the statement with evidence of a problem statement statement but ability to write a
insightful problem subject. most relevant contextual or related contextual lacks academic problem statement or
statement with Demonstrates the factors. The volume of factors. Important rigour, with identify important
evidence of all ability to construct a reading of sufficient aspects of the material that is contextual factors.
relevant contextual problem statement breadth and depth for a problem not incomplete or Work may have
factors. Identifies with evidence of competent understanding addressed. The irrelevant. failed for one or more
potentially most relevant of main issues, underlying depth of reading Little evidence of the following: 15.0 pts
significant yet contextual factors principles and concepts insufficient to of knowledge non-submission,
previously less- considered and but without the award a credit of the relevant academic
explored aspects of analysed. comprehensiveness of grade. Problem body of misconduct,
the issue(s). Highly Appropriately higher grades. statement may be knowledge to answering a different
original or addresses most factual and make a question from the one
insightful work. relevant aspects of descriptive rather persuasive asked, poor or
the issue. than analytical. case. incoherent
vocabulary, no
evidence of correct
scholarly referencing.
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeNo
description
Breadth and depth
of research 15.0 to >11.9 pts 11.9 to >10.4 pts 10.4 to >8.9 pts 8.9 to >7.4 pts 7.4 to >4.5 pts 4.5 to >0 pts
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
Provides an in-depth Demonstrated the Presents information Presents factual Little evidence of Presents
synthesis of ability to critically from relevant sources information from some knowledge of the information
information from review, analyse, representing various relevant sources relevant body of from
relevant sources, synthesise, and apply points of representing limited knowledge to make irrelevant
representing various a theoretical and view/approaches. points of a persuasive case. sources or in 15.0 pts
points of technical body of Demonstrates some view/approaches. Lack Failure to review very
view/approaches. knowledge in a broad analysis of those of analysis or critical critically, analyse, insufficient
range of areas and views/approaches. appreciation of consolidate and quantity.
diverse contexts knowledge sources. combine knowledge
perhaps with some and draw relevant
synthesis. conclusions.
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeNo
description
Use of appropriate
management theory

