Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sandstones
Limestone and /or Carbonate rocks
Characteristics of Reservoir Rocks
Framework
Sand (and Silt) Size Detrital Grains
Matrix
PORE
FRAMEWORK
CEMENT (QUARTZ) MATRIX
FRAMEWORK
(FELDSPAR)
0.25 mm
CORING ASSEMBLY AND CORE BIT
Drill collar
connection
PDC Cutters
Thrust bearing
Outer barrel
Inner barrel
Fluid
vent
Core retaining
ring
Core bit
Coring
Unlike a normal drill bit, which crushes
the rock into small pieces, a core bit can
be visualized as a hollow cylinder with
cutters on the outside.
Photo by W. Ayers
SIDEWALL SAMPLING GUN
The sidewall sampling tool can be used to
obtain small plugs from the formation.
The tool is run on a wireline after the hole
Core bullets has been drilled. Some 20 to 30 bullets
are fired from each gun at different
depths.
Up to 20 samples can
be individually cut
and are stored inside Samples
the tool.
WHOLE CORE ANALYSIS vs.
PLUGS OR SIDEWALL CORES
WHOLE CORE
Provides larger samples
Smaller samples
Less representative of heterogeneous formations
Within 1 to 2% of whole cores for medium-to high-
porosity formation
In low-porosity formations, from core plugs tends to
be much greater than from whole cores
Scalar effects in fractured reservoirs
Coring
whole core
core plug
INFORMATION FROM CORES
• Learning Outcomes
• Definition of Porosity
• Classification of Porosity
• Applications of Porosity
• Determination of Porosity
Packing
Sorting
Grain Shape
Reservoir Rocks & Fluid Properties
Porosity of Reservoir Rocks
• Rock reservoir have pore that are connected and contain fluids
(oil, gas, water) that can flow through the rock.
1
Reservoir Rocks & Fluid Properties
Definition of Porosity
Cement material
Effective / connected
porosity (25%)
Ineffective Porosity
(5%)
• For common reservoir rock types, under average operating conditions, porosity
values ranges;
Evaluating formation
Porosity Porosity
36% 20%
cubic packing of Rhombohedral
spheres resulting in a packing of spheres
least-compact resulting in a most-
arrangement with a compact arrangement Effect of cement material
porosity of 47.64% with a porosity of
26%
bulk volume
pore volume
grain volume
Density log
b m 1 f b = bulk density recorded by log
m = density of the matrix mineral grains (w/o porosity),
(2.65, 2.71 and 2.87 gm/cc
for quartz, limestone and dolomite, respectively)
f = density of the fluid in the pore space
• Porosity measurement
– Vb, bulk volume directly measured
• Direct measure, Vb
Common shaped sample (cylinder, or cubic) measured the dimensions and
consider bulk volume
• Measurement of Vb,
Irregular & regular sample shapes
A
Two means explained here;
- volumes faulted (volumetrically)
L
- methodologies gravity (gravimetrically)
- using mercury
Reservoir Rocks & Fluid Properties
Porosity
• Measurement of Vb ,
• Measurement Vb ,
Wtk = dry core weight
• Gravity method A
Wthg = mercury weight
Mercury
Hg volume faulted = Mercury weight faulted
mercury density
scale Scale
Cylinder P3 V3 T1
sample
line
sample
steel
Helium tank P1 V1 = P3 V3
P1 V1 T1
V3 = V1 + Vl + Vs -Vc - Vg
= Vp / Vb = (Vb - Vg)/ Vb
• = 20/2.67 = 7.5 cc
SOLUTION:
The bulk volume of the core sample is:
• φ =φ e−CPΔP
• ΔP :effective overburden pressure change
• P C :rock compressibility
• φ:lab porosity
h1 h2
Q KA 1
L
dp
Q KA 3
dL
Where dp = ∆hρg 4
Darcy’s h1-h2
q
Apparatus for
Determining
Permeability A
h1
h1 h2 h2
Q (Sand Pack Length) L
L
Q A
Q volumetric flow rate
A crosssectional area
