Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BASIC &
HARD DATA PROBABILITY HARD RESOURCE
SPATIAL MODEL 1 MODEL VALIDATION
MODEL
STATISTICS AIM 1 AIM 3
DIRECTED REPORTING
IMPLICIT
AUTOMATIC MODEL
DESIGN
Parkkinen: Geological Modelling and Resource
10/27/2015 1
Estimates
INTRODUCTION
This lecture is an instant short course, in techniques I have lately used when modelling and estimating
mineral deposits, a kind of cooking receipt + extra spicing with Applied Indicator Method (AIM).
AIM is a data management and arrangement procedure and it supports major interpolation methods.
To understand it you should have elementary, at best also practical, knowledge on some basics like:
- Databases (here ACCESS)
- Spreadsheets (here Excel)
- Basic and spatial statistics, variography (here SAGE2001), stereography (here STEREO32, V. 1.0.3).
- Mining software (here Surpac), block models and interpolation methods (OK, IK, IDW).
Modelling examples are from two sources: Otanmäki Mine Oy and Sotkamo Silver Oy. Note that they
represent intermediate results of ongoing processes, not anything final or acceptable for evaluation.
SPATIAL STATISTICS In a Probability Model single blocks are assigned values from 0 to 100.
In multi-element or multi-domain interpolations
SAGE2001:
SURPAC:
Variogram modelling
Level 0
3D Lithology
STRIKE
N40E
Straight borderlines are typical to
this kind of simple interpolation.
A complex interpolation with
several sets of search ellipsoid
parameters gives a softer and
Cross section more credible result as seen on
pages 11-14.
See red lines
Parkkinen: Geological Modelling and Resource
10/27/2015 8
Estimates
SPATIAL STATISTICS: stereogram and ellipsoids
A Surpac
C Surpac
B Surpac
Z Sage correlo
X sage correlo
Y sage correlo
Z sage2 correlo Anisotropy axes of
X sage2 correlo VuoroW lithology
Y sage2 correlo interpolation
A surface 1 See p. 7
C surface 1
B surface 1
B surface 2 Determined from
C surface 2 composite point
A surface 2 surfaces/Surpac
Points of possible
Axes
ME
For each Domain, interpolations were done according
to all defined sets of anisotropy parameters:
VuoroW: four sets of parameters (search ellipsoids),
MW Vuoro MW: two sets, VuoroME: two sets, VuoroE:
three sets (see page 13).
Each interpolation was committed in a succession of
varying axial lengths. Each interpolation produced
block values from 0 to 100.
For each Domain, minimum, maximum and average
block values were calculated.
W For results, see pages 11-13.
VuoroW Probability
MAX ORE %
< 10
10--30
30--50 VuoroW Probability
50--80 AVERAGE ORE %
> 80 >/= 50
VuoroW Probability
W
MIN ORE %
< 10
10--30
30--50
50--80
> 80
E
MW ME
W
MAX 50 %
MIN/AVE/MAX 50 %
AVE 50 %
MIN/AVE/MAX 80 %
Parkkinen: Geological Modelling and Resource
10/27/2015 12
Estimates
PROBABILITY MODEL 1 B: VUOROKAS W Ore bodies / AIM,
Several anisotropy structures on vertical sections.
Ore intersections
VuoroW
VuoroW: Average of
Probability Models
On a vertical section
>/= 80 %
>/= 50 %
VuoroW
Average >/= 50 %
Parkkinen: Geological Modelling and Resource
10/27/2015 13
Estimates
Otanmäki Oy: AIM-arrangements in a blockmodel:
Vuorokas block values on a section: ave_vuorow All attributes of one block
H.M.
H.M. Solid A
Solid A
H.M.
Solid A
Probability Model
vs Hard Model
Y11500 Zn Probability Model
Vs Hard Model
Y11460 Zn
Y11500 Ag g/t
IMPLICIT Ag 30-100
These sections show how both implicit and probability models are
IMPLICIT AG > 100
good for screening and helpful for the construction of
HARD Ag > 50
a hard model. Unfortunately, they need extra parameters to
reach the reliability of hard models. Unproven or even false
anomalies are to be expected.
Surpac Structural Suite creates a summary plane for all possible planes
containing composite samples. Planes can be adjusted e.g. according to
grade classes or cut offs. When such planes intersect, the intersection line
Azimuthal direction (bearing)and plunge are given. This is a way to study
deposit (domain) symmetry: principal symmetry plane may equal to the
domain foliation and the intersection line may equal to the domain lineation. Also
Surpa ’s Inquire/Bearing and distance between 2 points allows the construction
of possible axes on a surface as demonstrated on the stereo diagram, next page.
Parkkinen: Geological Modelling and Resource
10/27/2015 18
Estimates
SPATIAL STATISTICS : SOTKAMO HARD MODEL, A VARIOGRAPHY FOR Zn/AIM/OK
APPLIED INDICATOR METHOD / OK
Applied Indicator Method Parameters: Solid A
Grade Class Bearing Plunge Dip Anisot.ratio
Grades 10 000-30 000 g/t max/med max/min max range
Lag 40 m 0--1500 150 -50 55 1.7 15 109
1500--4000 145 -45 60 1.5 13 80
4000--10000 150 -50 45 2.5 18 245
Surpac 10000-30000 150 -60 55 3 35 193
Surpac
Surpac
Zn Probability %
In various grade classes (Domains)
Grade Class:
Zn g/t AIM Resource Model:
4000-10000 Zn g/t Final estimate
IDW3
IK
OK
AIM
OK 2 IDW2
AIM/
OK
Number of Samples
Distance to
Closest sample
Sotkamo Zn Resource
Classification:
0 Air
Some CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA: 1 Measured
- Level/Quality of Information 2 Indicated
- Robustness of Hard Model 3 Inferred
Zn g/t
IK
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank Messrs Ilkka Tuokko, Managing director of the Sotkamo Silver Oy and Jouko Jylänki,
CEO of the Otanmäki Mine Oy, for kindly permitting me to use real mine and exploration data for the
visualisation of modelling procedures.