30.0 to >23.7 pts 23.7 to >20.7 pts 20.7 to >17.7 pts 17.7 to >14.7 pts 14.7 to >9.0 pts 9.0 to >0 pts
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
All elements of the Shows reasoning and Identifies tools, Identifies and Fails to identify Fails to demonstrate
theoretical creative skills to use models, theories describes tools, tools, models, any coherent
frameworks are knowledge and from a range of models, theories theories from a understanding or
skillfully developed. awareness to exercise management from a range of range of application of
Appropriate critical thinking and disciplines. Performs management management theoretical
methodology or judgement in a critical analysis of disciplines. The disciplines and/or frameworks. Fails to
theoretical selecting and the tools, although work demonstrates work is of a poor identify tools,
frameworks may be applying methods and work of this standard a basic quality. Work may models, theories
synthesised from technologies in does not demonstrate understanding of contain factual from a range of
across disciplines or identifying and the complexity and the methodology or errors. The work management
from relevant sub- solving problems nuance required for theoretical demonstrates a poor disciplines and/or
disciplines. with intellectual the higher grades. frameworks. understanding of work is of a poor
Identifies flaws in independence. The elements of the Theories and/or the methodology or quality. Work may
published work. Identifies tools, methodology or frameworks are theoretical contain factual
Identifies tools, models, theories from theoretical applied in an frameworks. There errors. Work may be 30.0 pts
models, theories a range of framework are unsophisticated may be basic errors unrelated to the
from a range of management developed but some manner. in the application of question. Work is
management disciplines. Performs elements may be the theories and/or unsubstantiated by
disciplines. a critical analysis of missing, incorrectly frameworks. references.
Performs a critical the tools. Synthesises developed, or
analysis of the tools results . Critical unfocused. Coherent
in the context of the elements of the arguments supported
chosen management methodology or by evidence and
lens. Synthesises theoretical illustration from the
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeNo
description
Critical Analysis
15.0 to >11.9 pts 11.9 to >10.4 pts 10.4 to >8.9 pts 8.9 to >7.4 pts 7.4 to >4.5 pts 4.5 to >0 pts
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
Organises and Organises evidence to The work is clearly Lists evidence, but Use of insufficient Fails to use
synthesises reveal important patterns, structured and the it is not well evidence to support evidence in a
evidence to reveal differences, or similarities exposition of knowledge organized and/or analysis. Students meaningful
insightful patterns, related to issues being and ideas is clear and may be unrelated did not undertake way.
differences, or addressed. The work is competent. Organises to issues being enough reading or 15.0 pts
similarities related clearly structured and evidence, but the addressed. The empirical data
to issues being convincingly supported organisation may not be evidence is collection to allow
addressed. by appropriate evidence, effective in revealing descriptive and conclusions to be
argument or illustration. important patterns, factual in nature. made.
differences, or similarities
in issues being addressed.
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeNo
description 15.0 to >11.9 pts 11.9 to >10.4 pts 10.4 to >8.9 pts 8.9 to >7.4 pts 7.4 to >4.5 pts 4.5 to >0 pts
Conclusions High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
States a conclusion that is a States a conclusion States a general States a conclusion States an Fails to state a
logical extrapolation from focused solely on the conclusion that, that is not based on ambiguous, conclusion or
the inquiry findings. inquiry findings. The because it is so analysis and illogical, or states a
Evidence of formulated conclusion arises general, also evidence, but rather unsupportable conclusion that 15.0 pts
and sustained arguments specifically from and applies beyond the represents a basic conclusion from is irrelevant.
with sophisticated analysis, responds specifically scope of the interpretation. inquiry findings.
inferences, synthesis of to the inquiry findings. inquiry findings.
material.
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeNo
description
Report structure and
academic standards

10.0 to >7.9 pts 7.9 to >6.9 pts 6.9 to >5.9 pts 5.9 to >4.9 pts 4.9 to >3.0 pts 3.0 to >0 pts
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Serious Fail
Work is fully Work is fully Work is fully Students use Improper citation of Students fail to use
referenced according referenced referenced correctly some of sources and the following
to accepted scholarly according to according to the following referencing of information use
standards (use of accepted scholarly accepted scholarly information use work. (use of strategies (use of
citations and standards (use of standards (use of strategies (use of citations and citations and
references; choice of citations and citations and citations and references; choice references; choice of
paraphrasing, references; choice of references; choice references; choice of paraphrasing, paraphrasing,
summary, or quoting; paraphrasing, of paraphrasing, of paraphrasing, summary, or summary, or
using information in summary, or summary, or summary, or quoting; using quoting; using
ways that are true to quoting; using quoting; using quoting; using information in ways information in ways
original context; information in ways information in ways information in ways that are true to that are true to
distinguishing between that are true to that are true to that are true to original context; original context;
10.0 pts
common knowledge original context; original context; original context; distinguishing distinguishing
and ideas requiring distinguishing distinguishing distinguishing between common between common
attribution). The report between common between common between common knowledge and knowledge and ideas
contains no flaws in knowledge and ideas knowledge and knowledge and ideas requiring requiring attribution)
spelling, grammar, requiring ideas requiring ideas requiring attribution) Report Report contains
format and exhibits attribution). The attribution) Report attribution). The contains some extensive flaws in
high degrees of report contains no contains no flaws in report contains flaws in spelling, spelling, grammar,
creativity and flaws in spelling, spelling, grammar, minor flaws in grammar, format, or the
professionalism. grammar, format, format and is of a spelling, grammar, formatting. students failed to use
and is of a good standard. format. a report format at all.
professional
standard.
 Management In Practice Assignment 2 RubricManagement In Practice Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Total Points: 100.0

Related Items