L length of the porous medium q
h1 & h2 hydraulic head at inlet and outlet
k dp
Q=- A 5
dL
Q
A
L 0 k
p 2
p
1
7
Q
KA
p1 p2 or Q KAP 8
L L
Hence, the original equation of Darcy was modified to account for
viscosity as follows:
Q
KA
p1 p2 9
L
Reservoir Rocks and Fluid properties
Permeability is determined by:
Core analysis
Well test analysis (flow testing)
◦ RFT (repeat formation tester) provides small well tests
Production data
◦ production logging measures fluid flow into well
Log data
◦ MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) logs calibrated via core analysis
q
kA
Δp
μL
◦ where,
q cm3/s
k darcies
A cm2
p atm
cp
L cm
q
CkA
Δp
μL
◦ where,
q bbl/D
k millidarcies
A ft2
p psia
cp
L ft
Quantity Symbol Dimension Oilfield Units SI Units
Mass m m Ibm Kg
Moles n n Ibmol Kmol
Force F ML/t2 Ibf N
Length L L ft m
Area A L2 acres m2
Volume-liquids v L3 bbl m3
Volume-gases v L3 ft3 m3
Pressure p m/Lt2 psi kPa
Temperature T T R K
Flow rate-liquids q L3/t bbl/d m3/d
Flow rate -gases q L3/t Ft3/d m3/d
Viscosity μ m/Lt cP mpa.s
Permeability k L2 md m2
< 10 md fair
10 – 100 High
100 – 1000 Very High
>1000 Exceptional
This scale changes with time, for example 30 years ago k<
50 was considered poor.
Flow regimes
Reservoir geometry
• Incompressible fluids
• Slightly compressible fluids
• Compressible fluids
Flow Regimes
• Steady state flow
• Unsteady state flow
• Pseudosteady state flow
• Linear flow
• Radial flow
• spherical and hemispherical flow
Number of fluid flowing
• Incompressible fluids
• Slightly compressible fluids
• Compressible fluids
k dp
V
s
ds
Vs = Q/A and dp/ds = dp/dx, hence
KA dp
Q
dx
Separating the variables and
integrating gives the following eqn.:
Note that P1>P2
qs k dp g dz
vs ds c ds
A
The gravity term has dimension of pressure / length
Flow potential includes both pressure and gravity terms, simplifying
Darcy’s Law
q k dΦ
vs
A μ ds
ln Pe Pw
Q re k
re
rw 2h rw
2hk Pe Pw
Pwf Pe Q
r ln
re
rw
h
Q = flow rate, m3/sec
K = permeability, m2
h = thickness, m
Pe = pressure drainage radius, N/m2
Pwf = flowing pressure, N/m2
= fluid viscosity, N/m2
re = drainage radius, m
rw = the well-bore radius, m
h h1 h2 h3 hi
◦ Same pressure drop for each layer
p1 - p2 Δp Δp1 Δp 2 Δp 3
◦ Total flow rate is summation of flow rate for all layers
q q1 q2 q3 qi
◦ Average permeability results in correct total flow rate
kwh
q Δp ; A w h
μL
• Substituting,
kwh k1 w h1 k2 w h2 k3 w h3
q Δp Δp Δp Δp
μL μL μL μL
• Rearranging,
k
k i hi
h
• Average permeability reflects flow capacity of all layers
• Permeability varies across several
vertical layers (k1,k2,k3)
◦ Discrete changes in permeability
L L1 L2 L3 Li
◦ Same flow rate passes through each layer
q q1 q 2 q 3
◦ Total pressure drop is summation of pressure drop across
layers
p1 p2 Δp1 Δp2 Δp3 Δpi
• Rearranging, L
k
Li
k p1
i
• If k1>k2>k3, then k
p
– Linear pressure profile in each layer p2
0
0 L
x
• Permeability varies across several
(3) horizontal layers (k1,k2,k3)
◦ Discrete changes in permeability
h h1 h2 h3 hi
◦ Same pressure drop for each layer
pe - p w Δp Δp1 Δp 2 Δp 3
◦ Total flow rate is summation of flow rate for all layers
q q1 q2 q3 qi
◦ Average permeability results in correct total flow rate
2π k h
q Δp
μ ln(re /rw )
• Substituting (rw=r1, r2 ,re=r3),
q μ ln(re /rw ) q μ ln(r 2 /rw ) q μ ln(re /r2 )
pe - p w
2π k h 2π k1 h 2π k 2 h
• Rearranging,
ln(re /rw )
k
(ln(r i 1/ri )
All Layers ki
It is necessary to determine an average value of permeability.
