You are on page 1of 7

RESEARCH FLOWCHART

Title: Unfolding Complexity: Crafting Imprint Bio-Brochures as Instructional Materials Utilizing Merill's First Principles
Name: HARLINQUIN MANIPOL

Situation Statement of the Significance of the Study Theoretical/ Statistical Research Design
Problem Conceptual Tools ( SOP Based)
Framework
The gathered data were In the context of this
The realm of science, as an This study aimed to This study would be of Refer to statistically treated study, a mixed-
academic discipline, craft Bio-Brochures great service and worth to Figure 1. The Research accordingly by utilizing method approach
constitutes an unceasing with integration of the following: Paradigm showing the tool analysis. The known as the
journey of exploration and Merill’s First Principles ADDIE Model Microsoft Excel 0365 embedded approach,
comprehension. Within this of Instruction and Learners. This material and the Statistical or nested approach,
sphere, questions give rise to utilized among Grade holds immense significance Hypothesis: Package for the Social has been employed.
answers, and in turn, these 9 learners of Carmen for learners, offering them Sciences (SPSS) version This design is
answers ignite fresh National High School. access to innovative and In this study, the null 22 were employed in characterized by one
inquiries. Owing to its Specifically, this engaging instructional hypothesis was processing, treating and primary method being
profound cognitive and study sought to: materials through bio- formulated and was analyzing the data given precedence,
psychological demands on 1. Analyze the brochures aligned with tested. gathered. while another method
learners, science is widely needs of the Merrill's First Principles by is utilized to
acknowledged as one of the learners in means of positive results 1. There is no 1. In analyzing the complement and
most intellectually crafting Bio- on their performances significant difference needs in the crafted Bio- enrich the findings
challenging subjects to Brochures as after the utilization of the between the pre-test Brochures the following (Creswell, 2008).
master. Consequently, described by intervened supplemental and post-test scores of data were treated
science education assumes a the following: materials. These materials the controlled and accordingly. For the In this particular
pivotal role within the 1.1 learners’ foster active learning, experimental subjects learners’ academic study, the primary
mission of the Department academic personalized content in the implementation performance; the method accorded the
of Education (DepEd). The performan delivery, and improved of the Bio-Brochures. learners’ grade in the highest priority is a
department aspires to ce; retention, enhancing the 1st semester of General quantitative 2-group
furnish learners in basic 1.2 learners’ learning experience in the Biology was gathered pre-test and post-test
education with opportunities interventi complex realm of biology. while frequency and quasi-experimental
to cultivate scientific on needs; percentage were used design. This method
attitudes, technological and Science Teachers, Teacher- to treat data for the serves as the central
skills, and higher-order 1.3 learners’ Trainers and Educators. learners’ intervention framework for data
thinking capabilities, all least Science educators stand to needs and learners’ collection and
within a supportive learned benefit significantly from least-learned analysis. Concurrently,
educational environment. competen this study by gaining access competencies that were an unstructured
cies. to novel pedagogical tools ranked accordingly. survey was conducted
Nevertheless, several 2. Design crafted that can enrich their to gather qualitative
impediments hinder learners Bio-Brochures teaching methods and 2. The design of insights into the
from progressing toward in terms of the enhance student developing the crafted learning experiences
these educational objectives. following: engagement. The findings Bio-Brochures of the participating
One of the most prevalent 2.1.Task/ of this study are poised to integrating Merill’s First learners. This
hindrances encountered in Problem- serve as an exemplar for Principles of Instruction qualitative method is
science education is passive Centered; teacher-trainers, offering a in terms of the embedded within the
learning. This is palpably valuable framework for Task/Problem-Centered, broader quantitative
2.2. Activation;
reflected in the 2018 PISA enhancing their Activation, framework, providing
(Program for International 2.3.Demonstra pedagogical resources, Demonstration, a complementary
Student Assessment) results, -tion; thus catering to the lifelong Application, and perspective.
wherein the Philippines 2.4.Application; learning needs of both Integration were
achieved a score of 357 in and educators and students. analyzed using textual However, it is
science, falling below the 2.5.Integration The study holds particular statistics. noteworthy that while
average of participating significance for educators embedded mixed-
OECD countries. 3. Validate the crafted who aspire to transcend 3. In describing the method designs, such
Furthermore, the quality of Bio-Brochures by traditional instructional results of the data as the one employed
education in the Philippines technical and approaches, transitioning gathered during the in this study, are
came under intense scrutiny content experts in towards the utilization of validation of the crafted valuable for
in 2019, following the terms of: contemporary and Bio-Brochures the augmenting findings
outcomes of both local and 3.1 most essential innovative teaching researcher utilized the with diverse data
international assessments of learning materials. weighted mean in sources, the
student performance. These competencies; School Administrators. analyzing the experts’ prioritization of one
assessments underscored 3.2 instructional School administrators can scores using the Likert’s’ method over the other
the subpar performance of design and leverage the study's scale. can potentially
Filipino learners. Education organization; insights to support their diminish the rigor of
Secretary Leonor Briones 3.3 instructional teaching staff in adopting addressing secondary
highlighted that the quality of test and innovative approaches that research questions.
performance of Filipino visuals; may improve student Consequently,
students in large-scale 3.4 assessment; performance and secondary research
assessments, such as the 3.5 readability; engagement. Informed inquiries may not be
National Achievement Test and decision-making about as rigorously explored
(NAT), predominantly 3.6 referencing resource allocation, or may be perceived
gravitated towards low and source including investments in as less substantial in
