ECTE940-s1 Marking Rubric School of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering
ECTE940-s1 Supervisor Project Performance Assessment
R Student Name: Muhammad Ameer Hamza Janjua Student Number: 5085706
Title: Robot for home automation and AI-based surveillance
Mark Practical Work/Confirmation & Development of the Theory
Range (15%)
The application of relevant practical ideas, the application of relevant theo-
retical ideas, design and analysis, preparedness for meetings, correct use
of logbook, justification of methods used and time management.
HD Numerous applications of relevant practical ideas, in conjunction with 15
(85- an array of adapted (extended) theoretical ideas. Sustained
100%) demonstration of exceptional design skills and comprehensive 14
analysis. Complete preparedness for meetings, correct professional-
standard use of logbook, well established justification of methods
used plus effective and efficient time management of the project.
D A number of applications of relevant practical ideas, with the inclu-
(75- sion of several theoretical ideas. Demonstrated excellent design
84%) skills and effective analysis. Complete preparedness for meet-
ings, well documented and correct use of logbook, justification of
methods and assumptions made, and efficient time management.
C Occasional application of relevant practical ideas, confirming theoret-
(65- ical ideas. Demonstrated effective design skills and analysis.
74%) Generally prepared for meetings, correct use of logbook, justification
of methods or assumptions made, effective time management.
P Inclusion of a relevant practical idea, partial confirmation of related
(50- theory. Demonstrated acceptable design skills and analysis. .
64%) Occasionally prepared for meetings, adequate use of logbook, partial
justification of methods or of assumptions made, adequate time
management.
F Lack of any relevant practical ideas, or lack of confirmation of related 7.35 Lack of contributing original ideas, or initiative, lack of adoption of
(0- theory. Inadequate demonstration of design skills and analysis.
49%) Inadequate preparation for meetings, poor use of logbook, lack of
justification for methods or assumptions used, poor time manage-
ment.
Further optional comments
Final Mark: /50
40.90/50
Supervisor: Rabiul Islam
Problem Solving Ability/Ideas and Originality (15%)
Contribution of original ideas, suitable application of engineering tech-
niques, initiative, use of novel techniques or solutions, critical analysis of
findings, compliance of outcomes with specifications.
Significant and distinct contribution of original ideas, appropriate
application of engineering techniques, self-evident examples of
initiative, adoption and development of novel techniques and
solutions leading to exceeding original project goals, extensive
critical analysis and review of findings, comprehensive scope or
12.8
qualification of bounded outcomes.
Evidence of a distinct contribution of an original idea, appropriate
12.6 application of engineering techniques, evidence of initiative, adop-
tion or development of engineering techniques and solutions
11.3 leading to compliance with all major project goals, critical anal-
ysis of findings, general investigation of outcome scope.
Adequate contribution of new ideas, capable utilization of engineer-
11.1 ing techniques, evidence of initiative, adoption or development of
engineering techniques and solutions leading to compliance
with most major project goals, critical analysis of findings, gen-
9.75
eral investigation of outcome scope.
Limited contribution of original ideas, indication of some initiative
9.6 insights, adequate adoption of engineering techniques leading
to compliance of a subset of project goals, partial critical analy-
7.5 sis of some findings. Some investigation of outcome scope.
engineering techniques or solutions leading to insufficient
4 achievement of outcomes and project goals, absence of critical
analysis of any findings.
0 0
Date: 5th Nov, 2022
Overall Progress of Project and Suitability for Continuing (20%)
Evidence of outcomes from substantial preliminary work conducted, Compre-
hensive/detailed project plan and proposal for second session, Sufficient
justification of suitability for continuation of current project
15 Student is always self-motivated and has taken ownership of the project. 20
The execution indicates excellent and significant outcomes from substan-
19
14 tial preliminary work. A clear set out plan with goals and methods that
systematically follow from the background research. The preliminary 18
work and project plan provide exceptional and compelling justifica-
12.8 17
tion for continuation of the project.
Student is always self-motivated and is committed to the project. The exe-
12.6 cution indicates very good, significant outcomes from preliminary work. A 16.8
clear set out plan with goals and methods that systematically follow from
11.3 the background research. The preliminary work and plan provide excel- 15
lent justification for continuation of the project.
Student is mostly self-motivated and is committed to the project. The exe-
11.1 cution indicates significant outcomes from preliminary work. A clear set out 14.8
plan with goals and methods that follow from the background research.
The preliminary work and plan provide strong justification for contin-
9.75
uation of the project. 13
Student is self-motivated and is mostly committed to the project. The exe-
9.6 cution indicates some outcomes from preliminary work. A plan with goals 12.8
and methods is presented. The preliminary work and plan do not pro-
11
7.5 vide strong justification for continuation of the project.
10
7.35 Student lacks motivation and commitment to the project. The execution 9.8
indicates very little or no outcomes from preliminary work. The plan does
4 not contain clearly set out goals and methods. The preliminary work and 5
plan provide no justification for continuation of the project.
0