Three common types of computed averages are as follows:
i) arithmetic average
ii) harmonic average
ii) geometric average
Arithmetic Average
h1
kA
kh
i i
h
h2
k1
i
Q h3
k2
k3
Harmonic Average
kH
L i
k1 k2 k3
L /k i i
L1 L2 L3
Geometric Average
1
kG k1 k 2 k3 .......
h1 h2 h3
hi
Both are important properties that are related to fluids in sediment and
sedimentary rocks.
∴VP = VT − VG
Porosity varies from 0% to 70% in natural sediments but exceeds 70%
for freshly deposited mud.
Several factors control porosity.
a) Packing Density
Packing density: the arrangement of the particles in the deposit.
The more densely packed the particles the lower the porosity.
e.g., perfect spheres of uniform size.
b) Grain Size
VT − VG
=P ×100
VT
VT = dn × dn × dn = d 3 n3
π
d n 1 − 3 3
=
Rearranging: P 6 ×100
d 3 n3
π
Therefore: P =1 − ×100 =48%
6
d (grain size) does not affect the porosity so that porosity is independent
of grains size.
No matter how large or small the spherical grains in cubic packing have
a porosity is 48%.
There are some indirect relationships between size and porosity.
When grains settle through a fluid the large grains will impact the
substrate with larger momentum, possibly jostling the grains into tighter
packing (therefore with lower porosity).
Coarse sand is better rounded and less prone to breakage under load;
therefore the porosity is higher than that of fine sand.
c) Sorting
In general, the better sorted the sediment the greater the porosity.
In well sorted sands fine grains are not available to fill the pore spaces.
This figure shows the relationship between sorting and porosity for
clay-free sands.
Overall porosity decreases with increasing sorting coefficient (poorer
sorting).
The difference is unlikely if clay was also available to fill the pores.
For clay-free sands the silt and fine sand particles are available to fill
the pore space between large grains and reduce porosity.
Because clay is absent less
relatively fine material is not
available to fill the pores of fine
sand.
Therefore the pores of fine sand
will be less well-filled (and have
porosity higher).
d) Post burial changes in porosity.
Freshly deposited mud may have 70% porosity but burial under a
kilometre of sediment reduces porosity to 5 or 10%.
http://www.engr.usask.ca/~mjr347/prog/geoe118/geoe118.022.html
ii) Cementation
Here’s a movie of
cementation at Paul
Heller’s web site.
iii) Clay formation
Clay minerals are very fine-grained and may accumulate in the pore
spaces, reducing porosity.
Eocene Whitemud
Formation, Saskatchewan
iv) Solution
Most slides in this section are modified primarily from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, 1999.
However, many of the NExT slides appears to have been obtained from other primary
sources that are not cited. Some slides have a notes section.
OPENHOLE LOG EVALUATION
Well Log
SP Resistivity
POROSITY DETERMINATION BY LOGGING
Shale
Oil sand
Shale
• Bulk density
• Sonic (acoustic)
• Compensated neutron
4100
Density
correction
4200
Caliper
Mud cake
(ρmc + hmc)
Formation (ρb)
Long spacing
detector
Short spacing
detector
Source
BULK DENSITY
ρb = ρma (1 − φ) + ρ f φ
Matrix Fluids in
flushed zone
•Measures electron density of a formation
•Strong function of formation bulk density
•Matrix bulk density varies with lithology
–Sandstone 2.65 g/cc
–Limestone 2.71 g/cc
–Dolomite 2.87 g/cc
POROSITY FROM DENSITY LOG
Porosity equation ρma − ρb
φ=
ρma − ρ f
Fluid density equation
ρ f = ρmf Sxo + ρh (1 − Sxo )
We usually assume the fluid density (ρf) is between 1.0 and 1.1. If gas is present, the
actual ρf will be < 1.0 and the calculated porosity will be too high.