proficiency levels, citation. bio-brochures and teacher comparison to the
particularly in the domains 4. Determine the training, becomes possible, primary research
of Science, Mathematics, significant thereby contributing to objectives.
and English. difference exists overall educational
between the pre- effectiveness.
According to Michael (2006), test and post-test
the application of scores of the Curriculum Developers
constructivist approaches controlled and and Textbook Writers. The
can enhance students' experimental developed Bio-Brochures 4. To evaluate the
comprehension of scientific subjects in the may offer a foundational significant difference
concepts by facilitating their implementation of reference point for between the pre-test
learning processes. Active the crafted Bio- educators, providing them and post-test scores of
student participation in the Brochures with visual representations the controlled and
learning experience fosters a 5. Evaluate of instructional materials experimental groups in
more profound engagement experiences of the that complement the the implementation of
compared to the passive subjects after conventional and the crafted Bio-
acquisition of knowledge via using the crafted established resources. Brochures an inferential
traditional lectures and Bio-Brochures. Additionally, these Bio- statistics was deployed
conventional materials. Brochures can serve as in the process. The t-
Wang (2006) posits that the valuable guides, test, both paired and
creation of educational demonstrating the independent tests were
brochures can prove more potential for positive used to test for the
effective than conventional outcomes when integrating hypothesis in which it
instructional materials for innovative instructional compares the means of
several reasons. Brochures tools. This experience may two groups. Both the
possess visual appeal, inspire educators to further experimental and
capturing learners' attention explore and create control groups in the
more effectively. They can additional instructional aids pre-test and post-test
be designed with tailored to meet the are less than 30 in size,
interactivity, enabling diverse learning therefore the t-test is
learners to engage more requirements of 21st- the best statistical tool.
deeply with the material. century students. The content of
Furthermore, brochures can the competency-based
be tailored to cater to the Doctor of Philosophy in pre-test & post-test was
specific learning needs of Science Education Program validated by the
students, thereby enhancing of NEUST Graduate School. selected panel of
their learning effectiveness. As a result of this research, experts chosen for this
Lastly, brochures serve as the Graduate School is study based from the
tools for providing learners poised to establish a Expert’s Assessment
with concise summaries of substantial repository of Sheet, wherein they
key concepts and ideas, similar studies, enriching its checked the congruency
thereby aiding in information collection of research among test items,
retention. endeavors dedicated to the learning competencies
advancement and and the level of skills
Furthermore, the adoption assessment of instructional
of an effective instructional materials within the realm learners needed to
framework can facilitate of science education. develop. The validation
active learning. was guided by the Table
Consequently, Merrill's First Future Researchers. As a of Specifications (TOS)
Principles of Instruction source of inspiration and a as reflected by the
accommodates and foundation for further following Remembering,
integrates numerous active exploration, this study Understanding,
learning strategies while also provides a valuable Analyzing, Applying,
offering a systematic resource for future Evaluating, Creating
approach for their researchers in the field of levels of the Revised
implementation. Moreover, science education. It sets Blooms Taxonomy of
an expanding body of the stage for continued Anderson & Krathwohl
research lends support to advancements in the (2001). After the
these principles, suggesting development of innovative construction of the TOS,
that their incorporation into instructional materials and checking by the experts
pedagogical strategies, methodologies, fueling is needed to obtain the
especially within the context progress in science content validity.
of biology in the science education. A pilot testing
classroom, has the potential of the competency
to enhance student learning based pre-test and post-
(Frick, Chadha, Watson, test was selectively
Wang, & Green, 2007; conducted at Carmen
Merrill, 2006b; Thomson, National High School to
2002). This approach serves attest the internal
to bridge the gap between consistency of the test.
biology's abstract concepts Checking for the
and their real-world internal consistency of
applications. Merrill's First the test reliability is
Principles align closely with important, Cronbach’s
constructivist teaching and alpha was employed as
learning methodologies, the test was
which accentuate problem- administered once.
solving as a pivotal After the test, each
component of instruction. paper was examined to
determine the right or
wrong answer made
from each item by each
test taker. An item
analysis was prepared
and interpreted by the
researcher who gave
the 50-item test.
Experts rated
the Expert's Validation
Checklist (EVC) on
content and mechanics
using a scale established
by the LRMDS
Guidelines in 2008 as
shown in Table 2. They
wrote their comments
or suggestions on the
validation sheets for
that purpose. All
experts agreed that the
materials were
approved for utilization
in public schools. A pre-
test was given to the
participants prior to the
use of the created
teaching and learning
materials for General
Biology, followed by a
post-test. The test
results were statistically
analyzed to determine
the level of
performance of the
subject-learners using
the instructional
materials, as well as the
significant difference
between the learners'
pre-test and post-test
scores of both the
experimental and
control groups.
5. A thematic
analysis was used to
identify patterns in the
data based on the
experiences of the
subject-learners in using
the crafted Bio-
Brochures after the
evaluation utilizing an
open-ended
unstructured survey.
Moreover, follow-up
questions emerged
depending on the
responses of the key
informants. The data
analysis plan used in
this research study was
Colaizzi’s (1978)
descriptive
phenomenological
method. Colaizzi’s
distinctive seven step
process of rigorous
analysis provided a
concise and thorough
description of the
phenomenon under
study, confirmed by the
participants who lived
it. This method depends
upon rich first-person
accounts of experience.

You might also like