Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VP Clean Compressed Air
VP Clean Compressed Air
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE
MANUFACTURING FACILITY
Document No : VP-CA
Revision No : 00
Prepared by:
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 3 of 16
Effective Date :
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.1Background......................................................................................................................................................... 7
2.2Description of Current Compressed Air System.............................................................................................. 8
2.3Objectives............................................................................................................................................................ 9
2.4Scope................................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.5Approach/ Rationale......................................................................................................................................... 10
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 4 of 16
Effective Date :
1. Approval Signature
Prepared by
Mawanti Tambunan/
PT. Asia Pacific Consultants
Reviewed by
Enung Rohayati /
Validation Manager
Dwi Susilohadi /
M&E Manager
M. Parwoko /
Hormone Production Manager
Syanti P. Dewi /
QC Manager
Marthaningtyas D.S /
QA Manager
Approved by
Ridwan Halim /
Plant Manager
Sorta Saulina /
QAC Manager
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 5 of 16
Effective Date :
1.
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 6 of 16
Effective Date :
2. Document History
00 New Document
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 7 of 16
Effective Date :
3. References
Code Title
External Reference
ISO 8573-1 Compressed Air – Part 1: Contamination and Purity Classes, 2010
Internal Reference
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 8 of 16
Effective Date :
Along with a number of other critical systems described in other separate Validation Plans, TNF intends to
concurrently validate the Clean Compressed Air Systems serving the whole Facility. This document is intended
to describe the validation approach to be applied.
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 9 of 16
Effective Date :
Air that makes contact with product may be drawn only from “Clean Compressed Air Use Points” supplied with
compressed air which is further filtered through the clean compressed air filtration assembly. A 0.2µm filters are
used for sterile use points and 0.45µm or 1µm or better for oral solid dosage delivered via a SS316L housing.
2.3 Objectives
The objective of this Validation Plan is to describe the approach and provide high level guidance to the validation
activities related to the Clean Compressed Air system. This Validation Plan will ensure the validation activities
are arranged to provide documented evidence that the compressed air systems and components can be
expected to continue to function within the specified limits, meeting the predefined system requirements as
appropriate for cGMP-regulated processes..
It is intended to be a working document and will be periodically updated by site management responsible for
project completion and validation.
2.4 Scope
The scope of this Validation Plan (VP) includes qualification of the aspects of the Clean Compressed air systems
serving the Facility that have the potential to affect product quality.
The qualification activities and associated documents for the Compressed Air systems shall include the
following:
Requirements Specification
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 10 of 16
Effective Date :
Validation Plan
Impact Assessment
Installation Qualification
Operational Qualification
Performance Qualification
Since the system is pre-existing there will be no Design Qualification phase.
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 11 of 16
Effective Date :
The System Impact Assessment (SIA) process documented in section 8 will be adopted to determine which
aspects of the Compressed Air System have the potential to directly or indirectly affect product quality.
Systems having a direct impact will form part of the scope of the qualification activities. Where there is indirect or
no Impact, a Good Engineering Practice (GEP) approach will be used.
The CIA is a separate document detailing analysis performed prior to drafting the IQ protocol and used to guide
its creation. All components will be listed and assessed to identify which components having the potential for
critical impact upon product quality. This assessment will define the extent of testing required for individual
system components. Components having a direct impact will form part of the scope of the qualification activities.
Where there is indirect or no Impact, a Good Engineering Practice (GEP) approach will be used.
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 12 of 16
Effective Date :
The IQ summary section shall summarize all the testing done and as a minimum, contain the following:
Testing summary containing a list of all the IQ checks and their respective pass or fail result.
Details of any deviations from expected results/acceptance criteria (see section Deviation Handling
and Reporting) and any corrective action taken or rationale for acceptance of the deviation.
Assessment of success of the IQ and the rational for release for subsequent stages of qualification.
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 13 of 16
Effective Date :
6. Change Control
Change control process must be applied for any modifications following the date of execution of the IQ protocol.
The IQ execution process can capture under deviation some minor last minute changes after protocol drafting
and prior to execution, but once executed the system must be locked, protecting it from uncontrolled changes.
As the system is a pre-existing system, change control is expected to already be in place and operating
effectively.
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 14 of 16
Effective Date :
7. Responsibility
Responsibility Role
Protocol & Report Developer Validation Staff
Validation Manager, M&E Manager, Hormone Production
Review Protocol & Report Manager, Non-Hormone Production Manager, QA Manager, QC
Manager
Approve Protocol & Report PMC Manager, Plant Manager, QAC Manager
3.
8. Compressed Air System Impact Assessment
The system impact assessment shall be determined by reviewing the following:
1. Does the system, equipment, or utility come in direct contact with the product? (e.g. air quality).
2. Does the system, equipment, or utility provide an excipient or produce (or have direct contact with)
and ingredient, raw material, or solvent that comes in contact with the process? (e.g. water for injection).
3. Is the system, equipment, or utility used in cleaning/sterilizing/sanitizing? (e.g. clean steam).
4. Does the system, equipment, or utility preserve product status such as product safety, identity,
strength, purity or quality? (e.g. Nitrogen).
5. Does the system, equipment, or utility produce data used to accept or reject product? (e.g. Electronic
batch record system, critical process parameter chart recorder).
6. Is the system a process control system (e.g. PLC, DCS)? That affects a product’s safety, identity,
strength, purity or quality without a system in place for independent verification of control system
performance in place?
If the answer is “YES” for any of the questions above (1-6), then the system should be classified as Direct
Impact. Questions 7-9 will be N/A.
If the answer to ALL of the above questions (1-6) is “No”, proceed to questions 7-9.
7. Does the system, equipment or utility supply a utility or function to a direct impact system?
8. Can the system, equipment or utility affect the performance of a direct impact system?
9. Does the system, equipment, or utility provide information that is used for a regulatory submission (or
in technical report that support the submission), with the exception of registration stability?
If the answer is ‘YES’ to any questions 7-9, then the system should be classified as Indirect Impact.
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 15 of 16
Effective Date :
If the answer is ‘NO’ to all questions 1-9, then the system should be classified as No Impact.
Legend:
Y = Yes DQ = Design Qualification
N = No IQ = Installation Qualification
N/A = Not Applicable OQ = Operational Qualification
GEP = Good Engineering Practice PQ = Performance Qualification
Note:
The compressed air system is subject to indirect impact system that could potentially have an impact on direct impact
system (Clean compressed air system) but not directly to product quality, hence the complete qualification is not
appropriate.
9. Validation Sequence
No. Qualification Phase Sequence I II III IV V VI VII
Protocol Preparation & Approval
1 IQ Execution
Report Preparation & Approval
Protocol Preparation & Approval
2 OQ Execution
Report Preparation & Approval
3 PQ Protocol Preparation & Approval
PT. Triyasa Nagamas Farma
Validation Plan
Document No : VP-CA
Revision : 01
Page 16 of 16
Effective Date :
Execution
Report Preparation & Approval