ρmf is the mud filtrate density, g/cc
ρh is the hydrocarbon density, g/cc
Sxo is the saturation of the flush/zone, decimal
DENSITY LOGS
Working equation (hydrocarbon zone)
ρb = φ S xo ρmf + φ (1 − S xo ) ρhc
10800
Bulk Density
10900
Log
NEUTRON LOG
10800
Neutron
10900
Log
ACOUSTIC (SONIC) LOG
E3
E1
T0 E2
50
µsec
COMMON LITHOLOGY MATRIX
TRAVEL TIMES USED
+ Vsh ∆t sh + (1 − φ − Vsh ) ∆t ma
or
∆t L − ∆t ma
φs = φ =
∆t f − ∆t ma
φs = Porosity calculated from sonic log reading, fraction
∆tL = Travel time reading from log, microseconds/ft
∆tma = Travel time in matrix, microseconds/ft
∆tf = Travel time in fluid, microseconds/ ft
ACOUSTIC (SONIC) LOG
GR DT
0 API 200 140 USFT 40
CALIX SPHI
6 IN 16 30 % 10
4100
Sonic
porosity
4200
Caliper
SONIC LOG
The response can be written as follows:
t log = t ma (1 − φ) + t f φ
t log − t ma
φ=
t f − t ma
10800
Sonic
Log
10900
EXAMPLE
Calculate porosity. Does this value agree with density and neutron
logs?
Assume a matrix travel time, ∆tm = 51.6 µsec/ft. In addition, assume the formation is
saturated with water having a ∆tf = 189.0 µsec/ft.
EXAMPLE SOLUTION SONIC LOG
001) BONANZA 1
GRC ILDC RHOC DT
0 150 0.2 200 1.95 2.95 150 us/f 50
SPC SNC CNLLC SPHI
-160 MV 40 0.2 200 0.45 -0.15 45 ss -15
ACAL MLLCF
6 16 0.2 200
10700
10800
SPHI
10900
FACTORS AFFECTING SONIC
LOG RESPONSE
• Unconsolidated formations
• Naturally fractured formations
• Hydrocarbons (especially gas)
• Rugose salt sections
RESPONSES OF POROSITY LOGS
φφe
e
Clay Lamination
1
Schematic Reservoir Layering Profile
in a Carbonate Reservoir
Flow unit
Baffles/barriers
3250
3250 3250 3200 3250
3300 3250
3200
3250
3350 3350
Therefore:
10 ×160, 000
VP =
100
= 16, 000m 3
of oil
II. Permeability (Hydraulic Conductivity; k)
There are also controls on permeability that are exerted by the granular
material and are accounted for in the term (k) for permeability:
Along the walls of the pathway the velocity is zero (a no slip boundary)
and increases away from the boundaries, reaching a maximum towards
the middle to the pathway.
Smaller pathways reduce porosity and the size of the pathways so the
more tightly packed the sediment the lower the permeability.
ii) Porosity
The larger and more abundant the pore spaces the greater the
permeability.
The larger the grain size the larger the pore area.
iv) Sorting
Cementation
Clay formation
Compaction
Pressure solution
Fluid that is introduced at the surface will follow a path that is towards the
direction of dip of the beds.
Fabric (preferred orientation of the grains in a sediment) can cause
directional permeability.
The direction along the long axes of grains will have larger pathways
and therefore greater permeability than the direction that is parallel to
the long axes.
Main Topics
Phase Relationships.
Interface Phenomena.
Surface Tension.
Interfacial Tension.
Surface Free energy.
Phase Relationships.
Pressure-Temperature Diagram
Gas - gas
- No interface possible
1
Vuggy & Moldic Porosity
Cretaceous Reefs
Golden Lane Facies
2
Persian Gulf Arab D Reservoir -Ghawar
Swart et al. 2005
Petroleum
Partially
System dolomitized Mudstone
limestone
Dolomitization
Ghawar-largest field in
the world
Peak production; 5 million
Dolomite
barrels per day (1981)
Cumm. Prod. 65 billion bls
Average Porosity: 19%
Average perm: 617 mD
Moldic
Karst (dissolution) Dense Porosity
Dolomite
Calcite
(pink) Dolomitization Ordovician Dolomite Cavity,
Atrim Fm., Michigan OH
Dolomite
2 mm
Permian, W. Texas
2 mm
3
Trenton-Black River System-
Appalachian Basin Fractured
Reservoirs
1. Matrix Permeability
2. Fracture Permeability
Distributed
Fracture Network
Photo: J. Olson, UT Austin
4
Example of Fractured
Carbonate Reservoir
Southeast West
AGE Virginia
Sealed Bluefield
Formation
Reynolds
Fractures Lillydale
Alderson
Union
primary fault
play target
G reenbrier L im estone
MISSISSIPPIAN
Pickaway
MIDDLE
UPPER
Taggard
Denmar
Hillsdale
LOWER
Photo: J. Olson, UT Austin Maccrady Fm
McCrady Formation (Smosna, 1996)
(Gas Atlas)
ooids
Isopach of Union
Oolite, Rhodell
Field Area
study
area
3527’ 3527’
intragranular porosity
(blue) sparry calcite oolite rim
(poor porosity) (8% porosity)
1 mm
5
T UL
T UNION OOLITE
UL Estimated FA
FA H
H JA NET PAY ISOPACH
JA Ultimate CA
I CA M
I
M Recovery (EUR) Porosity > 4%
Map
T C.I. = 4’
UL C.I. = 200 MMcf
FA
OB T #5834
KN UL
T
T
FA UL
LO FA
PI TA B
IS NO
AR T
K
#5638
LO
PI
T
UL
FA
A
I ST
AR
2000’
Scale: 2000’ Scale:
2000’ 2000’
Cross-
Cross-section A – A’
DEPI #5834
(047-
(047-055-
055-00238)
NW SE UNION OOLITE
5
6
45
44
39
46
35
71
89
36
34
93
7
56
56
56
56
30
12
12
12
52
44
30
(Hanging wall)
A A’
PILOT KNOB
LITTLE
0
LIME ARISTA
UNION
-500 OPEN FRACTURES
PICKAWAY
-1000 DENMAR
30 MMcf natural
PRICE
-1500
PILOT KNOB
T THRUST FAULT
UL
FA 206’ OFFSET
O B
KN
Scale:
500’
T T
LO UL
PI
500’
A TA
FA
IS 50’
AR UNION OOLITE
(Foot wall)
2000’
A’
2000’
DEPI #5834
DEPI #5834
047-055-00238
(047-
(047-055-
055-00238)
FMI LOG
open
fracture
SIDEWALL
CORES
drilling
induced
PILOT KNOB THRUST FAULT 206’ OFFSET
fractures
50’
6
OPEN FRACTURES – DEPI #5834 (FAULT ZONE) Maximum Horizontal Stress
3446.5’
open fracture
open fracture
scale in cm 3446.5’
authigenic, euhedral
quartz crystals
scale in cm 3477’
7
FAULT WELL PRODUCTION
UNION OOLITE THRUST MODEL WITH FRACTURE SWARM
8
Hydrocarbon Traps and
Seals
Revision
What are geological elements of petroleum
system?
What are geological processes of petroleum
system?
How organic matters is converted into
petroleum?
• Source Rock - A rock with abundant hydrocarbon-prone organic
matter
• Seal Rock - A rock through which oil and gas cannot move
effectively (such as mudstone and claystone)
• Migration Route - Avenues in rock through which oil and gas moves from
source rock to trap
GOC
OWC
Organic Debris
Diagenesis
Oil Reservoir
Cracking
Methane
Metagenesis
Carbon
ii. Catagenesis
Catagenesis is the cracking process which results in
the conversion of organic kerogens into hydrocarbons
iii. Metagenesis is the last stage of maturation and
conversion of organic matter to hydrocarbons.
Metagenesis occurs at temperatures of 150° to
200°C. At the end of metagenesis, methane, or
dry gas, is evolved along with nonhydrocarbon
gases such as CO2, N2, and H2S, as oil molecules
are cracked into smaller gas molecules.
What is Trap
A trap is the place where oil and gas are barred
from further movement….(Levorsen, 1967)
.
Seals or Cap Rocks
For a trap to have integrity, it must be overlain
by an effective seal.
Any rock that is impermeable can act as seal or
cap rock but commonly mudstone
Introduction: Oil Traps
• Some rocks are permeable
and allow oil and gas to freely
Impermeable
pass through them
Oil / Gas
Water
Oil
(modified from Bjorlykke, 1989)
Summary
Questions?
Introduction
Migration of petroleum
Petroleum traps
Structural traps
Stratigraphic traps
Combination traps
Timing of trap formation
Conclusion
References
“Petroleum "is the general term used for all the natural hydrocarbons found in
rocks.
Petroleum "refers only to the liquid oil. Gaseous varieties are called “natural gas
"and highly viscous to solid varieties are called “bitumen”.
The fine grained muddy sediments in which petroleum originates are called
“source rocks".
The source rocks of petroleum are generally shales,silts and limestones.
petroleum migrates from the source rock into adjacent porous and permeable
rocks and accumulates there to form a pool. Such permeable rocks are called
“reservoir rocks".
The common reservoir rocks are sandstones,conglomerates,porous
limestones,fractured shales,and jointed igneous and metamorphic
rocks. Most of the known hydrocarbons are trapped in source rocks less
than 200 million years.
There are two types of migration when discussing the movement of
petroleum, primary and secondary.
Primary migration refers to the movement of hydrocarbons from within
the source rock and into reservoir rock.
Secondary migration refers to the subsequent movement of
hydrocarbons within reservoir rock; the oil and gas vacated the source
rock and has entered the reservoir rock
Petroleum trap, is subsurface reservoir of petroleum. The oil is
always accompanied by water and often by natural gas; all are confined
in porous rock, usually such sedimentary rocks as sandstones, arkoses
and fissured limestones. The natural gas being lightest, occupies the top
of the trap and is underlain by the oil and then the water. A layer of
impervious rock, called the roof rock, prevents the upward or lateral
escape of the petroleum.
The conditions necessary for the formation of an oil trap are as follows,
1. The porous reservoir rocks must have a favorable structure such as
an anticline fold or dome, to hold oil.
2. There must be an impervious cap rock or roof rock to check the
upward migration of oil.
3. The structural deformation of rocks must not be very severe.
Intensely fractured rocks may render traps ineffective by causing
leakage.
Contd.
A hydrocarbon reservoir has a distinctive shape or configuration,
that prevents the escape of hydrocarbons that migrate into it.
Geologists classify reservoir shapes, or traps into the following
types.
Structural traps
Stratighraphic traps
Combination traps
Structural traps are created when the seal or barrier is concave
upward[looking from below].The geometry is formed by tectonic
processes after deposition of the reservoir beds involved. This concave
nature may be due to local deformation as a result of folding, faulting or
both of the reservoir rock. Some of the important structural traps are as
follows.
a) Anticlines and domes
An anticline is an example of rocks which are
previously flat, but have been bent into an arch. Oil that finds its
way into a reservoir rock that has been bent into an arch will flow
to the crest of the arch, and get stuck. Folds result in the
physical bending[deformation]of the rock units without breaking.
The rock units undergo bending very slowly over a long periods
of geologic time. These types of traps are often found adjacent
to mountain ranges.
b)Fault trap
Fault traps are formed by the movement of rock
along fault line. In some cases, the reservoir rock has moved opposite
a layer of impermeable rock. The impermeable rock thus prevents the
oil from escaping. In other cases, the fault itself can be a very effective
trap, when a fault affects inclined strata, a reservoir rock may be
blocked off by an impervious shale there by creating an oil
trap.Commonly,faults form traps in combination with other structural
features such as folding.
c)Salt domes
This kind of trap originates when salt is deposited by
shallow seas.Later,a sinking seafloor deposits organic rich shale over the
salt, which is in turn covered with layers of sandstone and shale. Deeply
buried salt tends to rise unevenly in swells or salt domes, and any oil
generated with in the sediments is trapped where the sandstones are
pushed up over or adjacent to the saltdome.Where,saltdomes intruded into
the sedimentary rocks, good oil traps are formed. Here the oil accumulates
near the upturned edges of the reservoir rock which are sealed by the salt.
The main trap- making element in a stratigraphic trap is
some variation in the lithology or stratigraphy,or both of the reservoir rock.
The variation may be facies change, variable porosity and permeability or an
up-structure termination of the reservoir rock.
Contd.
The following may be the setup to give rise to such traps.
The timing of trap formation is related to petroleum migration and the formation
of the trap. This is an important aspect to be considered in the accumulation of
petroleum.
If the trap formation is before migration, then they will be the productive.
on the other hand, where trap formation post-dates its petroleum migration, they
could be barren. In post migration, structural changes by faults, they permit petroleum
to undergo further migration.
Oil is found in reservoirs in sedimentary rock. It is composed of
compressed hydrocarbons, and was formed millions of years ago in
a process that began when aquatic plant and animal remains where
covered by layers of sediments(particles of rock and mineral).As
bacteria and chemicals broke down the organic plants and animal
material,inccreasing layers of sediments settled on top. Heat and
pressure transformed the layers of sediment into sandstone,
limestone and other types of sedimentary rocks, and transformed
the organic matter into petroleum. Tiny pores in the rock allowed the
petroleum to seep in. These ‘reservoir rocks' hold the oil like a
sponge, confined by other non-porous layers that form a trap.
In India, reservoirs of petroleum and natural gas are found
in the belts of tertiary rocks of Assam,Gujarath,Offshore regions of
Bombay high, and in the Cauvery and Godavari deltaic areas.
Principles of engineering geology, k.M. BANGAR,Standard
publishers,2009,(338-341)
Geology of petroleum, second edition,A.I.LEVORSEN,C B S
Publishers,1986,(14-64).
Principles of physical geology, ARTHUR HOLMES, Ronald
Publishers,1945,(343-351).
WEBSITES
http://www.topogeo.com
http://oilandgas.com
http://sc-geoscience.com
http://geology.com
Classic Anticlinal Trap Model
Structural Trap – Compressional Anticline
Structural Trap – Compressional Anticline
Structural Trap – Fold-Thrust Structures, Wyoming
Structural Trap – Compaction Anticline
Structural Trap – Draped Anticline
Structural Trap Classification
Structural Fault Traps
Structural Fault Traps
Structural Fault Traps
Structural Wrench Fault Traps (strike slip / transtensional faults)
Structural Fault Traps
Structural Traps – Growth Faults (syndepositional faulting)
Structural Traps – Growth Faults (syndepositional faulting)
Salt and Clay Diapirs – Structural Traps
Salt and Clay Diapirs – Structural Traps
Stratigraphic Trap Classification
Stratigraphic Trap Classification
Stratigraphic – Meandering Fluvial Sandstone Traps Wyoming
Stratigraphic – Deltaic Sandstone Traps Wyoming
Stratigraphic – Barrier Island Trap San Juan Basin
Stratigraphic Pinchout Trap
Stratigraphic Traps Regressive Barrier Island Sandstone / shale traps
Shoreline Stratigraphic Traps – Transgressing/Regressing Barrier Island Complex
Stratigraphic – Fluvial Sandstone Traps Wyoming
Reef Reservoirs and Trapping Mechanisms (complex facies / permeability relations)
Diagenetic Traps – altered high/low permeability zones in reservoir; self sealing
Unconformity Trap – angular, shale seal
Libya - (Nonconformity) Unconformity Trap (over granite)
East Texas Unconformity Trap
Prudhoe Bay, AK Combination Fold-Fault-Unconformity Trap